Li b logic: it’s not dis crim I nati on if they dis crim I Nate against wh it e men.
Any US R1 schools hiring non-URM men? Seems like almost all of the US R1 schools are hiring URM and females.
URM. That's all that will get hired at top tier schools. If I was not a URM, I would take the first job I could get and then pray something opens up after all this craziness settles down. The world is full of lighting fuel and certain woke folks are threatening to light the match.
Amen to that
URM. That's all that will get hired at top tier schools. If I was not a URM, I would take the first job I could get and then pray something opens up after all this craziness settles down. The world is full of lighting fuel and certain woke folks are threatening to light the match.
Such a comment can have only one purpose: Entice more discrimination against URMs. What are the names of these URMs who are being hired everywhere? You want every white man who is not hired to believe that this is because of URMs. This is disingenuous. We all know that URMs continue to be victims of discrimination.
Amen to that
URM. That's all that will get hired at top tier schools. If I was not a URM, I would take the first job I could get and then pray something opens up after all this craziness settles down. The world is full of lighting fuel and certain woke folks are threatening to light the match.
Whites are actually fine. Asian males are actually discriminated.
Such a comment can have only one purpose: Entice more discrimination against URMs. What are the names of these URMs who are being hired everywhere? You want every white man who is not hired to believe that this is because of URMs. This is disingenuous. We all know that URMs continue to be victims of discrimination.
Amen to that
URM. That's all that will get hired at top tier schools. If I was not a URM, I would take the first job I could get and then pray something opens up after all this craziness settles down. The world is full of lighting fuel and certain woke folks are threatening to light the match.
Such a comment can have only one purpose: Entice more discrimination against URMs. What are the names of these URMs who are being hired everywhere? You want every white man who is not hired to believe that this is because of URMs. This is disingenuous. We all know that URMs continue to be victims of discrimination.
Amen to that
URM. That's all that will get hired at top tier schools. If I was not a URM, I would take the first job I could get and then pray something opens up after all this craziness settles down. The world is full of lighting fuel and certain woke folks are threatening to light the match.
This is a fact OP...
At my school we don't prioritize diversity. Instead we are trying to hire the best people we can find each year. Yet, when we hire a women, people on this board note that we are only hiring women. If we hire a man, there is no comment. Our biggest challenge is trying to identify who will be successful in research. This is much harder than teams drafting in the NFL or NBA where that got to see them play college ball. We are trying to infer from a small bit information everyones potential. For the candidates ranking job opportunities is much easier, schools with lower teaching loads, higher pay, and successful senior faculty are the best jobs.
How do you view rookies with crazy pubs and people's obsession with R&Rs?
At my school we don't prioritize diversity. Instead we are trying to hire the best people we can find each year. Yet, when we hire a women, people on this board note that we are only hiring women. If we hire a man, there is no comment. Our biggest challenge is trying to identify who will be successful in research. This is much harder than teams drafting in the NFL or NBA where that got to see them play college ball. We are trying to infer from a small bit information everyones potential. For the candidates ranking job opportunities is much easier, schools with lower teaching loads, higher pay, and successful senior faculty are the best jobs.
Potential Signals of Research Potential
1. PhD from top school
2. Pubs/R&Rs at top 3 journals
3. Pubs/R&Rs at top 5 journals
4. Letters from successful researchers describing candidates research potential
For us almost nothing else matters in selecting for round 1 interviews. I believe that we interviewed everyone who submitted an application to us that has either 1, 2, or 3.
Perhaps other schools use different signals, or order them differently in trying to guess who will be successful.
How do you view rookies with crazy pubs and people's obsession with R&Rs?
At my school we don't prioritize diversity. Instead we are trying to hire the best people we can find each year. Yet, when we hire a women, people on this board note that we are only hiring women. If we hire a man, there is no comment. Our biggest challenge is trying to identify who will be successful in research. This is much harder than teams drafting in the NFL or NBA where that got to see them play college ball. We are trying to infer from a small bit information everyones potential. For the candidates ranking job opportunities is much easier, schools with lower teaching loads, higher pay, and successful senior faculty are the best jobs.
You call it obsession? I call it doing the job, doing research. You dont do research you go teaching, instead you get a good paying job at an R1 university because you are either coming from a prestigious university or you are asian or UR or all of them.
Secondly, being a student in a prestigious university gives you many advantages such as data bank, connections to publish to top journals, invitations to conferences that are made only for prestigious universities, decent pay from your department and from Deloitte foundation too, and so on and on. But, think for a moment about another student from non prestigious universities who are struggling financially because their pay is not enough, Deloitte is biased and gives the money only to those spoiled students from "BIG" universities, have to constantly not get any invitation from JAR and jar like conferences, have their own ideas and develop their own papers and not being just an extension of their advisors' idea as a RA contribution, spend day and nights collecting data manually cause there are no funds from their university and still come up with the same amount of papers, if not more as their spoiled counterpart students from prestigious universities. At the end what is prestige? Its brainwashing, it is advertisement!!
Anyways, after all these you see and asian or a spoiled RA future scientist get your job and then you are ready to trash everything and forget about research because you finally figured out this piece of world is very dirty!!
Potential Signals of Research Potential
1. PhD from top school
2. Pubs/R&Rs at top 3 journals
3. Pubs/R&Rs at top 5 journals
4. Letters from successful researchers describing candidates research potential
For us almost nothing else matters in selecting for round 1 interviews. I believe that we interviewed everyone who submitted an application to us that has either 1, 2, or 3.
Perhaps other schools use different signals, or order them differently in trying to guess who will be successful.
What is number one and why does that matter and which science has established that coming from a "top", as you call it, would be the most important thing? How do ypu value the hard job of someone coming from a mid-tier university who has done same as those from top schools? This is just crazy and I an really convinced it is also illegal.
The legal equal employment opportunity law responsibilities are (pay attention to 1 and 3)
1.Make fair employment decisions.
2.Grant reasonable accommodations.
3.Craft unbiased policies.
4.Stop workplace harassment.
5.Provide equal pay.
6.Respond to discrimination complaints.
7.Display discrimination laws.
8.Keep employment records......