Check these and a bunch of other paper by AL and PD. All these paper seem disappeared from AL’s CV? Why?
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/698494
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/700844
A new marketing / consumer research scandal on sight?
-
Even if tenured allegations and investigations can have consequences. No one should be exempted.
It’s beyond the CB. Look at many so called quant papers, how many of them can be replicated? Field experiment is especially fraud. Also the Stanford SH papers are extremely concerning, but tenured, so?
There are no repercussions to retractions. JS had multiple, and she is sticking around. So are her co-authors from Iowa (AW) and Vtech (RB). CB is just more visible- XL is perhaps the worst with his made up datasets.
Mentioning XL, his student MA (from Emory) turned down an IU-tenured offer after saying yes. Given her fraud papers with XL, IU probably dodged a bullet.RB is such a machine I’m not sure losing a couple would really matter. But I do think wonder why he stuck around there.
We normalize bad behavior. Retractions cannot be a "they don't matter". They are serious as they hit at the very core of our field. How can someone feign ignorance when their co-author cheated on the papers? Why were they on the paper in the first place. It also shows the misogyny that exists on this board. People continue to hound AM and PW, while never going after RB. Disgusting. At least be equal opportunity offender.
If you want to hound AM< PW.. also hound RB. Or don't hound anyone.
-
Some of them are in her CV. There's also this one https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811617300873
Check these and a bunch of other paper by AL and PD. All these paper seem disappeared from AL’s CV? Why?
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/698494
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/700844 -
Why Northwestern's AL escaped from all the discussion? Some of her papers were very suspicious and PD was her former student and coauthor. Their papers were retracted, and AL threw her under the bus, then pretended she was innocent? How come?
PD was not an AL student. She was a CZ student. AL did not throw her under any bus. Issues arose after PD paper with CZ was retracted and NU conducted an investigation.
-
Senior faculty can always maintain plausible deniability if they are not the ones who collect or analyze the data. Even if they pressure their students to find impossible results, as long as it’s not in writing, they can claim ignorance. It’s almost always juniors who get hit. The environment that crates this pressure continues though.
Why Northwestern's AL escaped from all the discussion? Some of her papers were very suspicious and PD was her former student and coauthor. Their papers were retracted, and AL threw her under the bus, then pretended she was innocent? How come?
Are you kidding me? What world do we live in? They don't want to look at the data? What are they looking at then? revision numbers?
-
Senior faculty can always maintain plausible deniability if they are not the ones who collect or analyze the data. Even if they pressure their students to find impossible results, as long as it’s not in writing, they can claim ignorance. It’s almost always juniors who get hit. The environment that crates this pressure continues though.
Why Northwestern's AL escaped from all the discussion? Some of her papers were very suspicious and PD was her former student and coauthor. Their papers were retracted, and AL threw her under the bus, then pretended she was innocent? How come?
Are you kidding me? What world do we live in? They don't want to look at the data? What are they looking at then? revision numbers?
Seniors do a lot of writing and positioning the paper. I don’t think you’ve ever submitted a paper before? I’m not sure it’s a reasonable expectation for seniors to check every line of R code
-
Why Northwestern's AL escaped from all the discussion? Some of her papers were very suspicious and PD was her former student and coauthor. Their papers were retracted, and AL threw her under the bus, then pretended she was innocent? How come?
PD was not an AL student. She was a CZ student. AL did not throw her under any bus. Issues arose after PD paper with CZ was retracted and NU conducted an investigation.
I have no trust in any of AL's papers.
-
Why Northwestern's AL escaped from all the discussion? Some of her papers were very suspicious and PD was her former student and coauthor. Their papers were retracted, and AL threw her under the bus, then pretended she was innocent? How come?
PD was not an AL student. She was a CZ student. AL did not throw her under any bus. Issues arose after PD paper with CZ was retracted and NU conducted an investigation.
I have no trust in any of AL's papers.
Stop hating on herwhile hiding on a rumor forum. No PD paper with AL was retracted.
-
Senior faculty here. If your name is on the paper you are responsible for the content. End of story.
Senior faculty can always maintain plausible deniability if they are not the ones who collect or analyze the data. Even if they pressure their students to find impossible results, as long as it’s not in writing, they can claim ignorance. It’s almost always juniors who get hit. The environment that crates this pressure continues though.
Why Northwestern's AL escaped from all the discussion? Some of her papers were very suspicious and PD was her former student and coauthor. Their papers were retracted, and AL threw her under the bus, then pretended she was innocent? How come?
Are you kidding me? What world do we live in? They don't want to look at the data? What are they looking at then? revision numbers?
Seniors do a lot of writing and positioning the paper. I don’t think you’ve ever submitted a paper before? I’m not sure it’s a reasonable expectation for seniors to check every line of R code