Complete BS
Went to industry after failing to find an academic job.
BTW, a hilarious thing. Academic cares personal reputation. This lady dumped her ex after 8 years long relationship ... married a citizen to stay here.Does anyone know Poppy Qianyun Zhang (formerly NYU?)
Don't know her, but sounds so bad
Complete BS
Went to industry after failing to find an academic job.
BTW, a hilarious thing. Academic cares personal reputation. This lady dumped her ex after 8 years long relationship ... married a citizen to stay here.Does anyone know Poppy Qianyun Zhang (formerly NYU?)
This is sort of NYU thing. XL, the faculty there, also dumped her former lover, who helped her on research.
Don't know her, but sounds so bad
Complete BS
Went to industry after failing to find an academic job.
BTW, a hilarious thing. Academic cares personal reputation. This lady dumped her ex after 8 years long relationship ... married a citizen to stay here.Does anyone know Poppy Qianyun Zhang (formerly NYU?)
Xiao Liu at NYU Stern seems to come across as genuine, but she is certainly not. If you think so, you are fooled.
And yes, it is true that XL dumped FIVE former lovers, who helped her on research at CMU. To name a few, Fan, Zhang, Liu...
Truth cannot be defeated.
Mind your own business. XL is great
This is sort of NYU thing. XL, the faculty there, also dumped her former lover, who helped her on research.>
Complete fabrication. Impossible to have 5 partners during phd
Xiao Liu at NYU Stern seems to come across as genuine, but she is certainly not. If you think so, you are fooled.
And yes, it is true that XL dumped FIVE former lovers, who helped her on research at CMU. To name a few, Fan, Zhang, Liu...
Truth cannot be defeated.Mind your own business. XL is great
This is sort of NYU thing. XL, the faculty there, also dumped her former lover, who helped her on research.>
Saying "it is fabrication" is idiot. XL did have FIVE partners and dump them. Facts cannot be denied.
Complete fabrication. Impossible to have 5 partners during phd
Xiao Liu at NYU Stern seems to come across as genuine, but she is certainly not. If you think so, you are fooled.
And yes, it is true that XL dumped FIVE former lovers, who helped her on research at CMU. To name a few, Fan, Zhang, Liu...
Truth cannot be defeated.Mind your own business. XL is great
This is sort of NYU thing. XL, the faculty there, also dumped her former lover, who helped her on research.>
P-hacking in the context of FG's research would be the least of my concerns.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0001839214554990
Study 1: Recalling a networking event increases the number of cleaning-related words that people generate in a word-stem completion task (p < .001, d = .71).
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028381
Study 3: Being in a context that facilitates cheating leads people to recall fewer moral code items (p < .001, d = 1.18).
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-27253-001
Study 3: Following a creativity-priming manipulation (a sentence-unscrambling task), people cheat more on their performance (p < .001, d = .6). The effect on the DV is larger than the effect on the manipulation check (p = .003, d = .5)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19254236/
Study 1: In a control condition, people report solving 7 out of 20 matrices. Whey they can shred their work before reporting, they report solving 12. The key result: When a confederate wearing a CMU t-shirt (an "in-group identity cue") ostensibly cheats, people report solving 15. When the confederate is wearing a UPitt t-shirt (an "out-group" cue), people report solving 8. Effect size cannot be calculated, but p < .001 on 35 participants per cell.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21307176/
Study 1: Participants' level of "moral disengagement" increases after reading a scenario in which they imagine cheating (p < .001, d = 1.74).
Study 2: The "Moral disengagement" of participants is measured twice: Before and after reading a scenario in which they imagine acting honestly (vs. dishonestly). When people imagine acting honestly, the moral disengagement increased between "before" and "after" (p < .001, d = 2.7). The effect is reversed when people imagined acting honestly (p < .001, d = -1.67). The measure of moral disengagement is administered twice at a ~15 minute interval, so you'd expect participants' responses to be consistent, and the manipulation to have a small impact.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3458378/
Study 1: Signing at the top (vs. the bottom) decreases dishonesty: d = 1.07, p < .001, 95% CI: [.53; 1.55]. In the exact direct replication (https://www.pnas.org/content/117/13/7103), they found d = .04, 95% CI = [-.07, .15]. The CI of the replication does not include the original effect.Didn’t FG try to publish some failures to replicate her own work? Or am I misremembering...
Why only go after CM?
https://twitter.com/R__INDEX/status/1366581822616911881?s=20
:)Go after FG too. But the happiness research always seemed too hard to believe to me. If this blog is true, sad that p-hacking is what gets you to be a full professor at UCLA at $450K salary.
Someone did the math
https://mobile.twitter.com/ZoeZiani/status/1557124560352251905
4) It is not clear what explains the failure to replicate: The p-value of the original makes it very unlikely that it was a false positive. To get a p-value as small as the original one under the null, you would on average need to run 1 study a minute for 95 years ...See full post
How do you know XL has 5 partners
Saying "it is fabrication" is idiot. XL did have FIVE partners and dump them. Facts cannot be denied.
Complete fabrication. Impossible to have 5 partners during phdXiao Liu at NYU Stern seems to come across as genuine, but she is certainly not. If you think so, you are fooled.
And yes, it is true that XL dumped FIVE former lovers, who helped her on research at CMU. To name a few, Fan, Zhang, Liu...
Truth cannot be defeated.Mind your own business. XL is great
This is sort of NYU thing. XL, the faculty there, also dumped her former lover, who helped her on research.>