Post <blockquote>I'm rooting for Wooldridge, and Wooldridge alone. His textbook was my metrics bible for such a long time <blockquote><blockquote>Is it possible for Woolridge to win all by himself. Heck, is it even possible for the Nobel to go to one person only? <blockquote>No idea if econometrics will ever return to have a Nobel, but if I had to think: Arellano - Blundell - Bond (for dynamic panel data contributions) Bresnahan - Berry - Pakes (for empirical IO contributions that are now being increasingly used in other disciplines) Perron - Phillips (for time series contributions) Angrist - Card - Imbens (for pioneering work in the credibility revolution) Rust - Wolpin (for the estimation of dynamic structural models of discrete choice) I don't know where to categorize Wooldridge here. </blockquote></blockquote> Literally 3 people have won it alone in the last decade; Thaler (2017), Deaton (2015), and Tirole (2014). </blockquote></blockquote>

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.