Economics Job Market Rumors » The Economics Discipline

Too little money for macro!!!

(54 posts)
  • Started 1 month ago by Anonymous
  • Latest reply from anonymous
  1. Anonymous
    Unregistered

    ^^^ I'm not defending modern macro, but that is a silly standard to judge research by. By that measure, most mathematics departments would be emptied and their faculty fired, even though mathematicians are probably the most useful researchers in the world.

    Research is an uncertain game, and sometimes it takes years for seeds to bear fruit. You can't use a myopic standard like that to determine the value of people's work.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  2. Anonymous
    Unregistered

    Without the development in mathmatics, our modern civilization would not have been possilble. We couldn't have cars, buildings, bridges, chemicals, or whatever. What about modern macro? Could you just tell me just one thing that could not have existed without modern macro?

    Posted 1 month ago #
  3. Anonymous
    Unregistered

    ^FDIC

    Posted 1 month ago #
  4. Anonymous
    Unregistered

    FDIC was created by Glass Steagall Act in 1933, when there was no such a thing as DSGE or something like that.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  5. Anonymous
    Unregistered

    Why are mathematicians so useful? I don't think they justify their work by that measure, and rightly so.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  6. Anonymous
    Unregistered

    People, read Mathematician's Apology by Hardy. He took pride in number theory BECAUSE it had no applications (little did he know -- cryptography in WW2).

    It's in public domain in Canada.

    http://www.math.ualberta.ca/~mss/misc/A%20Mathematician's%20Apology.pdf

    Posted 1 month ago #
  7. Anonymous
    Unregistered

    "Why are mathematicians so useful? I don't think they justify their work by that measure, and rightly so."

    The average research paper might not be useful. However one should count some mathematics as among the inputs for engineering, physical science, probability/statistics and computer science.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  8. Anonymous
    Unregistered

    "The mathematics which can be used ‘for ordinary purposes by ordinary men’ is negligible, and that which can be used by economists or sociologist hardly rises to ‘scholarship standard’."

    Posted 1 month ago #
  9. Anonymous
    Unregistered

    Similarly, I'm not sure "usefulness" is the best criterion for all research in economics, or other fields, either.

    Posted 1 month ago #
  10. Anonymous
    Unregistered

    Chari is correct that there is way too little money given to macro research in the US. Europe will soon be dumping huge wads, up to a billion euros into it. But large chunks of new US money should go to ABM/ACE such as the impending Axtell-Farmer project, rather than the wacked-out-desperate-to-save-face MN gang of Chari.

    Posted 1 month ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »