I meant effect sizes, not sample sizes
A new marketing / consumer research scandal on sight?
-
While the effect of ambient temperature on WTP at d>2.0 is unbelievable, there are some cases (not this one!!) where demand effects can actually increase sample sizes.
Very obvious manipulations or very clean tests can yield high Cohen d's. Higher than the 0.59, for example.There are domains where you expect d’s higher than 1. Thousands of samples, very little deviation within conditions. Not exactly common, but they do
-
Hello. Although I am not suggesting anything (I am merely asking questions), I am putting some publicly available information here. Can someone provide more information about this?
1 - A study by Patti Williams, Nicole Verrochi Coleman, Andrea C. Morales, and Ludovica Cesareo (2018) - "Connections to Brands That Help Others versus Help the Self: The Impact of Incidental Awe and Pride on Consumer Relationships with Social-Benefit and Luxury Brands" has been retracted. Here is the retraction info: https://retractionwatch.com/2020/06/24/consumer-research-study-is-retracted-for-unexplained-anomalies/
Summary: 1st, 3rd, and 4th authors retracted the paper. All data was collected and analyzed by the 2nd author.
2 - Patti Williams was Nicole Coleman's committee chair/advisor. Sources: https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/pw-vitae-April-2017.pdf, and the JCR paper what was a Co-Winner of Ferber Award (award to papers based on doctoral dissertations): http://www.ejcr.org/ferberaward.htm (see year 2014 and the paper).
3 - Nicole Coleman's faculty page (https://www.business.pitt.edu/people/nicole-verrochi-coleman) lists several publications (and working papers) with Patti Williams and Andrea Morales - examples include https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article/44/2/283/2939533, https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article/46/1/99/5049929. The retracted article is still on her page.
4 - When you go to Andrea C. Morales updated CV or page (https://wpcarey.asu.edu/people/profile/837523), NO research with Nicole Coleman is listed. Nothing. Just do a Ctrl+F and search for Coleman. The same is true for Morales' Google Scholar Page: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=_eZDZvYAAAAJ&hl=en. There are no mentions to the publications or working papers.
5 - The same is true for Patti Williams' page (https://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/profile/pattiw/#research). The ferber award paper is there, but nothing else. All disappeared. http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Rh121jwAAAAJ&hl=en
6 - I couldn't access Coleman's Google Scholar Citations page. -
How can we caught a fraudster if the method is by removing participants that do not confirm the hypotheses? That is, rather than fabricating, the fraudster actually removes specific participants from conditions until he or she finds the pattern. I'm doubtful that there's an error detection method for this.
Looks like even if people fabricate, if the Fabrication is careful it will never be caught
-
Are you admitting to doing this?
How can we caught a fraudster if the method is by removing participants that do not confirm the hypotheses? That is, rather than fabricating, the fraudster actually removes specific participants from conditions until he or she finds the pattern. I'm doubtful that there's an error detection method for this.
Looks like even if people fabricate, if the Fabrication is careful it will never be caught -
I asked a question and you passively aggressively called me a fraud. Very mature of you.
Are you admitting to doing this?
How can we caught a fraudster if the method is by removing participants that do not confirm the hypotheses? That is, rather than fabricating, the fraudster actually removes specific participants from conditions until he or she finds the pattern. I'm doubtful that there's an error detection method for this.
Looks like even if people fabricate, if the Fabrication is careful it will never be caught
-
Second p hacking paper. But, given the method and standard errors, you can figure out how sensitive the results are to outliers on your own.
How can we caught a fraudster if the method is by removing participants that do not confirm the hypotheses? That is, rather than fabricating, the fraudster actually removes specific participants from conditions until he or she finds the pattern. I'm doubtful that there's an error detection method for this.
Looks like even if people fabricate, if the Fabrication is careful it will never be caught -
what made you even think to ask this question? This is not a normal behavior with data. Only fraudsters can come up with this idea.
I asked a question and you passively aggressively called me a fraud. Very mature of you.
Are you admitting to doing this?
How can we caught a fraudster if the method is by removing participants that do not confirm the hypotheses? That is, rather than fabricating, the fraudster actually removes specific participants from conditions until he or she finds the pattern. I'm doubtful that there's an error detection method for this.
Looks like even if people fabricate, if the Fabrication is careful it will never be caught
-
Come on. This is what AC posted yesterday. Take a look:
https://twitter.com/AaronCharlton/status/1439076007353401347?s=20
what made you even think to ask this question? This is not a normal behavior with data. Only fraudsters can come up with this idea.
I asked a question and you passively aggressively called me a fraud. Very mature of you.
Are you admitting to doing this?
How can we caught a fraudster if the method is by removing participants that do not confirm the hypotheses? That is, rather than fabricating, the fraudster actually removes specific participants from conditions until he or she finds the pattern. I'm doubtful that there's an error detection method for this.
Looks like even if people fabricate, if the Fabrication is careful it will never be caught -
Hello. Although I am not suggesting anything (I am merely asking questions), I am putting some publicly available information here. Can someone provide more information about this?
1 - A study by Patti Williams, Nicole Verrochi Coleman, Andrea C. Morales, and Ludovica Cesareo (2018) - "Connections to Brands That Help Others versus Help the Self: The Impact of Incidental Awe and Pride on Consumer Relationships with Social-Benefit and Luxury Brands" has been retracted. Here is the retraction info: https://retractionwatch.com/2020/06/24/consumer-research-study-is-retracted-for-unexplained-anomalies/
Summary: 1st, 3rd, and 4th authors retracted the paper. All data was collected and analyzed by the 2nd author.
2 - Patti Williams was Nicole Coleman's committee chair/advisor. Sources: https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/pw-vitae-April-2017.pdf, and the JCR paper what was a Co-Winner of Ferber Award (award to papers based on doctoral dissertations): http://www.ejcr.org/ferberaward.htm (see year 2014 and the paper).
3 - Nicole Coleman's faculty page (https://www.business.pitt.edu/people/nicole-verrochi-coleman) lists several publications (and working papers) with Patti Williams and Andrea Morales - examples include https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article/44/2/283/2939533, https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article/46/1/99/5049929. The retracted article is still on her page.
4 - When you go to Andrea C. Morales updated CV or page (https://wpcarey.asu.edu/people/profile/837523), NO research with Nicole Coleman is listed. Nothing. Just do a Ctrl+F and search for Coleman. The same is true for Morales' Google Scholar Page: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=_eZDZvYAAAAJ&hl=en. There are no mentions to the publications or working papers.
5 - The same is true for Patti Williams' page (https://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/profile/pattiw/#research). The ferber award paper is there, but nothing else. All disappeared. http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Rh121jwAAAAJ&hl=en
6 - I couldn't access Coleman's Google Scholar Citations page. -
Hello. Although I am not suggesting anything (I am merely asking questions), I am putting some publicly available information here. Can someone provide more information about this?
1 - A study by Patti Williams, Nicole Verrochi Coleman, Andrea C. Morales, and Ludovica Cesareo (2018) - "Connections to Brands That Help Others versus Help the Self: The Impact of Incidental Awe and Pride on Consumer Relationships with Social-Benefit and Luxury Brands" has been retracted. Here is the retraction info: https://retractionwatch.com/2020/06/24/consumer-research-study-is-retracted-for-unexplained-anomalies/
Summary: 1st, 3rd, and 4th authors retracted the paper. All data was collected and analyzed by the 2nd author.
2 - Patti Williams was Nicole Coleman's committee chair/advisor. Sources: https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/pw-vitae-April-2017.pdf, and the JCR paper what was a Co-Winner of Ferber Award (award to papers based on doctoral dissertations): http://www.ejcr.org/ferberaward.htm (see year 2014 and the paper).
3 - Nicole Coleman's faculty page (https://www.business.pitt.edu/people/nicole-verrochi-coleman) lists several publications (and working papers) with Patti Williams and Andrea Morales - examples include https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article/44/2/283/2939533, https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article/46/1/99/5049929. The retracted article is still on her page.
4 - When you go to Andrea C. Morales updated CV or page (https://wpcarey.asu.edu/people/profile/837523), NO research with Nicole Coleman is listed. Nothing. Just do a Ctrl+F and search for Coleman. The same is true for Morales' Google Scholar Page: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=_eZDZvYAAAAJ&hl=en. There are no mentions to the publications or working papers.
5 - The same is true for Patti Williams' page (https://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/profile/pattiw/#research). The ferber award paper is there, but nothing else. All disappeared. http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Rh121jwAAAAJ&hl=en
6 - I couldn't access Coleman's Google Scholar Citations page.