Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 522 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 348 Goods vs 131 No Goods

1. Economist
   255f
   

   The real issue is why it has not been retracted based on the content of the letter?

   3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   3ecb
   

   The good thing about EJMR is that it does occasionally help the profession to discover cases of fraud committed by researchers of all genders.

   3 weeks ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

3. Economist
   5ae2
   

   Because all Chicago and JAR is fraud.

   This is proof! There is no excuse not to retract, at a minimum. In a functioning world, this should lead to a full investigation of all of PL MM's fraudulent research and them going into hiding a la Hunton

   The real issue is why it has not been retracted based on the content of the letter?

   3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

4. Economist
   0507
   

   This also looks bad for Wiley, JAR's publisher. Is Wiley even a legit publisher anymore? Obviously they're not following COPE guidelines

   JF (also under Wiley) retracted a paper with similar issues - fabricated results there, fabricated data here. Same thing

   3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

5. Economist
   2633
   

   Mike, I haven't seen you or your RAs on here lately. You ok? Maybe you're just negotiating with Lil Petro to see if BU will cover some of the RA cost?

   3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

6. Economist
   d543
   

   good morning JAR nuts.

   3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Karl
   Rep: -66

   gm

   3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   7427
   

   Interestingly, JAR has no n*ts

   good morning JAR nuts.

   3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   927d
   

   This paper finds that fraud investigations are only useful when conducted by independent outsiders https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12784

   I think we know why the paper wasn't published at JAR! What a joke

   3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    d543
    

    good morning JAR nuts

    3 weeks ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

11. Economist
    5bee
    

    sut up

    good morning JAR nuts

    3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

12. Economist
    cfca
    

    This is immensely boring.

    3 weeks ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

13. Economist
    be90
    

    ^because you've always known that JAR is a dumpster fire and everyone at Chicago is a mor*ron and fraud? or?

    2 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

14. Economist
    0e97
    

    Is there any plausible reason the paper is not retracted?

    Other than the obvious: they're all frauds

    2 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

15. Economist
    d543
    

    gm JAR nuts

    2 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

16. Economist
    2cdd
    

    https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/accounting-rupture-dealing-with-fraud-at-jar

    2 weeks ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 1 Vlad !

17. Economist
    8fc0
    

    that's insignificant compared to FAKE DATA!

    And invited plagiarism.

    How many JAR papers flat out fake data? How many are plagiarized? How many at the Editors' request??

    toilet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JAR

    2 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

18. Economist
    d543
    

    gm JAR nuts

    2 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

19. Economist
    7c24
    

    Helloooooooooooio

    gm JAR nuts

    2 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

20. Economist
    5e55
    

    JAR has no nuts

    Do the JAR Editors/Ed board save their fraud work for JAR, or is all their work fraud too?

    2 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply »