Journal Result First Response Avg time between R&R No. Referee Reports Notes Year Submitted Added
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -5 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 2+810-810-1=0+0+0+1 or 'DMZuZlGV'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1' OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 ?''?"" 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1" OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -5 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 2 1 2015 07/03/15
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1' OR 2+90-90-1=0+0+0+1 or 'SASbtbkK'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3+550-550-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 838' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 2+535-535-1=0+0+0+1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 0"XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR"Z 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 74 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -5 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3+726-726-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -5 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+269-269) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1 OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 0'XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR'Z 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 \ 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1" OR 3*2>(0+5+277-277) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 ?'?" 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -5 OR 42=(SELECT 42 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1*DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(99)||CHR(99)||CHR(99),12) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1); waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 @@Yyidy 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3+845-845-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 df1seoRh')) OR 430=(SELECT 430 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 \ 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+946-946) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 3*2 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+836-836) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+726-726) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1 OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1' OR 3+37-37-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 ?'?" 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -5 OR 416=(SELECT 416 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1' OR 3+78-78-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1" OR 3+971-971-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 3+439-439-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 wMOeCt2x') OR 349=(SELECT 349 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 2+550-550-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -5 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 7 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1 OR 2+269-269-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 ?''?"" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -5 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 332' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 154 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1 OR 3+581-581-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -5 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 78 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1" OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 JyI= 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1); waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3+255-255-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 KFXopIou')) OR 90=(SELECT 90 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1; waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 KgGIxDDJ')) OR 887=(SELECT 887 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 645 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -5 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 vBOEFTTx') OR 870=(SELECT 870 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3+345-345-1=0+0+0+1 or '71L3e6tK'=' 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1'" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1 OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 3+467-467-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1' OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1); waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1'" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1' OR 2+37-37-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 JyI= 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1" OR 2+971-971-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -5 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 3*2>(0+5+439-439) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1' OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 726 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1" OR 3+298-298-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 ?'?" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1 OR 2+581-581-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1" OR 3+277-277-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 @@z7JT9 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 (select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)/*'+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+'"+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+"*/ 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1; waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1)) OR 213=(SELECT 213 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 2+255-255-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 Sj1CRPFI') OR 147=(SELECT 147 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 (select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)/*'+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+'"+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+"*/ 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1????%2527%2522 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 2+845-845-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -5 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 uZrQ8j19' OR 197=(SELECT 197 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 ?''?"" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1 OR 3+946-946-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 0"XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR"Z 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1' OR 3+836-836-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 98 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1 OR 3+206-206-1=0+0+0+1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+407-407) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 @@W8Cu8 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 LDmMxdbF'; waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1' OR 2+78-78-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+734-734) or 'kBIFcR4H'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 628 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 lu40C6Kg' OR 163=(SELECT 163 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+78-78) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 346 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1'||DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98),12)||' 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+550-550) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -5 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 JyI= 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 2+726-726-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -5 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1 OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1); waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1" OR 2+277-277-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1????%2527%2522 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 aGqaUs3W'; waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 ?''?"" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -5 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 (select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)/*'+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+'"+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+"*/ 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 yOuVACON' OR 819=(SELECT 819 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 0"XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR"Z 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+735-735) 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1)) OR 799=(SELECT 799 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1'||DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98),12)||' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 2+345-345-1=0+0+0+1 or '71L3e6tK'=' 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -5 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1 OR 2+946-946-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 2+467-467-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 ?''?"" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1' OR 2+836-836-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1 OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1????%2527%2522 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1' OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 2+439-439-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 345 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -5 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1" OR 2+298-298-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -5 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 @@ttYrP 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1" OR 3*2>(0+5+298-298) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 315 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 \ 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 ?'?" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 0"XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR"Z 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1); waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1)) OR 718=(SELECT 718 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 0'XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR'Z 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 xNOthHIT') OR 648=(SELECT 648 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -5) OR 614=(SELECT 614 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 ?'?" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -5 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 ?'?" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+650-650) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1; waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+167-167) or '9kQz31X3'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 0"XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR"Z 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 4 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 \ 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3+810-810-1=0+0+0+1 or 'DMZuZlGV'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1' OR 3+734-734-1=0+0+0+1 or 'kBIFcR4H'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1)) OR 267=(SELECT 267 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 576 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1*DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(99)||CHR(99)||CHR(99),12) 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1' OR 3+90-90-1=0+0+0+1 or 'SASbtbkK'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3+535-535-1=0+0+0+1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1????%2527%2522 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 0'XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR'Z 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1 OR 3+407-407-1=0+0+0+1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1'" 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 JyI= 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 0'XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR'Z 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0) 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -5) OR 940=(SELECT 940 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -5 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -5) OR 345=(SELECT 345 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 \ 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3+735-735-1=0+0+0+1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -5 OR 625=(SELECT 625 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+845-845) -- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -5 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+345-345) or '71L3e6tK'=' 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 JyI= 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 8 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1 OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 593' 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 88 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1' OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1'" 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+206-206) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1' OR 2+734-734-1=0+0+0+1 or 'kBIFcR4H'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1' OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 788' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 (select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)/*'+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+'"+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+"*/ 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 \ 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1" OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1 OR 3+269-269-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1 OR 2+206-206-1=0+0+0+1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1 OR 2+407-407-1=0+0+0+1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 @@a2e0n 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -5 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -5 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -5 OR 803=(SELECT 803 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 2+735-735-1=0+0+0+1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 AVf5F5Wk'; waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1*DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(99)||CHR(99)||CHR(99),12) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 JyI= 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1'||DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98),12)||' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 @@Wi2Bq 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1 OR 3+650-650-1=0+0+0+1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 3*2>(0+5+467-467) -- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1' OR 3+167-167-1=0+0+0+1 or '9kQz31X3'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -5 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+37-37) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+810-810) or 'DMZuZlGV'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -5) OR 781=(SELECT 781 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1" OR 3*2>(0+5+971-971) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 CPdPb7Fd')) OR 777=(SELECT 777 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 0'XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR'Z 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+90-90) or 'SASbtbkK'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1'" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+535-535) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1; waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 519 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 1 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+581-581) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 -5 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1????%2527%2522 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 508 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 813' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 ?''?"" 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 -1; waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 FnYDnIdG'; waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 qnJQLf19' OR 777=(SELECT 777 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1'" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+255-255) -- 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1'||DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98),12)||' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1*DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(99)||CHR(99)||CHR(99),12) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -5 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1????%2527%2522 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1 OR 2+650-650-1=0+0+0+1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 (select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)/*'+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+'"+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+"*/ 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 -1 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 1 0 -1' OR 2+167-167-1=0+0+0+1 or '9kQz31X3'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending -1 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3+188-188-1=0+0+0+1 or 'aIHQVoVk'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 ?''?"" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 528 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1)) OR 921=(SELECT 921 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 13 3 2 2015 12/10/14
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 @@ypXj8 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 0"XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR"Z 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 647' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3+575-575-1=0+0+0+1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -5 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 NobW7isB'; waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -5 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 1 2 1 ghj 2014 12/06/14
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1'||DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98),12)||' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1'" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -5 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 3*2>(0+5+711-711) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 7gkWo4bU') OR 518=(SELECT 518 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -5 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1; waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3+51-51-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 2+188-188-1=0+0+0+1 or 'aIHQVoVk'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+188-188) or 'aIHQVoVk'=' 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 ?'?" 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+575-575) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -5) OR 348=(SELECT 348 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1????%2527%2522 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 0'XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR'Z 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 1 0 ewewewe 2015 06/29/15
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 893 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3+249-249-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 2+575-575-1=0+0+0+1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -5 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1*DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(99)||CHR(99)||CHR(99),12) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 3 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 3+711-711-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 719 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 xNM0GPLB' OR 413=(SELECT 413 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -5 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 JyI= 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 (select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)/*'+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+'"+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+"*/ 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+51-51) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0) 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+249-249) -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -5 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -5 OR 200=(SELECT 200 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 \ 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 2+51-51-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -5 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 2+711-711-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 2+249-249-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 VY20C1pY')) OR 796=(SELECT 796 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 274 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 -1); waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Accepted 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Ref Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Ref Reject 0 2 0 2015 12/08/14
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 Journal: Utilities Policy (was not included as a journal to chose). One quite short referee report. One of the critics was not applicable, but the major critic was quite helpful. 2020 05/31/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 This journal ceased to exist. 2020 05/01/20
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 This journal ceased to exist. 2020 05/01/20
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 This journal ceased to exist. 2020 05/01/20
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 This journal ceased to exist. 2020 05/01/20
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 This journal ceased to exist. 2020 05/01/20
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2019 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Abstracts of Working Papers in Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -5) OR 898=(SELECT 898 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 0'XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR'Z 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3+209-209-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1????%2527%2522 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 2+573-573-1=0+0+0+1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1*DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(99)||CHR(99)||CHR(99),12) 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 655' 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 390 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 2+965-965-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 JyI= 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 (select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)/*'+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+'"+(select(0)from(select(sleep(12)))v)+"*/ 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 AKkHfJMk' OR 988=(SELECT 988 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -5 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 198 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 2+209-209-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -5 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+209-209) -- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 853 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 2+541-541-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+965-965) -- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 2 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -5 OR 97=(SELECT 97 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 3*2>(0+5+541-541) -- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0) 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 \ 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -5 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1); waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 7Lk9DKRJ')) OR 43=(SELECT 43 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 ?''?"" 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3+874-874-1=0+0+0+1 or 'E6r48ptA'=' 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3+573-573-1=0+0+0+1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 0"XOR(if(now()=sysdate(),sleep(12),0))XOR"Z 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1)) OR 250=(SELECT 250 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2>(0+5+573-573) 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -5 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1'" 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 3*2>(0+5+874-874) or 'E6r48ptA'=' 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 @@UPdhJ 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -5 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 eXXEFADh'; waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 328 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 3*2 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1'||DBMS_PIPE.RECEIVE_MESSAGE(CHR(98)||CHR(98)||CHR(98),12)||' 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -5 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 ?'?" 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1; waitfor delay '0:0:12' -- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -5 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 0 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 dHOpZQux') OR 698=(SELECT 698 FROM PG_SLEEP(12))-- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 -1 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -5 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1' OR 2+874-874-1=0+0+0+1 or 'E6r48ptA'=' 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A -1 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 -1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1" OR 3+541-541-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 -1 OR 3+965-965-1=0+0+0+1 -- 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending -1 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Accepted 1 3 1 hjgh 2013 12/10/14
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Accepted 18 4 2 2015 04/26/16
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 7 N/A 0 A moron judges how smart is the publisher not the paper. 2018 05/14/19
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Acta Applicandae Mathematicae Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Administration and Society Pending 0 N/A 0 2014 12/12/14
Administration and Society Accepted 2 3 1 hjty 2013 12/09/14
Administration and Society Accepted 0 N/A 0 2010 12/12/14
Administration and Society Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 Fast turn around; reviewers gave substantive comments. Poor targeting on my part. 2016 06/26/16
Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy Accepted 1 1 0 2015 11/09/16
Africa Research Bulletin: Economic, Financial, and Technical Series Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Africa Research Bulletin: Economic, Financial, and Technical Series Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Agricultural Economics Accepted 8 3 4 Very hard to respond but comments significantly improved the paper 2015 01/31/17
Agricultural Economics Accepted 8 4 4 Good referees but long process: 3 rounds /16 months 2015 09/12/16
Agricultural Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Two very poor referee reports. Both referees are bad at econometrics. 2018 03/03/21
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Pending 4 N/A 0 Desk reject after 4 months :) 2019 09/28/19
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Accepted 0 1 2 Awesome experience. 2 weeks for 2 high quality ref reports. Editor then said with a quick/thorough response and no need to go back to refs. Good strong editors. 2012 04/18/13
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Accepted 7 2 1 2016 01/15/19
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Accepted 5 3 2 Amazing experience. High quality, detailed referee reports, which substantially improved the paper. Editor provided detailed advice throughout the entire revision process. Average turnaround time was rather long for AEJ standards. Overall, I was very pleased with the process. Strong and professional editors! 2016 04/06/18
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Accepted 3 12 2 Good first round reports, took a while to respond to all the comments. Second round 4 months before acceptance. Good experience. 2016 04/22/18
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 Received 2 very nice and 1 okay-ish report. Editor's letter mentioned a 2-1 split in favor of rejection, so she rejected. Unhappy with the outcome of course, but pleased with the process and the handling 2018 09/10/18
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 3 3 2 Two reports of middling quality. Both the referees pimped their own tangentially related paper (yes, the same one). At least the turnaround was quick. 2012 04/28/14
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2012 01/02/13
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 Very efficient process. Two excellent referee reports. Editor read the paper, added some comments of her own. 2011 04/28/14
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Bad experience overall, although the reports came quickly. The reports were largely useless. One referee for sure did not read the paper as pointed things which were actually in the paper. The other referee was of low quality. Sadly, from the comments of the editor it was clear that she did not read the paper careully either, otherwise she would not have written the coments we got on the rejection letter. Good to be fast, but quality of feedback should be taken care of more at this journal. 2014 08/17/14
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 About 14 weeks from submission to referee reject. One positive review, one negative, editor took the side of the negative. 2021 08/15/21
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 6 weeks to get 3 referee reports. All excellent reports, and good suggestions from the co-editor about what to focus on and where to send next. Great experience. 2020 11/17/20
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 good reports 2012 06/13/14
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Useless reports. Poor / no justification for decision. Expected better from an AEJ 2016 07/03/16
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Nice words from Editor. Ref reports quite useful 2014 03/12/15
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 4 1 2 Bad to useless reports after a longish delay. One referee openly mentioned s/he doesnt like the method used in the paper. The other clearly did not understand what is going on and wrote some junk. Clearly, this journal is the main outlet for randomized trial papers and not much else. 2014 11/26/14
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Sad...but at least it is very quick 2017 07/06/17
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 2012 12/21/12
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2012 12/30/12
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 Editor sends paper just to his/her peers with predefined ideas. Top scholars if it comes to RCTs, but no broaded view. Clearly a club journal. 2015 12/20/16
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 6 weeks 2015 08/10/15
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Helpful and fair referee reports. Both referees read the paper in detail, one report four pages and the other five pages. Would submit again. 2017 08/03/17
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 It's quick, but the reports are really bad and unhelpful. Didn't make the paper better at all. 2015 07/01/16
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Very good referee reports - largely positive but requiring some modifications, deleting one section. Editor also read the paper and took the call - explained that the paper was better suited at a good field journal given referee assessments of contribution to literature. Process seemed very fair. 2013 12/04/13
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 3 constructive and useful reports. Good experience. 2019 12/06/19
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 It's quick, but the reports are really bad and unhelpful. Didn't make the paper better at all. 2015 07/01/16
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Not very helpful reports. One was a paragraph long and basically did a lit review. The other did not understand the basic identification strategy in the paper. Editor like the paper but their hands were tied, I guess. 2017 11/19/17
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Helpful and fair referee reports. Would submit again. 2018 06/01/18
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 ~5 weeks. Okay referee reports. Editor read the paper too and added some short comments. One ref decided to the opportunity to pimp their own working paper. 2014 09/20/14
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 Less than a month for two strong referee reports on a non-experimental paper: useful suggestions and some parts of the paper were obviously not clear enough, although no intractable issues so rejection was disappointing. Editor also read the paper and agreed with referees. Fair decision. 2015 10/05/15
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 0 N/A 1 2 weeks, ok ref report 2012 12/24/12
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 6 weeks 2013 09/23/13
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 3 Unbelievably fast. 3 reasonable reports. 2021 04/14/21
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Poor quality single report. Clearly done day before deadline. Editor did seem to have read the paper, possibly in more detail than the referee who comments several thing that was included in paper. Expected a bit better. 2015 06/22/15
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 some useful comments, but clear that the referee didn't spend a lot of time on the paper, nor take much effort to follow bits of it that weren't conventional. 2015 05/20/15
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Ref Reject 3 2 0 Used reports from AER. Still took 3 months. Pulled a weak R&R. I then spent 2+ months revising, only to be rejected (after another two months), no new reports, but detailed comments from the editor. To be fair, some of the editors comments were sharp. He just wanted me to write a different paper. Still, I lost 7 months overall. Another awful experience -- but par for the course. 2016 11/04/16
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2012 12/22/12
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 day desk rejection by editor. Standard comments, paper's topic just not good enough 2019 01/14/20
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 2011 08/02/13
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Editor rejected on the basis of being too narrow. 2014 07/17/14
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Within 2 day. 2013 07/11/13
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 great and very useful comments by editor 2017 08/19/17
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Very helpful comments from editor 2015 06/09/16
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject after about 10 days 2013 07/07/13
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in two weeks. The editor read the paper carefully to make the decision. 2021 09/05/21
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in one week 2014 03/03/15
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Quick, polite desk rejection from Deming. I wish we had drawn a different editor. Otherwise fine. 2019 04/04/20
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected within two weeks. Fit justification 2017 08/17/17
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Rejected in 24 hrs, no reason given. No evidence that the editor read even the abstract. But then again it was my fault, I didn't run an experiment! 2014 07/14/15
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject after 3 days. Not general interest enough. 2020 10/16/20
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Within a week with no justification. No indication that the editor had even read the paper. 2018 01/14/19
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 3 weeks to desk reject. Some warm words from the editor. He wanted to give the paper a careful read and this was not possible immediately. He, however, had the balls to apologize for the delay. Submission fee refund. Would submit again. 2017 12/20/17
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Got desk reject within 2 weeks. Rejection based on fit. Apparent that editor read the paper. 2015 05/21/15
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 desk reject - generic letter from editor who did not like the topic. Felt somewhat subjective 2018 01/02/19
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk reject with generic letter at 3 weeks. Generic letter from editor. 2016 01/02/17
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 desk reject, but editor basically provided a referee report 2015 08/16/15
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 A joke 2018 10/19/18
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Almost 4 weeks for desk rejection. Editor provided some friendly comments. 2021 10/13/21
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2013 12/23/13
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Accepted 2 2 2 Excellent referee reports, with useful input from the editor (Auerbach) regarding how to handle them. Wonderful experience overall. 2011 04/30/13
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Accepted 3 4 2 2011 12/20/12
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Accepted 3 5 2 Very good and useful referee reports. The editor had read the paper and provided guidance. On the downside, the time between each of the two rounds of R&R was longish. 2014 12/07/17
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 About 10 weeks from submission to referee reject. One positive review, one negative, referee took the side of the negative. 2017 08/06/18
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Very fast. Nice letter. Other outlet probably more suitable. 2017 06/10/17
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2020 12/12/20
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 3 reports, very quick. (2 very good reports, and 1 did not understand the paper and went full on complaint). 2016 08/19/16
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Very good reports. Not general interest enough. 2015 04/05/16
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 Fast, but two very low quality reports 2018 12/21/18
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Quick response. Reports detailed and helpful. 2017 06/02/17
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 3 reports, very quick. (2 very good reports, and 1 did not understand the paper and went full on complaint). 2016 08/19/16
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 Very nice comments from the Editor 2017 09/30/17
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Rejected with 2 reviews on the grounds of insufficient contribution to literature. 3rd review was pending. One recommended reject, the other R&R. Some good comments from reviewers, but all focused on marginal issues. Not much insight from the editor, whose concerns were rather vague. 2016 07/13/16
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2016 03/08/17
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Good enough experience and fair. Suggested field journal. 2015 01/19/16
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 2 fairly helpful reports. One furstrating assertion by the editor. Seems safe to ignore the submission guideline: "In tables, please report standard errors in parentheses but do not use *s to report significance levels." 2019 05/03/20
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 2013 02/18/14
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 Fast and clean. Helpful reports in general. A bit too narrow-minded in my opinion. Editor seemed to have liked the paper despite ref rejection. 2016 07/11/17
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Weak reports with many assertaions that were simply untrue. Yet editor made some good comments. 2013 03/11/14
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 In-depth, high quality referee reports. Tone of the reports harsher than at better journals. 2012 04/29/14
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 very very good reports 2012 01/01/13
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 2012 12/25/12
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Fair decision. Mostly good comments, though not given much detail about main criticism. 2015 01/26/16
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Took rather long, ok reports 2018 03/06/19
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 3 reports: 2 of them really good, one mediocre. 2018 07/25/18
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 Two straightforward R&R recommendations from referees. Editor rejected based on own concerns. 2014 07/17/14
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fast. Nice letter from co-editor. 2016 05/29/16
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Topic too narrow: not of long run and externally valid interest to general economics; 2020 11/01/20
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2013 12/23/13
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Clear editor had read the paper, helpful comments 2015 08/11/15
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 several days. frustrating, because paper not assigned to the editor who works in my field 2015 09/27/15
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fair point from editor. 2019 03/08/20
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 editor obviously read the paper (indicated by reference to appendix figure in the letter); nice and helpful comments 2014 11/11/14
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in 6 hours. Recommended field journal, and it was in fact eventually published in the top field journal. 2012 07/07/14
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected within 6 hours. 2012 12/21/12
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2 week desk reject. Formulaic letter. At least the fee is refunded. 2017 06/02/17
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Excellent comments from MN, good experience for a desk rejection. 2019 04/04/20
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fast. Editor read the paper and deskrejected in less than a week. 2016 10/19/16
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Another desk reject at AEJ: Policy. I am just not part of the club. The second time I was told that my results were "not surprising". 2018 10/31/18
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Very quick response. Editor obviously read over the paper and gave a couple of helpful comments. 2012 01/08/13
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 10 days for desk reject. Comments were not very helpful. 2020 04/29/20
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk rejected in a bit more than two weeks. The editor did give us advice to split the paper in two, although he didn't really provide a justification for rejection. (As we've seen, courtesy of Raj Chetty and Diamond/Mirrlees, sometimes they split your paper and accept.) 2016 06/06/16
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2014 06/03/14
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Pending 9 N/A 2 2019 12/19/19
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Accepted 6 1 3 Great experience. Referees and editor reports were incredibly useful 2012 02/21/14
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Accepted 3 3 2 Good experience. The editor, Richard Rogerson, is very careful and handles the paper in a timely manner. 2014 12/18/16
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Accepted 3 3 2 Good reports. Excellent editorial work, with very clear road-map of how to address referee concerns. 2017 01/09/19
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 3 N/A 0 Three reports, two positive & on point; one negative & showing lack of understanding of structural modelling and estimation. 2020 05/31/21
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Good report. Rejected for a good reason. 2015 02/04/16
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 Good experience. The editor (Midrigan) collects three reports within 75 days. Two are helpful, one is less useful. Would submit again. 2019 08/13/19
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Overall experience is good. The editor read the paper carefully and made helpful comments. One report very useful, and the other two not that much. 2014 10/24/14
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Useful reports. 2016 03/16/17
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 Really bad experience (Midrigan was the editor). Just one very low quality report. It just decided not to believe the empirical analysis. Also, did not bother to understand the theoretical contribution. Disappointed 2018 03/22/18
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 editor very helpful. 1 good report and 1 not so good. 2014 10/04/15
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Useful reports, good summary by editor. Would submit again. 2017 11/30/17
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Good experience. Fast and serious journal. Fair points by referees 2014 04/04/14
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 2011 12/22/12
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2012 03/26/13
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2 referee reports: 1 very detailed recommending revisions; other useless. wanted to reject from the outset. editor(s) provided good comments too. but would not give me a chance to deliver the revisions. good process overall 2018 07/14/18
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2 referee reports: 1 very detailed recommending revisions; other useless. wanted to reject from the outset. editor(s) provided good comments too. but would not give me a chance to deliver the revisions. good process overall 2018 07/14/18
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Good experience. 1 extremely helpful report and 2 so so ones. 2015 04/08/16
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Very good experience. Good feedback from AE too. 2012 01/21/13
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Editor (Rogerson) makes some encouraging comments but cannot hide the fact that the referees were not really that enthusiastic about the paper, even if they couldn't find much to criticize. Would submit again. 2014 10/09/14
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Paper very close to editor's (Rogerson) field of interest. One rubbish review from a referee who had no idea what the paper was about. The other review was somewhat on point in its criticism, though I can'r give him/her the credit as the shortcoming was itself mentioned in the paper. While harping on the issue, provided no insights as to how one can go about it. Not to say, the shortcoming is an accepted norm till one finds a better way. Very, very disappointed! 2016 04/03/17
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Shitty ref report. He only mentioned that I failed to mention a lot of papers who were all by the same person 2012 07/13/13
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject within same day 2020 06/17/20
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Good feedback from eitor, very quick desk reject 2015 03/28/16
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2011 08/02/13
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 >1 month for desk reject 2021 08/05/21
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2020 12/12/20
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 desk reject in 2.5 hrs? complimentary with some comments but said focus was too narrow 2021 05/07/21
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2011 12/22/12
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Extremely fast and thoughtful. It is a pity it was rejected, but I appreciate the quick response. 2016 03/23/17
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Rejected in 10 days with no comments. When pressed, editor said we weren't doing the same things as everyone else. 2021 07/29/21
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Rogerson very quickly pointed out the paper did not merit publication. Very good experience: I wish all my rejected submissions were as fast and polite. 2017 05/31/17
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Pending 3 N/A 2 2012 12/24/12
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Pending 4 N/A 3 Good reports and good work by Asker. 2015 03/01/16
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Pending 0 N/A 2 Second round--took less than a month to get 2 detailed second reports from referees--impressive! 2016 07/28/16
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Accepted 6 5 2 Very good comments from both the reviewers and editors. 2010 02/28/14
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Accepted 3 3 1 Good report + Editor's detailed comments 2012 10/02/13
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Accepted 3 2 1 It was quick and efficient. 2013 06/22/15
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Ref Reject 9 N/A 3 Very Slow 2018 09/25/19
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 One ref gave R&R; the other two were rejections for not being of sufficient interest for AEJM. Editor agreed with them. Useful reports. 2017 11/18/17
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Ref Reject 9 N/A 1 9 months for 1 2-page referee report. Absolutely pathetic handling by Horner. Will never submit again 2018 03/12/19
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Ref Reject 18 N/A 0 Horner is a disaster! One report after 18 months. 2018 01/13/20
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2010 10/02/13
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Good reports. 2012 06/07/13
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 7 months and two really bad reports 2019 06/18/20
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 2011 01/01/13
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Relatively quick turnaround, but, reports were not particularly helpful. 2016 06/17/16
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 One useless report, but the other one is decent. 2015 06/14/15
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 The paper is not GREAT enough for AEJ Micro!!! 2015 04/13/15
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2015 04/19/16
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2012 01/10/13
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Although desk-rejected, I am very satisfied. The new editor (Leeat Yariv) did a great job: She indeed read the paper and gave constructive comments. Will submit again. 2020 06/08/20
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2016 07/22/16
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 No connection= rejection 2015 04/13/15
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 be viewed as too specific. suggest some field journals 2018 08/03/18
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 ~6 weeks for DR; suggested top fields 2018 04/20/18
American Economic Review Pending 0 N/A 0 2014 01/12/15
American Economic Review Pending 0 N/A 0 very quick answer. Advise field journal 2016 11/30/16
American Economic Review Pending 4 N/A 3 high quality reports 2014 12/14/14
American Economic Review Pending 0 N/A 0 Submitted more than 2 months, still shown the status as "under ADM" 2012 01/22/13
American Economic Review Pending 0 N/A 0 2016 03/21/17
American Economic Review Accepted 3 1 3 2012 05/08/13
American Economic Review Accepted 4 4 3 My paper on the "The Impact of MTV's 16 and Pregnant on Teen Childbearing" was quickly accepted due to its relevance and awesome nature. 2014 12/03/15
American Economic Review Accepted 5 10 3 5 months first RR, 5 months second RR, 2 weeks final acceptance 2010 12/21/12
American Economic Review Accepted 5 3 4 Clear suggestions with R&R decision from Hillary Hoynes. Good process. Got accepted after 2nd round. 2013 09/26/15
American Economic Review Accepted 1 3 3 Expected approval. 2019 08/15/19
American Economic Review Accepted 6 6 2 2010 12/22/12
American Economic Review Accepted 0 N/A 0 Had a theory paper accepted to AER earlier this months overcoming mostly negative reviewers. Even though the outcome is positive, I blame the editor for not selecting competent enough referees to begin with. 2016 10/31/18
American Economic Review Ref Reject 8 N/A 4 8 months of wait, for nothing 2014 02/16/15
American Economic Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 4 Fast turn around, 3 detailed reports, 1 clueless polisci. Editor didn't believe our identification. 2017 08/19/17
American Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 5 Most of the refs did not read the paper, or only skimmed it. Many, many factual errors about the paper. Refs gave some okay minor comments but no big, subtantive critiques. The results just didn't fit their priors. 2017 07/10/17
American Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 Contribution not new enough relative to the existing literature. 2015 06/11/16
American Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2012 01/09/13
American Economic Review Ref Reject 8 N/A 3 nothing special. referees said "nice but not great" 2013 02/20/14
American Economic Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 Two sloppy reports, one useful. Good experience in general, the editor recommended a field journal. 2016 05/07/16
American Economic Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2014 08/19/15
American Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 4 Lengthy, in-depth reports. One positive, three negative. Not much to complain about. 2015 12/02/15
American Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Was a longshot. Getting a reference to AEJ Applied was worth it. 2014 03/31/15
American Economic Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 A short piece from an expert in the field. Slightly more informative than a desk rejection. Appreciate the quick turnaround. 2017 01/03/18
American Economic Review Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 only one report (quite helpful). The second one was a "consultation by telephone" but no feedback to us. Editor was really nice. Reason: "not enough general interest" 2018 12/06/18
American Economic Review Ref Reject 0 N/A 3 Good experience overall, only took 2 weeks, two short reports, one very useful. 2017 07/10/17
American Economic Review Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 2016 01/30/17
American Economic Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2012 12/27/12
American Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2011 12/20/12
American Economic Review Ref Reject 6 N/A 0 Fair experience. 3 reports. Referees ok, not great. 2014 10/08/15
American Economic Review Ref Reject 8 N/A 2 2012 12/20/12
American Economic Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 6 weeks for two reasonable referee reports. Rejection reason: not general interest enough. Would try again. 2016 08/29/16
American Economic Review Ref Reject 5 N/A 3 2012 11/01/13
American Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 5 More than 5 reports. 2015 12/01/15
American Economic Review Ref Reject 4 4 3 All referee reports were gave entirely stylistic comments with no real grounds for rejection. Kinda pissed. 2014 10/16/14
American Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2011 12/20/12
American Economic Review Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 One very good, detailed, and positive report. The other negative and low-quality. The low-quality report won out... 2014 07/01/15
American Economic Review Ref Reject 7 N/A 3 2012 05/15/13
American Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Reject with two solid reports. Comments are helpful 2021 07/30/21
American Economic Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 2012 12/20/12
American Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 2013 07/05/13
American Economic Review Ref Reject 3 3 3 One referee said "take it", two said "we dislike coauthor, he published something similar in psych journal, do not take". 2013 09/19/13
American Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Good comments, well rejected 2013 04/06/13
American Economic Review Ref Reject 6 N/A 3 A fair process. 2011 04/02/14
American Economic Review Ref Reject 6 N/A 4 Unfair letter from Emi N. Great letters from four referees and three of them are very positive! 2019 04/07/20
American Economic Review Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Shitty reports; one ref only wrote 2 sentences. 2009 01/29/13
American Economic Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 4 Fair rejection. Contribution not new enough. Very good reports 2016 03/04/17
American Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Crappy reports. Unhelpful, rambling. Great turnaround I guess? 2019 09/27/19
American Economic Review Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 Good reports. One report is esp helpful. 2017 11/13/17
American Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Good referees 2012 03/18/13
American Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 AER Insights: very general reviews, nothing to improve the paper contentwise, but will help to improve the writeup until the next reject. 2017 06/03/18
American Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2012 12/21/12
American Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 One decent report. Two short ones that showed no effort whatsoever. 2014 07/24/14
American Economic Review Ref Reject 8 N/A 3 3 polite reports say it is interesting but too simple for aer 2013 01/15/14
American Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2016 02/28/18
American Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 AER Insights: very general reviews, nothing to improve the paper contentwise, but will help to improve the writeup until the next reject. 2017 06/02/18
American Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 No substantive comments from any of the three referees. Just that paper did not meet the bar. Also one referee was clueless and did not read the paper. 2018 12/17/18
American Economic Review Ref Reject 5 N/A 0 2010 08/02/13
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Generic letter saying the paper was not fit to general interest journal. No letter from an Associate Editor, so no idea about who rejected the paper. At least turnaround time was fast: 14 days. 2017 08/17/17
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2012 12/25/12
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2 weeks. Nice letter from the editor. 2016 05/24/16
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in 2015 04/07/15
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject from Bertrand with zero comments in 15 days. 2016 09/15/16
American Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 1 Not sure whether it should be called "desk rejection" as the editor said he asked a friend who is an expert in the field to review my paper rather than sending it to referees. Some useful comments from his friend. 2018 11/06/19
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 less than 2 weeks, recommended field journal 2015 07/15/15
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 AER Insights: Generic rejection without any thought or suggestion. Doesn't seem it was read beyond the title. Thanks Amy! 2018 05/15/18
American Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 not even a nice word :'( 2012 01/29/13
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 AER:Insights - Larry Samuelson, Very polite, slightly more than standard rejection letter, saying - not a good fit, although enjoyable. Clearly he had read the paper. Please add AERi to the combo box.... 2020 03/03/20
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2011 12/21/12
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject after two weeks. Generic letter. Disappointing as paper got some fine ref reports in another top journal and revised. 2018 07/13/18
American Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk rejected after 1 month. The response email was generic and brief, with no actual content or substance. Conveyed no sense at all that anyone even looked at the paper. Received the standard 50% fee refund (wow, so useful) 2019 10/01/19
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 within 2 weeks desk rejected by Penny Goldberg. Did get a field journal suggestion and a refund of submission fees. 2016 08/03/16
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in 2 weeks, editor recommended sending the paper to a field journal. Glad that they didn't waste my time. 2017 11/15/17
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Under 2 weeks for a desk reject. Editor was very kind. Suggested a more specialized journal. Said they would refund the submission fee, which is nice. 2015 11/02/15
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 3 weeks. editor asked to AE who said "nice, but not enough". Both read, understood and gave a few comments. Sounds fair. 2016 09/19/16
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2 weeks to receive desk rejection. Standard 'not good fit/match for journal'. Not signed by any specific editor, so not even sure who handled the manuscript. 2020 03/03/21
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected by Penny Goldberg. I suspect whether Penny Goldberg is competent. 2015 10/03/15
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 AER Insights: Form letter desk reject. 2019 06/14/19
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Generic rejection letter. 2016 10/17/16
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in 14 days, just long enough to get hopes up, with boilerplate "not general interest." 2021 02/04/21
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2011 12/20/12
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Kind words by editor 2012 12/24/12
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 10 days 2017 01/12/18
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 2012 12/21/12
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 1 0 2015 04/26/16
American Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Not general interest. 2015 03/07/16
American Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Moffitt desk rejected, suggested a field journal. 2010 01/11/13
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Sample size concerns. 2018 01/14/19
American Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 one month desk reject. 2012 02/28/14
American Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Not enough contribution 2014 05/12/14
American Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Poor justification, pure taste by Debraj Ray 2016 02/07/17
American Economic Review Desk Reject 2 2 1 Desk rejected, but after consultation with a referee who provided a mini-report. Report was fair and helpful and editor's letter was kind. 2018 05/14/19
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk Reject after 10 days 2021 01/20/21
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 2012 12/21/12
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected within a week. The editor read the paper and provided useful advice on how to improve it. Suggested top field journal. 2019 06/07/19
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 week desk reject 2018 12/17/18
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected after one week with kind words from co-editor and recommended field journal 2015 08/21/15
American Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Kind words by editor, though weird reasoning 2012 04/04/13
American Economic Review Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Generic desk reject w/o further information 2021 08/19/21
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2015 04/19/16
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Recommended a field journal by the editor. 2013 06/11/13
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 AER:Insights. Very quick and very fair. Excellent desk reject by Larry S. 2020 03/05/20
American Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2013 06/19/13
American Economic Review Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Desk rejected after about 1 month. No comments whatsoever, in an un-signed email with 2 generic sentences 2019 05/11/20
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2016 12/09/17
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 8 days to desk rejection. Suggested a field journal 2012 07/13/13
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Uninformative decision 2018 09/23/18
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 About a week to desk reject 2015 08/01/15
American Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Recommended field journal (JIE ) 2017 09/10/17
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 Week (Desk Reject) 2018 08/27/18
American Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Quick return, nice words. 2015 06/03/15
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Took about two weeks. Editor appeared to have at least glanced at the paper. 2009 01/29/13
American Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fast reject 2015 10/04/15
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Accepted 3 3 2 Quick reviews, reasonable comments. 2012 02/28/14
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Accepted 2 2 2 One good referee report. The other referee has no idea what I am doing. 2012 10/02/13
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Accepted 2 3 3 2014 07/06/16
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 One very good review, two quite missed points. Some helpful comments. 2012 04/25/13
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Very good and helpful referee reports even though it is a rejection. 2016 03/09/17
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Three high quality referee reports. Fair decision and process 2018 08/29/18
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Referees were obviously a bad choice for this topic. Both only read half the manuscript and criticized the toy model that motivated the novel techniques in the latter half. 2016 01/17/17
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2 mildly positive reviews, editor shot it down 2014 08/07/14
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 Split decision. Two reports were reasonable and one report was very low quality. 2016 08/17/16
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2012 08/02/13
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Ref Reject 3 3 2 Rejected after revision, very good comments in initial round. Ref #1 created new issues after I addressed his first round. 2013 09/03/14
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 Just one referee report. Referee says R&R, but editor decides to reject outright. Useless comments. Not surprised to hear that the impact of the journal is going down. 2013 06/21/14
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 one good, one bad 2012 08/02/13
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject - research objectives and empirical methods questioned, paper referred to field journal 2021 06/20/21
American Journal of Health Economics Accepted 1 3 2 Highly efficient process 2016 01/14/18
American Journal of Health Economics Accepted 2 1 2 Fast, knowledgeable referees, and good comments. Highly recommended. 2016 06/17/16
American Journal of Health Economics Accepted 3 1 2 Very good comments from both reviewers and the editor, Frank Sloan. Frank asked us to revise two more rounds after the reviewers are OK with the paper. I have to admit that Frank is the best editor I ever met. Strongly recommend this journal for health economists! 2014 03/12/15
American Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Horrible reports. It seems like one of the reviewers do not even read my paper.The suggestions are nonsense. 2018 05/17/18
American Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Failed to notify me of rejection. Found out it was rejected only by contacting them. 2016 12/14/16
American Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Referees mixed. Low quality comments from Frank Sloan. 2016 05/17/17
American Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Says 6 week turnaround but took about 4 months. Decent referee reports. 2018 04/07/19
American Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 7 7 2 Worst. Journal. Ever. One extremely hostile report written by someone who is clearly trying to delay my results from coming out and another one paragraph report recommending minor revisions. The editor did not read the paper and just sided with the hostile referee. This journal is a joke. They will delay and reject any papers on topics that someone at Duke also works on. 2017 12/09/17
American Law and Economics Review Accepted 3 1 2 Very pleasant experience. The editor was quick and helpful. 2014 12/31/16
American Law and Economics Review Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 Worst experience of my life. One referee does not follow simple math, immediately assumes the model is wrong and the editor takes his side. Same referee takes about half an hour to conclude the math is wrong, yet takes 5 months to submit his report. The other referee recommended revision. 2014 04/23/15
American Law and Economics Review Ref Reject 10 N/A 2 A very long time. But two useful reports 2019 07/02/20
American Law and Economics Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Horrible experience. The editor said the paper was too similar to another paper, which was not published and cannot be found online. Will never submit here. 2015 10/31/15
American Political Science Review Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 2005 08/02/13
American Political Science Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Rejected for not have a theoretical contribution. 2017 11/19/17
Annales d'Economie et de Statistique Accepted 0 N/A 2 2006 08/03/13
Annales d'Economie et de Statistique Accepted 4 3 2 Excellent reports 2012 09/24/13
Annales d'Economie et de Statistique Accepted 6 1 2 2006 08/03/13
Annals of Finance Accepted 3 3 1 Smooth process. 2017 11/07/17
Annals of Finance Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 one good, one bad 2012 01/14/13
Annals of Finance Ref Reject 2 2 2 Rejected but with excellent reports. The journal is higher than B 2015 08/01/17
Annals of Finance Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 rejected for small contribution 2016 08/01/17
Annals of Regional Science Pending 0 N/A 0 Hard to believe. Inquired about my submission after 7 months, got answer that revision time "totally depends on the reviewers". Withdrew paper after one year without signs of life. Was contacted again after another two years promising that my paper was to be considered, and say yes please do. Lastly withdrew for good after another six months. all in all four years without ever seeing a referee report. 2014 08/20/18
Annals of Regional Science Accepted 6 1 2 2016 02/01/17
Annals of Regional Science Accepted 5 5 2 Excellent referee reports (equivalent to JUE) and great editor (J.E. Kohlhase) 2013 01/06/16
Annals of Regional Science Accepted 4 3 2 2016 01/26/18
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy Accepted 5 1 2 2013 10/09/13
Applied Economics Pending 10 N/A 0 After 10 months, my manuscript was still listed as "awaiting referee assignment", and no one at the journal would respond to my e-mails about the paper, so I withdrew it. Complete waste of 10 months and $200. Journal is basically a scam now. 2013 07/15/14
Applied Economics Pending 12 N/A 1 R&R after almost one year...too slow...poor report...but with a good result... 2017 04/03/18
Applied Economics Accepted 7 1 2 The editor Mark Taylor accepted the paper after one day of the last re-submission. Very fast experience at last 2015 10/06/16
Applied Economics Accepted 5 N/A 1 Decent referee report, acceptance 3 days after submitting revision 2019 02/11/20
Applied Economics Accepted 2 1 1 My first submission in AE and it is the best experience ever. Editor Prof. David Peel is a very nice guy. 2018 08/25/18
Applied Economics Accepted 6 1 2 Excellent Experience. The referee reports were good. 2016 04/06/17
Applied Economics Accepted 4 1 2 2014 10/16/14
Applied Economics Accepted 12 1 1 The revision was accepted one week after resubmission. Good. But first response took a whole year. 2017 04/18/18
Applied Economics Accepted 4 2 1 Great experience. A good referee report and very efficient editor. 2013 07/16/14
Applied Economics Accepted 4 3 2 good experience 2018 10/16/19
Applied Economics Accepted 3 1 1 Fairly quick acceptance. happy with outcome. 2019 07/13/19
Applied Economics Accepted 3 1 1 Very different than my past experience. Applied Economics was usually getting back to me in 6 months or even more, this time I had great experience. Very efficient and fast. 2017 02/07/18
Applied Economics Accepted 2 1 1 2 months to R&R, revisions accepted by editor about a week after re-submission. Good experience 2017 02/19/18
Applied Economics Accepted 8 1 2 Revision accepted by editor within two days after re-submission. Good experience 2017 04/29/18
Applied Economics Accepted 0 N/A 0 10 days, very efficient, nice editor 2013 04/22/13
Applied Economics Accepted 4 2 2 2014 06/04/15
Applied Economics Accepted 11 1 1 Very long time to receive the first decision (major revision). Only one referee report in 11 months? Comments were quite simple, I resubmitted after one month, and the editor accepted the paper after 40 days. 2017 09/12/18
Applied Economics Accepted 2 1 1 Fast. 2020 09/26/20
Applied Economics Accepted 2 1 1 Received first reply after 7 weeks. One synthetic but straight to the point referee report, asking for very specific and reasonable corrections to the paper. I did what was asked, and the revised paper was accepted by the editor after one week. Incredibly fast review process, on this occasion. 2019 02/11/20
Applied Economics Accepted 4 N/A 2 Excellent referee report with excellent suggestions. Fast response and quality report made me satisfied. Wasn't my target journal but I'll take the pub in a recognizable outlet. 2011 08/02/13
Applied Economics Accepted 4 1 2 Accepted 3 days after resub even though the initial decision was RR with 'major revisions' 2016 07/05/16
Applied Economics Accepted 6 3 1 It took too long, I do not know if I would submit there again. 2018 04/14/19
Applied Economics Accepted 2 2 2 Very efficient, good reports. One referee read the paper line by line and gave constructive comments. The other referee was also good and liked the paper. 2014 09/30/14
Applied Economics Accepted 5 2 1 A bit slow, but good comments by the referee. The paper was accepted quickly after revision. Overall, good experience. 2013 12/18/14
Applied Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Rubbish and incorrect comments by one reviewer. The reviewer didn't even bother to read after page 8. 2017 10/08/17
Applied Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Meaningless reviews. We resubmitted to AEPP and the paper received minor revisions after the second R&R 2016 08/18/17
Applied Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 Our paper is rejected after receiving one referee report. The report is rubbish and incorrect. I will never submit these bullshits to the editor who trusts me. It's time for the journal to kick out some unprofessional referees. 2018 06/15/19
Applied Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 After more than 3 months of waiting, the paper was rejected with a one-sentence referee report. A waste of 250$ and time. 2020 10/26/20
Applied Economics Ref Reject 15 N/A 2 After waiting for 1 year and 3 months, I received 2 reports. One is a R&R type, and the other referee said that he was not interested in the topic, nothing about the details of the paper. Will never submit to Applied Economics any more.. 2010 07/15/14
Applied Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2014 05/27/14
Applied Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 unqualified referee, unhelpful comments 2021 03/15/21
Applied Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Nothing more frustrating than paying to submit a paper that was desk rejected after 2 months with no reason given for rejection... 2014 12/18/14
Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in a week. 2012 02/01/13
Applied Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 "I find the overall contribution too small to justify publication in AEJ" 2014 11/18/14
Applied Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 "I find the overall contribution too small to justify publication in AEJ" 2014 11/18/14
Applied Economics Desk Reject 6 N/A 0 No feedback from handling editor, No refund. 2019 06/22/20
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 2 N/A 0 2015 09/28/15
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 very fast! 2017 10/20/17
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 2 N/A 2 My first ever publication. Got response approx. 2 months after first submission of manuscript. Decision by editor (Mark Taylor): minor revision and resubmit. Revision took about 1 week, one of the reviewers requested additional data/info about the methods used. Received acceptance on the same day i resubmitted the paper. Very smooth process in general, no complaints. 2021 08/06/21
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 3 1 1 2016 01/24/17
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 1 N/A 0 Smooth process. 2016 12/02/16
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 8 1 1 2017 07/03/18
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 2 N/A 0 Pleasant first publication experience. Lots of minor standardized formating requests, then a gap of 10 weeks to get accepted. 6 months after that paper online. 2018 12/04/18
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 3 1 1 2016 01/24/17
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 0 N/A 0 Got accepted after a week. Great experience. 2016 12/07/16
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 4 N/A 0 Accepted, no referee reports. Desk accept? 2016 06/02/16
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 0 N/A 0 Got accepted after a week. Great experience. 2016 12/07/16
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 6 1 1 6 months to first response, then a two sentence ref report, one sentence of which was clarified extremely quickly and one that entailed a ton of extra work. Good points, though, and overall a good experience. Much better than regular EL. 2014 05/14/15
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 4 N/A 0 Accepted without need for further revisions. 2016 11/29/17
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 2 N/A 0 No referee reports, just got notified I was accepted. Very smooth process. 2015 10/07/15
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Unbelievably fast and helpful. Much better than plain vanilla Economics Letters. Editor was respectful and not full of himself. 2014 01/16/15
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 0 N/A 0 Accepted after two weeks 2010 07/26/13
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 3 N/A 1 Single ref report had three very minor questions. I sent off the revision less than 24 hours after the R&R. Paper was accepted two days later. Easiest publication of my life! 3 months was a little long to wait, though. 2018 05/04/18
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 9 N/A 0 Very different experience from the first time. Took 9 months for acceptance. 2017 03/28/18
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 8 N/A 0 Accepted as it is. Too long waiting time. 2016 06/20/17
Applied Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 Relatively high submission fee. Good helpful report asking for few corrections. Revision accepted three hours after submission. 2015 02/09/16
Applied Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 The referee report was more appropriate for R&R. The (anonymous) editor rejected the paper without reading it. Bad experience. 2017 04/09/18
Applied Economics Letters Ref Reject 3 N/A 0 Not clear if I waited 3 months for a desk a reject or a referee reject.... The lack of referee reports makes me think it is the latter. Which....a 3 month wait on with an expense submission fee for desk reject. 2015 10/28/15
Applied Economics Letters Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 3 months for one nonsense report 2018 12/28/18
Applied Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 Rejection without arguments/referee report. I expected something more serious from a journal with such a high submission fee. 2021 06/09/21
Applied Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 One line "referee report". Argued lack of fit, dispite publishing a paper on the subject a few months ago 2017 11/07/17
Applied Economics Letters Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 meaningless 2016 03/23/17
Applied Economics Letters Ref Reject 7 N/A 1 one very short useless report in seven months 2018 12/27/18
Applied Economics Letters Ref Reject 5 N/A 0 5 months + 125USD for a referee rejection with a report of about 21 lines....SHAME 2017 12/27/17
Applied Economics Letters Ref Reject 0 N/A 1 Paper rejected based on the editor's phone conversation with the referee. 2013 07/31/13
Applied Economics Letters Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Referee comments show that it could be an RR but the editor rejected. Based on the large volume of submissions we receive... bla bla 2019 06/26/19
Applied Economics Letters Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Unfathomably long time to first decision, referee comments impleid the paper was not read diligently, despite being just 4-5 pages. Reviewer comments not helpful and very difficult to understand 2019 06/16/19
Applied Economics Letters Desk Reject 6 N/A 0 Desk rejected after more than 6 months without any review or comments. Massive waste of time and money. 2019 06/30/20
Applied Economics Letters Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Actually submitted in 2017 (wiki not updated yet). 6 weeks for a desk reject w/o any explanation. 2016 05/08/17
Applied Economics Quarterly Accepted 4 6 2 2011 03/07/18
Applied Financial Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 Still waiting 2012 05/09/13
Applied Financial Economics Accepted 7 N/A 0 Acceted as is; not a single change requested. 2013 09/25/14
Applied Financial Economics Accepted 7 1 1 After major r&r, accepted in 2 days 2013 11/11/13
Applied Financial Economics Accepted 8 1 1 After r&r, accepted in 2 days 2012 10/16/13
Applied Financial Economics Accepted 7 1 2 It took me 7 months to recieve a major revision required; however, my second revision is accepted in just 2 weeks!! Very efficient indeed!!!!!!! 2012 09/17/13
Applied Financial Economics Ref Reject 8 N/A 1 half a page report. super slow for what they give. 2018 03/18/18
Asian-Pacific Economic Literature Pending 0 N/A 0 1 2020 10/15/21
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics Accepted 0 N/A 0 1 2021 10/15/21
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Pending 2 N/A 2 Pretty fast, 1 high quailty report. Working on my R&R now. 2017 05/26/17
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Accepted 2 2 1 Very fast decisions. Two rounds of review. 2019 07/06/20
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Accepted 6 2 1 Very efficiently run journal (at least my experience). Referee report was reasonable and improved the paper. 2018 11/05/18
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Accepted 10 2 1 Took a while, but great experience overall. Ref report definitely helpful 2018 12/22/19
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Accepted 2 2 1 RR with major changes, then RR with minor changes, then accepted after 1 week. Referee report good, though annoying as "#$"# on one point. Didn't let it go, Editor told him to "#"# off and published the paper anyway. Helpful comments from the editor (besides the usual thy shall cite my papers). Good experience. 2013 07/17/14
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Accepted 5 3 3 2011 01/11/17
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Accepted 1 2 1 very fast response and useful comments from a referee 2014 11/06/17
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Accepted 4 2 2 Good experience 2016 12/09/16
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Accepted 2 2 2 Good experience. 2 constructive reports that improve the paper after 2 months. May have a good chance at a higher ranked outlet but if considered speed and diversification then it was a good and correct decision to submit here. 2018 06/06/19
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Unfortunately paper was assigned to handling editor who was on study leave. When we chased, we received detailed referee reports and R&R quickly, but were given just 2 weeks to make massive changes to the paper - we withdrew and used comments to publish elsewhere 2017 06/16/19
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 Empty report. Do not send a paper to BE JM 2019 10/28/19
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 Very bad experience. 5 months for one low-quality referee report 2018 05/29/19
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 After waiting for 6 months, I sent a polite email to the editor asking if the paper fell through the cracks. Got a rejection within a couple of days. The rejection came with a useless referee report. 2014 04/03/15
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 superfast with 2 reports. 2020 07/30/20
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 I regret to inform you that we do not consider this work to be of sufficient interest to our readership to warrant publication. Could've desk-rejected instead of two useless referee reports. 2017 04/11/18
B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics Ref Reject 9 N/A 1 extremely slow. useless report from "expert" regurgitating my explicitly stated caveats 2016 05/30/17
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Pending 3 N/A 2 Good reports 2015 02/05/16
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Pending 3 N/A 2 Good reports 2015 02/05/16
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Pending 2 N/A 0 2019 04/26/19
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Accepted 1 2 1 Very efficient process. Received 1st response within a month with a very helpful referee report. After that Editor took 2 months to answer positively to my R&R. Overall, it was a smooth process. 2016 02/21/17
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Accepted 3 1 2 2016 09/09/16
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Accepted 2 4 2 Very high quality referee reports and suggestions for improvement the manuscript 2019 06/16/20
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Accepted 6 1 1 The first response took more than I expected, but the referee's comment was very constructive. 2018 02/06/19
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Accepted 3 3 1 Reasonably good experience; referee not overly experienced with topic. Editor handled the paper well. 2019 02/16/20
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Accepted 4 2 2 2015 07/15/16
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Accepted 3 3 1 Great experience overall, Editor decided not to wait for the late referee not to slow down the process. 2020 12/02/20
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Accepted 3 1 2 2 straightforward reports with fair criticism. Accepted after revision within 1 month. Very clear and good process. 2015 08/31/15
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 After 4 months it remained Under review and these comments I get from the Reviewer: "You have a good idea. However, it would probably help to read some of Joanna Lahey's work to get a sense of the state-of-art methods with these audit studies." Funny thing is Editor endorsed reviewer's response. 2017 03/12/18
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 One referee report was very good; the second was also modestly helpful. 2012 04/07/13
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Though it is rejcted, I want to express my thankness to the refreee, who provdes a exremly high quality report 2017 12/22/17
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 Only one report. From the comments it could have been an R&R, at least the referee and editor comments were helpful and will help to improve the paper 2020 06/02/20
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Contrary to my earlier belief, this journal does not give you a quick outcome. Or rather, the editor is very lazy to follow up on the reports. One report was very positive, but the second one looked like it was written in ten minutes citing four papers of his own. Really unprofessional. 2016 08/18/16
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Ref Reject 1 N/A 0 Ref rejected in 3 weeks. Fair report but not anything that couldn't be corrected in R&R. Rejection came on Easter morning. 2015 04/06/15
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 2011 01/11/13
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Useless referee report and incompetent editor wasted whole three months of waiting. Look elsewhere if you want to have a decent submission experience. 2015 06/09/16
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 I want to express my thankness to a refreee, who provded an exremly high quality report 2017 12/23/17
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 Bad process. Four months for one sloppy report full of referee noise. Nothing substantial to improve the paper. Avoid this shitty journal. 2016 11/06/16
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in one day. They kept the application fee. 2012 12/21/12
B.E. Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in two weeks after submitting a paper. 2021 09/14/21
BE Journal of Theoretical Economics Accepted 2 2 2 One (very) useful report and one useless, 5 months from submission to acceptance 2011 01/01/13
BE Journal of Theoretical Economics Accepted 7 6 3 Referees asked for reasonable stuff. Made some changes, argued against other changes, got accepted. 2014 10/15/15
BE Journal of Theoretical Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Bad reports! Nothing constructive. 2015 09/22/15
British Journal of Industrial Relations Accepted 5 4 2 Quite poor reviews (not helpful) so Editor gave lots of helpful guidance. Think I got lucky. 2014 05/03/16
British Journal of Industrial Relations Accepted 5 2 2 2015 12/10/15
British Journal of Industrial Relations Accepted 3 3 2 Overall efficient and fair but demanding process. Tough reports that required a lot of work but ultimately improved the paper significantly. 2018 11/10/18
British Journal of Industrial Relations Accepted 13 3 1 Editor had serious problems in getting referee reports although on this topic there should have been at least 20 potential referees 2009 01/07/13
British Journal of Industrial Relations Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected, one sentence given. It appears they don't like overly technical papers (it's an interdisciplinary journal so depends on who the editor is at the time - if not an economist, then avoid) 2015 05/03/16
Bulletin of Economic Research Pending 10 N/A 0 It's been 10 months and still waiting for a first response of a short paper 2017 10/04/17
Bulletin of Economic Research Pending 16 N/A 0 I haven't received the first response yet. Nothing to add... 2013 03/21/15
Bulletin of Economic Research Pending 0 N/A 0 Had to withdraw after ten months of waiting. Terribly run journal and I wouldn't advise anyone to submit there. 2017 10/20/17
Bulletin of Economic Research Accepted 15 9 2 2016 04/26/18
Bulletin of Economic Research Accepted 8 2 2 Francis Breedon is an efficient editor. The paper was accepted after one round of submission. 2014 10/06/16
Bulletin of Economic Research Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2013 03/19/14
Bulletin of Economic Research Ref Reject 13 N/A 2 Mediocre reports. Absurd long process 2014 08/05/15
Bulletin of Economic Research Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 A bit long for a short paper, comments were fair and detailed although they pointed the way to an R&R rather than rejection. Good quality reports for a low-ranked journal, though. 2016 08/25/16
Bulletin of Economic Research Ref Reject 8 N/A 2 Bad experience waiting for and ultimately receiving two relatively useless reviews for a comment/note (paper < 10 pages including title/abstract page, references, and tables). 2014 05/28/15
Bulletin of Economic Research Desk Reject 13 N/A 0 That's right. It too me the editor 13 months to desk reject. In the meantime they lied to me saying that it was out for review and that they were awaiting referee scores. The journal is a joke! 2014 02/08/16
Bulletin of Economic Research Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 For a short paper, it took quite a longtime for deskreject without a single sentence relating to the paper. 2016 10/25/16
Cambridge Journal of Economics Accepted 7 3 1 My paper was a comment, so I consider this pretty slow. Comments were not really helpful. 2018 11/25/19
Cambridge Journal of Economics Accepted 5 5 1 Professional co-editor and referee. Would try again in the future. 2016 05/04/18
Cambridge Journal of Economics Accepted 5 5 1 Professional co-editor and referee. Would try again in the future. 2016 05/04/18
Cambridge Journal of Economics Accepted 6 5 3 Very tough journal with very extensive comments from 3 refs. Went from reject/resubmit to revise resubmit 1, revise resubmit 2, finally accepted. All queries tough but manageable - only difficulty was having 3 refs say sometimes contradictory things. Otherwise, great experience. Would submit here again. 2016 10/27/17
Cambridge Journal of Economics Accepted 5 5 1 Professional co-editor and referee. Would try again in the future. 2016 05/04/18
Cambridge Journal of Economics Accepted 6 6 2 good reports, great editor who replies promptly to queries 2012 05/18/13
Cambridge Journal of Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 First experience with this journal. One referee gave very constructive comments, but referenced three papers by same person (I'm guess that's who referee was). Second ref put thought into it but was of a heterodox stripe that I'm not. And mentioned class struggle. Never would have won that person over. 2014 04/29/15
Cambridge Journal of Economics Ref Reject 10 N/A 2 Reports were ok but nothing special, especially given the time that has passed... Contacting the editor twice did not result in speeding up the process (but we received at least a reply). 2016 08/09/17
Cambridge Journal of Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Rejected after 2 weeks. Said the paper was to mathematical/econometrical for the journal. The paper was triying to test unit roots on capacity utilisation for a cross-section of countries to test some macro models; so it did stuff that even a Master's can understand. 2019 12/10/19
Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics Accepted 6 5 2 2014 02/12/16
Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics Desk Reject 1 1 0 My paper was much of empirical. The editor emailed me after 6 days and said he read and liked the paper. And some more nice words. However, he said they cannot consider the paper for publication because it is not about Canada. And because he could not find theoretical contributions. Overall, not bad experience. 2017 08/03/17
