Complete Captcha
Loading..
Economist d87f
Might as well give it to heckman again too.
Heckman and Judd would be a great prize. I can only imagine Judd’s speech.
Post No idea if econometrics will ever return to have a Nobel, but if I had to think: Arellano - Blundell - Bond (for dynamic panel data contributions) Bresnahan - Berry - Pakes (for empirical IO contributions that are now being increasingly used in other disciplines) Perron - Phillips (for time series contributions) Angrist - Card - Imbens (for pioneering work in the credibility revolution) Rust - Wolpin (for the estimation of dynamic structural models of discrete choice) I don't know where to categorize Wooldridge here. Angrist - Card - Imbens confirmed. Hats off to you.
No idea if econometrics will ever return to have a Nobel, but if I had to think: Arellano - Blundell - Bond (for dynamic panel data contributions) Bresnahan - Berry - Pakes (for empirical IO contributions that are now being increasingly used in other disciplines) Perron - Phillips (for time series contributions) Angrist - Card - Imbens (for pioneering work in the credibility revolution) Rust - Wolpin (for the estimation of dynamic structural models of discrete choice) I don't know where to categorize Wooldridge here. Angrist - Card - Imbens confirmed. Hats off to you.
No idea if econometrics will ever return to have a Nobel, but if I had to think: Arellano - Blundell - Bond (for dynamic panel data contributions) Bresnahan - Berry - Pakes (for empirical IO contributions that are now being increasingly used in other disciplines) Perron - Phillips (for time series contributions) Angrist - Card - Imbens (for pioneering work in the credibility revolution) Rust - Wolpin (for the estimation of dynamic structural models of discrete choice) I don't know where to categorize Wooldridge here.
Send Post »
Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.
a blockquote code em strong ul ol li