Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 63 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 77 Goods vs 13 No Goods

1. Economist
   916a
   

   https://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/21/globe-newswire-what-is-the-best-possible-approach-for-harvesting-alternative-long-short-risk-premia.html

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

2. Economist
   ed39
   

   you just dont get - do you? Now get back to your first year coursework or your undergrad studies.

   Your links are about the same as is this one:

   https://www.colgate.com/en-us/oral-health/basics/selecting-dental-products/teeth-whitening-toothpaste-does-it-work-0214

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 0 No Jab !

3. Economist
   68f5
   

   Not another one.... Didn't Cam Harvey shut them all up with his work?..... How many more papers about this will come out?

   All the big guys in the field need to write a paper "discovering" that all cross-sectional AP is garbage. Then we can move on and do something useful.
   ... like showing the effect of the tinder activity of the CEO's daughter on dividend policy.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 3 Jab 0 No Jab !

Reply

Post <blockquote><blockquote>also: if factors proxy risk why would someone spend higher fees just to get exposure to risk? Billions are invested in factors because they promise alpha, that is higher returns without higher risk. </blockquote> this is not always true. the game now is harvesting risk premia. those who have a tolerance for risk can afford to hold riskier portfolios and earn, on average, higher returns.</blockquote>

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.