Seriously look at Jeffersons cv and the listed AERs
All this vitriol against LC proves the point
-
It’s like saying managing said high end coffee shop made you qualified to run ABV InBev. One, you worked the cash register at a statybucks. 2, you don’t have any of the relevant qualifications or experience to run the firm.
The level of vitriol seems too high for what it is. It would be like me saying I worked in a high end coffee shop but it was really a starbucks when I applied to work as a bartender. It's like, Ok, fine, it's not that high end. Now can I go back to my 11am whiskey sours?
I actually have no clue what the Board of Governors does. So, maybe you're right? I thought it was more advisorial to the gov. prez and with some management responsibility. But I really don't know and a quick google search didn't answer my question.
-
I don't get why nobody is bringing up if you look at Jeffersons cv, he lists it as an AER when it's NOT
You have at least five non overlapping critiques. The first is flat out racist. The second are “Econ phd” nutters- they believe that only people with a PhD can hold the position. The fourth are “cv nutters” who are using the P&P nonsense as a critique. The fifth are people who think Jefferson’s experience suits him for the job and not Cook’s- and that’s the opinion I think if most sane economists.
-
I don't get why nobody is bringing up if you look at Jeffersons cv, he lists it as an AER when it's NOT
You have at least five non overlapping critiques. The first is flat out racist. The second are “Econ phd” nutters- they believe that only people with a PhD can hold the position. The fourth are “cv nutters” who are using the P&P nonsense as a critique. The fifth are people who think Jefferson’s experience suits him for the job and not Cook’s- and that’s the opinion I think if most sane economists.
Yeah but the overlap with actual phd economists is less than 30% on this forum.
-
"Whyte people will do whatever it takes to exclude blacks from powerful spaces"
If OP is an economist, he knows that a Hoxby or Washington nomination would have raised no objections. Fundamentally dishonest post.I’m not so naive to think Hoxby and Washington wouldn’t raise objections, but they’d be easier to call racist
-
Love how the p&p “nonsense” is so quickly dismissed. Since so many frauds in the profession mis characterized their publication record with the AERPP . It’s academic fraud.
I don't get why nobody is bringing up if you look at Jeffersons cv, he lists it as an AER when it's NOT
You have at least five non overlapping critiques. The first is flat out racist. The second are “Econ phd” nutters- they believe that only people with a PhD can hold the position. The fourth are “cv nutters” who are using the P&P nonsense as a critique. The fifth are people who think Jefferson’s experience suits him for the job and not Cook’s- and that’s the opinion I think if most sane economists.
-
A p&p nutter in the wild.
Love how the p&p “nonsense” is so quickly dismissed. Since so many frauds in the profession mis characterized their publication record with the AERPP . It’s academic fraud.
I don't get why nobody is bringing up if you look at Jeffersons cv, he lists it as an AER when it's NOT
You have at least five non overlapping critiques. The first is flat out racist. The second are “Econ phd” nutters- they believe that only people with a PhD can hold the position. The fourth are “cv nutters” who are using the P&P nonsense as a critique. The fifth are people who think Jefferson’s experience suits him for the job and not Cook’s- and that’s the opinion I think if most sane economists.
-
I mean, it’s the federal reserve board of governors. Not the family planning board for kids who want to family good and do other things good too.
Why not choose a more accomplished and qualified AA economist (e.g. Glenn Loury)?
Loury would be a great pick. Someone who truly wants to better his fellow AA and not grift. He understands the root of AA problems is the chaotic family structure.
-
Whyte people will do whatever it takes to exclude blacks from powerful spaces
I'm curious, why do you think that she is qualified to have a say on monetary policy in the us? Forget race and gender and everything else that is not connected with her qualifications and knowledge.
I really want to know why people want her there when I'm sure there there are better qualified black women out there for that job