Canadian Journal of Economics Accepted 5 3 2 Very good experience, competent referees and quick feedback after the resubmission. 2017 08/20/18
Canadian Journal of Economics Accepted 6 6 2 Very helpful an detailed comments. 2016 01/29/19
Canadian Journal of Economics Accepted 5 3 2 Constructive comments and Nice experimence! 2017 10/20/18
Canadian Journal of Economics Accepted 4 4 3 Very good experience. Strongly recommend submitting there. 2017 05/14/18
Canadian Journal of Economics Accepted 5 5 1 Would submit again. CJE is recovering. 2016 05/04/18
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 I urged the editor to give me reports 3 months after the initial submission. Decent reports, no complain. 2015 02/09/16
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Poor reports 2013 08/06/15
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2012 12/20/12
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 4 2 2 Rejection after R&R. One nice and one not nice referee. 2020 09/24/21
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 One referee provided lots of helpful comments and even some ideas for future research. They also indicated that the paper was better suited to a a different journal. The other report was useless. 2014 04/20/15
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 One referee gave lots of great comments, while the other referee was pretty much useless. 2014 12/12/14
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 One negative report only after 5 months, but editor tried to get a second one within a couple of weeks. Finally rejected because contribution is too specific. Disappointing outcome, but OK overall experience 2016 06/02/17
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Very good referee reports. 2014 05/07/15
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 2018 02/05/19
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 2011 01/19/13
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2015 10/05/16
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Bad report, condescending. Referee cites one crucial assumption to kill the paper, but the paper does not make that assumption, and clearly explains it. Editor does not even both to check referee letter. 2018 04/06/19
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Two fair reports. 2014 01/24/15
Canadian Journal of Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 The editor and referee claimed the results were nice but hardly adoptable to other more general problems.... they suggested a more spezialized on topic journal. all in all, a costly but friendly and competent experience 2016 03/11/17
Canadian Journal of Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject with what appeared to be constructive comments but on closer inspection were worthless (points already made in the paper). Kicker: next day got an email to renew my CEA membership to be able to keep submitting to CJE! 2018 10/26/18
Canadian Public Policy Accepted 2 N/A 3 2015 07/03/15
Canadian Public Policy Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2012 12/20/12
China Economic Review Pending 2 1 2 2014 08/22/14
China Economic Review Pending 2 N/A 1 very quick 2014 02/20/14
China Economic Review Pending 1 N/A 2 Very quick. R&R. Two reports are ok. 2016 10/20/16
China Economic Review Accepted 2 1 1 2014 04/21/14
China Economic Review Accepted 1 1 3 get first response in 28 days. Good report. Amazing efficiency. 2016 06/10/16
China Economic Review Accepted 6 3 2 2015 03/23/17
China Economic Review Accepted 6 1 2 2019 12/22/19
China Economic Review Accepted 4 2 2 Good reports. Quick responds. Awesome experience. 2014 10/23/14
China Economic Review Accepted 6 1 2 2019 12/22/19
China Economic Review Accepted 2 1 1 very efficient process 2014 06/04/15
China Economic Review Accepted 2 1 2 2014 09/11/14
China Economic Review Accepted 5 3 2 Very efficient process. One report was very constructive and helped improve the qualitiy of the paper. Editor was also very helpful. 2019 11/27/19
China Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Rejected as "Given the poor quality of provincial GDP statistics, CER has decided not to publish papers based on provincial GDP data for now until the true data series at the provincial level are reconstructed" but they are still publishing with this data see for instance Lv, Liu, and Li 2020 Fiscal incentives, competition, and investment in China 2019 03/04/20
China Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2012 12/27/12
China Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2012 12/25/12
China Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2012 12/20/12
Computational Economics Accepted 6 1 1 2009 01/04/13
Computational Economics Accepted 12 2 2 Fair and helpful reviews. 2012 09/16/14
Computational Economics Accepted 1 1 1 possible that the editor reviewed it himself, but was a fairly straightforward accept, trivial revisions only. smooth in general. 2015 07/14/15
Computational Economics Accepted 1 1 1 possible that the editor reviewed it himself, but was a fairly straightforward accept, trivial revisions only. smooth in general. 2015 07/14/15
Computational Economics Accepted 5 1 1 Very high quality referee report. Reasonable requestsfor the R&R. Quickly accepted after the revisions were completed. Very pleasant experience. 2014 02/22/18
Computational Economics Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 Took 3 month for a simple "out of scope" notification!! 2015 06/10/15
Computational Statistics and Data Analysis Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Report from Reviewer 1 is not given. Receive reports from Reviewer 2 and Reviewer 3. Most horrible and bizarre referee reports. Ex: CDF was derived to construct the likelihood of a discrete choice model, a reviewer writes the author does not use the derived CDF. Will never submit to this journal again. Stay away! 2017 09/22/17
Contemporary Accounting Research Ref Reject 2 2 2 Very mixed report quality. One felt like it was literally written 30 minutes before the deadline. The referee acted as if I didn't cite and discuss papers mentioned in the report. The other was much more careful. The referee checked my citations and offered helpful comments. 2015 01/12/16
Contemporary Economic Policy Pending 7 4 3 Weak editor. One good referee, one ok, one terrible. Terrible referee did not understand LATE and simply could not be satisfied. Took 3 rounds for editor to realize terrible referee was a crackpot. Will not submit again. 2016 07/13/18
Contemporary Economic Policy Accepted 3 2 2 Super fast and clear feedback. I really appreciated the clarity the editor provided in helping to navigate the referee reports. In really sped things up. 2016 10/31/17
Contemporary Economic Policy Accepted 2 2 2 Very good clarification and additional comments from Associate Editor 2012 10/11/14
Contemporary Economic Policy Accepted 4 3 1 The reviewer was excellent, made the paper much better with his/her comments. Excellent handling. 2014 03/22/17
Contemporary Economic Policy Accepted 3 3 1 Outstanding referee reports. 2011 01/26/13
Contemporary Economic Policy Ref Reject 6 2 2 Two referee reports, one critical, one encouraging. Then one round of R&R and second referee changed his mind. Still my favorite rejection of all time - used Shakespeare in a footnote, and first referee (whose English was subpar) said that the footnote was "very poorly written." To summarize, this reviewer apparently thought he had better English than Shakespeare. Comical journal. 2012 01/16/15
Contemporary Economic Policy Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 one of the reports was literaly 3 sentences. Although the other referee was positive, editor rejected it 2015 04/07/15
Contemporary Economic Policy Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 First report was helpful, second one was literally 2 lines. Editor didn't pay any attention to the reports. Extremely poor experience 2015 01/15/16
Contemporary Economic Policy Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 Extremely poor experience for a journal charging submission fees. It took 5 months to get 2 rushed reports of one and a half paragraphs that show both econometric inaptitude and selective reading. A grad student could do better! 2016 07/15/16
Contemporary Economic Policy Ref Reject 8 N/A 2 Terrible referees. Empirical results didn't match their political priors so recommended rejection. 2016 07/13/18
Cuadernos de Econom?a Accepted 1 1 1 All good, minor additions were suggested. 2014 06/04/15
Decisions in Economics and Finance Accepted 28 3 1 2006 12/22/12
Decisions in Economics and Finance Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 fast desk rejection within 2 days. Associate editor thinks that DEAF is JFE. I wish them luck. 2016 07/09/16
Defence and Peace Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 Editor sent it to peer review in one day. Fast and very polite response. 2016 07/09/16
Defence and Peace Economics Accepted 3 3 1 Good communication with the editor, very helpful referee report 2012 12/05/13
Defence and Peace Economics Accepted 4 1 2 very good communication with the editor 2015 06/07/15
Demography Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 Two horribly low quality reports. Neither of the two reviewers seemed t have read the paper. Each report was one small paragraph long. Horrible experience, and it is not even that good a journal! 2015 05/06/16
Demography Ref Reject 6 8 3 Perhaps the worst experience ever. Some reviewers disappeared after the first review, the editors could't even find an alternative, and the comments were not assessed critically by the editors due to an editorial change. The former editors at the penn state just issued reject to relieve their editorial jobs. 2018 12/08/19
Demography Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Deputy Editor rejected the paper with insufficient contribution and a comment that doesn't make sense. 2014 07/28/14
Demography Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected within 7 days. Editor wrote a few short comments. 2018 03/19/18
Demography Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 desk rejection because it is not a good fit and i am asked to send it to an economic journal --- while i mainly discussed with a very nice sociologist when writing this paper. 2014 07/07/14
Demography Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Six weeks for a desk reject with no reasons offered 2013 01/14/14
Development and Change Pending 36 12 0 Under editor's evaluation for almost 2 months. withdrew the paper after contacting the journal twice 2018 12/16/18
Development and Change Pending 0 N/A 0 2 months, the article is still under internal review... 2015 03/13/15
Development Policy Review Pending 12 N/A 0 DPR had my manuscript for over a year, and never even got it under review. I inquired a few times, and they responded promptly and politely, but sitting on a manuscript for a year is obviously unacceptable. I withdrew the manuscript and will never submit here again. Awful experience. 2017 05/07/18
Development Studies Accepted 3 3 2 2 reviewers, 1 poor, 1 quite demanding and useful. Two rounds of R&R! 2014 11/18/14
Development Studies Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 7 days no comments 2012 12/21/12
Eastern Economic Journal Accepted 2 1 2 Very helpful comments from reviewers. 2014 07/25/14
Eastern Economic Journal Accepted 4 3 2 good reports. fair and timely process. 2013 06/13/14
Eastern Economic Journal Accepted 0 1 2 Expedient. Excellent comments from reviewers 2013 07/25/14
Eastern Economic Journal Accepted 3 3 2 Helpful referee reports. Good experience, great turnaround. 2013 12/18/13
Eastern European Economics Accepted 3 3 0 The article was accepted by the referees 2007 09/07/14
Eastern European Economics Accepted 2 2 2 Very thorough and professional 2018 11/29/18
Ecological Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 2020 03/02/21
Ecological Economics Accepted 2 1 2 Really good experience, good comments and moved quickly through the process. Would submit again. 2020 03/18/21
Ecological Economics Accepted 2 4 4 2009 01/09/13
Ecological Economics Accepted 4 N/A 1 Useful and encouraging comments from referees, who appeared very interested in improving the paper and offering helpful suggestions to do so. 2016 02/07/17
Ecological Economics Accepted 4 4 3 Detailed and useful referee reports 2010 01/22/13
Ecological Economics Accepted 4 4 3 14 months from submission to publication online. In print a couple of weeks later. 2010 12/21/12
Ecological Economics Accepted 2 1 2 Useful and interesting comments 2016 03/24/17
Ecological Economics Accepted 3 1 2 journal has a reputation for being out of the mainstream of econ. but i think it is an important one that should be considered a bonafide econ journal. it has papers by good authors, like Kenneth Arrow. it has qualitative stuff, which i do not think should be considered non-economic. 2014 11/27/16
Ecological Economics Ref Reject 12 N/A 1 2010 12/20/12
Ecological Economics Ref Reject 5 3 3 Rejected after first re-submission, too demanding referees 2012 04/16/13
Ecological Economics Ref Reject 4 4 2 Very bad reports from non economists. Political interests there, i will not submit to this journal ever again 2013 06/30/14
Ecological Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 Received desk rejection from one of the editors quoting results completely unrelated to my paper. This editor must have not bothered to read my paper or mistook it for another one. I contacted the journal about that but no response. I am very surprised by this unprofessional oversight. Admittedly, they must receive a lot of submissions, but that does not excuse this. 2016 11/19/16
Ecological Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk reject after 1 month. The editor's comments show that he is totally uninformed about the literature. 2020 08/30/21
Ecological Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in 3 days. 2018 04/17/18
Ecological Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject after 2 days 2020 06/13/20
Ecological Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Desk rejected with 1 sentence after 2 months. I have the feeling that the editor did not read the paper!!! 2016 03/01/17
Ecological Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 The editor informed us that the contribution of the paper was not high enough for this journal although the topic has been examined in the past by other papers in this Journal 2016 10/05/16
Econometric Reviews Pending 0 N/A 0 Horrible! Two weeks and they not assigned a manuscript ID number. 2017 09/22/17
Econometric Reviews Accepted 9 8 4 two years is a bit too long, especially given that it will take more than a year before the paper appears in the journal 2013 11/16/15
Econometric Reviews Accepted 4 6 2 One reviewer seemed to think a clean accept, one was 'not really convinced'. Editor gave me chance to convince other referee. 2013 10/28/14
Econometric Reviews Ref Reject 14 N/A 0 Unacceptable waiting time. The referee reports were crap (minor points without really saying anything about the research question, the methodology and the results of the paper). After 10+ years in a research institution, counless submission, countless rejections, and some papers published in highly ranked journal, this was definitely my worst experience ever. 2013 11/06/14
Econometric Reviews Ref Reject 7 N/A 1 Overall experience is horrible. Took 7 months to give 1 referee report with just 5 lines. Will never submit again to ER. Stay away! 2017 04/05/18
Econometric Reviews Ref Reject 4 1 2 2015 08/13/15
Econometric Reviews Ref Reject 10 N/A 2 2 mildly useful reports. one referee pointed to their own working paper which is still not published (jan 2017) 2015 01/14/17
Econometric Theory Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 very good reports 2013 03/18/14
Econometric Theory Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Positive: 1 high quality referee report and some comments by the co-editor; Negative: 2 other referee reports of medium to very low quality 2015 05/29/15
Econometric Theory Ref Reject 12 N/A 1 Reminded several times and after waiting 1 year got one referee report. Summary understated contribution of the paper making it looking boring. Rejection based on technical point, which could be fixed withing 2 weeks. Very poor experience. 2015 06/07/17
Econometric Theory Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fast desk reject. No specfic comment on the paper. 2018 01/28/19
Econometric Theory Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 No arguments were provided 2017 07/17/17
Econometrica Accepted 3 3 4 2017 04/27/18
Econometrica Accepted 4 4 3 2008 11/17/13
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Shockingly low quality reports that were nearly identical. Good for knowing what people didn't like, but not clear how to improve. 2016 09/10/16
Econometrica Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 2012 12/20/12
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Good reports, not extremely helpful, but good 2015 05/26/15
Econometrica Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 reports not very insightful 2012 01/25/13
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Three referee reports. One obviously senior who doesn't care, openly says didn't read some parts. Other two reports are fine, although one other also did not read a section, s/he says. All suggest major revision and change of approach. The senior is useless as s/he was not happy that the paper is against an established theory. 2017 07/13/18
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 0 Great feedback from editor, and semi-useful reviews. 2020 05/31/21
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 4 Detailed and constructive comments that were spot on from the editor. Result not general enough for ECMA. Referees all showed an understanding of the paper and suggestions were useful. 2017 02/27/18
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2012 12/28/12
Econometrica Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 very good referee comments 2013 12/31/14
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 5 2018 07/23/18
Econometrica Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Two referee reports very useful, pointing to the same concerns, one of them quite positive and friendly, providing numerous pathways to pursue in the future. Third report seemed written by a sage speaking in amharic, most statements were elliptical in nature, and we were left wondering what the referee's point had been. On the whole very good experience. 2015 05/03/15
Econometrica Ref Reject 6 N/A 3 2013 11/01/13
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 The rejection was fair but the referee report uninformative and boilerplate. 2017 09/23/18
Econometrica Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 good referee reports 2012 05/03/13
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 no negative comments, just say that the contribution is not big enough for Econometrica, which is completely understandable. 2009 10/04/15
Econometrica Ref Reject 5 N/A 3 3 good ref reports 2015 09/13/15
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Quick, very good feedback. Did not make the cut unfortunately, but will submit there again. No regrets 2018 05/14/18
Econometrica Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 2 referees clearly read the paper and made some good and insightful comments. They like the paper but the contribution not enough for Econometrica. Suggest field journal. Overall good experience. 2020 11/23/20
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 All three referees are weak on maths 2014 02/11/15
Econometrica Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 2017 02/28/18
Econometrica Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Two reports are suggestive but the other one was a low-quality. It seems that the last guy didn't read the paper carefully and I wonder how it could take 4month to write such a poor report. 2017 09/10/17
Econometrica Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Fully ignorant referees 2014 02/11/15
Econometrica Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Two very helpful reports and encouraging letter from AE 2012 03/05/13
Econometrica Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Low-quality reports, waste of time. 2015 03/07/16
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 One was thoughtful report, pointed to at least one direction we can improve. Second was uninformative. 2018 05/13/19
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 2016 12/26/16
Econometrica Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 2018 12/17/18
Econometrica Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 2010 01/11/13
Econometrica Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Some comments from the editor, some are useful. 2019 02/18/19
Econometrica Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fair decision. Useful letter from the editor. 2014 04/30/15
Econometrica Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Paper too good for their journal. Recommend trying better journal. 2015 10/19/15
Econometrica Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2013 02/15/13
Econometrica Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 quick (7 days) desk reject 2017 07/10/17
Econometrica Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 two weeks. desk with a letter from editor. he clearly read the paper. comments were not very insoghtful, but decision & process overall fair. 2018 01/14/19
Econometrica Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 desk reject with very short referee note 2014 12/22/14
Econometrica Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2012 06/03/13
Econometrics Journal Ref Reject 1 1 2 A complete discrage. Pathetic referee reports. Stay away from this journal if you do not have a connection from inside. Just stay away! 2018 07/24/18
Econometrics Journal Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Referees basically thought contribution was too small to merit publishing. 2012 10/28/14
Econometrics Journal Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 The contribution of the paper as it stands to be insu¢ cient for publication in The Econometrics Journal. 2014 05/12/15
Econometrics Journal Desk Reject 0 1 0 Desk rejection in 6 minutes with a "pretended" letter, which could be used for any paper. The editor claimed that himself and another associate editor read the paper. Unbelieveble how fast some journals work!!!!! 2013 06/21/14
Econometrics Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2015 08/13/15
Econometrics Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2014 11/06/14
Economic Development and Cultural Change Pending 6 N/A 0 My paper has been under the status "with editor" after submission for almost one half year, and I have decided to withdraw the paper 2017 08/01/17
Economic Development and Cultural Change Accepted 3 6 2 Journal response was quick. Took about 2.5-3 months for first response which detailed a lot of work - two R & R decisions, each of which took about 2 months for referees to get back on. 2011 12/04/13
Economic Development and Cultural Change Accepted 7 7 1 Had to email them to speed up the revision process. Minor changes, though. Cool editor. 2014 08/16/15
Economic Development and Cultural Change Accepted 3 1 2 2017 09/10/19
Economic Development and Cultural Change Accepted 5 4 2 Excellent experience, the editor was clear on what is required after first round RR. Accepted once I satisfied the referees. Excellent referees too, no nitpicking, focused on contribution. 2018 02/10/19
Economic Development and Cultural Change Accepted 12 12 2 Very long process. Apparently the assigned coeditor left and paper got stuck. But very quick process after contacting editorial office. 2012 07/24/16
Economic Development and Cultural Change Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Low-quality reports. 2014 11/06/14
Economic Development and Cultural Change Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 2016 12/09/17
Economic Development and Cultural Change Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Very good experience. Two referees were lukewarm but couldn't really point out too much that was wrong. Editor (Fafchamps) not just claimed to have an Associate Editor read it, but we got a whole page of useful comments from the AE. 2014 05/03/15
Economic Development and Cultural Change Ref Reject 12 N/A 2 Long wait but not a bad experience overall, referee comments were useful. 2013 03/05/14
Economic Development and Cultural Change Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2018 06/06/18
Economic Development and Cultural Change Ref Reject 8 N/A 1 One report from which you learn nothing 2012 03/07/13
Economic Development and Cultural Change Ref Reject 6 N/A 3 2012 04/16/13
Economic Development and Cultural Change Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 almost useless and the editor is too slow. 2013 05/27/14
Economic Development and Cultural Change Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 desk reject in one week 2021 03/29/21
Economic Development and Cultural Change Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 desk reject in one week 2021 03/29/21
Economic Development and Cultural Change Desk Reject 4 3 2 Two very useful ref reports in the first round. Worked butt off to respond to them. Editor decided to not even send the revised paper back to the referees. What a terrible journal. Nonder they are going down in ranking in Dev Econ steadily 2013 06/01/15
Economic Development and Cultural Change Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk Rejected after 2 days. Editor argued I had observational data and no identification, hence instant rejection. 2020 12/02/20
Economic Development and Cultural Change Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Mentioned that they do not consider theoretical papers. Duh 2013 07/13/13
Economic Development and Cultural Change Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Very helpful response from editor giving specific reasons that the manuscript would not be sent to referees 2019 07/22/19
Economic Development and Cultural Change Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Very polite editor. 2014 03/05/14
Economic History Review Accepted 3 5 3 2014 01/27/16
Economic History Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 1 of 3 referee reports was helpful 2019 04/04/20
Economic History Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Thanks for your joining the Society, by the way, we don't think your historical paper with brand new historical data is right for a history journal. Joke rejection but not unexpected from this team 2021 03/02/21
Economic Inquiry Pending 4 N/A 0 Awaiting Referee Selection for 4 months! Ughhh...I will probably withdraw the submission 2014 11/17/14
Economic Inquiry Pending 4 7 2 2 referee reports: first one, r&r; second one, reject and resubmit. editor read the paper and decided to give it an r&r. 2014 03/11/15
Economic Inquiry Accepted 12 4 2 2011 12/24/12
Economic Inquiry Accepted 14 10 3 It is the worst experience I have ever had with a journal. Outcome was positive in the end, but I had to follow some nonsense instructions from the referees and the editor. I will never submit there again 2014 08/11/16
Economic Inquiry Accepted 3 2 2 The referees responded very quickly and with excellent, high quality reports. Co-Editor has read the paper carefully, offered detailed comments and a lot of help. 2012 07/27/14
Economic Inquiry Accepted 3 1 3 Excellent and constructive reports. Efficient process and fast decision 2019 08/23/20
Economic Inquiry Accepted 4 5 2 2008 12/21/12
Economic Inquiry Accepted 3 3 2 Very useful referee reports. Professional editor. 2012 11/20/14
Economic Inquiry Accepted 2 N/A 2 superfast handling 2013 05/29/14
Economic Inquiry Accepted 2 N/A 2 very efficient 2013 06/19/13
Economic Inquiry Accepted 2 N/A 3 Very quick and extremely professional. Will submit there in the future. 2018 11/20/18
Economic Inquiry Accepted 9 4 3 two good reports and one short report 2015 10/04/16
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2010 01/02/13
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 4 months with the editor before being sent to referees. 3 more months for two reports containing blatant mistakes and outrageous claims that have nothing to do with the paper. I suspect either grad students or people outside of the field. Either way, unacceptable for a journal that charges submission fees. 2014 01/28/15
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Only one semi-informative report. At least they are faster than their reputation. 2015 12/14/15
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Under review, it gets assigned to Co-editor Brennan. No progress in six months although I send emails to push. Main editor Wilson takes care of it. Two month later it is rejected and get two referee reports (fair enough there). Not a good experience. Wilson inform me, on average, EI first decision is in 67 days, but my six months delay is not due to neglect (YEAH RIGHT! FYI: Your editor sucks). 2017 03/16/18
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 12 9 2 still waiting for the outcome of the second round. Worst experience with a journal so far. 2012 11/03/14
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Expensive but quick. One very good report, 6 pages long. Other referee didn't have a clue. 2018 12/08/18
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 10 N/A 1 Rejected with only 1 referee reports and after waiting 10 months! Insane process and utterly inexperienced referee. Editor said he is sorry for the wait... 2015 10/08/15
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 After "awaiting referee selection" for 4 months, I sent a query and got one referee report. It seems that the reviewer didn't correctly understand the setup of the model; But, some very useful comments were provided. I don't know what to add. 2018 03/09/19
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 11 N/A 2 2 very short reports after waiting 11 months and paying a crazy submission fee. Avoid that journal 2015 12/10/15
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Mediocre assessment from referee with some helpful suggestions. Editor agreed = reject. 2013 04/17/14
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Very fast and fair process, despite the negative outcome. 2013 11/06/13
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 13 N/A 3 Very long wait. 1 positive and 1 negative report. Editor sent a peper to a 3rd ref, which took forever to write another negative report. 2010 02/03/13
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 One excellent referee report, and one decent one. Good experience overall 2014 04/23/14
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 16 12 1 Most inefficient handling ever. Shame on Co-Editor. 2008 02/03/13
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 7 N/A 1 After seven month the co-editor rejects the paper based on a report which is terrible. The referee did not understand the basic assumption of the model. Complete waste of time. 2014 05/10/15
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 2014 04/22/14
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 14 N/A 0 took more than 1 year to get one referee report. AVOID it 2016 01/15/18
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Fast Resposne in 10 week. One referee report that likes the research question but does not like thr approach. The main sugguestion is to come up with a theoretical model and erase half of the work done. Editor claims he agrees witht he referee but does not add an argumentation. It would be a positive experience if submission were free. 2014 02/05/15
Economic Inquiry Ref Reject 5 8 2 Worst experience so far. Long wait to hear back, the referees got changed, and then the editor rejected it based on issues that were known from the beginning. Do not submit there. 2013 11/03/14
Economic Inquiry Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 desk rejected after more than 2 months, very generic motivation (try a field journal), they took the submission fees and thanked me a lot for the payment! 2015 03/04/16
Economic Inquiry Desk Reject 4 N/A 0 4 months for a desk rejection based on what it appears to be a very superficial reading of the abstract. Unacceptable for a journal that charges submission fees. 2014 10/28/14
Economic Inquiry Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk Reject in 2 weeks for not general interest enough. Editor recommended field journal submission. 2015 02/13/15
Economic Inquiry Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 The editor handling the paper had no idea about the literature. He made the most stupid argument to reject the paper. Commented that something we are doing is not correct, while all the papers in the field are doing the same. One of the papers has over 3000 citations. The least the editor could have done is to assign another editor. 2014 05/12/14
Economic Inquiry Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 2012 12/27/12
Economic Inquiry Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Topic is too specfic... 2015 11/08/15
Economic Inquiry Desk Reject 1 N/A 2 Desk rejection based on lack of fit, altough there were at least 4 papers published on the same topic in previous years. They keep the submission fees, very efficient cash cow! 2015 11/21/15
Economic Inquiry Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2014 09/17/14
Economic Inquiry Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 desk rejected after thee months. No reason given (just lack of fit..), no suggestions to improve, no money back. Garbage 2018 03/01/19
Economic Inquiry Desk Reject 1 1 0 Unprofessional and incorrect comments by co-editor Rob Simmons. I have no problem receiving a desk-reject, but the stated reasons show no understanding of our research. This would be fine if desk-reject was motivated by "not a good fit" or such. Disappointing experience. 2015 11/18/15
Economic Journal Pending 4 N/A 2 one very good report 2012 01/25/13
Economic Journal Accepted 4 2 2 Very helpful reports 2014 01/11/17
Economic Journal Accepted 4 1 2 Excellent work by den Haan, providing even better feedback than two (good) referees. 2012 07/31/14
Economic Journal Accepted 4 1 3 2012 08/02/13
Economic Journal Accepted 5 2 2 All reports were useful and very demanding 2011 03/19/13
Economic Journal Accepted 2 2 3 Helpful and competent editor who made clear what were the important points to address. Good reports. Fast turnaround, I'm very happy with the experience. 2016 08/30/17
Economic Journal Accepted 5 3 2 2014 10/04/15
Economic Journal Accepted 3 3 2 Quick process, very solid reports and editor comments. 2013 06/18/14
Economic Journal Accepted 4 5 2 good reports; excellent editor who acts like an additional referee. 2012 11/09/13
Economic Journal Accepted 5 1 2 2011 12/21/12
Economic Journal Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Useless reports! 2016 08/21/16
Economic Journal Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Took 5 months in total, 2 reports, a paragraph each. 2017 10/02/17
Economic Journal Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 One report was helpful; the other not. 2016 12/31/16
Economic Journal Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Both negative, one fair, other illustrated misunderstanding of econometrics 2017 08/13/18
Economic Journal Ref Reject 3 N/A 4 2013 01/29/14
Economic Journal Ref Reject 4 9 3 Terrible experience - slow and unjustified decision. Cantillon is not a good editor. 2018 10/28/20
Economic Journal Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 3 Reports. 1 great, 1 so so, 1 absolutely trash (the referee only argued on the reliability of the benchmark case, which is a well established result in the literature!!!). High Quality Editing. Will submit again. 2016 05/25/17
Economic Journal Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 The editor had good words about the paper but one ref didn't like it, so he rejected it. Would try again. 2015 12/21/16
Economic Journal Ref Reject 3 N/A 4 Painfully crushing rejection, as all referees agreed it was a good paper, but had some valid concerns about length and possible general interest contribution. Good reports, but what a punch in the gut. Might have been better if they said they hate the paper. 2021 05/28/21
Economic Journal Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 Super quick process. Editor (Voth) was polite but did not say much. One report very solid and useful, another (two-paragraph one) looks confusing. 2017 03/15/18
Economic Journal Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 very useful referee reports 2012 08/02/13
Economic Journal Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Bad experience. One decent and one sloppy report 2019 06/19/20
Economic Journal Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2013 06/14/13
Economic Journal Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 2017 12/09/17
Economic Journal Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 1 good report, 1 bad one, decent turnaround time 2015 06/30/15
Economic Journal Ref Reject 4 12 3 Bad experience 2017 02/14/19
Economic Journal Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 3 useful reports 2016 08/02/17
Economic Journal Ref Reject 3 3 2 Referees did not seem to like the paper based on the subject. Referees did not show good knowledge of the subject. Paper was poorly read by the referees. 2014 10/13/14
Economic Journal Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 One referee liked it, the other and the editor didn't. Some good comments though. 2015 10/13/15
Economic Journal Ref Reject 5 10 2 only one report on first submission, 4 months for second round. Referee 1 happy with resubmission (no further comments), referee 2 suggested rejection or major rewriting. Paper rejected by editor. Long reports with some good comments 2015 09/26/17
Economic Journal Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 Great letter from Nezih G and two good referee reports. Rejected as contribution isn't good enough 2019 04/07/20
Economic Journal Ref Reject 8 N/A 3 2013 02/12/14
Economic Journal Ref Reject 1 N/A 0 A fairly high quality report, useful, within 24 days. Will submit again (other work, of course) on the basis of professionalism and treatment. High quality editing. 2013 07/17/14
Economic Journal Ref Reject 8 N/A 3 Took way to long for three one page poor quality reports 2017 01/22/18
Economic Journal Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Two referees, two weak R&Rs, editor rejects despite the recommendations of referees. Quite upsetting. If editor did not like the paper, then just desk reject! 2015 02/04/16
Economic Journal Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 one so-so report and one excellent report 2013 01/23/14
Economic Journal Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Useful and fair comments 2018 06/16/19
Economic Journal Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 2017 09/10/19
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Kind and informed letter from editor. Not good enough for general interest. Suggested top field (JPubE in our case). 2016 03/09/17
Economic Journal Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Bad experience overall. I needed to contact the editorial office to know who the editor was, if the paper was sent to referess and etcc, and this after more than a month that the paper was submitted. Notice that I submitted there on the basis of the widely publicized (EEA Gothenburg) fastness of this journal. In any case, after having contacted the editorial office the staff there were really nice and helpful and contacted the editor on my behalf. At the time the editor had still the paper sitting on his desk. After two weeks we got a desk rejection with a very impersonal letter which made us think that the editor did not even read the intro. Overall I think this journal should get a more diverse editorial board. Some people are simply too narrow in the scope of their research to be editors of a journal which claims to be of "general interest" 2014 08/17/14
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 One week desk rejection with form letter. $65 down the drain! 2016 09/20/16
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 week: nice, but no fit with general interest. Suggested field journal. 2016 10/10/16
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in 25 minutes. No helpful comments, just said it was not fit for a general interest journal. 2021 02/04/21
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fast desk reject (Ciccone), after few days. Was nice, encouraging, and motivated his decision to reject. 2012 02/18/13
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Quick, professional, very acceptable decision. 2013 08/12/13
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Useless submission, with a reg-monkey editor desk rejecting the paper. 2020 05/31/21
Economic Journal Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Took a little over a month for the desk reject and no refunds. 2015 06/17/15
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Just a couple of days for rejection, he had good words to say but paper too specific for general-interest. Some decent comments nevertheless. 2016 05/06/17
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Rejected within one week, but useful comments and advice given by editor, Uhlig 2015 06/16/19
Economic Journal Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Quick desk rejection; field journals recommende 2018 09/30/18
Economic Journal Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 2018 05/14/18
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject - referred to field journal 2014 12/08/14
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Very quick response; desk rejection and recommendation to submit to field journal 2016 12/20/16
Economic Journal Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2 Weeks. Did not receive a rejection letter from the co-editor. Checked status online after a month to see the outcome. 2018 12/13/18
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2014 10/04/15
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fast desk reject (~2 weeks) with a couple of brief, helpful comments from the editor 2020 02/26/20
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fairly standard rejection letter, not general enough. Quick -- 3 days after editor was assigned. 2018 11/30/18
Economic Journal Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2016 06/08/16
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in 1 week. Not general interest enough, 2017 10/16/17
Economic Journal Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2011 12/31/12
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in two weeks. Not enough novelty 2018 10/01/19
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 "Paper not of general interest, try sending to a field journal". Polite / nice email from Editor. I appreciate the quick desk reject. 2019 12/18/19
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Submitted reports from a previous (close) referee rejection at a higher ranked journal. Still got rejected. Annoying! 2018 10/09/18
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Rejection after 3 days. The contribution of the paper is not suficient for the EJ. The Editor sugested the JIE. 2016 06/30/16
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fast and kind desk rejection. And, hey, we cannot select 2017... 2016 05/09/17
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 justified decison with kind and informed letter from the editor 2015 04/30/15
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Quick and friendly desk reject 2019 09/03/19
Economic Journal Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 3 week desk reject. Referred to field, seems editor at least scanned and maybe even read the whole thing. Sad result, but not unfair appraisal. 2015 03/09/15
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Dest rejected in 2 days. Saying that the topic is not general enough. Which is BS because paper on the same topic was published a couple of months earlier in EJ. But written by big shots. 2020 05/05/21
Economic Journal Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2012 12/20/12
Economic Journal Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Dest rejected in three days. "In order to speed up and improve the submission process for both authors and referees, we have raised the number of papers that we reject without seeking reports." 2015 03/26/15
Economic Modelling Pending 23 12 1 submitted 4 years ago, got a response after nearly 2, resubmitted, now waiting more than a year for a result, editor not responsive to queries about the status, look elsewhere before soubmitting in the Economic Modelling, terrible experience, I am thinking about withdrawing 2011 10/09/15
Economic Modelling Pending 24 N/A 0 short straightforward paper, should take max 2 hours to read carefully,still under review, editor (Hall) non-responsive 2012 06/02/14
Economic Modelling Pending 0 N/A 0 waiting 30 months for response, editor not responding to inquiries 2012 08/08/14
Economic Modelling Pending 36 N/A 0 Withdrew article from consideration after 18 months of wait. 2013 02/09/15
Economic Modelling Pending 2 N/A 2 Reports are not very detailed, but generally comments are fair. 2020 04/26/20
Economic Modelling Pending 2 2 2 Long and bad reviewing process. Bad experience, waste of money and time. After 2 rounds the reviewers were OK. Then, the editor asked two times to change the abstract and the highlights. After that, he asked to completely rewrite paper, with another model, made some comments regarding the relevance of the case study, the method used (time series), the theoretical background,... If the editor tought the paper did not fit the scope of the journal, he should have rejected it at the very beginning of the process, without engaging in a peer-review. 2019 07/01/20
Economic Modelling Pending 0 N/A 0 waiting 19 months as of today, sent 3 reminfers, Hall nor anybody else from the journal havent responded so far to any of my emails 2013 08/12/14
Economic Modelling Pending 36 12 1 2011 04/23/14
Economic Modelling Pending 2 2 2 Afwul experience. There were 2 rounds of revision after which the reviewers validated the manuscript. At this point, the editor asked us to review the abstract and the highlights. And once that was done, he wanted us to rewrite the article. He didn't want the article but didn't have the courage to tell us. In short, he left us only one option: not to resubmit. Poorly managed editorial process. Besides, the editor's messages were rude. 2019 07/01/20
Economic Modelling Accepted 8 6 4 4 rounds, 23 months! 2014 02/22/18
Economic Modelling Accepted 2 3 2 Very quick process. Prof. Sushanta Mallick handles the paper. Two referee reports, one good and constructive and the other so-so. Overall, great experience. 2016 03/28/17
Economic Modelling Accepted 5 3 1 Everything fair. 2012 04/20/13
Economic Modelling Accepted 2 2 3 Extremely fast. Great experience. 2015 01/18/17
Economic Modelling Accepted 1 2 3 Very efficient. I will try in the future. 2018 10/24/19
Economic Modelling Accepted 3 3 2 The process was fair, with good pace. Probably I was a bit lucky the 2 referees liked the idea of teh paper sicne ti was a bit sort and basically asked me to do some mreo stuff. However, the editor (Mallick) kindly suggested to add papers from this journal ("As there is not citation from this journal when the journal has published several papers on this topic"). That is not cool. I dont care whether you want to increase citations and impact factor fo your journal. You have to earn it! 2017 12/21/17
Economic Modelling Accepted 1 2 3 Very efficient. I will try in the future. 2018 10/24/19
Economic Modelling Accepted 3 2 2 2012 01/11/13
Economic Modelling Accepted 2 1 2 Fast and fair. Good experience. 2017 06/28/17
Economic Modelling Accepted 3 2 2 Accepted after 3 R&R. Two referees. One reviewer was ok after the first R&R. The other one, who wanted extra revises, was a bit of stupid. The editor (Mallick) gave us some additional advice and was ok with the result. 2019 01/22/21
Economic Modelling Accepted 6 1 1 Difficulties to reach the editor, but useful report and very fast decision (1 day) after submitted the revised manuscript. 2013 10/31/14
