Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 281 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 508 Goods vs 488 No Goods

1. Economist
   aee7
   

   I'm rooting for Wooldridge, and Wooldridge alone. His textbook was my metrics bible for such a long time

   Is it possible for Woolridge to win all by himself. Heck, is it even possible for the Nobel to go to one person only?

   No idea if econometrics will ever return to have a Nobel, but if I had to think:
   Arellano - Blundell - Bond (for dynamic panel data contributions)
   Bresnahan - Berry - Pakes (for empirical IO contributions that are now being increasingly used in other disciplines)
   Perron - Phillips (for time series contributions)
   Angrist - Card - Imbens (for pioneering work in the credibility revolution)
   Rust - Wolpin (for the estimation of dynamic structural models of discrete choice)
   I don't know where to categorize Wooldridge here.
   

   Literally 3 people have won it alone in the last decade; Thaler (2017), Deaton (2015), and Tirole (2014).

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   cb8c
   

   I think it will go to Moore and Kyotaki this year. Long overdue for macroeconomics.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

3. Economist
   5587
   

   Dasgupta and Heal, confirmed.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 1 Vlad !

4. Economist
   9aea
   

   No idea if econometrics will ever return to have a Nobel, but if I had to think:
   Arellano - Blundell - Bond (for dynamic panel data contributions)
   Bresnahan - Berry - Pakes (for empirical IO contributions that are now being increasingly used in other disciplines)
   Perron - Phillips (for time series contributions)
   Angrist - Card - Imbens (for pioneering work in the credibility revolution)
   Rust - Wolpin (for the estimation of dynamic structural models of discrete choice)
   I don't know where to categorize Wooldridge here.

   Yay for econometrics. :)

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

5. Economist
   772a
   

   When they said experiments, I was so sure it was going to be List, lol.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

6. Economist
   f1ab
   

   Card for his work on personality classification

   Haha this

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   6fdd
   

   No idea if econometrics will ever return to have a Nobel, but if I had to think:
   Arellano - Blundell - Bond (for dynamic panel data contributions)
   Bresnahan - Berry - Pakes (for empirical IO contributions that are now being increasingly used in other disciplines)
   Perron - Phillips (for time series contributions)
   Angrist - Card - Imbens (for pioneering work in the credibility revolution)
   Rust - Wolpin (for the estimation of dynamic structural models of discrete choice)
   I don't know where to categorize Wooldridge here.

   Angrist - Card - Imbens confirmed. Hats off to you.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   18d5
   

   And to think that Bresnahan, Berry and Pakes received so many nominations on EJMR. Most likely they will still be the frontrunners next year too.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   5c7a
   

   Much more well deserved than the banerjee-duflo pair

   1 year ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    852c
    

    They could have amended their rules and given the prize to StataCorp LLC

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

11. Economist
    a38f
    

    Barro is similar to Stephen Ross.

    People Who shouldn't win but just might.
    Reinhart and Rogoff (Macro is overdue even if no one is worthy)
    Andrei Shlefier (If its only about merit nothing makes you unelidable)
    Barro (Not as unfavorable as the others but still probably the wrong direction)

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

12. Economist
    8f2b
    

    I think David Card has to win at some point. Unfortunate he can't win with Alan Kruger. He can win with Alan's other great collaborator Josh Angrist for there work in experimental Labour economics.

    Nah, Angrist winning would be a complete joke

    Two things
    1. Who says Swedes don't know how to make a joke.
    2. Alan Kruger like Amos Tversky has entered the unofficial Nobel Laureate club, because we all know he would have shared the prize with Card had he not tragically taken his own life in 2019. Yesterday was world mental health day and all I can think is RIP Alan.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

13. Economist
    65d9
    

    joke profession, joke nobel

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 1 Vlad !

14. Economist
    37f5
    

    really hope for angrist and card. would be strong signal where the discipline is going to

    To toilet?

    LOL this aged well. Let's hope that the poster above is not Cassandra. We wouldn't want our discipline to go to toilet that quickly, would we..?

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

15. Economist
    74b6
    

    The prize was overdue, like it or hate it, but I think Rubin should have been in the list.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

16. Economist
    ff35
    

    I think David Card has to win at some point. Unfortunate he can't win with Alan Kruger. He can win with Alan's other great collaborator Josh Angrist for there work in experimental Labour economics.

    Give that man a cigar, you nailed it!

    I guess there are some smart people that post here on EJMR.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

17. Economist
    ff35
    

    No idea if econometrics will ever return to have a Nobel, but if I had to think:
    Arellano - Blundell - Bond (for dynamic panel data contributions)
    Bresnahan - Berry - Pakes (for empirical IO contributions that are now being increasingly used in other disciplines)
    Perron - Phillips (for time series contributions)
    Angrist - Card - Imbens (for pioneering work in the credibility revolution)
    Rust - Wolpin (for the estimation of dynamic structural models of discrete choice)
    I don't know where to categorize Wooldridge here.

    You also nailed it with Angrist - Card - Imbens (for pioneering work in the credibility revolution)

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

18. Economist
    0973
    

    All men for other prizes this year puts a lot of pressure on the econ committee to pick a female laureate

    But Esther won it not too long ago

    I guess one token woman. Then we are done. Right boys?

    Elinor Ostrom in 2009

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

19. Economist
    77f0
    

    Great that this year’s winners had done deep, non-obvious research. It is something to celebrate.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

20. Economist
    749c
    

    when economists started focusing on confirming common sense in small samples they stopped producing robust implications for policy

    the result is over-financialization, lack of innovation and disenfranchisement of 30% of population

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply »