the problem is not those well-executed papers per see. the problem is JF slot is a super scarce resource in social science. If we focus on execution too much, they will squeeze out papers with truly novel ideas, which are not as easily executable as an effect you firmly know is there.
JF only crowds out well executed/novel ideas by lrms
The paper has been withdrawn:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jofi.13164
Wow.
The Accepted Article version of the above article from The Journal of Finance, published online on 30 May 2022 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been withdrawn by agreement between the journal's editors and Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Finance Association. The withdrawal has been agreed after an additional review of the article revealed that the authors did not properly characterize the relationship of their work to the earlier literature.
Nagel really putting JFE and RFS to shame.
JF did the right thing. "The withdrawal has been agreed after an additional review of the article revealed that the authors did not properly characterize the relationship of their work to the earlier literature."
Your turn, Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham and Kelly Shue. Or are you still playing the "early literature review" card?
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/forthcoming-jf-by-yale-profs-is-a-rip-off-of-lrm-paper
The paper has been withdrawn:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jofi.13164Wow.
The Accepted Article version of the above article from The Journal of Finance, published online on 30 May 2022 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been withdrawn by agreement between the journal's editors and Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Finance Association. The withdrawal has been agreed after an additional review of the article revealed that the authors did not properly characterize the relationship of their work to the earlier literature.
Nagel really putting JFE and RFS to shame.
he's the most professional and fairest editor the fenance profession has ever seen
Stop wasting the time
Nothing will happen
JF did the right thing. "The withdrawal has been agreed after an additional review of the article revealed that the authors did not properly characterize the relationship of their work to the earlier literature."
Your turn, Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham and Kelly Shue. Or are you still playing the "early literature review" card?
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/forthcoming-jf-by-yale-profs-is-a-rip-off-of-lrm-paper
shame
Stop wasting the time
Nothing will happenJF did the right thing. "The withdrawal has been agreed after an additional review of the article revealed that the authors did not properly characterize the relationship of their work to the earlier literature."
Your turn, Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham and Kelly Shue. Or are you still playing the "early literature review" card?
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/forthcoming-jf-by-yale-profs-is-a-rip-off-of-lrm-paper