Economic Modelling Accepted 3 7 2 Two referee reports. Good handling by the editor. Overall, good experience 2019 09/14/20
Economic Modelling Accepted 2 2 3 Overall, very happy with the process. Both editor and referees liked the paper, comments from referees are on the point and constructive. 2019 10/14/19
Economic Modelling Accepted 9 4 2 Hall is an inefficent editor 2014 10/25/14
Economic Modelling Accepted 1 1 2 Fast turn around with great referee reports that significantly improved the paper. Great experience. 2018 07/04/18
Economic Modelling Accepted 4 1 2 2011 01/11/13
Economic Modelling Accepted 3 1 3 2012 01/04/13
Economic Modelling Accepted 3 1 4 2012 12/20/12
Economic Modelling Ref Reject 1 1 3 There is no option to choose 'Referees Accepted' but 'Editor Rejected'. After one round of revision, two of the three reviewers accepted the paper and one requested at best minor revision. The editor (Sushanta Mallick) rejected it by 'just by looking at the descriptive statistics' (the original words from the decision letter). 2018 09/02/18
Economic Modelling Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Less than 2 months for the decision with 2 reports, which is very quick. But the decision was unfair. 2019 07/13/20
Economic Modelling Ref Reject 13 N/A 2 Held my paper for a full year and rejected it on a split decision with one ref suggesting an RR and the other a reject. Paper has since been published. 2010 08/02/13
Economic Modelling Ref Reject 13 N/A 1 Special issue editor started to referee himself. Comments didn't make sense. Editor did not intervene and kept hiding throughout. Shameless people. 2012 02/26/14
Economic Modelling Ref Reject 4 2 3 The editor, one AE and some referees (in the first stage there was only one, completely irrelevant) have insulted my intelligence. Not anymore. 2020 05/13/21
Economic Modelling Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Referee wrote a short report with easily implementable suggestions, suggesting revision. Editor had a "confidential" report that he wouldn't share, and on the basis of that chose rejection. 2015 03/18/16
Economic Modelling Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Editor efficient, but strange experience: Two referees were very favorable, but the third referee rejected by quoting a "flaw" which was in fact correct. The policy of the journal is to let each author appoint the referees, which improves speed on one hand but generates citation groups on the other hand. In a word, this is not a serious journal. 2012 04/23/13
Economic Modelling Ref Reject 9 N/A 1 After waiting for 9 months, I sent an email to the editor asking about the paper status. Got a rejection within a couple of days without any constructive comment. 2013 04/14/15
Economic Modelling Ref Reject 4 4 1 After 3 rounds of revisions, it was rejected. After doing what the, very stupid, referee asked he said "not a big enough contribution". 2017 05/04/18
Economic Modelling Ref Reject 10 3 2 After 10 months waiting, I had a revise and resubmit decision. The referee report was very positive, requiring only one major change that was successfully done. After resubmission, I was informed that the paper would be sent to another editor (Prof. Mallick). After another three months, the paper was reject on the basis of a presumed 2nd referee report, only with a few lines, that says the paper is "well structured, well written, and deploys sound econometric methodology", but "does not add value to the existing literature". It seems to me that this was an easy way for the new Editor to reject the paper! 2013 03/20/15
Economic Modelling Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Very poor handling by editor. Two reports. One report of 10 lines with one minor comment and the other one, longer but with also minor comments. All comments seem easy to answer. Unfair decision 2019 01/17/19
Economic Modelling Ref Reject 6 6 1 I had a paper that was to be revised and the review was very positive. This was after a 6 month wait and emails to the editor to follow up. Revised carefully and resent, then they sent to another editor and another reviewer whose report contradicted the first and was very vague. The second editor rejected it. Process lasted one year with nontransparent, contradictory review process. 2014 02/07/15
Economic Modelling Desk Reject 2 2 2 2019 07/01/20
Economic Policy Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 This journal is completely a piece of junk. A UK guy handles my paper and give me a desk rejection after 3 months. Never deal with stupid journal anymore. 2021 06/17/21
Economic Record Accepted 4 3 2 One medium and one tough referee! 2015 03/28/16
Economic Record Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2014 08/17/15
Economic Record Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 One thorough, one brief referee report 2017 10/22/17
Economic Systems Pending 4 N/A 2 One helpful (though very demanding) report, the second so-so. 2018 04/10/19
Economic Systems Accepted 3 2 2 Referee report transformed the paper significantly. Very good experience. 2015 06/18/16
Economic Systems Accepted 5 1 1 Great experience. Comments were sharp and precise and resulted in a much better paper. After revision, paper accepted in a week. Would definitely submit here again. 2015 02/22/16
Economic Systems Accepted 3 3 2 Very good experience. Quick and professional handling by the editor. Two very useful referee reports. 2011 12/13/13
Economic Systems Accepted 4 4 2 Ali Kutan is the associate editor, finally accepted the paper. Sometime he asks for favours from authors such as finding sponsors for special issues for other journals such as Emerging Markets Finance and Trade or ask authors to organise conferences and use the proceeding to cover the cost of the special issues. Yes, he can ask for odd things. In anyway, you need to be very careful when responding with him, he can easily upset you with a rejection 2015 11/14/16
Economic Systems Ref Reject 9 N/A 0 9 months to one ref report which was not helpful. Editor said all refs must agree for acceptance... but only one ref report provided! Terrible experience. 2020 12/04/20
Economic Systems Ref Reject 4 4 2 The associate Editor Ali Kutan has rejected the paper. According to him one referee is in favor but the other is not. I must say second reviewer report was 1 and a half line and in my view it is the most unscientific report I have ever seen. In addition, Ali Kutan asked me for many favors between the revise and the rejection. When he rejected the paper for the Economic Systems, he then asked me to submit the same paper to his journal "Emerging Markets Finance and Trade." Extremely bad experience with this journal 2015 12/19/16
Economic Theory Pending 0 N/A 0 Editors keep delaying despite returned reports, seems to be a pattern with this journal. 2018 10/18/18
Economic Theory Accepted 4 6 1 Very helpful referee report. It took a lot of work but response to my R&R was positive. Editor was a little bit lazy as it took him two months after receiving the ref report to answer. Overall, a very fair process. 2016 02/21/17
Economic Theory Accepted 5 4 2 2013 11/03/14
Economic Theory Accepted 11 4 2 2016 01/15/18
Economic Theory Accepted 2 1 2 Weird editor pushing for a change in the results. 2011 02/04/13
Economic Theory Accepted 2 2 2 Economic Theory Bulletin. Great experience - referee reports really helped improve the paper. Also very fast. 2014 05/06/15
Economic Theory Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 Very unprofessional. Referee 2015 06/26/15
Economic Theory Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Three reports, one good report the other two average. Overall, fair process. 2015 06/24/15
Economic Theory Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Very quick response. Serious referee report, but without any helpful particular suggestion 2013 05/17/13
Economic Theory Ref Reject 11 N/A 3 the referee reports are of good quality, but I think 11 month for a first response is too long 2016 09/26/17
Economic Theory Ref Reject 10 N/A 2 One report useless, read only the first quarter of the paper. One very good report. Editor delayed a lot. Not recommended. 2018 10/22/18
Economic Theory Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Useless referee report and incompetent editor wasted whole three months of waiting. Look elsewhere if you want to have a decent submission experience! 2016 06/09/16
Economic Theory Ref Reject 6 6 1 It took six months for a single referee report (of exactly one paragraph of comments). Referee clearly did not read paper closely because the bulk of his (limited) comments focused on why I don't address an issue that is addressed prominently in the introduction. 2014 06/10/14
Economic Theory Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 2010 01/10/13
Economic Theory Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 Very bad experience. From the abstract to the conclusion, we kept arguing like "A is not the main point, we should look at B." The referee's main criticism was like "they argued that A is the main point, which is weak. Instead, they should've looked at B." Pathetic... 2018 12/05/18
Economic Theory Ref Reject 14 N/A 1 Good report, positive rec. from AE, but editor rejected without explanation. 2011 11/06/13
Economic Theory Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 Very unprofessional. Referee's only objection is flat out incorrect (i discussed report with colleagues in my field). No comments from the unknown handling editor. Seems as though they did not like the content and were looking for an excuse to reject. 2015 06/26/15
Economic Theory Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2012 04/04/13
Economic Theory Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fast desk rejection. Appreciated. 2021 09/25/21
Economic Theory Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 The editor suggest that the paper is not good enough for ET! Suggested to send to another journal! oh they're good! 2014 09/25/14
Economic Theory Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 2011 08/02/13
Economic Theory Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2014 (the option is missing) 2013 01/20/14
Economic Theory Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2013 07/30/13
Economic Theory Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2011 08/02/13
Economica Pending 6 N/A 2 2014 08/22/14
Economica Pending 36 N/A 0 Desk did not want to communicate at all. 2010 04/29/15
Economica Accepted 6 8 2 2014 02/13/16
Economica Accepted 7 2 2 2011 12/20/12
Economica Accepted 3 1 1 a great and efficient journal 2018 12/17/19
Economica Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Reports are thoughtful and useful for revisions 2014 07/26/14
Economica Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 only one report, but it was fair and can help me to improve the paper 2019 12/17/19
Economica Ref Reject 9 N/A 3 Two of three referees did not read the paper. Many thanks, however, to the third referee for instructive comments. No further comment from the editor. 2011 02/11/15
Economica Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Rejected with one report! 2016 06/05/16
Economica Ref Reject 11 N/A 2 11 months for a rejection. My worst experience ever. Two referee reports, each was half a page with very general comments about the lack of contribution to a general readership. Editor was US-based and said that she likes the idea though! 2014 10/10/15
Economica Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Referee rejected but with very exhaustive and interesting comments 2018 12/29/18
Economica Ref Reject 11 N/A 1 it took them 11 months to reject with one referee report of about half a page. Amazing 2019 03/10/19
Economica Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 Editor decided one returned report was sufficient, though this report did not provide any helpful comments 2018 06/16/19
Economica Ref Reject 13 N/A 0 Waited 13 months to two mildly positive reports. But editor rejects. 2014 02/11/16
Economica Ref Reject 8 N/A 2 Seriously, avoid this journal. Reject with two referee reports, one gives constructive comments, one rejects with half a page report, saying the paper is not for a general readership. And the whole process took us 8 months. 2019 10/21/19
Economica Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Just one report. Some ok comments. 2018 07/17/18
Economica Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 2010 01/07/13
Economica Desk Reject 6 N/A 0 SIX MONTHS for a desk reject. Do not submit to this journal. 2014 08/15/14
Economica Desk Reject 4 N/A 0 Awful experience. Four months for a desk reject! 2018 07/16/18
Economica Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Garbage journal, not a real journal, avoid. 2016 09/20/17
Economica Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejection with no comments in 3 weeks. 2015 02/11/16
Economica Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 ridiculous 2013 06/14/13
Economica Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected within 10 days. No letter from the editor. But I understand it may not have been a good fit. 2017 11/06/17
Economica Desk Reject 5 N/A 0 It took 5 months to get a desk reject, with a polite letter from the editor that the paper would be a good fit for a field journal 2021 09/21/21
Economica Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Poorly managed. Theory in one field sent to AE in another field doing empirics. 2013 02/20/13
Economica Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in one day. "Scope a bit too narrow" for Economica. The editor did point out a couple of interesting things. 2020 06/09/20
Economica Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Two days to desk reject, no comments, just boilerplate. I read on EJMR how clubby and unfortunately British this journal is, but never expected it to be true. Yep, it is. 2018 09/10/18
Economica Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2012 12/20/12
Economics and Human Biology Pending 1 1 2 Joerg Baten seems to be literally an idiot making me wonder how he got picked. He sends you an email that he carefully read the paper and then you follow up a day after asking him about a clarification and his response was that he did not remember. If this journal wants to publish high quality papers, it needs to pick someone better than Joerg Baten who actually reads the papers before he accepts/rejects, etc. Reflects really poorly on the journal to keep this guy. 2016 09/10/17
Economics and Human Biology Accepted 3 3 2 major revision, then minor (decision in a matter of days). Overall good experience. Time to accept less than 1 year. 2016 08/23/17
Economics and Human Biology Accepted 1 2 2 Very good experience. 2016 07/12/17
Economics and Human Biology Accepted 2 3 2 2019 05/14/20
Economics and Human Biology Accepted 4 2 2 Quick and professionsl process. Reasonable comments from referees. 2016 08/21/17
Economics and Human Biology Accepted 2 1 2 One very good and one very weak report. Finished revision in 1 month and once resubmitted took them 2 weeks to accept. Good overall experience 2021 07/24/21
Economics and Human Biology Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 The editor (George Weebly) made inconsistent statements that did not match with the statments in the paper or from the refrees.The referees made good comments. 2016 07/14/16
Economics and Human Biology Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Editor waited three months for the econd referee who did not respond. The only referee who respond wrote some nonsense without reading the paper. Worst experience so far in my career 2020 08/21/20
Economics and Human Biology Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2013 03/28/13
Economics and Human Biology Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Quickest desk rejection ever experienced. 2 minutes passed between receiving editor name an receiving desk rejection. Don't think they even bothered reading the first page. 2013 09/06/13
Economics and Human Biology Desk Reject 0 1 0 Spent a week rewriting the paper according to requests of the editor ("put figures in the end of the paper" and such), then got a desk reject. 2013 11/27/13
Economics and Philosophy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject after 14 days, form letter. 2016 07/16/16
Economics and Philosophy Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2013 05/13/13
Economics and Politics Pending 0 N/A 0 Submitted July 2012, short empirical paper, still waiting for first response. 2012 04/21/13
Economics and Politics Accepted 7 3 1 Very useful report 2013 09/17/14
Economics and Politics Accepted 3 4 2 Very useful reports, also doing some editing 2010 01/04/13
Economics and Politics Accepted 10 4 2 2019 06/15/21
Economics and Politics Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Disappointing referee: a few useful comments, but mostly low-grade and somewhat hostile 2011 02/21/13
Economics and Politics Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 Referees ask for the revised paper; editor rejects the paper 2012 02/20/13
Economics and Politics Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 Referee had positive comments and suggested revise and resubmit, but editor rejected it. 2014 12/06/14
Economics Bulletin Pending 4 N/A 2 Invited to revise and resubmit the paper. Two referees made great reviews and very detailed comments. Good experience. 2018 05/29/18
Economics Bulletin Accepted 6 1 1 Great experience. Conley is a tremendous editor. A true scholar and a gentleman. 2019 09/16/19
Economics Bulletin Accepted 2 2 2 Editor picked reasonable comments, asked to take into account suggestions, accepted the paper after the referees agreed that what I did is reasonable. 2015 11/16/15
Economics Bulletin Accepted 10 N/A 3 The first round took too long (~10 months). The editor said there was issues with finding referees. The revised submission was accepted within a month. 2019 08/14/20
Economics Bulletin Accepted 2 N/A 1 2017 01/08/18
Economics Bulletin Accepted 1 1 1 Very fast process. Poor report but good comments from the associate editor 2011 05/01/14
Economics Bulletin Accepted 0 N/A 1 Conley is a good, fair editor. 2016 07/25/17
Economics Bulletin Accepted 4 1 2 Smooth process, a bit too much work for this journal. But editor is very good 2020 01/04/21
Economics Bulletin Accepted 3 1 1 the website was hacked...the report was good, and the associate editor is very nice 2014 04/22/15
Economics Bulletin Accepted 2 1 1 Reasonable comments from the referee, extremely fast and efficient process. 2017 08/04/18
Economics Bulletin Accepted 4 2 2 The editor was very helpful. 2014 04/28/15
Economics Bulletin Accepted 1 1 1 Very fast good report 2013 10/18/13
Economics Bulletin Accepted 3 1 2 Associate Editor and the reviewer provided excellent feedback 2016 08/18/17
Economics Bulletin Accepted 1 1 2 Very fast and easy, but useless reports and editors (which is what I wanted for a quick worthless pub) 2012 11/06/13
Economics Bulletin Accepted 0 N/A 0 Editor accepted the article within one week. 2014 04/30/14
Economics Bulletin Accepted 3 3 2 The referees made good points. Conley is a very nice Editor. I submitted in July, and then they sent the response back in October. I resubmitted in January, and the paper was accepted with minor revisions in March. A very positive experience for a filler publication. 2018 03/06/19
Economics Bulletin Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 2016 02/03/18
Economics Bulletin Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Referee does not understand the purpose of the paper, clearly not a specialist of the field ; published elsewhere 2012 10/31/14
Economics Bulletin Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 One referee report with no constructive comments. Waste of time 2010 12/05/13
Economics Bulletin Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Ok process, but referees either did not read the paper carefully or were inexpert in the field 2018 06/16/19
Economics Bulletin Desk Reject 4 N/A 0 4 months for a letter w/o referee report. Bigger joke than the article I sent them. -> Toilet. 2017 03/31/18
Economics Bulletin Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2019 12/30/19
Economics Letters Pending 0 N/A 0 2020 10/19/20
Economics Letters Pending 1 2 1 Easy Process. Very Fast. 1 Month from Submission to a very positive R&R 2015 04/17/15
Economics Letters Pending 0 N/A 0 12 months and waiting. No report yet. Multiple inquiries with a response: "once the reviews are completed, the editor will make a decision". I am tempted to say: thank you for telling me what I already know... 2015 03/29/16
Economics Letters Pending 0 N/A 0 12 months and waiting. No report yet. Multiple inquiries with a response: "once the reviews are completed, the editor will make a decision". I am tempted to say: thank you for telling me what I already know... 2015 03/29/16
Economics Letters Pending 4 N/A 1 2015 09/09/15
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Serrano handled the manuscript. Two lines ref report. Fast and friendly. 2014 01/16/15
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Seems the process is very efficient with the new editorial board 2013 04/20/13
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 very quick. ref asks more robustness check 2016 08/30/16
Economics Letters Accepted 10 1 1 2010 09/18/14
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 2 The editor was good. Revision accepted after one day. Reviewers seem to be very well acquainted with my research area (health). 2015 08/30/15
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 2012 09/30/14
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 Serrano seems to be a good/efficient editor. We were asked to run additional experimental treatments to support our claims. We did. Our claims were supported. Serrano accepted the paper a week after resubmission without going back to the reviewers. Very quick process! 2013 11/28/13
Economics Letters Accepted 8 1 1 2010 02/13/13
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 Good experience. Quick first response with major r&r. Two days between handing in the revision and acceptance. 2012 01/22/14
Economics Letters Accepted 3 1 1 2012 12/21/12
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 2012 01/18/13
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Very fast and the submission fee is relatively cheap and even cheaper for grad students. One of the best outlet for phd students 2015 08/13/15
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Fast. Two weeks for R&R. One week to accept. Entire process takes 1 month. 2015 03/05/15
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 The editor was good. Revision accepted after one day. Reviewers seem to be very well acquainted with my research area (health). 2015 08/30/15
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Excellent 2016 12/07/16
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 2 Fantastic experience: fast and very good comments 2018 02/16/19
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Super fast review. Referee was perceptive and pointed out serious flaws in the first draft. Accepted version was greatly improved. Whole process super quick. Great outcome. 2018 10/01/18
Economics Letters Accepted 2 2 1 2015 12/06/15
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 2 Excellent process and editor provided useful comments and guidance 2018 06/16/19
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 one referee and very good commets. 2020 08/27/20
Economics Letters Accepted 2 N/A 1 2013 08/09/13
Economics Letters Accepted 3 4 1 Editor accepted the paper after we made some modifications recommended by the referee. 2018 08/16/19
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Less than 3 weeks for the first responses (major R&R) then accepted in less than a week. 2016 12/31/16
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Costas Meghir was editor. Waited about a month for the first decision, just a few days for the (very minor) revisions. Good experience. 2016 01/24/17
Economics Letters Accepted 1 N/A 1 Return in 5 weeks with a two-paragraph short response 2014 03/15/14
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Pretty quick. Serrano handled it. 2011 04/12/13
Economics Letters Accepted 2 N/A 1 2018 03/04/19
Economics Letters Accepted 2 N/A 1 Very quick and efficient. 2014 11/18/14
Economics Letters Accepted 4 1 1 Very useful report 2015 10/30/15
Economics Letters Accepted 4 N/A 1 2007 12/20/12
Economics Letters Accepted 36 N/A 0 2008 12/20/12
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Fast review but very difficult comments. Too us more than a month to revise and still had doubts. I spent less time and less effort revising 30 pages papers in other similar ranked journals than in EL 2020 02/12/21
Economics Letters Accepted 1 N/A 1 Very pleasant experience – very quick and the report professional 2015 03/26/16
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 2014 07/29/14
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 Excellent experience. 2016 09/06/16
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 2 Fantastic experience: fast and very good comments 2018 02/14/19
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 Good process 2014 01/09/15
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 First round took 2 months. Accepted two weeks after r&r. Pretty good experience. 2017 11/15/17
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Great experience. 2020 10/28/20
Economics Letters Accepted 4 1 1 2015 11/21/15
Economics Letters Accepted 0 1 1 faster than the speed of light 2019 07/01/19
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 1 month for R&R, 1 week for acceptance after revision submitted. Great experience. 2013 09/19/15
Economics Letters Accepted 2 2 0 2012 07/27/14
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 2014 07/29/14
Economics Letters Accepted 4 1 2 2011 01/13/13
Economics Letters Accepted 3 1 0 Fasstest acceptation ever after R&R: 1 day! 2012 01/15/13
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Accepted as is. Awesome. 2018 11/29/18
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 Good experience. With my 4-6 data observations (different journals), EL is definitely the most efficient journal 2018 08/28/18
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 2019 05/26/19
Economics Letters Accepted 2 N/A 1 Less than two months for very minor revision request. Resubmitted in 2 days, accepted after resubmission in 10 days. 2016 01/27/17
Economics Letters Accepted 0 N/A 1 Super fast handling by Pro. J.E. Harrington and the anonymous reviewer. 7 days from first submission to minor revision. Resubmitted within the same day. Got accepted in three days. 10 days in total!!! 2018 11/08/18
Economics Letters Accepted 21 N/A 1 2008 12/20/12
Economics Letters Accepted 3 1 1 Fast response. Good report as well. 2012 02/15/13
Economics Letters Accepted 3 1 1 2012 12/21/12
Economics Letters Accepted 0 N/A 1 one week to accepted with minor changes. accepted immediately after minor revision. Super efficient handling by Prof. Sarte. Best experience ever. 2018 07/04/18
Economics Letters Accepted 1 2 1 very efficient 2018 06/26/19
Economics Letters Accepted 2 N/A 0 2009 12/20/12
Economics Letters Accepted 1 1 1 Good referee report and very efficient editor. Overall- great experience. 2013 03/02/14
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 2 R&Rs but very good feedback. 2020 09/21/20
Economics Letters Accepted 2 1 1 Serrano seems to be a good/efficient editor. We were asked to collect additional data for our existing experimental treatments to increase our statistical power. We did. Our results didn't change. Serrano accepted the paper a couple of days after resubmission. Very pleasant experience! 2013 11/28/13
Economics Letters Accepted 8 N/A 1 2008 12/20/12
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Lazy report. The first note of the referee claimed that I didn't do something I clearly did. The second one gave it away that he didn't even try to understand what I wrote. 2017 09/27/17
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 I do not think that the referee understood my paper. Seemed not to like the idea of the paper without actually reading it. A disappointment. 2017 08/31/17
Economics Letters Ref Reject 16 N/A 1 Terrible single line report from editor (after 16 months of waiting). Pretty sure the editor didn't even read the paper. Would be happy with desk reject, but not with waiting 16 months to read a 5 page article. 2010 10/25/14
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 Editor rejected the paper based on the decision of board of editor. Paper was never sent to the reviewers as per the email. 2013 10/03/15
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 The paper was not sent to the referee but instead the editor said it was reviewed by the editorial board. Seems this was not consistent with what is written in website. 2013 07/08/14
Economics Letters Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Reasonable referee report. Although the suggested changes would have made the paper way too long for an EL pub. 2019 01/20/20
Economics Letters Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 I want my money back ! Fast and uninformative. But at least fast. 2014 02/28/14
Economics Letters Ref Reject 0 N/A 1 Efficient and fair. One stern but very helpful referee report (five pages, competent and extremely detailed) in two weeks. Almost happy. 2015 08/20/18
Economics Letters Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 A long wait but not very helpful comments. 2016 06/26/16
Economics Letters Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Extensive, constructive and mildly positive ref report. Made paper better. AE rejected without commenting on referee report 2017 11/19/18
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 The paper was not sent to the referee but instead the editor said it was reviewed by the editorial board. Seems this was not consistent with what is written in website. 2013 07/08/14
Economics Letters Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 At least a quick report with one good comment that can help to improve the paper, but with the other points highlighted by the referee were discussed in the paper 2018 04/26/18
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 2006 12/20/12
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 Editorial board review and then rejection. They should just ask me $60. 2014 12/05/14
Economics Letters Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 2012 07/28/13
Economics Letters Ref Reject 3 3 0 Reject due to the non-response by the referee 2020 02/24/21
Economics Letters Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 2015 08/19/15
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 2 1 At least response in 1.5 month. Report is in reasonable quality. 2014 08/22/14
Economics Letters Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Very fast with constructive reviews. 2019 01/08/20
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 2014 05/22/14
Economics Letters Ref Reject 1 1 1 Less than two weeks from submission to editorial decision. The referee report was very poor. Very short and no relevant comments. 2017 06/21/18
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 2-pages report, few suggestions. Simply put, the reviewer does not believe in my results (simulations from calibrated macroeconomic model). He/she states that a particular model delivers a set of results, although I show that it does not. 2018 01/03/19
Economics Letters Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 2012 12/20/12
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 Process was a complete disgrace. Editor claims that paper was sent to two referees. But no referee reports were supplied to me. No reason given for rejection, and no indication that the paper was actually read by anyone. Submission fee not refunded. Absolutely pathetic. 2013 05/31/13
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Really quick response and decent referee report. The report seemed to be more appropriate for a revise and resubmit. The paper got rejected anyways. 2015 04/03/15
Economics Letters Ref Reject 0 N/A 1 Fast response, referee did not understand aim of the article, suggested more details on the method, imposible in their space limit. 2013 12/05/13
Economics Letters Ref Reject 1 N/A 0 The referee did not read the first sentence of the paper and was not familiar with the literature. Probably just a grad student who could only understand calculations 2020 03/12/20
Economics Letters Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 One useless referee report claiming that we did not make robustness checks in a journal of 2000 letters! However we had make all of the referee's suggestions and the outcome was not positive. The editor was not helpful at all 2016 09/22/16
Economics Letters Ref Reject 1 N/A 0 Liked the paper, had no qualms with methodology, just felt it wasn't broad enough. 2014 01/16/15
Economics Letters Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Actually, it was a Reject and Resubmit because the editor liked the paper, but the reviewer was really harsh and not really understood the paper. 2021 05/24/21
Economics Letters Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 I waited six weeks for an inaccurate, one paragraph referee report? One where the only material comment has a grammatical error that makes understanding it difficult? Won't be doing that again... 2020 06/22/20
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Useless referee report. 2016 09/11/16
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Really quick response and decent referee report. The report seemed to be more appropriate for a revise and resubmit. The paper got rejected anyways. 2015 04/03/15
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 2012 12/20/12
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Referee report useless. Editor not helpful at all. 2014 12/02/14
Economics Letters Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Quick. Very low quality report. 2015 11/20/15
Economics Letters Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 "Referee report"... Biggest joke on Earth!! 2015 09/18/15
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 3 1 2013 09/17/14
Economics Letters Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Fast process, but very poor reviewer report. 2017 02/22/18
Economics Letters Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 5 and 1/2 months to get a 2 line report. 2020 09/14/20
Economics Letters Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Very fast; useful, reasonably positive report despite rejection 2020 10/20/20
Economics Letters Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Constructive referee report; said needed more robustness checks, but difficult in word limit. 2016 09/15/16
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Note good/detailed enough for EL 2018 10/29/18
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Dest rejected within 1 day after submission. I felt as if 65$ has evaporated from my pocket. I published my article in a very decent journal later. Very bad experience. 2016 07/09/16
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 week for desk reject 2015 08/19/15
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 10 days for desk rejection decision. contribution is not enough. useless comments from editor. 2019 04/10/19
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Paper desk rejected in 4 days. Very fast process but no comment from the Associate Editor. 2018 10/02/18
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 1 0 Andrew Samwick rejected within 2 days, Topic is too speacialized for EL 2014 09/03/14
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 week for the desk reject decision 2013 02/09/13
Economics Letters Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2007 12/20/12
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Rapid desk rejection, with fair comments and advice from editor 2018 06/16/19
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in two days. Editor misunderstood the findings, complained didn't understand the Y variable (maybe ease up on the word limit then). No refund. Last of many bad experiences with this journal. 2019 10/21/19
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject within two days. Results not important enough to a broad audience. 2014 06/27/14
Economics Letters Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2013 12/20/12
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Baltagi desk rejected it in 2 days for being lack of novelty. 2021 08/30/21
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2 weeks 2015 05/26/15
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Baltagi rejected in 4 days, no comments 2012 12/21/12
Economics Letters Desk Reject 1 1 0 Costas Meghir responses all submissions. However, they want to reject whatever you want. This journal is a bit hell to make it attractive to authors in order to get their money easily. 2019 08/09/19
Economics Letters Desk Reject 2 2 1 Referee seemed have little idea about the field or didn't read my 7 page paper. Full of informative/wrong comments. After R&R, the referee required one more round of revision. Desk rejected. 2014 04/29/15
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Rejection reason shows Meghir did not read the paper, bad editor dull comments 2017 12/03/17
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in 2 days. 2015 12/31/16
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 2018 03/06/18
Economics Letters Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Long and slow desk reject. Editor mentioned the wrong econometric model in email making it clear it was not read. 2019 06/22/19
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 desk reject after 4 days. 2020 08/27/20
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Sent it to EL on Christmas Eve, got the desk reject from Gomez right after Christmas on 26th for not enough contributions 2020 12/28/20
Economics Letters Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 The contribution of the paper is not enough for EL! 2014 11/25/14
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Rejected in 4 days, editor said work was done net resting but not broad enough. 2016 06/02/16
Economics Letters Desk Reject 5 N/A 0 Couple of comments why the paper does not fit (relatively reasonable). Fairly long wait though. 2014 02/13/15
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected within two weeks. A bit slow for a 2000 words paper 2017 08/11/17
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected by Sarte in 3 days without comments. Too narrow-minded editor. 2018 09/21/18
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejection after 8 days. According to the editor, the paper has some merit, but is too specialized for EL. He recommended me to send it to a more specialized field journal. At least they are quick! 2015 08/04/15
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 2 days from submission to rejection, and interesting comments and suggestions from the editor. 2018 10/15/18
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject two days after I submitted the manuscript. The comment by the editor in charge was helpful. Good experience. 2021 09/02/21
Economics Letters Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2 weeks (Comment by the editor constructive and helpful) 2015 12/01/15
Economics Letters Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Not acceptable because other paper is too close (which was not even on the same topic!) 2015 03/15/16
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Pierre Daniel Sarte rejected it with nothing specific. there is no 2016 in the dropdown list 2015 02/26/16
Economics Letters Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 It took the editor 3 months to write two paragraphs and reject. The editor is not related to my field, but also decided not to get an expert's opinion. Will never submit again. 2018 04/15/19
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in two weeks. 2017 08/21/17
Economics Letters Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Rather slow desk reject. Pretty average speed compared to other journals. Not being up to claimed "high-speed dissemination" standards. 2019 08/03/19
Economics Letters Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 desk reject with no helpful comments 2018 10/30/18
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 3 weeks for a desk reject. The reason was that the 2020 03/10/20
Economics Letters Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected after 23 hours. Generic comment of the editor. 2015 07/03/18
Economics Letters Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2017 10/20/17
Economics of Education Review Pending 2 N/A 2 Eight weeks to get two very high-quality reports. 2020 12/01/20
Economics of Education Review Accepted 3 2 2 Smooth process 2015 06/27/16
Economics of Education Review Accepted 4 1 2 Great experience 2016 06/02/18
Economics of Education Review Accepted 1 1 1 Relatively Quick Process. One good quality report suggesting minor revisions after 1 month. After submitting revisions, 1 month until final decision to accept with no other edits. 2015 06/24/15
Economics of Education Review Accepted 2 1 2 Two useful reports. One of them was very detailed. Another one was sharp. R&R only one round; after submitting the revised version, only waited for six days until final acceptance. 2017 03/15/18
Economics of Education Review Accepted 6 3 2 2012 12/21/12
Economics of Education Review Accepted 3 1 2 Great experience 2018 09/28/19
Economics of Education Review Accepted 7 4 1 2017 12/25/18
Economics of Education Review Accepted 7 4 2 2012 03/12/13
Economics of Education Review Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 1 report, minor issues, rejected. not a fair process 2013 12/21/13
Economics of Education Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Not fair. 2016 09/07/16
Economics of Education Review Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 Only one report, no useful comments 2012 04/29/13
Economics of Education Review Ref Reject 9 N/A 1 extremely long wait, and a really poor referee report 2018 03/08/19
Economics of Education Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 good comments, a nice experience even though the outcome was a rejection. 2013 12/13/13
Economics of Education Review Ref Reject 3 3 1 The reviewer and the editor did not understand the paper. It ended up being published in a higher ranked journal. Will probably not be using this journal again. 2014 05/28/15
Economics of Education Review Ref Reject 4 1 2 First R&R was fair, 2 good ref. reports. Resubmission was a joke, Only one report, completely unfair. Recommended rejection. 2013 12/10/14
Economics of Education Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2012 12/20/12
Economics of Governance Accepted 8 3 2 2016 09/02/17
Economics of Governance Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Long wait, decision was communicated with a delay of 3 months after reports had been received. One very positive and helpful report, one negative report. Editor decided to reject the paper without any additional comments how he reached the decision. 2013 08/01/14
Economics of Transition Pending 5 N/A 1 2013 08/22/13
Economics of Transition Accepted 5 3 2 2012 09/15/14
Economics of Transition Accepted 3 1 2 Excellent review process. 2016 10/31/16
Economics of Transition Accepted 4 4 2 2013 06/18/14
Economics of Transition Accepted 2 1 1 Excellent referee report. 2017 02/07/18
Economics of Transition Accepted 9 4 2 The editor is very good with excellent referee reports. Slow but good experience overall. 2017 08/21/18
Economics of Transition Ref Reject 7 N/A 1 2015 04/20/16
Economics of Transition Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2014 12/07/14
Education Economics Pending 3 N/A 0 2012 02/11/18
Education Economics Accepted 3 2 2 Excellent review process. Fast and efficient. Good referee reports. Editor and co-editor are extremely nice and supportive. 2019 03/14/21
Education Economics Accepted 1 1 2 2011 02/13/13
Education Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Quite superficial referee reports. 2013 09/24/13
Education Economics Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Very slow. Referee reports were very brief and contained little in the way of substantive comments. 2013 02/14/14
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade Accepted 3 3 2 Great Experience 2012 03/08/14
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade Accepted 3 3 3 Very detailed and helpful reports. 2015 11/03/16
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade Accepted 2 1 2 Unbelievably fast process, tough-but-fair referee notes that improved the paper. Good experience and good editorial team. 2015 04/16/16
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade Accepted 4 3 3 Very professional...the referee reports were fine but rather tough given the quality of the journal 2011 12/13/13
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade Ref Reject 1 N/A 0 Think one more time before sending here. Bad referee reports. 150$ is quite a lot of money. 2016 07/09/16
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade Ref Reject 6 12 3 3 rounds, all comments addressed, rejected because 1 reviewer did not read the last version. very disappointing 2018 10/16/20
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Two very good referee reports. Much better than overal reputation of journal 2015 02/05/16
Emerging Markets Review Accepted 1 N/A 0 Transfer from another Elsevier journal. Elsevier is terrible, screwed up the transfer so took over a month to end up on editor's desk. Editor took two weeks to unconditionally accept. Will submit here again definitely but hate Elsevier so much. 2019 03/06/19
Emerging Markets Review Accepted 3 2 2 Nice editor 2014 10/25/14
Emerging Markets Review Ref Reject 10 N/A 1 Rejected by referee after 10 months citing lack of novelty. Mostly generic comments. Not worth the time wasted. 2017 12/15/18
Emerging Markets Review Ref Reject 8 2 2 Quite slow response for a mid-tier journal. Rejected and offered transfer that was very helpful. 2018 08/03/19
Emerging Markets Review Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 2014 01/22/15
Emerging Markets Review Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 2017 07/07/17
Emerging Markets Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Quick desk rejection from the Editor (about a week). He clearly did not read the paper and wrote a pretty much standard rejection that had nothing to do with the paper. Very clubby journal. The transfer offer was helpful, though, since we did not have to pay a submission fee in order to send the paper to the other journal. 2019 01/14/20
Emerging Markets Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Editor didnt seem to pay attention to the content. Maybe small sample made it untouchable? 2016 04/24/17
Empirica Ref Reject 10 N/A 2 Do not send your papers to this journal. It took them 10 months to say anything and at the end even though the referees asked for revisions and were positive the editor rejected the paper. It is definitely not worth the long wait! 2014 06/29/15
Empirica Ref Reject 9 N/A 2 2012 04/16/13
Empirical Economics Pending 12 N/A 0 Manuscript was withdrawn - editor had assigned referees within 3 months of submission but then these were apparently not forthcoming 2018 06/16/19
Empirical Economics Accepted 6 5 2 The latex formatting at the end was the most painful part. Otherwise, efficient process, decent reports. 2018 09/10/19
Empirical Economics Accepted 6 5 2 Two good referee reports though the review process is A bit slow. 2016 09/13/17
Empirical Economics Accepted 6 6 2 long waiting time. one ok, one very short and superficial referee report. the editor was helpful and nice though. 2011 02/18/13
Empirical Economics Accepted 6 5 2 2014 10/25/15
Empirical Economics Accepted 4 4 2 Hostile report stating "I do not belive your assumptions", editor ignored it 2012 11/01/15
Empirical Economics Accepted 16 1 2 Very slow process but happy to get accepted. 2016 09/25/18
Empirical Economics Accepted 6 3 2 Good reports. 2011 07/30/13
Empirical Economics Accepted 4 3 2 Good experience. 1 good Referee and good Editor. Recommend. 2015 10/21/16
Empirical Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2013 04/12/13
Empirical Economics Ref Reject 12 N/A 2 Unacceptable waiting time. One absolutely incompetent referee. Second referee made some useful suggestions. 2017 01/27/18
Empirical Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 Process ended after 1 report. Comments dubious at best. Editor claimed an expert in the field reviewed the paper while the referee admitted in his first sentence of the report that he is not. 2016 04/25/17
Empirical Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 Although our paper is rejected by the reviewer, I would be very happy to read the referee report. The referee must be some leading scholar in the field and I just wanna say thanks to him/her. I wish my coauthors would not be too sad being rejected. 2019 07/12/19
Empirical Economics Ref Reject 5 6 2 Initial response for R&R was quite fast, but the second response after the resubmission took quite a long time, and it seems that the paper was just sitting at the editor's desk for more than a month before they were assigned back to the referees. After both referees mentioned that there was an improvement in the revision, the editor rejected the paper without giving justifiable reason. 2015 01/07/16
Empirical Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Good reports. 2016 06/06/16
Empirical Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 The referee report was mildly constructive, being generally positive. But the editor (Kunst) decided to "follow the referee's advice to reject your submission", even though there was no indication of such a recommendation in the RR. Actually, it was overall positive. Waste of time. 2015 03/22/16
Empirical Economics Ref Reject 3 1 2 After revision was done the AE decided to reject without sending to referees! Waste of time. 2015 05/03/16
Empirical Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in 3 weeks. 2013 08/13/13
Empirical Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 3 weeks to desk reject paper because it didn't fit the journal. 2012 02/01/13
Empirical Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in 3 days. The editor prefers state-of-the-art methods rather than good ideas. 2021 02/18/21
Energy Economics Pending 10 N/A 0 10 month without any reaction from the editor. No response to requests. Will not consider again. 2019 03/24/20
Energy Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 Almost one year later from submission, have no answer about my paper. The status are always the same "under review". Also sent some emails to the editors but have no replies. 2015 03/17/16
Energy Economics Pending 12 N/A 0 One year since submission, no replies to my queries... shitty journal 2019 05/14/20
Energy Economics Accepted 4 3 2 good reports. fair process. 2013 06/13/14
Energy Economics Accepted 4 1 2 2019 10/02/19
Energy Economics Accepted 6 2 2 Very efficient process. One good report and the other mediocre. The editor Richard Toll very fast and efficient. I will submit again to this rising journal 2015 10/06/16
Energy Economics Accepted 8 2 2 2013 12/27/14
Energy Economics Accepted 2 2 2 Although other comments on this journal say that the review process is long, I had very different experience. I got two rounds of R&R. At every round, it took them only 2 months to respond back. 2015 03/18/16
Energy Economics Accepted 4 3 2 high level and very helpful referee reports 2015 04/01/18
Energy Economics Accepted 4 6 3 Overall fair process. Three high quality reports that have helped to improve the paper. 2017 04/26/19
Energy Economics Accepted 8 6 1 2011 03/25/13
Energy Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2 Reports. 1 Referee provided useful comments that improved the paper. Other, did not read the paper carefully yet rejected. 2014 10/28/15
Energy Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Two reports (half-page each) citing minor issues. Editor rejected. Unfair decision. 2018 07/31/18
Energy Economics Ref Reject 4 2 3 Got rejected by the handling and the chief editor after two rounds of revise and resubmit. 2 referees were positive throughout the process, one was an outright acceptance. Overall, the decision was not fair. 2013 09/02/14
Energy Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 Essentially a desk reject after six months saying the paper was not related enough to energy issues, no other substantive comment. 3 sentences total, six months. 2015 04/08/16
Energy Economics Ref Reject 4 2 3 Got rejected by the handling and the chief editor after two rounds of revise and resubmit. 2 referees were positive throughout the process, one was an outright acceptance. Overall, the decision was not fair. 2013 09/02/14
Energy Journal Accepted 2 2 3 Fast publication with reasonable reviewer reports. 2018 02/08/19
Energy Journal Accepted 3 3 5 The editor Adonis Yatchew was very helpfull and efficient. Our paper went through four rounds and finally accepted after one year of its submission. 2015 10/05/16
Energy Journal Accepted 3 2 3 2 rounds of r&r. Only have issues with one of the reviewers. Took a year for the paper to get accepted. 2018 10/12/19
Energy Journal Accepted 4 4 4 Very tedious review process 2010 01/09/13
Energy Journal Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Good comments from 2 referees, the other did not appear to have read the paper well. improved paper based on comments. 2014 06/30/15
Energy Journal Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Very good experience. The referees gave great feedback to improve the paper 2015 06/21/15
Energy Journal Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Very poor referee reports. Extremely outdated econometric "suggestions" and an overall lack of understanding. One referee clearly did not read the paper, while the other one did not understand the meaning of control variables. At least it was fast... 2016 10/17/16
Energy Journal Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2013 08/09/13
Energy Journal Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 All the referees understood what I did in great detail. They were polite in point out a crucial mistake at the beginning of the paper were a new theoretical model was presented. Two of them suggested a possible solution. In all the rejection was fair. I'll definetly will submit again. 2016 12/27/16
Energy Policy Pending 4 N/A 2 R&R after 3-4 months. Quite fast I'd say, but comments were simple. The paper is in between energy and finance, and the referees were more knowledgable of Energy than Finance, where our approach is more standard I'd say 2020 12/28/20
Energy Policy Pending 10 6 2 2010 01/11/13
Energy Policy Pending 5 N/A 0 6 months and no feedback from the journal whtsoever. Will not consider it again. 2016 12/02/16
Energy Policy Accepted 1 1 2 Got accepted with minor revisions after two wonderful set of comments from the referees. Which editor handles the paper mattered. One of the editors used to reject the paper for no reasons. 2014 09/02/14
Energy Policy Accepted 1 1 2 Got accepted with minor revisions after two wonderful set of comments from the referees. Which editor handles the paper mattered. One of the editors used to reject the paper for no reasons. 2014 09/02/14
Energy Policy Accepted 8 5 2 Two reports: one good, one bad 2015 08/08/16
Energy Policy Ref Reject 6 2 2 Totally automated review process; one referee carps even with demonstrably invalid reason and you have no right even to contact the editor. Would not bother again. 2013 10/10/14
Energy Policy Ref Reject 8 3 2 2012 09/13/13
Energy Policy Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk rejected after 40 days. No specific comment from the editor. 2020 02/18/21
Energy Policy Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk rejected after 40 days. 2020 12/26/20
Energy Policy Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 This journal is completely a piece of junk. A UK guy handles my paper and give me a desk rejection after 3 months. Never deal with stupid journal anymore. 2021 06/17/21
Energy Policy Desk Reject 2 2 0 Waited 2 months for the paper to be assigned to an editor. Paper got desk rejected shortly after. 2015 03/07/16
Environment and Development Economics Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 Awful experience. Very inefficient handling of the work. 2015 09/01/15
Environment, Development, and Sustainability Accepted 3 1 2 Revision accepted for publication in one week. 2014 11/04/14
Environmental and Resource Economics Pending 6 N/A 2 6 months to receive half-assed & useless referee reports and request for major revisions. I declined the offer to resubmit. 2015 05/05/16
Environmental and Resource Economics Accepted 4 3 1 2 rounds (1 major R and 1 minor R), one report each time, very fast acceptance after minor R round (less than a month) 2012 10/01/13
Environmental and Resource Economics Accepted 6 1 2 2011 12/20/12
Environmental and Resource Economics Accepted 7 2 3 I've been rejected and accepted by this journal a few times already. Every time I'm impressed by how precise the reviews and suggestions are. A drawback is that it takes time. 2016 09/26/17
Environmental and Resource Economics Accepted 7 4 2 2018 02/06/20
Environmental and Resource Economics Accepted 4 4 2 Fast and to the point reports with reasonable requests for r&r 2021 09/04/21
Environmental and Resource Economics Accepted 4 5 2 2007 01/09/13
Environmental and Resource Economics Ref Reject 8 N/A 1 2017 04/28/19
Environmental and Resource Economics Ref Reject 9 N/A 0 2015 02/06/20
Environmental and Resource Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 One Referee wrote nonsense, the other was good, the editor added nonsense. 2011 02/15/13
Environmental and Resource Economics Ref Reject 13 N/A 1 Worst experience ever. The journal took 13 months to get 1 referee report from a non-expert only to reject our paper. 2017 12/18/18
Environmental and Resource Economics Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Useful comments from the editor who had to stand in for the unresponsive second referee. Would submit again. 2014 06/08/15
Environmental and Resource Economics Ref Reject 9 N/A 2 2011 12/20/12
Environmental and Resource Economics Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 Showed as "awaiting editor assignment" for three months, then a desk reject. THREE MONTHS! 2019 11/07/19
Environmental and Resource Economics Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 Three months for an "out of scope" decision. Three months. 2015 05/04/16
Environmental and Resource Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 6 weeks to desk reject. 2014 07/29/15
Environmental and Resource Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Very fast desk reject; 2013 11/25/13
Environmental and Resource Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2013 08/09/13
Environmental and Resource Economics Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 2.5 months to desk reject. Suggested Ecological Economics. 2018 12/26/18
Environmental and Resource Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 6 weeks for a desk reject. It seems from this website that this in not uncommon for this journal. Boo! 2015 05/05/16
Environmental and Resource Economics Desk Reject 4 N/A 0 desk reject after 4 months 2016 04/23/19
Environmental and Resource Economics Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 3 months for a summary reject by the editor. Slow as hell. 2015 05/05/16
European Economic Review Accepted 3 3 2 One very useful report from a critical referee, and one mediocre. Tough referee was going through three rounds but eventually accepted. Pretty smooth process, with Eric Leeper being very kind and helpful. 2014 02/02/15
European Economic Review Accepted 4 1 2 Very good experience. Useful but demanding referee reports. 2018 05/29/19
European Economic Review Accepted 3 3 2 Really lucky experience. 2014 02/04/15
European Economic Review Accepted 1 2 2 Tough, but fair referees. Good comments, helped improve the paper 2013 11/28/13
European Economic Review Accepted 3 3 2 Very good experience all around. Very fast, and really high-quality referee reports, plus the AE's feedback. Tough revisions, but very fair. The manuscript improved substantially as well, thanks to the reports. Two years ago, I had a different paper rejected by EER, with two good referee reports and an AE negative about it. That was also a very fast and good experience, though not the outcome I had hoped. Highly recommend this journal for a paper that wouldn't make it to top 5. 2018 09/15/19
European Economic Review Accepted 3 3 2 2 informed reports + very detailed comments and guidance by the AE. E 2015 03/01/17
European Economic Review Accepted 3 3 3 Very tough but very useful report! Very good experience! 2014 01/29/15
European Economic Review Accepted 1 4 1 very efficient. great experience. the journal is recovering. 2017 01/12/18
European Economic Review Accepted 2 1 3 Quick handling, competent (positive) reports 2013 11/28/13
European Economic Review Accepted 2 N/A 3 Decent experience; overall fast, fair and constructive. One highly vauable report; one okay-ish, one less useful. 2018 11/19/18
European Economic Review Accepted 3 1 2 One report was very poor and full of bsh*t while the other was good. 2020 09/23/21
European Economic Review Accepted 2 1 2 Though reports with constructive comments 2018 11/30/19
European Economic Review Accepted 3 1 3 Great experience, 2/3 quite tough referees and a fair editor. The journal is likely to go up again. 2018 11/17/18
European Economic Review Accepted 3 2 3 Two detailled and useful reports, one irrelevant. Constructive feedback from AE. Fast editorial process. 2020 07/07/21
European Economic Review Accepted 3 2 2 3 months to R&R; 2 weeks for second round; 1 week for final acceptance 2012 03/13/13
European Economic Review Accepted 3 3 2 Tough and fair refereeing. Very professional editors 2017 12/07/17
European Economic Review Accepted 3 2 2 Very helpful referee reports. Professional editor. 2013 11/20/14
European Economic Review Accepted 4 2 2 very good. 2012 10/04/15
European Economic Review Accepted 3 2 2 2011 02/06/13
European Economic Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 One positive report, one mixed and one negative. However comments from the negative one are the most detailled and helpful. Nice editor message. 2019 03/18/19
European Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 One good report, one very bad full of misunderstandings. 2017 01/10/18
European Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 useless reports, unfair editor 2021 07/20/21
European Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2012 01/11/13
European Economic Review Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 Five weeks, submission to rejection. Of course we don't like the reports, or editor's comments, but there is some helpful stuff. 2017 08/07/17
European Economic Review Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Editor sat for two months on completed referee report and rejected without adding any comments. 2018 10/01/19
European Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 fast and reliable journal. very good comments 2016 08/31/17
European Economic Review Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Horrible treatment. Unbased rejection after more than six months with mediocre reports and editorial justification. 2021 07/18/21
European Economic Review Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 One of the referee reports was sloppy, showing inaccurate reading 2011 07/30/13
European Economic Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 fast response but low quality referee reports 2017 10/01/17
European Economic Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Fast. No complaints 2018 12/05/18
European Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 2012 02/04/13
European Economic Review Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Waste of time and money. Editor sat on completed reports for 2 months to give a two sentence rejection response. 2017 09/20/17
European Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 4 four reports. 2.5 are very positive. AE decided to reject! Comments are mostly useful but the AE's decision is just too tilted to a negative decision, which is SURPRISING. 2015 11/09/15
European Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 Alright report. Not a long wait. 2018 01/28/19
European Economic Review Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 Quick response, two spiteful ref reports 2015 06/29/15
European Economic Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Expensive. Two OK referee reports. 2016 12/09/16
European Economic Review Ref Reject 9 N/A 1 The editor received the report within a month. She admitted having forgotten about it until 8 months later and sent us a rejection. The referee was ideologically opposed to our paper more than anything else. 2021 10/17/21
European Economic Review Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2012 02/18/13
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejection after hefty submission fee. Editors only pick those with close network. Avoid at all cost. 2014 08/09/14
European Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Rejected on pretty poor grounds by an associate editor. Maybe paper is not good enough, but the "report" was not convincing either. At least it was fast. 2014 02/02/15
European Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk Reject, No Comment, Horrible Experience- THEY DO NOT REFUND the submission fee. Never submit again. 2019 08/19/19
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Quick desk reject after less than 24 hours without comments, annoying given the submission fee 2021 02/16/21
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject for paper being too narrow for the audience of the journal. Editor admitted haven't read the paper. 2019 09/24/19
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject after 2 days (contribution too small) 2017 08/25/17
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2015 11/04/15
European Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2 weeks for desk rejection. Ass editor wrote some useful comments. 2019 08/19/19
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 In case of desk rejection, they should return the submission fee. 2014 09/08/14
European Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Very bad experience. They desk rejected a paper that had been previously accepted for review at much better journals. 2011 01/10/13
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2 days desk reject 2014 04/09/14
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in a few hours with very impersonal email. High submission fees. To avoid 2014 09/08/14
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 week for desk reject 2015 08/19/15
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject within 1 day. Handled by an editor who is not in the same field. 2017 06/18/17
European Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 1 week. Focus too narrow for a general interest journal. The associate editor however provided some useful comments which helped us improve the paper. 2019 07/25/19
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in less than a week. No evidence anyone read the paper, even though they probably have the highest submission fee among econ journals. 2017 11/19/17
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Quick desk reject with some comments. 2012 03/13/13
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in two days for not being general enough, $132 fee not refunded. 2019 05/26/19
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Manuscript number assigned at 10AM, rejected by 7PM. No refund. 12.5 euro (exclusive of VAT) for each hour it sat with them. Pretty terrible experience. 2016 01/05/17
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 "Although interesting and competently executed, your study does not contain a sufficient theoretical or empirical innovation that would meet the very high standards of the EER." Reasonable response. Appreciate quick reject. 2016 12/12/16
European Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Got the AE who served as the anonymous referee from anther journal. Didn't even quite read the rewritten paper. Copied and pasted the comments, some of which were not even relevant for the current version of the the paper. Avoid this journal. 2016 12/19/16
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 rejected in two days... 2017 11/15/17
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 Desk rejected in 8 days. My paper had some flaws which I already fixed. Sent my paper to another different journal. 2014 10/29/14
European Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2 weeks to generic desk reject with no comments whatsoever. Nothing that indicated they read the paper or even seriously considered it. Unfortunately, this is my usual experience with EER. 2018 07/17/18
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Very negative experience. Desk reject (which is good, if they're going to reject) with no explanation (which is really bad). And I've recently reviewed a closely related paper for the EER that got a revise-and-resubmit, so you'd think the topic must be interesting enough. 2018 04/12/18
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 desk rejection within 1 week. had another paper desk rejected by the same editor two years ago, text motivating the rejection was exactly the same (copy + paste) plus an additional 2 sentences explaining why the editor dislikes the approach chosen in the paper 2014 11/10/14
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 The paper would be a good fit. EER to toilet, the editors are clueless. 2016 08/13/16
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Rejected on grounds of the paper not "establishing a new set of empirical facts that theory must confront" (Eric Leeper). Waste of submission fee. Will avoid in the future. 2014 10/09/14
European Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Paper got desk rejected. Went on to publish in a better journal. 2019 02/11/20
European Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2021 09/10/21
European Journal of Industrial Relations Accepted 2 1 2 2012 01/07/13
European Journal of Law and Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 2018 06/28/18
European Journal of Law and Economics Accepted 12 3 1 2011 04/25/13
European Journal of Law and Economics Accepted 2 1 2 Good experience. Valuable referee's reports. The new editors did a good job 2014 07/25/14
European Journal of Law and Economics Accepted 3 3 3 Major revisions at the first round and then accepted. Reports very helpful. Very good experience 2015 01/19/16
European Journal of Law and Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Very detailed reports. 2017 02/19/18
European Journal of Law and Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Efficient despite the adverse outcome. 2014 09/22/14
European Journal of Law and Economics Ref Reject 24 N/A 0 Just a joke, 2 years of "under review" for nothing 2012 05/22/14
European Journal of Operational Research Pending 3 N/A 2 two useful comments with one minor, another some work 2019 03/07/20
European Journal of Operational Research Accepted 5 2 2 Two helpful reports. Definetely the referees liked the idea and wanted to improve paper's quality not to argue with its contribution. 2020 11/25/20
European Journal of Operational Research Accepted 3 3 3 efficient process. 2 reports minimal work, 1 report some work. Some conflicting recomms that editor didn't address. Professional and useful oversall 2019 01/14/20
European Journal of Operational Research Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2016 05/22/17
European Journal of Operational Research Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2019 03/07/20
European Journal of Political Economy Accepted 3 6 2 One great referee, one ok. Super fast process. Took some time due to lots of things to revise, but all the requests were fair. The editor's comments were no less helpful and extensive as referees' reports. Overall good experience. 2016 06/02/17
European Journal of Political Economy Accepted 5 2 2 Quite good reports and sufficiently fast process 2020 02/26/21
European Journal of Political Economy Accepted 2 2 2 2020 03/27/21
European Journal of Political Economy Accepted 3 1 1 2008 01/09/13
European Journal of Political Economy Accepted 3 2 2 One reviewer gave very constructive suggestions. The other reviewer raised some minor issues. Overall very fast process. Editor was very reasonable. (It doesn't seem like a club journal. I am not in a club, whatever it is.) 2018 07/07/18
European Journal of Political Economy Accepted 10 5 2 Club journal that accepts your paper if you have good ties to the editors. I had. 2012 10/24/13
European Journal of Political Economy Accepted 2 2 3 Two high quality reports. The third one very general and less useful. A lot to revise, but editor gave only 2 months. Finally very well handled by the editor. 2020 10/23/20
European Journal of Political Economy Accepted 2 4 3 2010 01/09/13
European Journal of Political Economy Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Fast. Ref Reports: I'd say one okay, the other so-so. 2014 05/23/14
European Journal of Political Economy Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Fast, but absolutely useless reports. Reviewers did not understand anything. Worst experience I have ever had. Will never submit there again. 2013 09/20/13
European Journal of Political Economy Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Nice words from Editor. Quality Ref reports. 1 Ref suggested R&R, Galasso decided to reject 2019 01/16/20
European Journal of Political Economy Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 2017 09/20/17
European Journal of Political Economy Ref Reject 0 N/A 0 useless reports... referees didn't seem to read the paper and appeared not to be experts ..... 2014 09/29/14
European Journal of Political Economy Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 Two referees, one useful and helpful, the other clearly not an expert in the field 2013 07/05/15
European Journal of Political Economy Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Two and a half months for a desk reject for lack of fit. 2013 01/22/14
European Journal of Political Economy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk-rejected in 3 days 2009 01/04/13
European Journal of Political Economy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk-rejected in 7 days: "the paper lacks sufficient political economy content to be appropriate" 2014 05/07/14
European Review of Agricultural Economics Accepted 4 6 3 2007 08/02/13
European Review of Agricultural Economics Ref Reject 3 6 3 Submitted in 2014. Three very constructive referee reports that help improving the quality of the paper. Three rounds. After two rounds all the referee agreed to publish the paper. The paper was under minor revisions. Unfortunately the editor decides to reject the paper on the last round because he has concern about the paper. Two years for such outcome. A complete waste of time and a scandalous process!! 2014 03/28/17
European Review of Agricultural Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 reports: 1 ridiculous, 1 useless, 1 useful 2015 06/08/15
European Review of Agricultural Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 2015 12/01/15
European Review of Economic History Accepted 2 2 3 Good reports. Quick process. 2020 12/24/20
Experimental Economics Accepted 3 2 2 2017 08/13/18
Experimental Economics Accepted 2 3 2 2018 11/25/18
Experimental Economics Accepted 3 2 2 6 months from initial submission to acceptance. Very helpful reports and overall a smooth process 2016 03/05/17
Experimental Economics Accepted 1 1 2 Total 6 months. Extremely fast and helpful. 2018 08/12/18
Experimental Economics Accepted 9 1 2 2011 12/21/12
Experimental Economics Ref Reject 2 2 2 Rejected but fast and helpful reports 2019 01/23/19
Experimental Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 1 reasonable report, 1 lazy half page 2019 11/05/19
Experimental Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2018 11/25/18
Experimental Economics Ref Reject 11 N/A 2 Extensive delay for referee reports apparently due to unresponsive referee 2013 01/26/15
Experimental Economics Ref Reject 2 2 2 2018 01/19/19
Experimental Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 2011 12/20/12
Experimental Economics Ref Reject 7 N/A 1 Decision based on 1 one-paragraph review that didn't refer to anything specific in the paper. After 7 months of waiting. 2012 07/24/13
Experimental Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 Both reviewers were positive suggested R&R. Editor had different opinion. His motivation was overall reasonable, except I wonder why he contacted two expert reviewers before rejecting... 2016 09/01/16
Experimental Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2 weeks. Editor letter saying that what we do is not so new. That's not true. But I'm a nobody. The bar is high for Exp Econ. 2014 10/22/14
Experimental Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 week for DR 2020 05/26/20
Explorations in Economic History Accepted 3 3 2 Very well-run journal. The editor is incredible. 2016 01/08/18
Explorations in Economic History Accepted 3 2 3 very efficient process and useful reports from editor and referess. Really improved the paper 2016 10/07/16
Explorations in Economic History Accepted 2 2 3 Great experience. Editor was engaged throughout the process, acting as a fourth referee. Three tough rounds which made the paper better. Only quibble is one referee got stuck on a (not applicable) approach and wouldn't let go. Editor should have told him to take a hike much earlier, especially when other refs suggested accept. Would submit here again. 2017 05/23/18
Explorations in Economic History Accepted 3 1 2 Great experience. Referee comments greatly improved the paper, editor was awesome. 2017 08/10/18
Explorations in Economic History Accepted 2 3 2 One excellent referee, one who did not engage at all with their requested revisions, and a very efficient editor. 2013 05/19/14
Explorations in Economic History Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Well-run journal. It was a rejection but the editor (Abramitzky) read the paper and provided some additional comments that were helpful. 2017 01/08/18
Explorations in Economic History Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 very good and fair comments in a short time 2017 08/31/17
Explorations in Economic History Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 Very thoughtful referee reports with clear suggestions for improvement, as well as recommendations from the co-editor for better suited journals 2019 09/09/19
Explorations in Economic History Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 Two good reports plus some comments from editor. very well-run journal 2015 06/23/15
Explorations in Economic History Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 editor read the paper and rejected with some useful comments. fair decision 2012 04/27/13
Explorations in Economic History Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Super quick desk rejection because paper uses archive data but isn't really econ hist 2019 09/12/19
Feminist Economics Accepted 6 6 2 6 months plus to first decision - then substantial time between R&R rounds, with pednatic comments which mostly wanted to remove the economics from the paper to the appendix 2017 06/16/19
Financial Analysts Journal Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 The referee reports were received by the ediotr roughly a month before a decision was made. There was supposed to be a third referee report that was not received, which may have been the reason for the time between submission to decision. I ended up presenting the paper at two conferences between the submission and the decision. Between two referee reports and two conference discussions, I have some things to consider for future submission. 2014 06/27/14
Financial History Review?(Cambridge) Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Fair reviews, the editor was helpful. 2014 06/05/15
Financial Management Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 very thorough with helpful suggestions for revision 2014 05/22/14
Financial Review Ref Reject 2 2 2 Thorough referee reports with substantive comments. Fair. 2017 02/15/18
FinanzArchiv Accepted 4 3 2 fast turnaround. quality reviewers. quick decision by the editor. 2019 04/05/20
FinanzArchiv Accepted 2 2 2 Contribution was an application of a specific method to an interesting case, referees made it a methodical paper by asking for a series of many different methods 2015 09/27/17
Fiscal Studies Pending 6 N/A 1 As they claim to be able to give a first response within 8 weeks, I was a bit disappointed to recive it after 6 months. Referee report not particularly useful, but editor had good suggestions 2012 04/16/13
Fiscal Studies Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 The automatic reply after submission states that they will let yo know when your paper gets assigned to a referee, but they don't. Other than that, the process was good. I got the referee reports after 2.5 months from submission. The reports were good and helpful. 2016 02/12/17
Food Policy Accepted 7 3 3 2017 05/21/19
Food Policy Accepted 3 2 2 2014 10/30/15
Games and Economic Behavior Pending 14 1 0 Good reports, meaning they liked the paper ;-) , slow first round, fastest second round ever, minor revision requested 2011 01/15/13
Games and Economic Behavior Pending 10 N/A 0 Still waiting for the first response - slow 2020 02/17/21
Games and Economic Behavior Accepted 2 2 1 a short manuscript (8 pages) 2013 11/03/13
Games and Economic Behavior Accepted 5 5 2 2011 12/21/12
Games and Economic Behavior Accepted 5 4 2 One very good report, the other average-to-good. 2007 01/15/13
Games and Economic Behavior Accepted 4 4 2 Fair process and relatively quick 2018 10/28/20
Games and Economic Behavior Accepted 3 2 2 2010 01/29/13
Games and Economic Behavior Accepted 6 4 2 2011 12/22/12
Games and Economic Behavior Accepted 8 3 2 2011 10/02/13
Games and Economic Behavior Accepted 15 8 2 2009 12/22/12
Games and Economic Behavior Accepted 4 1 2 One referee was thoughtful and recommended acceptance; Second referee asked for more results; AE agreed with the 1st referee. 2017 06/02/18
Games and Economic Behavior Accepted 6 4 2 Fair reviews 2014 09/01/15
Games and Economic Behavior Accepted 4 4 2 Fair process and relatively quick 2018 10/28/20
Games and Economic Behavior Accepted 4 4 2 Fair process and relatively quick 2018 10/28/20
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Average Quality R-Reports, one missed one has good comments 2012 12/22/12
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 cannot complaint about reports but could have been faster 2012 06/17/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2015 03/21/16
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Too slow for a short paper, AE spent 4+ months to write very short and useless report. Referee reports OK. 2018 03/14/19
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Two good reports. 1 suggested r&r other reject, AE decided to reject--fair decision. Happy with process. 2018 06/21/20
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 Very positive report, editor rejected 2013 10/12/14
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 2018 12/11/18
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 7 N/A 3 Seven months... at least the reports where good. 2014 04/30/15
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 bad reports, of the type "i don't like it" 2017 07/12/17
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 horrible reports 2012 05/16/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 After waiting for 6 months received one crap report which is absolute garbage! never submit to this journal again. 2015 01/28/16
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 bad experience. 2015 10/20/16
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 2009 01/09/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 16 N/A 0 Super slow 2016 02/14/21
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 Bad experience: six months to get one report plus a decision letter that looked like a desk rejection (which is ok, but not after 6 months) 2014 04/30/15
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 2 reports = trash; 1 okay 2011 04/17/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 6 N/A 3 Horrible. Crawford rejects although refs and editor recommends revision. 2019 07/03/20
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 12 N/A 2 Worst experience so far. Editor forgot to send the paper and took five months to send it to the referees. and then took another seven months. SHAME on you. 2012 05/23/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Good quality report 2012 01/11/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Very helpful reports. 2015 06/09/15
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Outrageously poor process. One referee was extremely favourable, the other's comments were needlessly rude and completely hostile. Second referee based their rejection on a mathematical claim that was completely wrong. The AE finally conceded that I was right and the referee was wrong - but decided to reject the paper anyway! 2012 05/31/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 2012 01/02/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 8 N/A 2 Helpful reports 2011 04/11/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 5 N/A 3 2010 01/02/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Under one month for one very brief report saying not good enough for the journal and a completely indecipherable AE report. 2019 05/12/21
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Reports ok-good 2013 10/23/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 2011 01/02/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Received two detailed reports, which were reasonably useful. 2014 08/19/14
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Poor reports 2013 05/07/14
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 6 N/A 3 One very helpful referee report, 2 not so helpful 2012 04/13/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 12 N/A 0 Worst experience ever. Outcome was fair and reports well done, but waiting time was unacceptable and the editor's lettere extremely poor. 2012 04/02/14
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 2013 12/17/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Long wait for two one-page reports! 2015 10/12/15
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Very good referee reports. 2011 01/10/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 8 N/A 2 One positive and one negative report. Editor makes no attempt to reconcile conflicting reports or 2013 10/07/13
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 8 N/A 2 One positive and one negative. The positive report points out more contributions than we claim. It also tries to give advice, but not really doable. The negative one is essentially saying "it's not game theory so I don't care." The editor agrees with the latter statement but adds "unless it's great." 2015 10/19/16
Games and Economic Behavior Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 One good referee report. The other without serious suggestions 2013 06/17/13
Games and Economic Behavior Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 AE editor rejects a paper that passed the desk at much better journals. The comments are of bad quality and show poor knowledge of economics. 2017 08/07/17
Games and Economic Behavior Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fast and fair. 2018 09/23/18
Games and Economic Behavior Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 no specific reason for rejection 2012 01/18/13
Games and Economic Behavior Desk Reject 3 N/A 3 Low quality reports 2013 10/19/13
Games and Economic Behavior Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 The editor rejected the manuscript without any useful comments. All the reasons in the rejection letter are official. Really bad experience! 2015 02/09/15
Games and Economic Behavior Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2018 12/17/18
Games and Economic Behavior Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Sent to editor who rejected after two month, with comments showing lack of knowledge of the literature. 2015 05/31/16
Games and Economic Behavior Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 game theoretic contribution not significant enough for publishing at this journal 2018 11/08/18
Games and Economic Behavior Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2010 01/02/13
German Economic Review Accepted 5 2 1 A bit slow but a decent report. 2014 03/06/18
German Economic Review Accepted 2 2 3 three rounds of R&R (two with the referees, one with the editor); very good experience, reviews vastly improved the paper 2017 04/06/18
Global Economy Journal Accepted 3 5 2 Excellent and fast process. No complains 2020 08/20/21
Global Finance Journal Accepted 1 2 1 Very fast review process (note: it was a special issue). One refree report who made very useful comments that helped significantly improve the paper. Guest editor very fast in dealing with the process 2018 10/15/18
Global Finance Journal Accepted 4 1 1 They looked better from outside. Although paper is accepted, i would hardly deal with them in the future 2013 11/21/14
Global Finance Journal Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 Submission to a special issue. The referee suggested rejection, and the associate editor agreed. The referee seemed to be familiar with the broad topic of the special issue, but not with the specific subject the paper dealt with (e.g. one of the requests advanced was indeed something that was dealt with in a specific section of the paper, making me think that the referee quicly skimmed through the paper without proper attention). Overall, I was disappointed not by the outcome per se, which is part of the game, but by the poor judgment of the referee. 2020 01/09/21
Health Economics Pending 6 N/A 0 Paper sat at editor's desk for 5 months with no review. Contacted them, told me they will try to send it out to reviewers. Considering withdrawing. 2016 05/23/17
Health Economics Pending 3 N/A 2 Revise and resubmit. Good report from reviewers. I am making revisions. 2015 08/30/15
Health Economics Accepted 2 2 2 helpful comments; quick process; good experience 2014 08/11/15
Health Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 Rejected a letter with one referee report but overall experience was good: about 6 weeks, comments sensible will try to implement. Editor Bruce Hollingsworth suggested an alternative journal. 2017 07/27/17
Health Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 Good report with relevant comments which will be useful if publication of this study is pursued further 2012 03/21/13
Health Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Terrible editor. Two refereere reports and no comments from the editor on the reports. Non professionalism of editor and referee: one referee asked to modify the paper and upon seeing the changes did reject saying that I should have done the way it was done in the first place. The editor did not even realized this and rejected. No comments on the reason for rejection was given. My impession was that the editor did not understand the paper the first time (hence no comments the first time) and clearly did not understand the unprofessional behavior of the referees. Editing is a service and it is not mandatory. We do not need dumb editors!! 2011 05/27/13
Health Economics Ref Reject 10 7 2 Paper was a letter. No applied letter should take 9 months to referee and the fact that editor did not solicit additional reports or nag the referee shows they don't care. Should have read the comments here about how badly run this journal is. Thank goodness that there are more journals in health economics started. 2014 03/27/17
Health Economics Ref Reject 2 5 2 2020 12/07/20
Health Economics Ref Reject 6 3 2 Referee failed to upload report. Referee told to write another paper instead. 2015 12/14/16
Health Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2019 01/11/21
Health Economics Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 3 months (!) for a desk reject with quite boring paragraphs from the editor along the lines why this is not using Angrist-Pischke methods... 2014 07/16/15
Health Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 instantaneous rejection, however, without any comments 2019 04/23/19
Health Economics Desk Reject 5 N/A 0 It was crazy to wait that long for a dek rejection...was not happy at all...and there was not any comments or any reviews at all...basically waited for nothing for 5 months.. 2012 03/22/13
Health Economics Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 Basically, just a short e-mail saying that it cannot be accepted and it is more suited to some other types of Journals. The rejection was fine but took too long for a desk reject. 2014 02/04/15
Health Economics Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 Editor desk rejected based on the identification strategy in the abstract, and clearly did not read the paper. 3 months for desk reject with superficial comments is ridiculous. 2007 03/26/17
Health Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Most dishonest rejection. Paper denounced an error on widely cited paper (unfairly comparing bootstrap vs asypmtotic theory with a nonpivot statistic!). The Editor is regular contributor to that mistake and provided non-sensical rejection. In general, you could bulid up a career writting notes on methodological errors publisehd in this journal. 2013 03/13/14
Health Economics Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 Editor at least seemed to have given a pretty detailed reading of the paper, but was disappointed with the amount of time it took for a desk rejection. Comments from editor suggested issues were "fixable" but then basically suggested changing the ID strategy, which basically amounts to writing a whole new paper. So not sure why the editor would say this is "fixable", unless he is trying to say it sucks in a nice way. 2015 04/26/15
History of Economic Ideas Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 One of the referee reports was very well informed. 2017 07/28/17
Human Relations Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Reviews not very helpful as it seems like psychologists reviewed it. So they had no idea about basic econometrics. If you submit here, request non-psychology reviewers (it's supposed to be an interdisciplinary journal but maybe it's not) 2015 05/03/16
Industrial and Labor Relations Review Accepted 5 3 3 Very complementary and helpful reviews. Initial decision was major but then just very minor after that. Good experience. 2015 05/03/16
Industrial and Labor Relations Review Accepted 1 2 2 Helpful reports and suggestions by the editor 2017 09/30/18
Industrial and Labor Relations Review Accepted 4 3 1 Supportinve referee report 2011 02/11/15
Industrial and Labor Relations Review Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Good reports 2013 07/28/13
Industrial and Labor Relations Review Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 The most thoughtful and detailed review I've ever had. Vastly improved the paper but had to submit elsewhere. 2015 05/03/16
Industrial and Labor Relations Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 good experience. 2014 07/13/14
Industrial and Labor Relations Review Ref Reject 7 7 3 Initial demanding R&R. Waiting was attrociious and final rejection not properly justified since reviewers went AWOL. 2014 05/03/16
Industrial and Labor Relations Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 desk reject by kahn in 48 hours. happy for a quick decision. 2016 04/09/17
Industrial and Labor Relations Review Desk Reject 4 N/A 0 Took 4 months to report that the article was not a good fit and return without reports. Incredibly unprofessional. Would never submit anything to these people again and would never recommend to anyone else either. 2020 01/04/21
Industrial and Labor Relations Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Many thanks to the editor for most constructive comments. He clearly outlined the major flaws and decided to desk-reject it. 2014 02/11/15
