Liar
True story. Years years ago, I was in my third year review and had nothing. Listed one of my recently submitted papers as R&R (it was not). Passed the review.
Didn’t publish much later but published enough to get tenure at an MRM. Now semi checked out. If I didn’t lie a bit back then, I wouldn’t get the chance to succeed later on.
Liar
True story. Years years ago, I was in my third year review and had nothing. Listed one of my recently submitted papers as R&R (it was not). Passed the review.
Didn’t publish much later but published enough to get tenure at an MRM. Now semi checked out. If I didn’t lie a bit back then, I wouldn’t get the chance to succeed later on.
No way. The seniors asked me about the editor letter at least
if true, the papers have been conditionally accepted since 2021. it is just interesting that she not rushing to publish them. she has been an assistant prof since 2011 and has only one JCF. a very curious case
Nothing curious here. You are just a jelly a$$ho.le and/or a backstabbing colleague. What a sad "scholar" you are.
if true, the papers have been conditionally accepted since 2021. it is just interesting that she not rushing to publish them. she has been an assistant prof since 2011 and has only one JCF. a very curious caseNothing curious here. You are just a jelly a$$ho.le and/or a backstabbing colleague. What a sad "scholar" you are.
so much anger... for simply stating it is a very curious case? is something really going on then?
In her CV, this lady (with PhD in finance from UT Austin in 2011 https://business.smu.edu.sg/faculty/profile/5851/margaret-zhu) argues that she has two conditional acceptances at JF and RFS respectively. Both are single-authored publications.
“Real Effects of Corporate Hedging”, Journal of Finance, conditional accepted;
“Corporate Derivatives Hedging in the Past Two Decades”, Review of Financial Studies, conditional accepted;
Does her first paper cite "The Real and Financial Implications of Corporate Hedging" by Campello, Lin, Ma, and Zou, Journal of Finance 2011? Does she consider her paper to be contemporaneous?
Of course these are ghost publications. You can always say the condition was not met at the final stage. But I would call it “gaming the game”, not a “serious fraud”.
Under your argument, I could claim all of my working papers currently under review are "conditionally accepted," and I would not be committing fraud?
Obviously, through the two solo top3 pubs. If true, she's supposed to be OK (not able to see the drafts..). If no, fraud lemon
How can she survive at high MRM Austin finance? Surprisingly weak even after 10 years. Weaker than most LRM graduates but still get a good job in Asia
Honestly, I am soooooo on the fence on this one.
On one side, I feel like no-one should be publicly accused like this without any proof/evidence. I believe in "innocent until proven guilty" - and there is not a shred of proof here.
On the other side... this is oh so fishy....