What happened to Andrea Morales at ASU?
A new marketing / consumer research scandal on sight?
-
Hello. Although I am not suggesting anything (I am merely asking questions), I am putting some publicly available information here. Can someone provide more information about this?
1 - A study by Patti Williams, Nicole Verrochi Coleman, Andrea C. Morales, and Ludovica Cesareo (2018) - "Connections to Brands That Help Others versus Help the Self: The Impact of Incidental Awe and Pride on Consumer Relationships with Social-Benefit and Luxury Brands" has been retracted. Here is the retraction info: https://retractionwatch.com/2020/06/24/consumer-research-study-is-retracted-for-unexplained-anomalies/
Summary: 1st, 3rd, and 4th authors retracted the paper. All data was collected and analyzed by the 2nd author.
2 - Patti Williams was Nicole Coleman's committee chair/advisor. Sources: https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/pw-vitae-April-2017.pdf, and the JCR paper what was a Co-Winner of Ferber Award (award to papers based on doctoral dissertations): http://www.ejcr.org/ferberaward.htm (see year 2014 and the paper).
3 - Nicole Coleman's faculty page (https://www.business.pitt.edu/people/nicole-verrochi-coleman) lists several publications (and working papers) with Patti Williams and Andrea Morales - examples include https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article/44/2/283/2939533, https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article/46/1/99/5049929. The retracted article is still on her page.
4 - When you go to Andrea C. Morales updated CV or page (https://wpcarey.asu.edu/people/profile/837523), NO research with Nicole Coleman is listed. Nothing. Just do a Ctrl+F and search for Coleman. The same is true for Morales' Google Scholar Page: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=_eZDZvYAAAAJ&hl=en. There are no mentions to the publications or working papers.
5 - The same is true for Patti Williams' page (https://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/profile/pattiw/#research). The ferber award paper is there, but nothing else. All disappeared. http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=Rh121jwAAAAJ&hl=en
6 - I couldn't access Coleman's Google Scholar Citations page. -
Suspect paper:
Andrews, Michelle, Xueming Luo, Zheng Fang, and Anindya Ghose. "Mobile ad effectiveness: Hyper-contextual targeting with crowdedness." Marketing Science 35, no. 2 (2016): 218-233.their code is available on the MNKSC website. Try running it and replicate the results from the paper. You cannot. But, MKSC does not care. Because XL got a lot of papers with the INFORMS brass, they don't want to embarrass themselves.
-
Any guesses as to, in JCR/JMR, how many papers are true, p-hacked, and completely fabricated? Thoughts?
The problem with this as posed is you end up with 3 matrices.
Matrix 1: True but p hacked, true not p hacked, false and p hacked, false and not p hacked
Matrix 2: true and fabricated, true not fabricated, false fabricated, false not fabricated
Matrix 3: p hacked and fabricated, p hacked not fabricated, and so on and so forthI’d say about 30% of the not preregistered results in JCR would replicate, but I wouldn’t be stunned if an actual analysis were lower.
-
Great paper
Suspect paper:
Andrews, Michelle, Xueming Luo, Zheng Fang, and Anindya Ghose. "Mobile ad effectiveness: Hyper-contextual targeting with crowdedness." Marketing Science 35, no. 2 (2016): 218-233.their code is available on the MNKSC website. Try running it and replicate the results from the paper. You cannot. But, MKSC does not care. Because XL got a lot of papers with the INFORMS brass, they don't want to embarrass themselves.
-
Great paper
Suspect paper:
Andrews, Michelle, Xueming Luo, Zheng Fang, and Anindya Ghose. "Mobile ad effectiveness: Hyper-contextual targeting with crowdedness." Marketing Science 35, no. 2 (2016): 218-233.their code is available on the MNKSC website. Try running it and replicate the results from the paper. You cannot. But, MKSC does not care. Because XL got a lot of papers with the INFORMS brass, they don't want to embarrass themselves.
moron
-
Why XUEMING IS A JOKE?
List some papers and explain why. Otherwise that's just jealously.
Same for VK.Subway paper in MS looks very fake
Total fake. The code is available on the MKSC website. Instead of whining here, a few of you should go check it out. I reported it to datacolada, but those morns only look for fraud in CB.
-
fu
Great paper
Suspect paper:
Andrews, Michelle, Xueming Luo, Zheng Fang, and Anindya Ghose. "Mobile ad effectiveness: Hyper-contextual targeting with crowdedness." Marketing Science 35, no. 2 (2016): 218-233.their code is available on the MNKSC website. Try running it and replicate the results from the paper. You cannot. But, MKSC does not care. Because XL got a lot of papers with the INFORMS brass, they don't want to embarrass themselves.
moron
-
Does anyone know exactly what sorts of data anomalies were in papers by Ping Dong and/or Nicole Coleman? In Lawrence Sanna's case, I read that the means and standard deviations were pretty much identical across conditions, indicative of copying and pasting with minor changes (read: fabrication) of data to make it look somewhat different. In other fields, people have been caught copying cells directly without any changes. How were Ping and Nicole caught and what were the data anomalies? Anyone know? Insider?
-
Does anyone know exactly what sorts of data anomalies were in papers by Ping Dong and/or Nicole Coleman? In Lawrence Sanna's case, I read that the means and standard deviations were pretty much identical across conditions, indicative of copying and pasting with minor changes (read: fabrication) of data to make it look somewhat different. In other fields, people have been caught copying cells directly without any changes. How were Ping and Nicole caught and what were the data anomalies? Anyone know? Insider?
I think PD was a case where she was caught in the lab taking the experiment and fabricating data
-
Why XUEMING IS A JOKE?
List some papers and explain why. Otherwise that's just jealously.
Same for VK.Subway paper in MS looks very fake
Total fake. The code is available on the MKSC website. Instead of whining here, a few of you should go check it out. I reported it to datacolada, but those morns only look for fraud in CB.
Do you have evidence? If not, shut up