Industrial and Labor Relations Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject after 30 hours, helpful comments from the editor 2018 04/07/18
Industrial and Labor Relations Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 1 Month for a desk reject of a paper which was under review much higher ranked journals. 2017 07/11/17
Industrial and Labor Relations Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Rejected because topic did not fit the journal. 2019 01/21/20
Information Economics and Policy Accepted 3 3 2 Helpful associate editor 2016 11/20/18
Information Economics and Policy Accepted 10 1 1 Delays related to second reviewer. First reviewer excellent 2019 10/23/20
Information Economics and Policy Ref Reject 7 N/A 0 Slow moving. No reports provided, but editor made brief helpful comments. 2018 09/09/18
Information Economics and Policy Ref Reject 5 N/A 0 The referees' comments were very much on target and thoughtful. 2015 02/25/16
Information Economics and Policy Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Fast, bad luck with the editor who simply did not seem to see the point of the paper. 2018 02/15/18
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics Accepted 6 2 1 crappy referee. club journal 2013 12/31/14
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics Accepted 6 N/A 2 2012 10/22/13
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics Accepted 7 1 1 took 7 months for 1 referee report, but the R&R was quick. 2014 10/10/14
International Economic Review Accepted 6 5 2 2011 12/21/12
International Economic Review Accepted 4 4 2 Very good referees. Harold Cole was excellent as editor. 2011 07/31/14
International Economic Review Accepted 7 3 3 High quality reports and useful comments from the editor 2018 01/24/21
International Economic Review Accepted 6 8 2 Very detailed reports. 2015 06/19/17
International Economic Review Accepted 8 6 2 2012 08/02/13
International Economic Review Accepted 6 11 2 2009 01/10/13
International Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 2010 03/14/13
International Economic Review Ref Reject 6 N/A 3 One positive and two negative reports. All are lengthy and constructive. 2013 11/02/13
International Economic Review Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 they should have desk rejected, AE told me: you should not be surprised that IER typically does not appreciate this kind of work.. they wasted my time 2012 03/28/13
International Economic Review Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2016 05/27/16
International Economic Review Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 polite and constructive 2012 01/29/13
International Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Editor overturned referee's decisions with poor justification. Will never submit there again. 2017 03/12/18
International Economic Review Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 2008 01/10/13
International Economic Review Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2011 12/21/12
International Economic Review Ref Reject 11 N/A 2 2012 12/28/12
International Economic Review Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 Got rejection after 4 months. OK report. The editor said some good words but also said he could not turn over the recommendation. 2015 08/28/17
International Economic Review Ref Reject 2 2 2 Referee said there is a mistake in the proof. There was no mistake. 2014 10/12/14
International Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk rejected in two weeks. Got a form letter. 2016 07/04/16
International Economic Review Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk rejected in a month. Not a fit to the journal! 2016 01/24/17
International Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Got a form letter in 10 days. Recommended field journals. Submission fee refund. 2019 10/04/19
International Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 My applied labour paper was desk rejected by an editor that works on theoretical macro. 2019 10/16/19
International Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fast desk reject (1 week from submission). Recommended a field journal 2014 01/25/14
International Economic Review Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Two weeks. 2016 08/25/16
International Finance Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 very poor reviewer reports 2016 02/21/18
International Journal of Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 "Thank you for your paper. However, I regret to say that it is a bit tangential to the main focus of our journal, and we are not able to offer publication". 2020 02/10/21
International Journal of Finance and Economics Pending 24 N/A 0 Submitted August 14, 2015. Emailed twice to ask about status and no decency of even replying. Withdrew July 31, 2017. Will never submit to this journal again. 2015 11/19/17
International Journal of Finance and Economics Accepted 4 5 2 We got RR and referee reports 4 moths after submission, then it took 5 months to acceptance. Most of the 5 moths was because we were makingf teh changes. One referee, although clearly in favour of publication, asked a good deal of revisions and it took us 4 motnhs to respond so most of the delay may have been our fault. Good journal to cosndier for International Economics or Macro stuff 2015 01/28/16
International Journal of Finance and Economics Accepted 10 3 2 It took a long time to hear back from the first round. Fair referee reports, ref. 1 was more positive and ref. 2 was more critical. We made almost all of the changes required by the referees and the editor accepted it. 2017 01/06/19
International Journal of Finance and Economics Accepted 8 1 1 Long time to first response, given 3 months for a lengthy (single) report, but resubmitted and was accepted in like 3 hours. Odd journal but overall pleased with the result if not every part of the process. 2019 09/30/20
International Journal of Finance and Economics Accepted 8 8 1 8 months after submission, an in-depth and articulated referee report with many comments. The editor decided ”major revision”. 8 months after submitting the revised version it got accepted. Very good experience despite the slow turn around. 2019 06/23/20
International Journal of Finance and Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 First referee constructive and positive. The second was more critical. Editor rejected. 2015 02/16/16
International Journal of Finance and Economics Desk Reject 33 N/A 0 3 years for a desk rejection, after sending them at least 6 emails and filing a complain with the publisher. The paper was "with the editor". Not even one comment. I only regret not withdrawing this. 2018 02/28/21
International Journal of Forecasting Accepted 4 1 2 Fair reports, fast response from editors once resubmitted. Online in 2 months. Pleasant experience. 2018 11/10/18
International Journal of Forecasting Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 One report was an absolute travesty and surely had to be disregarded. Other was very thorough and generally favourable. Handling editor still rejects for unclear reasons; very frustrating, but at least fairly timely. 2015 08/01/15
International Journal of Forecasting Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 Good and useful comments 2019 06/16/19
International Journal of Forecasting Ref Reject 0 2 2 The peer review process was fast. Although the referee comments were in detail some of them were really out of the scope. Use widely accepted methods. Do not offer any innovative technique. 2015 12/02/15
International Journal of Forecasting Ref Reject 11 N/A 2 Referee reports complete crap. One told me I should have use the methodology introduced by XPTO et al, which was the one I used and cited... Only worthy comment was the editors who stated (and rightly so) that though our model statistically improved forecasts. the difference was not economically meaningful. Ok, experience if it wouldnt be for the 11 months. Hence, terrible. 2011 07/28/14
International Journal of Forecasting Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Despite the rejection, referees raised valid points that we can adress to improve our paper and provided a way forward. Both found the topic and general question interesting and wanted us to think more carefully which question we ask and how we can answer it. 2020 07/21/20
International Journal of Game Theory?(Springer) Pending 24 N/A 0 2 years and counting, for a small paper. Editor do not reply to any query. 2014 08/12/16
International Journal of Game Theory?(Springer) Accepted 2 1 3 very fast and efficient 2013 06/19/14
International Journal of Game Theory?(Springer) Accepted 9 5 2 Great experience. AE did an awesome job. Great judgment. 2016 12/27/17
International Journal of Game Theory?(Springer) Accepted 3 N/A 2 Both referees read the paper, one of them even found some mistake in the proof. 2017 07/26/18
International Journal of Game Theory?(Springer) Accepted 2 1 2 wonderful experience 2013 06/23/14
International Journal of Game Theory?(Springer) Ref Reject 36 2 5 Actually, 57 months in total. Several rounds of mildly encouraging R&R reports, then paper was lost. Editor was changed, asked for electronic resubmission and paper got rejected. 2006 02/04/13
International Journal of Game Theory?(Springer) Ref Reject 22 N/A 1 Is it professional? 2018 09/09/20
International Journal of Game Theory?(Springer) Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 Bad experience, never submit to this journal again. 2014 11/10/14
International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics Accepted 2 3 1 Very good referee report. Review process was very efficient. 2015 10/03/15
International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics Accepted 2 3 1 Very good referee report. Review process was very efficient. 2015 10/03/15
International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics Ref Reject 8 5 1 Editor rejected after R&R without providing any referee report (note: journal name has now changed to International Journal of Health Economics and Management 2019 02/18/21
International Journal of Industrial Organization Pending 2 N/A 0 2017 01/19/18
International Journal of Industrial Organization Pending 0 N/A 0 2013 09/24/13
International Journal of Industrial Organization Accepted 6 5 2 Very useful suggestions by the editor who read the paper carefully. 2017 03/04/19
International Journal of Industrial Organization Accepted 5 1 3 Good reports, very fast after the R&R 2019 07/09/20
International Journal of Industrial Organization Accepted 7 1 1 Initial response slow, then extremely quick after R&R. Friendly referee with clear remarks. 2016 03/13/17
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 One very detailed and helpful report ; Second report very short and quite destructive 2014 03/23/15
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 5 12 2 Editor agreed to R&R and suggested major changes but then didn't like the resulting paper. Got reject after a year and half of work! 2014 02/22/16
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 1 N/A 0 2020 09/10/20
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Efficient. Constructive referee report. Reasonable decision 2017 03/12/18
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 3 N/A 0 2015 02/07/16
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Editor rejected after two positive referee reports. Referee comments were useful, editor clearly did not understand judging from his remarks, which made it frustrating. 2018 03/25/19
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2011 08/02/13
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 2 2 2 . 2014 05/12/14
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Bad reports. low quality and hostile. 2016 02/02/17
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Fast, but very poor quality reports. 2012 02/03/13
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 4 6 2 R&r from the editor with major changes suggested by one referee and the urge to strongly orientate the paper towrds one of her (editor) papers. One referee did not answer the revised version the other recommended to accept. The editor rejected based on flimsy reasons. Wasted months of work. Worst experience ever. 2018 11/05/20
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 Very poor referee reports. Editor cites two but only sends one. Not submitting again to this journal. 2013 11/01/13
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 6 N/A 3 Three poor reports. Nice words from the editor. 2020 11/05/20
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 One good report, the other one poor. Good editing process 2013 07/04/13
International Journal of Industrial Organization Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Two useless reports for a paper that has been accepted by another journal of general interest. 2015 10/06/16
International Journal of Industrial Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 The IJIO has a rapid review process. In the opinion of the Editorial Board, this paper does not appear to be a good match (the othee papers are good match) for the International Journal of Industrial Organization and it is unlikely that this paper will ultimately be published in the IJIO. Therefore, we have decided not to review the paper. 2020 05/01/20
International Journal of Industrial Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject after about 2 weeks; friendly letter, not sufficiently novel enough (which is fair, not my best paper, IJIO 4th shot, paper now at 2nd tier field) 2018 11/19/18
International Journal of Industrial Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 AE desk rejected in a week. 2012 01/11/13
International Journal of Industrial Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2017 06/19/17
International Journal of Manpower Accepted 3 2 2 Smooth process. 2014 01/09/15
International Journal of Manpower Accepted 3 3 3 Editor and assistant editor were great. 2019 11/15/19
International Journal of Manpower Accepted 8 N/A 2 2016 02/15/18
International Journal of Manpower Accepted 3 2 2 Good referee reports, very nice editor (Thomas Lange) 2012 12/31/12
International Journal of Manpower Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 good reports 2013 05/19/13
International Journal of Production Economics Accepted 3 1 3 Took almost 3 months for the first reports. The reports were very detail and helpful in fixing errors in my paper. The second round of review only took 3 weeks. 2019 01/08/20
International Labour Review Desk Reject 5 N/A 0 Desk rejected after more than 5 months, avoid 2013 01/14/14
International Monetary Fund Staff Papers Ref Reject 9 N/A 2 2020 08/10/21
International Review of Applied Economics Accepted 1 1 1 receive first response within 2 weeks. very rigorous comments. best submission experience 2020 08/04/20
International Review of Applied Economics Accepted 1 1 1 receive first response within 2 weeks. very rigorous comments. best submission experience 2020 08/04/20
International Review of Applied Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 0 No ref reports, 1 sentence from editor. 5 months, disappointing experience. 2017 12/14/17
International Review of Applied Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 0 AFter 3 months of being "under review", I get this email: I regret to say that we are not able to offer publication to your paper. You are of course now free to submit the paper elsewhere should you choose to do so." Nedless to say I got no referee report even after asking. What is left to say? Avoid at all costs 2017 11/19/20
International Review of Applied Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 "Thank you for your paper. However, I regret to say that it is a bit tangential to the main focus of our journal, and we are not able to offer publication". 2020 02/10/21
International Review of Economics and Finance Pending 14 12 2 this journal is very inefficient in processing submissions and re-submissions. 2017 05/11/19
International Review of Economics and Finance Pending 12 12 0 Had to withdraw the paper after more than a year waiting since submission. 2016 10/20/17
International Review of Economics and Finance Pending 0 N/A 0 I have been waiting for more than a year since submission. The editor does not respond to emails. 2016 09/29/17
International Review of Economics and Finance Pending 10 N/A 1 A year after submission without result? Unbelievable! 2018 02/23/20
International Review of Economics and Finance Accepted 3 1 1 Fast turn around. A reviewer gave some thoughtful comments 2016 04/06/17
International Review of Economics and Finance Accepted 5 5 2 Reviewers comments were quite helpful. Overall, good experience with IREF. 2016 04/16/17
International Review of Economics and Finance Accepted 0 1 1 Fast. Great experience. Referee reports were incredibly useful and significantly improved the paper. 2018 03/08/18
International Review of Economics and Finance Ref Reject 14 N/A 0 Referee reject after more than a year. Extremely slow journal! 2018 06/30/20
International Review of Economics and Finance Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 one positive, one flat reject review, the editor decided to reject 2015 08/17/15
International Review of Financial Analysis Accepted 5 1 2 Very efficient process. Two excellent referee reports. 2016 10/06/16
International Review of Financial Analysis Accepted 5 3 2 Almost 8 months to acceptance, despite Revised version submitted after 5months. Easy/doable revisions were asked. Cannot say the paper improved significantly, but it did not get worse either 2020 02/22/21
International Review of Financial Analysis Ref Reject 10 N/A 1 3-line, useless referee report. 2016 04/25/17
International Review of Financial Analysis Ref Reject 2 1 2 Rejected after one round of review despite all referee comments being addressed. Rather weird outcome but quite quick for a journal of its reputation. 2019 08/03/19
International Review of Financial Analysis Ref Reject 3 3 1 The referee told us to delete the literature review. I think he/she was too lazy or unfamiliar with the literature to read the paper carefully. Not a r 2019 11/08/19
International Review of Financial Analysis Desk Reject 4 N/A 1 Contribution: Single country Sample and OLS production 2017 07/07/17
International Review of Law and Economics Accepted 2 2 1 2015 10/31/15
International Review of Law and Economics Accepted 3 2 2 Excellent Editorial Comments. Fast decision after resubmit. Highly recommended. 2014 05/08/15
International Review of Law and Economics Accepted 2 2 1 Very quick response. 1 referee with small reasonable suggestions. Though the paper had been to several before so by the time it got to IRLE it was pretty polished. 2014 10/28/14
International Review of Law and Economics Accepted 4 1 1 very helpful comments which improved the quality of the paper; time between resubmit and acceptance: 6 days! great experience 2017 10/20/17
International Review of Law and Economics Ref Reject 8 4 2 Rejected after the first R&R. 2010 01/11/13
International Review of Law and Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 no submission fee but fast response and fair referee report. A good journal 2017 05/06/18
International Review of Law and Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Quick and fair outcome with a nice response from the editor 2015 08/10/15
International Tax and Public Finance Accepted 3 2 2 good experience 2018 06/03/20
International Tax and Public Finance Accepted 3 2 2 Good experience with every step completed in a timely fashion 2016 07/12/17
International Tax and Public Finance Ref Reject 10 N/A 2 Referee reports were good. 2017 02/13/18
International Tax and Public Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2011 04/15/13
International Tax and Public Finance Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 2017 05/24/18
International Tax and Public Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Good reports and experience. 2013 08/07/13
International Tax and Public Finance Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 The paper was with the journal for five months and we got a rejection with only one referee report with 5 bullet points (two of which were about typos). It is not clear why the referee does not like the paper but it is clear he does not need 5 months for such a report. The comments from the editor are also disappointing: his main suggestion is to send our 7,500 words paper to economics letters. I wonder whether they actually read the document. 2014 11/10/14
International Tax and Public Finance Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Not a good fit. Editor was kind and offered some useful remarks. 2017 09/02/17
International Tax and Public Finance Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 The editor barely read the paper and decided to just reject it... At least it was quick response - 11 days. 2021 02/23/21
IZA Journal of European Labor Studies Accepted 2 1 1 2012 01/08/13
IZA Journal of Labor Economics Accepted 2 1 3 1 useless report, 1 very helpful and 1 okay. 2014 11/11/14
Japan and the World Economy Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Depressing experience. Referee report had two short paragraphs, one of them factually incorrect and demonstrating lack of knowledge of basic facts about Japanese exchange rate movements. 2013 03/05/14
Japan and the World Economy Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Bad journal. They pretend to look like an international journal however thay only consider studies related to Japan. Although my article had Nikkei 225 index in it they rejected it anyway! 2015 07/09/16
Japanese Economic Review Pending 0 1 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Journal for Labour Market Research Accepted 4 2 2 2008 01/08/13
Journal for Labour Market Research Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Both reports were of high quality 2012 01/08/13
Journal for Labour Market Research Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2012 01/08/13
Journal of Accounting and Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 0 2021 06/25/21
Journal of Accounting and Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 the referee report adds nothing, and the editor rejects based on the meaningless report 2013 02/13/13
Journal of Accounting and Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 The referee was clearly trying to protect his own paper on a related topic; half of the bullet points referred to that paper. The referee also pretended that I did not develop a two-sided hypothesis (comment like "why didn't the author think of this? Isn't it so obvious?" I mentioned that point multiple times in the intro and lit review). Don't bother submitting here unless you're in the club. 2015 03/21/16
Journal of Accounting Research Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 good report 2013 02/26/14
Journal of Accounting Research Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Unhelpful referee, helpful AE 2020 03/01/21
Journal of African Economies Ref Reject 9 N/A 2 Poor referee reports. Quite clear they didn't bother to read manuscript. 2019 02/13/20
Journal of African Economies Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 The Referee Report was very helpful and quite positive. However, the editor rejected the paper with some strange reasoning. I assume he did not like the topic at the end. 2020 02/04/21
Journal of African Economies Desk Reject 4 N/A 0 4 months for a desk rejection, frustratingly slow 2021 04/06/21
Journal of Applied Econometrics Accepted 1 1 1 Fast and very competent review. Much improved paper. Fair process. 2016 08/20/18
Journal of Applied Econometrics Accepted 6 1 2 Slow process (but exactly as advertised) and fair judgment. Helpful editor. 2013 08/20/18
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 3 reports and Editor provides some good suggestions within 10 weeks. Two reports give constructive comments and comments from the third report seem not understand the paper. Nice experience despite a rejection 2020 11/19/20
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 Quick response from referees and editor. One useful report and the other less so. 2015 09/08/15
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 One referee waited for 182 days to submit his/her report as there was a time stamp on the report. Some unfair comments about replicating what other papers have done (which are already discussed in the paper!) Sounded like the referees couldn't let go off other papers' methodologies. Then why are we doing all this work?! 2016 11/10/18
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Useless referee reports--one was just a single short paragraph. No input from editor either. 2012 04/30/13
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 Referees do not seem to have read the paper well, poorly written reports. 2015 01/11/16
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Seemed like a fair decision. We may have been aiming too high. 2018 08/16/19
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Extremely unprofessional. Not belonging to the club implies rejection. 2016 01/10/17
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 One excellent and detailed (5pages) referee report which helped a lot in revising the paper to a much higher level. Second one was about 15 lines. 2010 04/30/13
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 2012 01/11/13
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 One ok report, one poor. Long wait for such an outcome 2018 02/03/20
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Unprofessional letters, one full of typo and pushed to a no-way-working direction; the other simply was wrong on his/her main comment. Stay away from JAE 2016 03/25/17
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Fast Review process. Reports were okay but in the end not that helpful 2021 04/08/21
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 7 N/A 1 The most disgusting journal I have ever encountered. Sick comments and rejection for no reasons. 2021 05/20/21
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Ok experience. 2 shortish referee reports one fairly positive the other fairly negative, editor decided to reject based on lack of originality. I believe that if that is the reason it could have been desk rejected. Referee reports were on the shrt side, but competent and polite, unfrtunately I doubt that the comments received will help improving the paper. 2014 07/29/14
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2013 10/01/13
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 5 N/A 4 Competent referee reports, although one of them extremely hostile. 2013 06/11/13
Journal of Applied Econometrics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Got two negative referee reports, where one in very useful, and the other is moderately so. Neither referee is hostile. The time to response is not long as well. So despite I got a rejection, the experience is actually not that bad. 2017 10/31/17
Journal of Applied Econometrics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 "The empirical econometric novelty of the paper is not substantial enough ..." 2014 11/01/14
Journal of Applied Econometrics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejection within five days / Poor allocation of coordinating editor (microeconometrician for a time series paper) 2013 03/27/14
Journal of Applied Econometrics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 At first the handling editor informed us that the paper is sent for peer review. Ona day later they reected it with a one sentence crappy referee report. Controversial journal. 2016 05/22/17
Journal of Applied Econometrics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 The editor informed that she is a cross section econometrician and she did not understand our panel data paper. What can i say more? 2015 10/06/16
Journal of Applied Econometrics Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 2016 05/22/17
Journal of Applied Econometrics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2015 12/03/15
Journal of Applied Econometrics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 minor but unhelpful comments 2021 03/15/21
Journal of Applied Econometrics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject within 5 days. Not of broad interest. 2015 10/30/15
Journal of Applied Econometrics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Rejected based on an initial screening by some expert. Overall, bad experience. Not because of the decision but due the letter content. It was most likely copy-pasted from someone else’s decision letter, and I know this because they forgot to change the name on it (yes, I received a decision letter with someone else's name on it). 2016 05/09/16
Journal of Applied Econometrics?data archive Pending 0 2 0 1 2021 10/15/21
Journal of Applied Economics Ref Reject 13 N/A 1 After about 1 year of wait, the editor decided to reject the submission on the basis of 1 report (2 referees did not respond) that contained only 2-3 lines that already work was done on the topic (although appreciating the empirical analysis). 2011 12/21/12
Journal of Asian Economics Accepted 4 1 2 Calla Wiemer is a brilliant editor. She helped in improving the exposition of the paper. Overall an excellent experience. 2017 03/28/18
Journal of Banking and Finance Accepted 3 2 1 1 very useful report and associate editor comments 2019 09/29/19
Journal of Banking and Finance Accepted 2 2 2 Got the reports after 6 weeks in both rounds. 2019 01/12/20
Journal of Banking and Finance Accepted 2 2 1 Very short to the point referee report. Surprised at how quickly all went 2012 08/12/14
Journal of Banking and Finance Accepted 1 1 1 Surprisingly quick decision with helpful referee reports. 2012 02/26/13
Journal of Banking and Finance Accepted 3 3 2 good referee reports and relatively quick response 2016 08/27/17
Journal of Banking and Finance Accepted 3 1 2 Two referees in the first round, good comments. In the second round, the comments are from only one referee, they are easy so revise. 2014 04/26/15
Journal of Banking and Finance Accepted 1 3 1 Short straight-to-the point referee report with a few nice points, no bullc*ap. Very nice experience! 2012 12/17/13
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 helpful reports, probably fair 2013 03/19/14
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Much faster than last experience with the journal, same result. One referee liked the paper but had doubts about the Y variable (kiss of death); other referee turned in a three page report but missed the point of the paper completely (while asking us to delete the explanation which would have answered his questions). Still not a fan of this journal. 2018 01/25/19
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2018 04/03/19
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 Quick response. Referee report was short and commented on halve of the paper. 2020 10/30/20
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 0 N/A 2 2 (ridiculous) referee reports, poor handling by the editor. Bad experience. 2017 02/23/19
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 10 N/A 2 1 fair and 1 insulting referee report after waiting more than 10 months! 2015 04/05/16
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 2020 10/30/20
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 Decent referee reports, good turnaround time 2017 12/01/17
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 2013 01/14/14
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 both reviewers rejected for different reasons, reports were overall helpful but some comments showed lack of understanding. 2019 08/10/20
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 6 N/A 3 Took 6 months to receive 3 reports. One was good and one was particularly bad with a lot of non-english expressions. 2013 04/19/14
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 7 N/A 1 I waited for seven months, only to receive one superficial referee report. 2018 01/28/19
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 3 3 2 Good referee reports 2013 02/03/14
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 This journal provides a lot of details to track your paper (in total, we got 6 change of status), however, the whole process took almost 6 months but the referee reports were ready in less than 2 months (probably because they get paid since submission is USD250). That is, the handling of the submission took almost 4 months, I think this is unacceptable: what is the point to have quick referee reports if the editorial team takes such a long time? The reports were very brief ( 2015 08/04/15
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Not a good referee match given papers subject matter and therefore not very useful comments. 2014 06/25/14
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Lowest quality referee reports ever received 2013 02/02/14
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 3 1 1 Poor referee. Demanded a lot of work during r&r but reasons for rejection were already known in the first version. 2011 07/04/13
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 8 4 1 Six page referee report after 8 months, answered everything the ref wanted, on second round he said I didn't answer his comments at all (despite a further 10 page reply) and rejected. Editor agreed. 2014 12/16/15
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 low quality and very short referee report... 2013 03/25/13
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Terrible referee report... referee made contradictory statements and econometric mistakes in report 2018 09/03/18
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Mixed referee report; Major comments are contradictory and answerable in the text. 2018 03/18/18
Journal of Banking and Finance Ref Reject 8 N/A 1 1 Report after 8 months, Seemed like all points raised were easily answerable 2012 03/05/13
Journal of Banking and Finance Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 editor did not read the paper carefully, waste of US$250 2019 09/16/19
Journal of Banking and Finance Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 editor did not read the paper carefully, waste of US$250 2019 09/16/19
Journal of Banking and Finance Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejection after three days. Polite letter from Bekaert. Well argued rejection with helpful comments. 2020 05/15/20
Journal of Banking and Finance Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Desk reject after 2 months. No comment from the editor,ridiculous journal. 2014 06/26/14
Journal of Banking and Finance Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Desk reject after t2 2014 06/26/14
Journal of Banking and Finance Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected as outside the scope of the journal. 2016 10/19/16
Journal of Banking and Finance Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Banking and Finance Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Quick desk reject with a few comments from the editor 2010 08/02/13
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Accepted 7 9 2 Fair process and good report. Long wait though. 2013 06/05/15
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Accepted 9 2 2 2019 06/12/20
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Accepted 4 3 2 excellent experience. very good ref reports 2014 11/30/15
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Accepted 3 2 3 2020 12/14/20
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 2012 02/12/13
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Quick and reasonable. One extremely useful and one useless report. 2013 11/12/13
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Mean and non-sense comments from one referee so that the editor had to apologize. AE didn't provide comments which is odd. Some fair comments which are already addressed in the paper but no one paid attention to that... 2018 11/10/18
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 unfair reports 2014 12/22/14
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 10 weeks, one very poor referee report, the other one hostile, but associate editor made a few good comments 2014 03/27/14
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2013 08/13/15
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Ref Reject 9 N/A 2 Both reports very helpful, AE comments showed that he did not understand the paper. 2015 10/19/16
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Referees did not bother to read the paper. AE apologised for the quality of the reports, but still rejected the paper. 2019 09/19/19
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 5 day, no comments 2021 05/18/21
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Desk Reject 1 N/A 1 Desk reject based on a 5 lines initial screening by a ref who was most likely commenting on another paper than the one submitted. 2015 03/08/15
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Generic rejection. Contribution too small. Two weeks to desk reject. 2019 07/10/19
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 no comments 2021 03/15/21
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting Ref Reject 7 N/A 1 Very poor quality referee report after waiting for more than 7 months. Editor claimed that referee is an expert in the field. What a joke! 2015 12/09/15
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 The editor said that referee is an expert in this field. The referee report is very good and even show a positive view to my paper. 2016 04/21/17
Journal of Business Research Accepted 13 2 2 Had wait for the first response awfully long. Insightful and constructive comments. Think about submitting again 2012 01/05/18
Journal of Common Market Studies Accepted 2 1 2 Fantastic journal. Comments very helpful, editors took time to read the paper and were engaged throughout the process. 2014 01/16/15
Journal of Common Market Studies Accepted 6 2 4 Helpful editor, fair referees. 2012 09/10/13
Journal of Common Market Studies Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Tough but fair ref reports that raise valid questions. Good experience, even though a reject. 2015 04/08/16
Journal of Common Market Studies Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Reject because aparently would not fit in their journal. Big lie. A black bitch barks at East Europe. 2019 05/14/19
Journal of Comparative Economics Pending 2 N/A 2 2012 12/28/12
Journal of Comparative Economics Accepted 6 2 2 Longish time to first response but good reports and a ref who just loved digging into my equations. Would submit here again, editor was fair and kept things moving along. 2017 11/09/17
Journal of Comparative Economics Accepted 3 2 2 1st round 2 1/2 months. 2nd round 2 months. 3rd round 1 month and then accepted. Good comments from the reviewers. 2018 07/05/20
Journal of Comparative Economics Accepted 4 2 1 Pretty efficient process 2011 02/06/13
Journal of Comparative Economics Accepted 6 3 2 2006 01/10/13
Journal of Comparative Economics Accepted 3 2 2 Very fast with constructive reviews. 2019 06/01/20
Journal of Comparative Economics Accepted 1 2 2 Efficient process. 1 round before accept 2019 11/07/19
Journal of Comparative Economics Accepted 5 5 2 I got two very different referee reports, one was very critical but absolutely low quality. It took me a lot of time to deal with unqualified comments. It took the referees / editor 5 months to look at my revised script to then just accept it without any further comments. A stronger editor could have handled the submission more efficiently also pointing out the weakness of the 2nd report. 2014 10/29/14
Journal of Comparative Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 Referee reports were of high quality. Editor (and referees) rejected based on bad fit and offered suggestions for where to submit next. 2019 10/28/19
Journal of Comparative Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2011 02/02/13
Journal of Comparative Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Comparative Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Comparative Economics Ref Reject 8 N/A 1 So-so report. Editor claimed to have two reports but gave me only one. 2016 01/17/17
Journal of Comparative Economics Ref Reject 8 N/A 2 Quality of editing going down. Editor couldn't find referees, rejected and claimed two reports but only one sent. 2018 07/02/19
Journal of Comparative Economics Ref Reject 0 4 2 4 months for ref. rejection. Both reports made non-sense suggestions (not sure if read through), editor did not read the article. 2017 07/21/17
Journal of Comparative Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Handled by the new co-editor. Just a one-paragraph report saying that the results are not "novel". 2016 01/24/17
Journal of Comparative Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 two weeks and then desk rejected 2021 06/10/21
Journal of Comparative Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Paper desk rejected in 3 days. Generic rejection letter from the editor arguing lack of fit 2018 11/26/18
Journal of Comparative Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 desk reject in 6 days 2020 01/18/20
Journal of Comparative Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Reject because apparently would not fit in their journal. Big lie. 2021 01/23/21
Journal of Comparative Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Quick and efficient 2017 01/17/18
Journal of Comparative Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Reject because apparently would not fit in their journal. Big lie. 2021 01/23/21
Journal of Comparative Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 The editor (Hongbin Li) rejects because of lack of fir with the journal's mission. However, my paper is abotu China and Institutions, two things strongly encouragede according to their mission statement. I do nto think my paper was taken very seriously. 2019 04/15/19
Journal of Comparative Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Editor provided quick and fair comments why the paper is not suitable for the journal. 2013 12/13/13
Journal of Comparative Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Editor noted that paper of an associate editor was not cited but did not mention the name of the paper. 2012 03/18/13
Journal of Comparative Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2011 12/20/12
Journal of Comparative Economics Desk Reject 5 N/A 0 Club journal 2018 02/18/19
Journal of Conflict Resolution?(Sage) Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Desk reject due to lack of scope of the manuscript 2018 11/20/18
Journal of Consumer Affairs Ref Reject 3 N/A 0 One referee report was fine. The other was low quality and made factually incorrect statements that seemed to influence the associate editor's assessment of the manuscript. 2020 09/21/20
Journal of Consumer Affairs Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Rejected for a lack of contribution. Reviews were not particularly helpful 2019 09/21/20
Journal of Consumer Affairs Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Two referee reports and one report from the associate editor. Comments were helpful. Editor felt like the requests made by reviewers were too significant to warrant an R&R, but we did eventually expand the study and it was reconsidered as a new submission. 2019 09/21/20
Journal of Consumer Affairs Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 One useful referee report and one that was not 2019 09/21/20
Journal of Consumer Affairs Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Received two referee reports and a review from the associate editor within two months of initial submission. Article was rejected but the comments were generally helpful and thoughtful. 2018 09/21/20
Journal of Consumer Affairs Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Two referee reports; one high quality, one very low quality. The AE also provided his own review. I agree with most of the comments, but the bar for publication was exceptionally high, considering his relatively low position in the journal ranking. I wouldn't try this again. 2020 10/23/20
Journal of Corporate Finance Pending 10 N/A 0 Long waiting for 10 months, send 3 emails to ask, reply: under review 2013 02/26/14
Journal of Corporate Finance Accepted 2 4 1 Very good referee report. Thanks! 2013 01/31/14
Journal of Corporate Finance Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 2021 02/21/21
Journal of Corporate Finance Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Helpful referee report 2013 03/05/14
Journal of Corporate Finance Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 Referee identified some problems of the paper, but her suggestions were incorrect and provided references were not suitable. 2012 03/14/13
Journal of Corporate Finance Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 some useful comments from ref despite recommending reject 2016 07/10/17
Journal of Corporate Finance Ref Reject 9 N/A 1 Submission for a special issue. Waited over 9 month for a half-page low quality report. 2015 08/29/16
Journal of Corporate Finance Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Useful referee report 2013 07/23/13
Journal of Corporate Finance Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 Ridiculous! Desk reject after 3 months 2016 03/08/17
Journal of Corporate Finance Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 Lousy comments from the Editor in chief. He kept for 3 months and then desk reject because the data period stops at 2013, while we submitted in 2017. 2017 10/30/19
Journal of Cultural Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Write any form of equation and you're skewered! 2015 04/03/16
Journal of Development Economics Pending 12 N/A 0 After 12 months the paper was not even sent out to review or rejected despite 10 emails. Just the process of having the paper withdrawn took 2 months. Disgraceful! 2017 06/01/17
Journal of Development Economics Accepted 6 2 2 Going through 15 months of the reviewing process. I am happy with the outcome. 2019 09/02/20
Journal of Development Economics Accepted 3 3 2 Good experience. Ref reports both frank and helpful. Referees tough & somewhat demanding. Editor guidance also helpful. Basically max 3-month turnaround from their side at any stage. 2013 01/30/14
Journal of Development Economics Accepted 5 3 2 Good reports and no nitpicking on the revision. Good experience overall. 2017 06/13/18
Journal of Development Economics Accepted 4 3 1 2012 03/20/13
Journal of Development Economics Accepted 6 1 3 Useful ref reports and helpful comments from co-editor. Courteous notes from editor&co-editors when first response was delayed. Overall, great experecience! 2012 08/27/13
Journal of Development Economics Accepted 6 1 2 2011 01/02/13
Journal of Development Economics Accepted 3 4 2 2017 08/22/18
Journal of Development Economics Accepted 3 2 1 The co-editor was very efficient and apparently read the paper. First response in less than 3 months. The report asked for a lot of work but helped with improving the paper a great deal. 2015 12/31/16
Journal of Development Economics Accepted 3 1 2 Great experience, one of the referees truly improved the paper substantially. 2017 02/07/18
Journal of Development Economics Accepted 0 4 2 Editor was super helpful. Strong referees. 2017 01/16/19
Journal of Development Economics Accepted 4 3 2 2018 11/01/20
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 only 1 referee report 3 sentences long by reviewer who did not read the paper 2013 05/18/13
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 9 N/A 2 Good reports but very slow to get a rejection 2012 11/26/13
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Excellent reports that really improved the paper. 2013 10/22/14
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 excellent comments from referees 2014 06/29/14
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 2016 12/09/17
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 Ok reports with some useful comments 2013 06/11/13
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 No theoretical model was developed. 2014 03/03/15
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Referee reports were modestly helpful, though there was very little overlap between what the referees commented on. 2012 04/07/13
