JMR Retraction
The paper argued that conceptual priming of fullness could reduce perceptions of hunger lolWhich paper is this?
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00222437221105028
A new marketing / consumer research scandal on sight?
-
JMR Retraction
The paper argued that conceptual priming of fullness could reduce perceptions of hunger lolWhich paper is this?
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00222437221105028
the retraction notice only mentions "inconsistencies."
I would like to know the details of how authors tempered with the data.
Also, the authors should be punished. -
JMR Retraction
The paper argued that conceptual priming of fullness could reduce perceptions of hunger lolWhich paper is this?
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00222437221105028
the retraction notice only mentions "inconsistencies."
I would like to know the details of how authors tempered with the data.
Also, the authors should be punished.I'm also curious what the inconsistencies are.
-
There are no repercussions to retractions. JS had multiple, and she is sticking around. So are her co-authors from Iowa (AW) and Vtech (RB). CB is just more visible- XL is perhaps the worst with his made up datasets.
Mentioning XL, his student MA (from Emory) turned down an IU-tenured offer after saying yes. Given her fraud papers with XL, IU probably dodged a bullet.
-
There are no repercussions to retractions. JS had multiple, and she is sticking around. So are her co-authors from Iowa (AW) and Vtech (RB). CB is just more visible- XL is perhaps the worst with his made up datasets.
Mentioning XL, his student MA (from Emory) turned down an IU-tenured offer after saying yes. Given her fraud papers with XL, IU probably dodged a bullet.RB is such a machine I’m not sure losing a couple would really matter. But I do think wonder why he stuck around there.
-
There are no repercussions to retractions. JS had multiple, and she is sticking around. So are her co-authors from Iowa (AW) and Vtech (RB). CB is just more visible- XL is perhaps the worst with his made up datasets.
Mentioning XL, his student MA (from Emory) turned down an IU-tenured offer after saying yes. Given her fraud papers with XL, IU probably dodged a bullet.RB is such a machine I’m not sure losing a couple would really matter. But I do think wonder why he stuck around there.
If you cheat, you can be a machine. That’s why RB is stuck there.
-
There are no repercussions to retractions. JS had multiple, and she is sticking around. So are her co-authors from Iowa (AW) and Vtech (RB). CB is just more visible- XL is perhaps the worst with his made up datasets.
Mentioning XL, his student MA (from Emory) turned down an IU-tenured offer after saying yes. Given her fraud papers with XL, IU probably dodged a bullet.RB is such a machine I’m not sure losing a couple would really matter. But I do think wonder why he stuck around there.
We normalize bad behavior. Retractions cannot be a "they don't matter". They are serious as they hit at the very core of our field. How can someone feign ignorance when their co-author cheated on the papers? Why were they on the paper in the first place. It also shows the misogyny that exists on this board. People continue to hound AM and PW, while never going after RB. Disgusting. At least be equal opportunity offender.
If you want to hound AM< PW.. also hound RB. Or don't hound anyone. -
It’s beyond the CB. Look at many so called quant papers, how many of them can be replicated? Field experiment is especially fraud. Also the Stanford SH papers are extremely concerning, but tenured, so?
There are no repercussions to retractions. JS had multiple, and she is sticking around. So are her co-authors from Iowa (AW) and Vtech (RB). CB is just more visible- XL is perhaps the worst with his made up datasets.
Mentioning XL, his student MA (from Emory) turned down an IU-tenured offer after saying yes. Given her fraud papers with XL, IU probably dodged a bullet.RB is such a machine I’m not sure losing a couple would really matter. But I do think wonder why he stuck around there.
We normalize bad behavior. Retractions cannot be a "they don't matter". They are serious as they hit at the very core of our field. How can someone feign ignorance when their co-author cheated on the papers? Why were they on the paper in the first place. It also shows the misogyny that exists on this board. People continue to hound AM and PW, while never going after RB. Disgusting. At least be equal opportunity offender.
If you want to hound AM< PW.. also hound RB. Or don't hound anyone. -
Yes, what is happening on the quant side? Dont hear much there. And what about qualitative work?
It’s beyond the CB. Look at many so called quant papers, how many of them can be replicated? Field experiment is especially fraud. Also the Stanford SH papers are extremely concerning, but tenured, so?
There are no repercussions to retractions. JS had multiple, and she is sticking around. So are her co-authors from Iowa (AW) and Vtech (RB). CB is just more visible- XL is perhaps the worst with his made up datasets.
Mentioning XL, his student MA (from Emory) turned down an IU-tenured offer after saying yes. Given her fraud papers with XL, IU probably dodged a bullet.RB is such a machine I’m not sure losing a couple would really matter. But I do think wonder why he stuck around there.
We normalize bad behavior. Retractions cannot be a "they don't matter". They are serious as they hit at the very core of our field. How can someone feign ignorance when their co-author cheated on the papers? Why were they on the paper in the first place. It also shows the misogyny that exists on this board. People continue to hound AM and PW, while never going after RB. Disgusting. At least be equal opportunity offender.
If you want to hound AM< PW.. also hound RB. Or don't hound anyone.
-
Senior faculty can always maintain plausible deniability if they are not the ones who collect or analyze the data. Even if they pressure their students to find impossible results, as long as it’s not in writing, they can claim ignorance. It’s almost always juniors who get hit. The environment that crates this pressure continues though.
Why Northwestern's AL escaped from all the discussion? Some of her papers were very suspicious and PD was her former student and coauthor. Their papers were retracted, and AL threw her under the bus, then pretended she was innocent? How come?