AEA under attack by NYT « Economics Job Market Rumors

4 years - 39 posts - Latest - RSS
Thread: 91 Goods vs 30 No Goods

Economics Job Market Rumors » Economics » Econ Lounge

AEA under attack by NYT

Economist
340c

https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/outcomes-of-the-2017-18-econ-job-market/page/4

I messed up on the previous regression post; I accidentally copied the all TT reg, which explains why nat_chinese is so strongly positive.
Here's just US TT:
postdoc: 0.1269
female: 0.1069***
white: 0.0988
asian: -0.0406
black: 0.2738**
hispanic: 0.1124
uswnr_rank: 0.0000
solo_jmp: 0.0391
top_5: 0.3884***
top_field: 0.1526***
other_pub: 0.0049
nat_american: 0.0968**
nat_chinese: -0.0581
nat_korean: -0.2728***
field_development: 0.0178
field_econometrics: 0.2221**
field_environmental: 0.0123
field_finance: 0.0827
field_health: 0.0028
field_trade: 0.0531
field_labor: 0.0794
field_macro: -0.3745***
field_micro_theory: 0.0556
field_public: 0.0774
constant: 0.0747
R2 = 0.1377

suprised that this didn't get more commentary. it's better to be black than to have a top field pub. being female is 2/3 as good as having a top field pub.

4 years ago # QUOTE 5 Volod 0 Vlad !
Economist
b3e6

what a shocker. white American females pretending they're discriminated against, asking for more power and privileges, when in reality chinese/korean males are being screwed. Just like every other industry.

4 years ago # QUOTE 18 Volod 2 Vlad !
Economist
e537

reminder: https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/clouds-are-forming-over-economics/page/4

4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !
Economist
3a4c

Screw these non-American Asian males. They won’t come to happy hour, always smiling contributing NOTHING to the work environment, and just wanting to accept their countrymen into PhD programs paid by the American people. MAGA

what a shocker. white American females pretending they're discriminated against, asking for more power and privileges, when in reality chinese/korean males are being screwed. Just like every other industry.

4 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 7 Vlad !
Economist
8092

Screw these non-American Asian males. They won’t come to happy hour, always smiling contributing NOTHING to the work environment, and just wanting to accept their countrymen into PhD programs paid by the American people. MAGA

what a shocker. white American females pretending they're discriminated against, asking for more power and privileges, when in reality chinese/korean males are being screwed. Just like every other industry.

Asian-Americans are discriminated against as much as Asians in faculty hiring.

4 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 2 Vlad !
Economist
1f1c

Well you find anybody tweeting about that.

what a shocker. white American females pretending they're discriminated against, asking for more power and privileges, when in reality chinese/korean males are being screwed. Just like every other industry.

4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !
Economist
e861

“Other members seemed more skeptical of that idea when it was raised in a closed-door session last Thursday, according to several people who were there. Mr. Blanchard cut off discussion, saying he was hungry and it was time for lunch, these people said. The committee will take up the issue again in April.”
What member of the AEA Executive Committee leaked this tidbit to the NYT?

I read about Blanchard and lunch on Twitter

4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !
Economist
bd2c

“Let’s have have lunch” strikes again!

4 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !
Economist
8eca

Blanchard receives endorsement deal from "It's Just Lunch" dating site. Confirmed.

4 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !
Economist
f943

Finding it harder and harder to feel sorry for these privileged white women. When can we start focusing on the truly disadvantaged members of society and not this puppet show?

4 years ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !
Economist
3acd

Time for the old corrupt men at the top of the profession to go. The quicker it happens the better even if takes a few false harassment claims.

4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 3 Vlad !
Economist
ed04

Fun fact, there is no obvious omitted category in this regression. Also you can't reject that white=black at a reasonable significance level.

white: 0.0988
asian: -0.0406
black: 0.2738**
hispanic: 0.1124

4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !
Economist
19be

RR they are coming for you. Get ready.

4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !
Economist
e861

“Let’s have have lunch” strikes again!

LOL

4 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !
Economist
e861

Lunch is a tool used by the powerful to exploit others

4 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !
Economist
e861

Fun fact, there is no obvious omitted category in this regression. Also you can't reject that white=black at a reasonable significance level.
white: 0.0988
asian: -0.0406
black: 0.2738**
hispanic: 0.1124

Pacific Islander?

4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !
Economist
3c64

Fun fact, there is no obvious omitted category in this regression. Also you can't reject that white=black at a reasonable significance level.
white: 0.0988
asian: -0.0406
black: 0.2738**
hispanic: 0.1124

Middle Eastern was the omitted category, he said in the other thread

4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !
Economist
24db

Is it crazy to think that the AEA has this data for many years now, and could run the regression any time they wanted to, but just doesn’t want to do it?

4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !
Economist
84ab

Fun fact, there is no obvious omitted category in this regression. Also you can't reject that white=black at a reasonable significance level.
white: 0.0988
asian: -0.0406
black: 0.2738**
hispanic: 0.1124

Middle Eastern was the omitted category, he said in the other thread

I guess unidentified/mixed race could also be there.

4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

« Previous 12

Recently Announced

Upcoming

Economics

Job Market

Off Topic

Job Market Wiki

Job Market Candidates

Updates

AEA under attack by NYT

Reply