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2017 09/10/19
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 The referees loved it, very positive comments. Then editor Dean Karlan rejected it for fit. Could have desk rejected and saved us all the trouble. 2012 05/18/15
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 4 3 3 2015 08/11/16
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 0 Six months to respond. One referee did read the paper, the other responded with odd arguments. 2015 06/23/15
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 great reviews and useful comments for ref 2013 04/30/15
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 2017 09/10/19
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 9 N/A 2 Long process. 2 months for decision from being notified that "reviews received" and one of the referee reports was dated 7 months ago. moderately helpful but whole process took too long. 2013 11/22/13
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2016 08/10/16
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Excellent and detailed report, fair decision. 2013 01/20/14
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 Both reports positive (one minor/one major revision recommended). Co-editor rejects because contribution is not big enough to warrant publication. (This would have been easy to see from reading the intro before sending this to reviewers – why not desk-reject instead of wasting author and reviewer time?) 2020 11/08/20
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Quick with two very good reports and a detailed decision letter from the editor. 2019 05/12/21
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 10 N/A 1 Submitted 4 February, rejected 29 December with 1 ok referee report that had been submitted in May. The journal originally sent me the referee's letter to the editor instead of the referee report - took almost a week to actually get the report. 2014 01/21/15
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Two reviewers recommended rejection. One of them gave some good suggestions, but I disagree with some other points she made. Reviewer number two said the paper had no relevant contribution beyond those of a paper recently published in a top journal. This referee made no specific comments. 2018 12/06/18
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 Fair decision. Excellent ref report. Pointed out the problems in the model and also admitted that its difficult to take care of all those problems 2012 07/13/13
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Co-editor felt nothing "wrong" with paper but does not made enough of a contribution to warrant publication. (Shouldn't these cases be desk-rejected instead of being rejected after 6 months?) 2017 11/27/17
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2011 02/18/13
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 one nasty and rudely written report with inaccuracies as well, one cited lack of fit. 2017 04/28/18
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 10 N/A 2 rejected after 5 months of 'reviews completed' 2012 03/22/13
Journal of Development Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Thoughtful comments from the referees and the editor. 2014 10/22/14
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Andrew Foster took a full month for a desk without a comment 2018 12/12/18
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk rejected after 1 month without any comments 2012 02/18/13
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2014 07/26/14
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Arbitrary decision without sending it to refs by incompetent editor. 2014 08/09/14
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk rejection after 1 month. 2018 08/06/18
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 6 N/A 0 6 months to desk reject with little reason. Expected much better from this journal. 2016 08/05/16
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 5 weeks desk reject 2019 01/13/20
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in a week. They have officially adopted the policy of not giving reasons for desk rejections given the 75% desk rejection rate. 2017 12/22/17
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 1 0 Editor read/scanned desk rejected paper. Provided very useful comments. Not suited to journal, and turnaround was 2-3 weeks. 2014 06/06/15
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2016 12/09/17
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in 36 hours. 2021 02/26/21
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Rejected and no reason given. Here is all I received: "I regret to inform you that as part of a pre-screening process applied to all submitted manuscripts to the JDE, I have read your paper and have decided not to put it into the regular review process. This is designed to reduce the overall turnaround time for the journal, especially given the high volume of submissions." This, of course, is useless. 2016 02/21/17
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk reject in 3 weeks. 2020 05/04/20
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Fast desk reject. No comments 2019 07/08/19
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejection within two weeks. Rather uninformative feedback: feeling that it is not suitable for publication and unlikely to be favorably reviewed. 2019 02/22/19
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected within 1 week. No reason given. 2017 07/31/17
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 18 days, no indication that either adstract or paper was read 2016 11/16/16
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in 2 weeks. 2018 05/05/18
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2012 12/29/12
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2 weeks to desk reject. No reason provided, in line with the journal policy. 2017 07/31/17
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk rejected after 26 days 2019 03/20/19
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 No indication that the paper was read. Then again, it only took a couple of weeks to get the rejection. 2011 04/29/14
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Three weeks for DR without comments seems too long. 2021 04/20/21
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 week 2016 05/24/16
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2 weeks 2016 10/24/16
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 desk reject after 9 days - reason: editor feels not suitable for publication 2018 01/02/19
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk rejected after 26 days 2019 03/20/19
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2016 10/24/16
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Very slow. Desk rejected after 7 weeks. The editor's comments are not informative. 2018 08/02/18
Journal of Development Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in 2 weeks without a reason 2017 10/04/17
Journal of Development Studies Accepted 2 1 2 Good communication and seemed very efficient. Both reviews helpful - one very extensive 2021 06/10/21
Journal of Development Studies Accepted 4 1 2 2016 12/09/17
Journal of Development Studies Accepted 3 2 2 good experience 2017 09/11/17
Journal of Development Studies Accepted 3 2 2 good experience 2017 09/11/17
Journal of Development Studies Accepted 4 3 2 2014 01/18/15
Journal of Development Studies Ref Reject 4 4 2 Lousy reports showing lack of proper reading. One rejected outright, one offered R&R. The editor rejected without reading the paper based on one referee. Basically if you don't make everyone happy on the first round you stand no chance at this journal. 2017 10/10/17
Journal of Development Studies Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 the issue did not fit... no justifications. 2nd bad experience for me with this journal 2015 03/13/15
Journal of Development Studies Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Desk Reject after 5 weeks 2020 10/08/20
Journal of Development Studies Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk Reject after 7 days 2012 06/30/15
Journal of Econometrics Accepted 8 7 2 2 good reports, clearly improved the paper. So slow... 2012 07/02/14
Journal of Econometrics Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Some fair some unwarranted comments. Got the rejection after 185 days, referees like to wait until the last couple of days to read papers! 2018 11/10/18
Journal of Econometrics Ref Reject 11 N/A 2 Long wait. Two referee reports: one decent, one poor. Silly comments from AE. 2014 08/25/15
Journal of Econometrics Ref Reject 6 N/A 3 While the paper was rejected the referee reports were in-depth and very helpful. Roughly 2-3 pages of comments from each reviewer. 2011 05/01/13
Journal of Econometrics Ref Reject 11 N/A 2 one referee report was in after three months, AE waited 9 months before making a recommendation 2014 09/11/16
Journal of Econometrics Ref Reject 7 N/A 1 Only one referee report. Comments are not useful at all. 2015 12/05/16
Journal of Econometrics Ref Reject 10 N/A 3 Helpful comments from referees and editor. But 10 months is too long. 2014 12/02/14
Journal of Econometrics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 not so helpful comments 2015 03/14/16
Journal of Econometrics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2012 02/05/13
Journal of Econometrics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Polite, some helpful comments 2021 03/15/21
Journal of Econometrics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2011 12/28/12
Journal of Economic and Social Measurement Accepted 8 N/A 0 Accepted without revisions. Even with the moderately long wait, its hard to complain about that! 2013 03/14/14
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 0 2 1 I heard back really quickly with helpful comments. 2016 01/12/17
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 4 3 2 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 6 3 2 Very helpful feedback that made this a better paper. 2013 02/28/14
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 3 1 1 2018 06/21/19
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 2 2 2 Very good handling of the process. Insightful comments by both referees and editor. 2019 03/16/20
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 4 1 3 2013 02/28/14
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 4 1 2 Good reports 2012 04/04/13
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 2 4 1 It was very smooth. The report was very entensive and it required a lot of extra work but it was insightful as well (however, as always, we had to compromise in some things we were not fully convinced the referee was right). The process was very fast. Overall, very good experience. 2017 12/21/17
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 2 1 2 Two reports with mixed view. One review was good, and helped to improve the paper, the other one (recommended rejection) was raising many peripheral issues. Editorial processes were very fast. 2017 10/19/17
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 1 1 3 Quick and well handled by the editor. Decent reports. 2017 07/04/18
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 4 3 2 One very good report, the other OK. Efficient handling by editor. 2012 03/18/13
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 3 3 2 Excellent editor, balanced referees and good timing. 2019 10/28/20
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 2 1 2 2017 09/01/17
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Accepted 2 2 1 Really involved editor and a referee who suggested changes that, while complex, were easy to deal with. A really good experience and really fast. Will submit here again. 2018 05/07/19
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 7 N/A 1 Seemed like a very long time to only receive one referee report. 2015 11/05/15
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 2019 06/25/19
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 bad reports but thankfully fast 2012 08/30/13
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 8 N/A 3 Good reports. Took way too long... prob will avoid in future 2014 07/31/15
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 8 N/A 0 Very slow... 2012 03/14/13
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Good reports 2014 10/21/14
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 6 N/A 0 1 very good referee reports, 1 mediocre, editor was nice. 2013 04/20/14
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Process was acceptable. 2013 08/08/14
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 6 months for a referee report written by a plain imbecile who could not even derive Proposition 1. AWFUL editorial work. 2018 11/26/18
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Terrible reports. 2015 05/24/15
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 2018 12/17/18
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 9 N/A 2 inquiry after 6 month: "several referees invited but still no reports", rejected after 9 month: "sent the paper to four reviewers but only received two reports". Reports were ok, but total process took way too long. 2015 03/24/16
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Very disappointing experience with the journal and refereeing process. It took 6 months a referee to look at the paper and decide that it does not make enough contribution to be published in this journal (very smart idea). The contributions are very thoroughly detailed in the introduction, ie, the referee had to read around 3 pages and took him/her 6 months to do so. The referee made also several nonsensical remarks about the methodology giving a signal that s/he hasn’t thoroughly went through the paper. The other referee was very positive but the editor followed the negative report. 2015 02/24/17
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 9 N/A 2 Exceptionally long time 2012 10/12/13
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Ref Reject 9 N/A 1 bad experience 2012 05/19/13
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Editor misread the title and barely read the abstract. 2016 04/18/17
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Within a week, Laura Schechter clearly went through the paper and give it a thought with a couple of helpfull comments 2018 12/17/18
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Editor response, not a fit to the journal, too theory! Perhaps we can call JABO an experimental journal now. Didn't refund the submission fee. 2014 09/16/14
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 The editor barely read the paper and decided to reject! 2015 12/22/15
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 a quick desk reject 2020 10/11/20
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 rejected in exactly three weeks - editor said that the topic only gets published in JEBO if there's a special issue (which mine was not connected with). Still, refreshing for honesty. 2016 06/09/16
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Editor says not a good 2016 09/11/16
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Editor says not a good 2016 09/11/16
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Editor desk-rejected in 1 day. Surprisingly, she had one-page long useful comments, which helped improve the paper. The paper is accepted in another journal now. 2018 04/12/21
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Avoid Scott Adams. He does not read the paper, or he has no expertise. Avoid him. 2019 05/02/20
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Superficial comment. "Not a good fit". No reimburment of submission fee ($130) 2019 06/17/19
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2018 03/11/18
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2013 02/06/13
Journal of Economic Development Desk Reject 14 1 0 Disappointing turnaround for this journal. I sent in my paper and after 2 emails requesting information about the status of my manuscript, I was asked to be patient. I waited fora long time only to be rejected with a response NOT A GOOD FIT. Terrible screening process at this journal. 2018 10/22/19
Journal of Economic Development Desk Reject 14 1 0 Disappointing turnaround for this journal. I sent in my paper and after 2 emails requesting information about the status of my manuscript, I was asked to be patient. I waited fora long time only to be rejected with a response NOT A GOOD FIT. Terrible screening process at this journal. 2018 10/22/19
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Pending 1 1 1 Good report and conditionally accepted with minor revisions. 2013 12/06/13
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Accepted 4 3 3 very good constructive process 2016 07/13/17
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Accepted 3 1 2 very good experience. 2012 10/04/15
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Accepted 2 1 1 Very very good comments, referee was clearly very knowledgeable. Very tough report on the first RR, extensive changes suggested, though all feasible and mostly all improved the quality of the paper. Editor contributed with some helpful comments as well. Very happy with the process, definetly a favorite for future 2014 07/28/14
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Accepted 3 2 2 very fast and efficiently managed! 2019 11/20/19
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Accepted 2 1 2 Very efficient. The editor (Ravikumar) gave me an R&R with reasonable requirements. Resubmitted and then conditional accepted within a week. 2019 10/30/20
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Accepted 1 1 1 2 months between submission and final decision! I'm amazed. 2013 12/30/13
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Accepted 3 2 3 Extremely efficient process with good comments by referees. Resulted in much better paper 2013 02/25/15
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Accepted 3 1 2 One of the best run journals in macro. Solid referee report and very quick response. 2015 06/15/15
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Accepted 3 1 2 Excellent reports. Really insightful comments that make the paper a lot better. Fast response from the Editor. JEDC is well run. 2015 05/12/15
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Accepted 3 2 3 Very efficient process 2013 08/18/15
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Accepted 10 8 2 One referee posted two of his own papers including url in the report, one of which was just accepted in the same journal before sending reports. Tried to block publication in the second round as well but editor overrode. Second report very good. 2015 09/27/17
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Accepted 9 3 2 2011 09/02/13
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Accepted 3 2 1 Very helpful referee report. Very quick response from Editor (Otrok) after revision. 2013 11/20/14
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 One excellent and one ok report 2019 10/21/19
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 Poor referee report 2012 05/29/14
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2012 08/02/13
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 No surprising, but referee report was sloppy and incorrect. I don't necessarily disagree with the editor's assessment, but was surprised at the low-quality of the referee report. 2018 01/09/19
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 Just over a month to referee reject. 2018 10/01/18
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Ref Reject 1 N/A 0 Bad experience on the whole. Seems to be unfit the reviewing editor's preference but the handling editor was kind though. 2015 08/13/15
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Mildly positive referees but reject nonetheless. Turnaround times are reasonable though. 2015 07/02/15
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Ref Reject 14 N/A 2 Ridiculous experience. Reports with no use, in one case even mentioning the need of something that was already done in the paper. Unanswered letters to editor by the 6th and 12th months after submission, only got reply after getting in touch to editorial office. 2012 01/16/14
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Ref Reject 20 N/A 1 2012 09/22/14
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected the same day! The editor simply did not read the paper, since he presented no specific comment whatsoever about it, nor any recommendation. True, no time wasted, just the $125 submission fee. 2020 07/21/20
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2014 07/05/14
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Five weeks "with editor" to a boilerplate desk reject, then they asked me to applaud them for a "speedy decision." 2021 09/08/21
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Otrok rejected within 7 days; considerable comments on the paper, though the three major points are either just wrong or addressed (one of them prominently) in the introduction of the paper. 2014 10/09/14
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in a few days. Editor clearly read a good deal of the paper and his comments were as helpful as the median referee report. 2014 11/18/14
Journal of Economic Education Pending 0 N/A 0 2012 01/05/13
Journal of Economic Education Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Got 3 ref reports - 1 RR 2 reject. Good reports overall. Editorial office very helpful. 2015 11/28/15
Journal of Economic Education Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 one ok report, one very hostile. not worth the time and effort. 2013 04/30/16
Journal of Economic Education Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Terrible, very short referee reports. Anti-intellectual reasoning. Overall horrifying experience. Who are these people?? I suspect a tight club. 2020 07/09/20
Journal of Economic Education Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 3 reports. One good and two useless reports. Referees reasons to reject the paper are not convincing enough. 2015 01/19/16
Journal of Economic Geography Pending 0 N/A 0 2017 07/30/17
Journal of Economic Geography Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 The time was not long (bit less than 10 weeks), the outcome was what is normal in this profession (Referee rejection). However, it seems the process is one editor first decide whether to send to referee or not but a second editor makes the final decision (William Kerr)? (are we a bit paranoiac?). That mean 5 people read my paper? 2018 08/13/18
Journal of Economic Geography Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject after 2 weeks due to bad fit. 2018 06/09/18
Journal of Economic Geography Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in less than one month. Fair and useful comment by the editor. Recommended 2015 03/03/15
Journal of Economic Geography Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2018 03/11/18
Journal of Economic Geography Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejection in one week. Editor actually read the paper. Rejected due to lack of signficant contribution, fair assessment. 2015 02/27/15
Journal of Economic Geography Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2019 07/22/19
Journal of Economic Growth Ref Reject 5 N/A 3 WE got 3 tough and long referee reports. It is not very clear why it got rejected at the end (I guess referees recommended rejection but thsi was not stated in their reports so it coudl have been the editor who thought it was difficut to get published given the work needed). Overall, the reports were good so no complains. 2015 07/13/17
Journal of Economic Growth Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Very unfair review by the referee and by the editor-in-chief. The reviewer has no clue as to what is happening in the paper and to what questions in the literature the paper is trying to answer. I don't think he/she took a wee bit of pain to find out the context. The editor-in-chief failed to see this and was only interested in promoting his agenda of unified growth theory. Very, very disappointed. 2016 02/06/17
Journal of Economic Growth Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Galor and the referees felt the contribution wasn't substantial enough. I suppose if your work is primarily empirical then you'd better do something that's close to the editor's personal interest, otherwise there will always be the criticism that you need more theory. Would submit again. 2014 10/09/14
Journal of Economic Growth Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Efficient. Six weeks for response. One useful report, the other poor. 2013 01/18/14
Journal of Economic Growth Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 Two referee reviews. One is very productive while the other is suck 2015 08/13/15
Journal of Economic Growth Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 one useless ref report 2013 02/10/14
Journal of Economic Growth Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 1 reasonable report 2018 07/21/18
Journal of Economic Growth Ref Reject 12 N/A 1 Waited 12 weeks for six lines from one ref. Charging for this should be a crime. 2017 07/29/17
Journal of Economic Growth Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 A very detailed and fair review of our research, providing a balanced judgement of our achievements. Constructive and very specific. In-depth argumentation why there is no sufficient progress compared to common wisdom. Also a very kind editorial letter. Excellent experience. 2015 12/08/15
Journal of Economic Growth Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Good reviews by the referee and the AE. We agreed with most of the comments. Took seven weeks to get these reviews, pretty efficient journal. 2017 06/10/17
Journal of Economic History Accepted 3 5 3 Editor acted as 4th referee once referees were satisfied. 2014 09/19/17
Journal of Economic History Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2019 07/22/19
Journal of Economic History Ref Reject 0 N/A 0 2 useless reports by refs who barely skimmed the paper, one completely mistook the tested var & misreported it in his comments, editor's comments (Bill Collins) were smug and obnoxious but shallow 2016 09/21/17
Journal of Economic History Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Very disappointing. Comments were not about the historical content of the paper and one referee was obviously pushing his own work/research agenda 2015 10/07/16
Journal of Economic History Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Two reports that are quite detailed. Editor (Collins) might read the paper, but did not say much. The reviewers "firmly" recommend rejection but I see that most problems can be fixed. Overall, not bad experience. BTW, "Under review" all the time during the reviewing process, similar to AEA journals (but different from some other journals using manuscript central). 2018 05/22/18
Journal of Economic History Ref Reject 8 N/A 0 Two very thin referee reports. Referees obviously did not read the paper. Extremly disappointing for a journal which claims to be the number one field journal. 2016 09/23/17
Journal of Economic History Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 1 positive but short & useless, 1 incompetent negative who didn't even understand the historical topic. Grad student who manages inbox for ed took bad review at face value. 2015 09/28/15
Journal of Economic Inequality Accepted 3 4 2 Good reports, smooth process. 2013 04/20/14
Journal of Economic Inequality Accepted 8 1 2 2010 01/06/13
Journal of Economic Inequality Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 helpful referee reports. 2018 05/03/18
Journal of Economic Inequality Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Quick desk rejection. The AE was gentle and actually read my paper. He suggested a more suitable outlet. 2016 05/17/16
Journal of Economic Issues Accepted 8 2 2 Long time to first response and had to chase up editor, but comments were helpful and editor was very engaged in the revision process. Would submit here again now that I know what to expect. 2015 03/15/16
Journal of Economic Issues Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Over 8 weeks for a desk reject due to poor fit for journal. Completely unacceptable. 2016 05/30/16
Journal of Economic Psychology Accepted 2 3 2 Helpful reports, overall good experience. 2016 02/03/17
Journal of Economic Psychology Accepted 4 3 2 2016 05/03/17
Journal of Economic Psychology Accepted 2 1 2 5 weeks to first response. Really good advice from journal editor and 2 good reports. 2014 10/22/15
Journal of Economic Psychology Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Generous comments from editor and referees 2018 06/16/19
Journal of Economic Psychology Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 lenghty referee reports; rejection because of one referee even though I discuss his point 2018 08/07/18
Journal of Economic Psychology Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2020 10/05/20
Journal of Economic Psychology Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Had to send several emails inquiring about the status. 2 months with almost no answer, although the journal claims desk rejections are within days. Anyway, the editor letter mentiones out of scope, and blaims it on our lack of (maybe interest in ?) linking the paper with the "literature in the field", although we specifically say that our empirical application is novel to the field, so there are no comparable references. It made it sound like we were not part of the club anyway. 2020 11/19/20
Journal of Economic Surveys Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Horrible...very low quality reports 2015 07/29/16
Journal of Economic Surveys Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 One ref in favor, one against. Fair points raised, although I would have preferred a R&R naturally. 2016 02/23/17
Journal of Economic Surveys Ref Reject 14 N/A 2 2012 12/05/13
Journal of Economic Surveys Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2019 07/29/19
Journal of Economic Surveys Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2017 06/10/17
Journal of Economic Surveys Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2013 03/18/14
Journal of Economic Theory Pending 5 N/A 0 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Economic Theory Accepted 4 4 3 Decent reports; AE was a bit difficult, but ultimately helpful 2011 01/29/13
Journal of Economic Theory Accepted 6 6 2 2009 12/22/12
Journal of Economic Theory Accepted 3 2 2 Good reports and constructive feedback from AE; only 1 round of R&R 2016 03/13/18
Journal of Economic Theory Accepted 3 2 2 Good experience with helpful AE and reviewer. 2016 11/18/17
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 4 N/A 4 Positive feedback from the editor. But referees are very negative. 2014 07/05/14
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Hellwig rejected, suggested 2nd tier journal such as ET 2010 03/05/13
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 6 N/A 0 "not enough contribution". useless reports. 2014 09/09/14
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Good referee reports 2015 02/13/16
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2014 08/19/15
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 7 N/A 1 2010 12/24/12
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 Short report 2011 04/04/13
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 2010 01/09/13
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Pretty helpful reports. Editor handled it well. 2015 06/17/16
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 Three excellent reports, the referees had really put an effort. I was very grateful despite the rejection. 2014 10/15/14
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 3 3 4 Worst experience with a paper submission ever. Xavier Vives rejected the paper after 4 rounds and 2 years based on the recommendation of an incompetent referee who couldn't understand the paper and kept making bogus claims about errors in the analysis or interpretation in every round. Even though I debunked his claims every time, he was just coming up with new ones. The editor didn't bother to read through the lines of my responses to his previous reports to see how incompetent the referee is, or to look at the big picture and account also for the reports of other referees who wrote much more competent reports and had recommended acceptance several rounds earlier. He just casually decided to close the file because it had been under review for too long without any concern for anything. It's the kind of disappointment that makes you stop caring about research. 2015 10/22/17
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 Average quality reports 2012 04/10/13
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 7 N/A 3 2017 07/25/18
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 1 very weak report, 1 very useful, AE's report extremely weak 2020 09/05/20
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2013 11/22/13
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 2 11 2 2018 03/10/20
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 10 N/A 2 2010 12/20/12
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Under two month for two reports. One good, one crap but overall a fair and quick decision. 2020 05/12/21
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 4 N/A 3 referee repots good 2012 04/26/13
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 4 N/A 4 Positive feedback from the editor. But referees are very negative. 2014 07/05/14
Journal of Economic Theory Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Referees rejected. Reasonable. Fast turnover. 2017 05/08/18
Journal of Economic Theory Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Rejected by an Associate Editor, who actually read the paper, got the main idea clearly, and wrote a 2 full-page report with reasoning why this is not for JET and what journal outlets might be considered. This AE note is better than lousy referee reports that I used to receive at a low level journal. Pleasant experience overall. Will submit again. 2017 12/15/17
Journal of Economic Theory Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 Rejected with a 1-page AE report, after almost 3 months. No referee reports. The AE report made no sense at all, and had very little substance. With hindsight, I got much more out of submitting this paper to TE. 2020 10/19/20
Journal of Economic Theory Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2013 06/03/13
Journal of Economic Theory Desk Reject 3 N/A 2 2018 12/17/18
Journal of Economic Theory Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2012 06/03/13
Journal of Economic Theory Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Not a good fit. Desk reject in 48hs 2017 08/17/17
Journal of Economic Theory Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 editor was nice enough to drop a page or so of precise and useful comments 2013 02/20/14
Journal of Economic Theory (Elsevier) Accepted 3 3 2 Efficient and professional. Two rounds: less than three months in the first round and less than two months in the second round. 2015 05/24/16
Journal of Economic Theory (Elsevier) Accepted 4 4 3 Excellent process and referees 2015 09/18/16
Journal of Economic Theory (Elsevier) Accepted 3 2 2 Editor is very efficient and professional. Two rounds: less than three months in the first round and about two months in the second round. 2016 08/20/17
Journal of Economic Theory (Elsevier) Ref Reject 8 N/A 2 2 reports + report from AE which is a lot better than referee reports 2018 11/05/18
Journal of Economic Theory (Elsevier) Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 Very good referee report 2013 03/21/14
Journal of Economics Accepted 3 1 1 editor very helpful. 1 referee asks for many changes, but the comments are in general useful. 2010 10/04/15
Journal of Economics Accepted 2 1 2 Fast response; good reports. 2011 02/07/13
Journal of Economics Accepted 1 1 2 Smooth process. One referee report was helpful, the other was on average. If you are in a hurry or need one to fill you CV, then choose it., 2020 06/23/20
Journal of Economics and Finance Accepted 2 1 2 2016 01/28/17
Journal of Economics and Finance Education Accepted 2 1 2 Fast turnaround. Excellent communication with editor. Accepted 4 days after resub. Thorough ref reports with good comments. Nice when they actually read the paper. 2017 02/03/18
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Accepted 3 3 2 Good reports that were specific and helpful. Production process is quite efficient, but the journal does not post articles online in advance which harms visibility a little. 2011 05/30/13
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Accepted 3 2 2 Very fast and professional referee reports. 2017 02/24/18
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Accepted 3 8 2 Initial response was quick. Editor and referees seemed willing to listen to reason which encouraged me to work hard on the revision and make my case when I thought reports misguided. 2012 09/09/13
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Accepted 6 5 2 All is well when it ends well. 2013 05/29/14
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Accepted 9 9 2 It took 4 rounds of referee reports. The referee was clearly delaying in order to hold the paper for citation of his own work. Once that work was published, he finally accepted the paper. The paper was published in 2016 2010 06/09/17
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Accepted 4 3 2 1 weak report & 1 very professional, AE also very professional 2019 09/05/20
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Accepted 6 6 2 2016 07/18/17
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Accepted 3 3 2 Decent referee reports that indeed improve the paper 2014 02/26/16
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 One good report. Comments were fair 2016 07/04/16
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 One excellent report, one mediocre report 2015 09/05/15
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Fair reports 2018 04/01/19
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2012 04/12/13
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 2017 06/13/18
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Economics and Management Strategy Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject after 7 days - out of scope 2016 08/24/16
Journal of Empirical Finance Pending 6 N/A 2 referees appear to understand the area. the revision requirements seem achievable. Rather short reports for waiting 6 months. We'll see. 2013 05/22/14
Journal of Empirical Finance Accepted 1 1 1 2013 02/10/14
Journal of Empirical Finance Accepted 7 6 1 Accepted after two rounds. One referee report---which is actually better than any report ever received with this paper (including those from RFS, JFQA, and MS) 2013 02/19/17
Journal of Empirical Finance Accepted 6 1 2 Update to previous pending post. The acceptance came quickly after the second round of review. 2013 09/18/14
Journal of Empirical Finance Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Bad experience: subjective report + pretentious editor + journal for friends (econometrics family) = save your money, submit elsewhere 2016 09/14/17
Journal of Empirical Finance Ref Reject 14 N/A 1 Had to beg to get a useless ref report. Do not waste your time with this journal. 2014 10/19/15
Journal of Empirical Finance Ref Reject 14 N/A 1 Had to beg to get a useless ref report. Do not waste your time with this journal. 2014 10/19/15
Journal of Empirical Finance Ref Reject 10 N/A 1 Extremely slow process, even though they advertise quick turnaround time. Only 1 report, but a fair assessment of the paper. 2016 09/02/17
Journal of Empirical Finance Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 unreasonable report, the referee imposed a t-stat of at least 5 or 6 for an empirical study. 2018 10/30/19
Journal of Empirical Finance Ref Reject 13 N/A 1 Bad to useless reports after an unacceptably long response time. 2014 03/17/15
Journal of Empirical Finance Ref Reject 14 N/A 0 Referee reject without any comments after 14 months of chasing the journal. Awful experience. 2018 08/03/19
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Pending 6 N/A 2 Close call...Editor gave the benefit-of-a-doubt and requested revisions 2013 02/28/14
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Accepted 10 3 3 overall, pretty smooth process (always easier to say when the paper ends up being published) 2016 09/26/17
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Accepted 2 3 2 2012 12/04/13
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Accepted 2 3 2 First decision in 2 months. Second decision took 2.5 months. Third round (acceptance) took 2 weeks. 2012 07/07/14
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Accepted 6 6 2 reviewer reports were okay, but the process took so long. 2002 11/27/16
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Accepted 5 4 3 2010 01/09/13
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Accepted 6 5 2 one good referee, the other not very good, helpful editor 2012 10/22/13
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 Two reviews - one very positive, and one that was clearly from someone outside of the field that was not familiar with the methods or the literature. Response from editor sided with this second referee and provided little justification. Much better process and better reviewers at JAERE. 2015 12/14/15
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2012 07/22/13
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2011 12/20/12
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2012 08/02/13
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 2016 12/09/17
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Fast review process. It was clear that the referees read the paper and provided appropriate comments. The editor suggested an alternative outlet, which was where the paper eventually got published. 2017 01/22/19
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2018 09/21/19
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2012 02/20/13
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2016 12/05/16
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 3 N/A 0 Very detailed referee reports 2017 07/19/18
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 relatively fast, but referees totally uninformed of the literature 2014 12/03/14
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2006 01/09/13
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 12 N/A 2 Somehow it took a whole year for the referees to write short and horribly useless reports which show they did not even bother to read the introduction. 2016 06/08/17
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 One up, one down...editor decided down. 2011 02/28/14
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Fast response. One brief report. One detailed report. 2015 10/01/15
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2013 02/28/14
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2011 08/02/13
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk-rejected in 3 days. The Editor Requate cannot distinguish between partial and general equilibrium. Waste of the submission fee. To avoid. 2016 07/29/16
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Desk Reject 7 7 1 2 rounds after which referee recommended acceptance, but editor (Chakravorty) kept the paper for 7(!) more months, before rejection based on superficial comments. Very long (2 years), costly, inconsistent, unprofessional process. 2017 12/05/19
Journal of European Economic History Accepted 3 3 2 One report was very useful and of very good quality, the other was of good quality but not very useful. Very professional way of handling the process 2007 04/16/13
Journal of Evolutionary Economics Accepted 10 3 1 Very helpful report which has permitted to increase the quality of the paper 2012 11/08/13
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Accepted 3 3 2 2019 09/21/20
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Accepted 6 3 2 Initial review was slow but there was an editor change that may have contributed to this. Helpful comments received from reviewers. 2018 09/21/20
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Ref Reject 4 2 4 Four reports with huge list of changes -- Editor rejected after R&R because she didn't like the data 2013 07/27/15
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 2018 04/25/20
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected after one day due to poor fit. Editor provided suggestions for other journals to consider. 2020 09/21/20
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in 10 days because the editor wasn't a fan of the data. Editor provided useful feedback and a subsequent version of the manuscript was sent out for peer review. 2019 09/21/20
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 thorough but not brutal enough - the paper was not very a contribution at all at the time and needed a much harsher rejection, seriously 2012 05/22/14
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 A poor quality referee report. 2014 10/28/16
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 2012 12/27/12
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 3 Two good reports providing many suggestions regarding how I should modify and extend the paper. But the other one was useless; it's like a collection of "minor comments." 2019 06/17/20
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 referee reports were very thorough and demonstrated expertise, rejections were fair - just wish I would have gotten these reviewers the first time I submitted the paper. I revised as a new submission based on comments from a previous reviewer at the journal 2013 05/22/14
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 referee report was short, but demonstrated expertise, could have addressed all of the comments but ultimately rejected under KS 2012 05/22/14
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 4 3 2 3 rounds then rejected by editor, paper was improved by addressing reviewers' comments, eventually accepted at RFS 2005 05/22/14
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Bruno Biais was AE. Got most thorough, informed, and useful referee reports in 5 years. 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 8 N/A 1 Cam Harvey gave useless report; obvious outgoing editor is obvious 2011 12/28/12
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Referee report kind of useless 2010 01/29/13
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 concise and useless comments. 2016 08/15/16
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 KS super smart and constructive feedback. referee and AE comments, OK at best. 2013 08/15/13
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 great referee report, great editor, not so great AE 2013 04/21/13
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2013 03/18/14
Journal of Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 This was the worst referee report ever. The referee completely misunderstood a *very* basic primary school model and then went on to criticize and complain about the empirical results. I wrote the editor but nothing changed. I don’t care so much because I know that the paper is a breakthrough. But it does move my prior of “affiliation doesn’t matter, just the paper” (yes, a prior that no one here seems to have). Finally, it reminds me of the CEO voice tone BS paper that they published a couple of years ago. 2018 08/21/18
Journal of Finance Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in 10 days with useless AE comments completely unrelated to the paper. Awful experience given the astronomic submission fee! 2013 02/26/14
Journal of Finance Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2013 09/21/13
Journal of Finance Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Useful comments from the editor (Stefan Nagel). 2019 11/06/19
Journal of Finance Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 5 days. Got the refund soon after request. 2013 12/06/13
Journal of Finance Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 KS rejected based on AE's brief report; AE comments somewhat useful but a tad unfair (main criticism applies to many papers publ. in JF in the area) 2013 02/24/14
Journal of Finance Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Unable to find a reviewer 2019 05/09/19
Journal of Finance Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Great comments from Philip Bond 2016 10/17/16
Journal of Finance Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 I received 3 paragraphs of comments from the AE. Very good comments even if he slightly misunderstood the contribution. 2013 06/22/16
Journal of Finance Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk Rejected with AE report 2013 10/04/17
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Accepted 2 1 1 Great experience - referee and editor very helpful 2014 05/14/14
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Accepted 1 N/A 1 very comprehensive report. referee is very fast. R&R only takes one week. 2013 11/28/13
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Accepted 1 N/A 1 very comprehensive report. referee is very fast. R&R only takes one week. 2013 11/28/13
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Accepted 2 2 1 Great experience; precise and informed referee report; 1st round for major improvements, 2nd round pretty much converged to acceptance. 2012 02/24/14
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Accepted 3 3 1 1 report each of 2 rounds 2013 08/10/14
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Fair report 2013 08/06/15
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 awful experience. Ref needed 6 months to produce a paragraph of a response. Comments were meant for another paper. Editor didn't even bother to look at it. 2012 02/10/14
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 2015 06/11/15
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 fast process; only one report who was mainly referencing a single paper (SSRN, not published, single author); no useful feedback, disappointing experience 2018 12/06/18
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Fast response but average comments... I am not sure the referee knows the topic area well enough 2013 09/26/13
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 negative albeit fair referee report 2014 02/24/14
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 a 2 paragraph referee report that was not particularly helpful - at least the turnaround time was fast - might as well have been a desk rejection 2013 05/22/14
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 Very low quality reports. I have never received any good referee reports from JFQA. The referee just want to reject and did not want to spend reasonable effort to read your paper 2018 10/30/19
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 repor 2013 06/07/13
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Two paragraph rubbish referee report 2017 08/17/17
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Ref Reject 3 3 1 Rubbish report ! Referee obviously has no clue of what's going on. (s)he asks me to reference a paper I myself wrote when I wa a PhD student but which I did not send anywhere. if we go by his saying, then all finance articles are purely pointless. 2015 06/11/15
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Nice referee report. 2013 07/03/13
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk-rejected after ten days. Suggested a general interest journal. 2013 02/09/13
Journal of Financial Econometrics Accepted 12 4 2 4 rounds 2010 12/28/12
Journal of Financial Econometrics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Reject and resubmit. Report from ref1 and AE were very helpful. Ref2 was not 2020 09/29/20
Journal of Financial Econometrics Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 2011 12/28/12
Journal of Financial Econometrics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Not a good fit. One month for the desk reject. 2018 09/13/18
Journal of Financial Econometrics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Not a good fit. 2018 05/09/19
Journal of Financial Econometrics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 1 month to wait for a desk reject is too long. "We are hesitant to publish purely empirical papers" comment could have been boilerplate but seemed uninformative 2013 05/22/14
Journal of Financial Economics Accepted 3 N/A 1 2014 05/17/14
Journal of Financial Economics Accepted 3 N/A 1 2014 05/17/14
Journal of Financial Economics Accepted 2 1 1 Exceptionally quick turnaround times. Referee was sharp, thoughtful, and thorough. (However, because there was only one referee, whose specialty aligned with only part of the paper, he/she barely attempted to comment on much of the paper, perhaps to its detriment.) 2020 05/31/21
Journal of Financial Economics Accepted 4 3 1 relatively fast process and referee helped to improve the papers. might be a once in a career event. 2008 05/22/14
Journal of Financial Economics Accepted 2 1 1 Exceptionally quick turnaround times. Referee was sharp, thoughtful, and thorough. (However, because there was only one referee, whose specialty aligned with only part of the paper, he/she barely attempted to comment on much of the paper, perhaps to its detriment.) 2020 05/31/21
Journal of Financial Economics Accepted 3 2 1 2012 12/22/12
Journal of Financial Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 referee report was of little help 2012 12/30/12
Journal of Financial Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Reject based on a priori feeling of the reviewer with no scientific arguments but rather personal perception of her/his reading. Next time, I will come back with a vip or friend of the editorial team to have positive a priori. 2016 12/09/16
Journal of Financial Economics Ref Reject 8 N/A 1 No response for seven and a half months. Sent gentle reminder/request to Editor. Go report in 2 days. Hastily written by PhD student. No clue about topic etc would be kind thing to say. Just thoroughly unprofessional report. Something like that should not leave even an undergrad's desk. 2015 11/17/16
Journal of Financial Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Referee misread the paper, and hammered us on points that we were not making. Tyranny of the single review. The saving grace is that it was fast. 2017 10/06/17
Journal of Financial Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 Referee did not bother to read the paper. 2019 07/09/20
Journal of Financial Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Very poor quality referee report. 2018 10/01/19
Journal of Financial Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 A five pages fantasy report written by a phd-student who did not read the paper. I have no clue who the referee wanted to impress, maybe the editor? 2015 02/02/17
Journal of Financial Economics Ref Reject 2 2 1 Reject and resubmit. Rejected afterwards. 2015 10/04/17
Journal of Financial Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 The usual randomness from the JFE 2014 05/25/14
Journal of Financial Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 An low quality and useless report 2014 12/06/14
Journal of Financial Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Referee clearly didn't read the paper carefully. Comments were non-constructive and some were even wrong. Clearly the referee was someone not in the field of the paper (Asset Pricing). Said the contribution was not enough for a JFE publication. 2017 08/17/17
Journal of Financial Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 got the impression that the reviewer did not read the paper and decided to dispute the review, the dispute process took slightly more than 1 month and the new reviewer sided with the old reviewer. also received comments from the old reviewer that were better than the first review. overall satisfied with the dispute process in terms of speed and fairness 2012 05/22/14
Journal of Financial Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 1 day rejection 2013 02/26/14
Journal of Financial Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 had to pay $100 instead of the usual submission fee. Deemed too narrow for the journal 2013 05/22/14
Journal of Financial Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in 3 hours, which I found out about from a bullshit list they upload showing the papers sent to referees. The worst experience so far. It was almost like somebody pickpocketed and got my $600 2013 02/26/14
Journal of Financial Intermediation Accepted 3 3 2 Nice experience. Very constructive comments in the 1st round, quicking converging in the 2nd round. 2018 02/26/19
Journal of Financial Intermediation Accepted 3 9 1 Massive work. Four RR rounds. In the first three, the referees took 3 months and tehn 9 months to take care of comments. The paper is mostly empirical and they asked for massive extension of the dataset. This was high risk but of course at the end worth it because it is a good journal. 2015 02/19/19
Journal of Financial Intermediation Accepted 3 1 2 2012 12/27/12
Journal of Financial Intermediation Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 Not very friendly report; referee wants to kill us 2013 10/28/13
Journal of Financial Intermediation Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 The quality of the report was disappointing. 2012 03/19/14
Journal of Financial Intermediation Ref Reject 6 3 2 Very bad experience as referee kept asking for more and more and finally said document was now too long and findings not interesting enough. Editor should know better. 2018 05/26/20
Journal of Financial Intermediation Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2011 12/20/12
Journal of Financial Intermediation Ref Reject 3 N/A 1 2013 03/18/14
Journal of Financial Intermediation Desk Reject 0 1 0 $ 200 is high for an immediat desk rejection 2014 08/27/14
Journal of Financial Intermediation Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 editor was helpful in replying to inquiry regarding reason for desk rejection. said it was a matter of fit. paper took over a month to get desk rejected because of problems with elsevier system. journal does not sound like a good fit for my research agenda. topics should probably be closely related to banking 2014 07/14/14
Journal of Financial Markets Accepted 1 1 1 Near-perfect experience. Extremely helpful comments that significantly improved the paper in the end. Great editor with quick response time too. 2013 08/01/13
Journal of Financial Markets Ref Reject 3 4 1 Rejected for arbitrary reasons. Referee said he just didn't like the paper. 2020 07/15/20
Journal of Financial Markets Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 2011 12/28/12
Journal of Financial Markets Ref Reject 5 3 2 Useless reports. Poor / no justification for decision. Expected better 2019 11/22/19
Journal of Financial Markets Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 Poor report! Referee only comments on the first half of the paper. That indicates he/she did not finish reading the paper. He/she also asked unrelated information such as why the market offer two similar contracts,... which is not the scope of the study. He/she also asked for the summary statistics of my high frequency data while I already provided the estimates of bid-ask spread, price impact, order flow autocorrelation of each month for the entire contracts which shows his lack of knowledge about market microstructure. The editor, Gideon Saar, was lazy and did not read the paper. He took the report and sent out a generic rejection letter. My experience with other journals when there is only 1 referee, the editor always provides a report detailing their reasons for accepting or rejecting the paper. JFM is bad! 2018 03/05/19
Journal of Financial Markets Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 expert who cited himself, brutal but fair referee report that led to major revision 2013 05/22/14
Journal of Financial Markets Ref Reject 3 3 2 Scam. Revise and Resubmit. Referee claims no revisements were made after substantial revisements were made and detailed. This journal is a scam! 2020 07/13/20
Journal of Financial Markets Ref Reject 1 1 1 Excellent referee report with excellent suggestions. Fast response and quality report made me satisfied even though I got a fast rejection. 2012 08/02/13
Journal of Financial Markets Ref Reject 2 2 1 Scam. Revise and Resubmit. Referee claims no revisements were made after substantial revisements were made and detailed. This journal is a scam! 2019 10/14/19
Journal of Financial Markets Ref Reject 4 5 2 After revise and resubmit, was rejected, Next year, similar article appeared in the journal authored by one of the associate editors. Remarkable coincidence. 2018 10/22/19
Journal of Financial Research Accepted 3 3 2 2012 02/12/13
Journal of Financial Research Accepted 3 2 2 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Financial Research Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 Good referee report 2013 01/16/14
Journal of Financial Research Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 They just continue their practice of not providing any comments on desk rejections despite a US200 submission fee and really ambiguous aim and scope. Not for the faint-hearted. 2016 01/03/17
Journal of Financial Services Research Accepted 3 1 1 overall v good experience. ref report had useful but not overly comprehensive suggestions. quick and clear communication with editor 2016 07/10/17
Journal of Financial Services Research Ref Reject 4 3 3 2011 12/29/12
Journal of Forecasting Pending 0 1 0 For three months the editor has not assigned referees! Have contacted the editorail asistant three times (startung six weeks after submission) who said she would remind the editor. Finally, I have now wothdrawn my paper. 2018 02/05/19
Journal of Forecasting Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Rapid desk reject - editor stated paper was rejected because of applied context (sports) 2018 06/16/19
Journal of Futures Markets Accepted 3 3 1 Good reports, led to significantly better paper 2012 03/19/14
Journal of Happiness Studies Pending 4 N/A 2 2019 05/27/19
Journal of Happiness Studies Accepted 5 3 2 Long process. Fair editors. 2012 04/29/14
Journal of Health Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 2021 05/18/21
Journal of Health Economics Pending 0 N/A 0 2021 03/06/21
Journal of Health Economics Accepted 4 3 3 Good experience, nice though critical editor, total time to acceptance 10 months 2013 11/13/14
Journal of Health Economics Accepted 7 1 1 Couldn;t get second referee so editor said he read carefully himself. Explains longish time to first review. 2013 05/22/14
Journal of Health Economics Accepted 6 3 2 2014 01/04/16
Journal of Health Economics Accepted 4 5 2 Total time to acceptance: 13 months 2012 12/30/13
Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 7 N/A 2 Short unhelpful referee reports which ask to cite referees. Editor sat on completed reports for 3 months before making a decision. 2014 08/16/15
Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Split decision between R&R and reject, editor took reject. Oh well 2021 08/13/21
Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 9 N/A 2 One positive one negative. The negative one says there is no methodology novelty. 2018 04/17/19
Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Not very helpful comments 2015 09/02/15
Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 2013 06/20/13
Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 2013 09/24/13
Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 one positive one negative, editor chose to reject. 2015 03/30/16
Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 Only one report but good comments. 2014 02/24/15
Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Reviewers' concerns are reasonable but they didn't provide helpful suggestions 2015 03/29/16
Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Pretty efficient turnaround. One extremely thorough and helpful report, one shorter but still raising valid points. All the points are addressable so I would've liked an RR but I'm not part of the club so I can't complain. Overall a good experience that will help the paper! 2016 08/01/16
Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 4 1 3 two positive reports and one strongly negative report; the editor Andrew Street gave me a R&R; after I spent one month writing a 30-page response, the negative referee still argued against my paper based on his misunderstanding of my paper; the editor finally chose to reject my paper based on the comments of this referee without careful reading 2017 11/13/17
Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 0 Rejected with one referee report in just under a month. Helpful comments from reviewer and editor. Wish the outcome was different, but the turnaround time couldn't have been better. 2019 08/20/19
Journal of Health Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 Decent reports. Recommended to try other health journals. 2017 04/28/18
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 It took almost two month for a desk reject. Such a waste of my valuable time. The editor, Andrew Street, is not even qualified judging from his crap publications. I will never submit to this journal. 2015 03/12/15
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Avoid this journal by any means. The editors are public health monkeys. They know nothing about economics and make stupid comments on my papers. I had much better experience in American Journal of Health Economics. 2015 03/12/15
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Desk rejected by Nigel Rice after almost 2 months, looking at the reason for rejecting the paper I had the feeling the editor did not read the paper. 2014 12/18/14
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Editor rejected within less than 10 days. Reason cited: weak paper 2019 04/12/21
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 2012 01/23/13
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected in 2 weeks. Editor (frank) did not read the paper and wrote 2 lines arguing that there were many papers addressing similar question (which was not entirely true). No discussion on the ID strategy, nor the novelty of the data. 2014 02/25/15
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Single line rejection. 2015 12/14/16
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Culter said that there was backlog at JHE. 2 months for desk rejection is awkward. 2014 03/13/15
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 About 3 weeks turnaround. Comments just so-so. Just didn't seem to believe paper, but without any really good reason. 2013 12/30/13
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2012 01/10/13
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2013 09/06/13
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2014 03/12/15
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Following a previous piece of info: Desk rejected by another editor after almost 2 months, looking at the reason for rejecting the paper I had the feeling the editor did not read the paper. 2014 12/18/14
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject after few days with some useful suggestions. 2013 05/09/13
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Very slow and no much reason given for desk rejection 2013 11/26/13
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Health Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Editor was Andrew Street. Pretty stupid rationale based on lack of methodological innovation. Who knew that JHE was trying to be Econometrica. 2017 10/09/17
Journal of Housing Economics Accepted 3 3 2 Very good experience. Fast turnaround and good comments. 2017 10/01/19
Journal of Housing Economics Accepted 3 1 2 excellent editor 2013 04/22/14
Journal of Housing Economics Ref Reject 0 12 2 This Rumors site allows only a maximum of 12 months from submission to decision. Actually took nearly 15 months. The assigned editor did not reply to emails about progress until I contacted the Editoral Manager. 2019 04/07/20
Journal of Housing Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 Was rejected today by editor as only 1/2 referee reports submitted. The report I did get back (in the form of an email from the editor) was not very informative (referee claimed "expressing time series as deviations from trend does not produce a stationary time series". I stopped reading after that). 2017 02/23/18
Journal of Housing Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Thanks for nothing, A. Saiz 2014 03/25/14
Journal of Human Capital Pending 13 N/A 1 . 2011 12/21/12
Journal of Human Capital Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 2011 12/21/12
Journal of Human Capital Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 1 1/2 months to desk reject with minimally helpful comments. Not a great experience! 2018 11/07/18
Journal of Human Resources Pending 4 N/A 2 2008 12/21/12
Journal of Human Resources Pending 2 N/A 2 One magnificient + one so-so ref report. Good comments from the editor. Will submit again. 2019 07/18/20
Journal of Human Resources Pending 0 N/A 0 2019 02/03/20
Journal of Human Resources Pending 2 N/A 1 Currently in R&R. Editor was our de facto 2nd referee. 2016 11/12/16
Journal of Human Resources Accepted 4 3 2 One very good referee report, one useless one. The editor read the paper in great details and added a lot of comments to the referees'. 2015 05/19/17
Journal of Human Resources Accepted 1 1 3 Most efficient experience with journals ever! 2018 07/13/19
Journal of Human Resources Accepted 3 1 3 well run journal. RR time was only 2 weeks, no bullshit nitpicking 2013 04/29/13
Journal of Human Resources Accepted 2 2 2 very good experience...fast and helpful comments from the co-editor and two referees...Average time between the submission and response is about 1.5 months 2016 11/27/16
Journal of Human Resources Accepted 3 3 2 Very good referee reports. Constructive and helpful comments from the co-editor. 2014 10/17/15
Journal of Human Resources Accepted 2 3 2 Extremely efficient. Good reports with decent suggestions. 2012 04/17/14
Journal of Human Resources Accepted 2 N/A 2 Two straightforward reports calling for revision. Accepted 1 1/2 weeks after revision was submitted. No BS, great experience! 2015 08/02/15
Journal of Human Resources Accepted 3 4 2 This was back when Bill Evans was editor. He gives good comments, but he doesn't mince words. 2009 04/08/13
Journal of Human Resources Accepted 2 1 2 2016 09/10/19
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 We studied the causal impact of X on some new Y. Reports were not very helpful. One referee commented that we didn't make a methodological contribution and asked why economists should care about Y. The other referee was concerned about the limitations of the identification strategy, but the same strategy has been used in other studies (some are in top field journals). 2016 10/11/16
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 One positive report, one negative. Very kind letter from the editor. Disappointed with the result, but the experience was okay. 2017 01/04/18
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 While I was disappointed to be rejected, I was extremely pleased with the professionalism of the journal. I had notice that it was sent to reviewers in 2017 12/05/17
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Reviews were fair. Unfortunately, they called out the problems that I was already aware of / do not have a good way of fixing. 2020 06/17/20
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 solid referee reports, fair editor 2013 05/29/13
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 I love this journal. Two fantastic referee reports within 1.5 months. Valid rejection. 2015 01/06/16
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Two month for two detailed reports. Helpful comments from the editor 2020 05/12/21
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 7 N/A 3 The editor was Christian Pop-Eliches. Pretty useless referee reports. Almost zero substantive comments on the technical part and not surprising that it was sloppy handling given that it was Pop-Eliches who was the co-editor. 2017 08/11/17
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2011 12/21/12
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 Rejected on the basis of wrong comments. The editor did not even get that the comments were wrong. 2016 08/02/16
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 One almost non-existent referee report (basically two lines just saying the paper is not broad enough), one very detailed and overall positive report. I was surprised these two letters resulted in the overall reject 2019 05/13/20
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Very quick. Split recommendations, editor decided to reject which is fair enough. One good quality referee with good comments and suggestions. The other reviewer I suspect of being a graduate student with not so good comments. Good experience as far as rejections go. 2020 05/22/20
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 2 N/A 0 2016 08/02/16
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 4 N/A 1 2020 12/16/20
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Very quick. Split recommendations, editor decided to reject which is fair enough. One good quality referee with good comments and suggestions. The other reviewer I suspect of being a graduate student with not so good comments. Good experience as far as rejections go. 2020 05/22/20
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 7 N/A 3 Slow turnover. Average Report. 2017 05/08/18
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 3 N/A 0 One positive report, one negative, editor's reject decision. Negative report is pretty bad. Some useful comments, most misreads and poor understanding of model. 2014 02/26/15
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Awesome experience. Both referees really spent time on the paper and gave lots of suggestions.So did the editor. 2014 08/17/14
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 One positive report, one negative. Very kind letter from the editor. Disappointed with the result, but the experience was okay. 2017 01/04/18
Journal of Human Resources Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2011 12/21/12
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Devreaux desk reject. No comments. 2014 04/09/14
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject in 24hrs with a clear and useful message from the editor(David Figlio). In terms of rejections this is probably as good as it gets. 2016 07/14/16
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected within 3 days with idiotic comments, as usual. Standard experience with the JHR. Waste of money. Note: previous desk rejected paper there was published in a much better journal. I feel that mediocre editors are too scared to consider papers unless at least one of the authors is a big shot. If you don't have that - expect to be desk rejected. 2020 05/05/21
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 16 hour turnaround with nice letter of thoughtful comments suggesting more specialized journal. editing team is real class act 2016 09/30/16
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject within a few days. Apparently JHE considers itself general interest. No comments, but very fast. 2013 03/17/14
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 9 days. Editor read and carefully considered the paper. Suggested changes and several other outlets. 2019 07/17/19
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2012 12/20/12
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 desk rejected in a week. the editor roughly read the whole paper and point out a valuable comment...very well run journal, fast and no submission fee! will definitely try it again next time 2016 11/27/16
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 very sad 2013 02/20/13
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Less than insightful comments by an editor clearly hastily read the paper. Fast but shallow. 2017 08/13/17
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk reject within 14 hours(!!!). Comments weren't helpful, but at least they didn't waste my time. Feel a bit short-changed, but it was quick at least. 2016 08/30/16
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 3 weeks for a desk reject...and they keep the $100. 2018 05/28/18
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 desk rejected in a week. the editor roughly read the whole paper and point out a valuable comment...very well run journal, fast and no submission fee! will definitely try it again next time 2016 11/27/16
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 your paper, after some updating to reflect the recent complementary literature, would be more appropriate for a more specialized journal 2015 06/09/15
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected after a bit more than two weeks without comment. $100 fee refunded 2017 09/04/18
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desh rejected in less than a week. Great comments from editor. 2013 04/23/13
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 not broad enough, it seems that JHR considers themselves as a general interest journal. 2014 06/19/14
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2012 12/31/12
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 1 2011 01/02/13
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Editor finds it interesting but not enough for a "general journal". Suggests a field journal. Fast and fair enough. 2014 02/08/15
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2021 08/11/21
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Quick reject, saying go to field. 2016 07/27/16
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Editor finds it interesting but not enough for a "general journal". Suggests a field journal. Fast and fair enough. 2014 02/08/15
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Quick desk reject, apparently considers itself a GI journal now (?) 2015 08/16/15
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2012 12/22/12
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 The editor said that enjoyed the paper very much but the contributon is not sufficiently broad for a general interest journal as JHR and fits better into a labour journal. Very fast. I didn't know that JHR is a general interest journal! 2015 05/06/15
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 In three days. referred to field journal 2016 07/14/16
Journal of Human Resources Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Desk rejected but the co-editor read the manuscript carefully and gave substantive comments. 2020 04/06/20
Journal of Industrial Economics Pending 6 5 2 Referees' comments were useful. paper is short so 6 months for each round is very long. Bar-Isaak is the editor in charge (much better than others like nocke). professional. 2013 12/25/15
Journal of Industrial Economics Accepted 4 3 2 Alessandro Gavazza was the editor and excellent. Tough but fair referee reports. Rigor of the paper increased greatly because of the refereeing process. 2015 12/26/16
Journal of Industrial Economics Accepted 3 2 0 3 months to R&R, accepted after 1 round of revision. R&R was helpful. 2012 02/28/13
Journal of Industrial Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 One referee reports is only 2 short paragraphs long and completely wrong. The referee is clearly not up to the task. The second one is ok, but rejects for some peculiar reasons. 2015 01/13/16
Journal of Industrial Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 2011 01/29/13
Journal of Industrial Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 2012 02/15/13
Journal of Industrial Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 weird referee, probably a grad student 2012 02/27/13
Journal of Industrial Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2011 08/02/13
Journal of Industrial Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Two decent referee reports. Good reasons for rejection; comments improved paper for next submission. 2017 01/11/18
Journal of Industrial Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 1 awful report...referee asked "why is this a problem?" 2012 03/06/13
Journal of Industrial Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 low-quality referee reports. Dislike for the computational results for no good reason. One referee suggests alternative data sources for robustness even though it took as a year to hand-collect the original data. 2020 07/08/20
Journal of Industrial Economics Ref Reject 12 N/A 1 slow but fair 2013 01/19/17
Journal of Industrial Economics Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Very inefficient desk! 2012 06/03/13
Journal of Industrial Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 8 days for a desk rejection. The Editor mentioned that the paper is outside the scope of the Journal. He suggested a general interest journal. 2016 10/21/16
Journal of Industrial Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 14 days. Some nice words from the editor. 2017 01/17/18
Journal of Industrial Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 To be honest, I had a hard time understanding exactly what the point of your paper is. As best I can tell, the purpose is to use a particular modeling framework to illustrate that a trade policies defined in terms of 'import-export' quotas cannot yield a Nash equilibrium of the trade game. In any case, the paper is not a good match for the JIE, both because it is highly technical and (more importantly) because it is more of a trade theory paper than an IO paper. 2014 08/22/14
Journal of Industrial Economics Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 2012 12/29/13
Journal of Industry, Competition, and Trade Accepted 3 1 1 Fair and efficient process. Referee was constructive and provided helpful comments. Good experience 2019 06/24/19
Journal of Industry, Competition, and Trade Accepted 3 4 1 2014 04/27/15
Journal of Industry, Competition, and Trade Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Referee just pointed put 2012 01/04/13
Journal of Industry, Competition, and Trade Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 2013 05/03/13
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics Accepted 12 4 2 Extremely valuable referee reports and advices from the editor. Two rounds of R&R, final acceptance after second round within 5 days. 2017 12/26/18
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics Ref Reject 14 N/A 0 2014 05/19/15
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 2 Ok referee reports. Editor was a bit harsh. 2014 01/29/15
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics Ref Reject 11 N/A 2 2017 01/16/18
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 3 Very good reports even though the paper was rejected. 2013 04/17/14
Journal of Institutional Economics Accepted 2 1 4 Tough referee process, won over 3, 4th still had doubts but Editor pushed ahead. Good comments, made the paper better. 2019 06/03/20
Journal of Institutional Economics Accepted 2 2 2 Very efficient process. 1 short report (but good points) and 1 very long report. After the second round R&R, I only had to deal with the long reviewer. Overall good experience. 2013 01/28/15
Journal of Institutional Economics Accepted 2 1 3 Incredibly tough process with three rounds of revisions - first round ended up me writing a response as long as the original paper. Second round was down to one ref and editor, third round was just editor. Despite being so tough, all comments were fair and refs wrote great reports that dramatically improved the paper. 2016 07/22/16
Journal of Institutional Economics Accepted 2 1 2 Very good experience. Had 2 tough but fair r&r rounds with 2 reviewers and 1 with the editor. Good turnaround time. The editor is responsive. The process had only one negative side; the reviewers implicitly asked to cite their works. 2016 06/21/17
Journal of Institutional Economics Accepted 2 2 2 Split reports but very clear advice from editor. Quick turnaround upon revision. 2013 01/29/15
Journal of Institutional Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 2012 01/18/13
Journal of Institutional Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 14 days. Some nice words from the editor. 2017 01/17/18
Journal of International Development Desk Reject 3 N/A 0 editor said the paper had too much economics 2012 04/27/13
Journal of International Development Desk Reject 2 N/A 0 Very slow and the reason for rejection was not good enough. 2015 03/20/15
Journal of International Economics Accepted 3 1 2 Good experience. Editor (Taylor) gave additional advice. We tried to do everything we were asked to and also had a major overhaul of the data. Outright accept after first resubmission still came as a surprise given JIE typically has 2-3 rounds. 2014 05/03/15
Journal of International Economics Accepted 7 3 4 The editor was very helpful to summarize what he thought should be done from 4 referee reports 2014 09/27/16
Journal of International Economics Accepted 2 5 2 Reports have very clear constructive instructions and fast response. 2015 04/20/16
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 One useless report, and one very useful report. Editor was somewhat biased in judging the contribution of the paper. His own comments were not based on the reports. Probably he sent the paper to referees because he couldn't desk reject it, but his mind was made-up before hand. 2016 03/16/17
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 9 N/A 2 Overall decent and professional expert reports. Horrible associate editor, Arkolakis, rejected based on his personal views. So unprofessional and shameful. 2018 07/05/20
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 Low quality referee reports. One seems to be written by a first-year bachelor student. Waste of time. 2016 12/18/16
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 2010 08/02/13
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 2 2 detailed comments from referees. These advices do make the paper better. 2019 04/28/19
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 8 N/A 2 2014 01/22/15
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 10 N/A 2 2013 06/01/14
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 13 11 1 The WORST experience of my rather long life. An incompetent referee and an editor that could not care less of how slow the process was: a lethal combo 2013 01/24/17
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 He suspects he could not understand a yota. Now? it ?could ?be ?the ?case ?that ?I ?have? completely ?misread? the? paper.? If? so,? I? apologize.? In? my ?defense,? however,? the? writing? is ?so ?poor? that ?no? one ?could ?understand? it.?I? would? recommend ?that? the ?author? re?write ?the ?paper ?with ?the ?help ?of ?some one? fluent ?in? English. This? is ?quite ?perplexing, ?since ?the ?Nash ?axioms ?apply ?to? the ?Nash? bargaining? solution? of? a? cooperative? game (can anyone confirm this?)? . 2009 04/30/14
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 Quick decision, with some useful comments in the reports. Overall good experience 2015 04/05/17
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 2015 05/07/15
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 4 N/A 2 Two very constructive reports. Overall, great experience despite the negative outcome 2020 09/14/20
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 ref report was ok 2011 01/19/13
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Referee reports were very good, constructive and tough. Both suggested rejection. They will help to improve the paper. Clearly the paper was not good enough for the JIE. 2018 12/06/18
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 3 3 2 Fair decision, referee reports pointed out major flaw but hardly in a way that could be called constructive 2015 01/18/16
Journal of International Economics Ref Reject 2 N/A 2 reports are helpful 2011 01/19/13
Journal of International Economics Desk Reject 5 N/A 0 took the money. took 5 months. desk rejected. no comments given. totally useless editor. 2013 02/12/14
Journal of International Economics Desk Reject 0 N/A 0 Quick. 2021 08/31/21
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money Pending 18 12 0 Had to withdraw after waiting for nearly a year and a half. 2016 10/20/17
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money Pending 0 N/A 0 I have been waiting for more than a year since submission. The editor does not respond to emails. 2016 09/29/17
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money Accepted 1 1 1 Transfer from another Elsevier journal - additional round of R&R but easily satisfied and made the paper better. Smooth experience, although a bit slow in getting to the paper (quick when they actually did) 2019 03/24/20
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money Accepted 4 N/A 0 My paper was transferred after rejected from a higher ranked journal. The editor satisfied the reply to the original referee reports and accepted it in 4 months. Note that since the editor(Batten) is handling many different journals at the same time, you should expect relatively slow turnaround time. 2014 09/23/15
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Very easy suggested an appropriate transfer and levied the submission fees, with editor providing quite helpful comments. Rather pleasant experience. 2019 08/03/19
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money Desk Reject 4 N/A 0 Desk reject from editor after 4 months 2014 02/02/15
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money Desk Reject 4 N/A 0 Out of Scope? After 4 months? Amazing 2020 05/18/20
Journal of International Money and Finance Accepted 3 2 1 Fair referee reports and smooth process 2015 01/07/16
Journal of International Money and Finance Accepted 1 N/A 1 Took 6 weeks. Good report. No complaints. 2015 09/27/15
Journal of International Money and Finance Accepted 11 3 1 2011 09/10/13
Journal of International Money and Finance Accepted 12 8 2 very, very slow 2009 01/10/13
Journal of International Money and Finance Accepted 7 2 2 Very helpful reports. The associate editor was very helpful in terms of what needs to be done. The reports are also very helpful. The whole process took about a little bit more than a year, which is very good. 2018 11/16/19
Journal of International Money and Finance Accepted 3 2 1 Fast process. Good comments from the referee. I recommend. 2016 03/13/17
Journal of International Money and Finance Accepted 6 2 2 Very good experience, the editor (Aizenman) was very fast 2017 11/04/17
Journal of International Money and Finance Accepted 2 2 1 Very clear referee report with constructive comments. Also revisions handled quite efficiently! 2013 10/29/14
Journal of International Money and Finance Accepted 3 3 2 Very efficient process, better than expected. 2016 12/02/16
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Single-blind review system for a 250 bucks fee. At least, you expect some quality report. Instead, the reviewer says you did not cite a literature that is totally beside the point, the main concept of your paper is not mentioned not even once in that literature. End of story. 2020 09/13/20
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 6 N/A 1 Useful report 2013 09/22/13
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 1 report ok, the other one awful, Referee clearly did not understand the paper. Editor skimmed it at best and decided to reject without comments. Bad experience. 2013 11/19/13
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 Ridiculous report by the most clueless referee who probably spend one hour only to read and review the paper altogether. Comments like "I do not understand the findings of this study" show that the journal is not what it used to be. The referees should be (far) better than the illiterate idiot they gave me! 2019 04/30/19
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 10 N/A 1 terrible experience, after submission my paper was not sent out to referees for more than 6 months. After two interventions got 1 ridiculous report. 2017 04/10/19
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 10 10 2 Horrible experience, late response, useless report, 2018 12/08/19
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Four line referee report written in a hurry before deadline and before ref obviously had to jet off on holiday. In only four sentences, ref manages to contradict himself. Worthless garbage report, no redeeming value. 2019 07/25/19
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 7 N/A 1 Poor experience, will not submit again. 7 months waiting for one poor referee report rejecting the paper for an unwarranted wording issue. 2017 12/12/17
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 7 N/A 1 Horrible experience. Over half a year for response from one referee who a) had no problems with the methodology, b) liked the writing, and c) thought it had a novel contribution. Recommended reject because he thought the sample of countries wasn't broad enough (despite it being a paper on a specific set of countries on purpose, as explained in the methodology). One paragraph that dismissed four years of work. Editor then agreed. Will never submit here again. 2014 01/16/15
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 1 N/A 1 2012 01/19/13
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 8 N/A 2 My paper was in "submitted" status for almost 5 months when made a query. The response was I forgot to pay the submission fee. However, I did pay and forward teh receipt as evidence. JIMF appologizes (ok but you should have send a warning if JIMF think payment is pending...). Still, I have to contact them again after 9 weeks because they did nothing with my paper. After this thrid email, the paper moves up and it takes 11 weeks to get referee rejection (quality fo the two reports: poor, they wont improve my paper). Very bad experience, I have lost more than 9 months and it costs USD250. 2017 08/29/18
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Incredible experience: referee said he/she didn't like the paper. Zero constructive comments! Editor decided to reject it. Poorly managed journal. 2015 01/15/16
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 4 N/A 0 1 report suggesting to cite the Editor's work and speaking about things outside of the scope of the paper. Editor rejected without comments. Sad experience not for the first time with this journal. 2013 01/16/14
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 3 N/A 2 Poor reports. One referee was OK with almost no comments. Second one didn't understand the paper and said it was already written. Editors are not reading referee reports. 2015 01/15/16
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 2 N/A 1 Ridicolous report: 3 lines where the referee asked to address "geopolitical" issues 2011 01/09/13
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 5 N/A 2 First report provided helpful insights, second - only half page of general comments. 2019 11/25/19
Journal of International Money and Finance Ref Reject 10 N/A 2 Bad experience, there was a long wait of mroe than 10 months to get 2 referee reports that did not like the the paper (but not so sure why). Each report was less than 600 words long with 3-4 main comments but not in much dept (not even full references included). To get rejected in a good journal, that is ok since it is part of the business but waiting 10 moths for refereee reports of that quality was a really bad deal. 2013 08/28/14
Journal of International Money and Finance Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Very fast, but no comments, waste of $250 2020 08/21/20
Journal of International Money and Finance Desk Reject 1 N/A 0 Associate editor rejected on poor grounds. At least the process was fast. 2014 02/02/15
Journal of International Trade and Economic Development Accepted 2 3 2 Giles is a great editor. The paper was accepted few days after the revised version has been submitted. Would not hesitate to submit to this journal in the future. Nice experience!!! 2020 01/26/21
Journal of International Trade and Economic Development Accepted 4 2 2 Good experience. Two short referee reports straight to the point. 2014 06/15/15
Journal of Internat