By the way, not only economists post here. EJMR of late has gained quite a following in the professional mathhematics community.Indeed, it is rumoured that the 2022 Fields Medals were decided on EJMR. Now, it looks like a candidate for a 2026 Medal was first discovered on EJMR.
Honestly this thread is worth it just for this legendary post. Extraordinary work weird man, keep posting. The best trolls don't even realize that they're trolls
his first proof has 7 versions and turns out false. this was over 2 years of work from the timestamps. this is some random guy in zimbabwe. and you think were mean to think this paper is prob wrong? ljl...
it's obv wrong and the mistake is probably related to a statement that is assumed to be true but actually isnt. so in fact, not only is the proof wrong but the author doesnt even understand the tools hes using. ljl.Or maybe it's you who actually doesn't understand the methods the author is using ? If it's cranky as you claim, it sjould be very easy for you to simply POINT out the EXACT error. It's a 4-page paper, for goodness sake.
It doesn't matter how many wrong versions the author produced before. A problem like the RH can only be understood after numerous failed attempts. The question is, does the author LEARN from the past mistakes to make their approach better ? And why would the author's nationality matter ?
Your comments are completely void of any sense nor substance. You said you're not a number theorist, so you should probably just be a spectator in this thread.
i think this guy posts a lot here. hes the math phd larper who keeps recommending the actuarial career. hes a complete loon. he pretends to have a phd in fourier analysis and claims to be a data scientist making 300k a year. ljl.
Actually, the author mentioned in the BC/AMM thread that he is slef-taught and works under very difficult socioeconomic conditions. It's clear that you're merely hating on the author despite being clueless in number theory. Just shut the hell up, your comments are full of hate & racism, and are not adding any value to this thread.
This is such a silly post. It shows that he's not careful when posting stuff and doesnt know how to check his own work because he's simply not good enough at math.
It doesn't matter how many wrong versions the author produced before. A problem like the RH can only be understood after numerous failed attempts. The question is, does the author LEARN from the past mistakes to make their approach better ? And why would the author's nationality matter ?
Your comments are completely void of any sense nor substance. You said you're not a number theorist, so you should probably just be a spectator in this thread.
Why dont you take your cra/zy wok/e a/s/s back to chad topaz land at mjmr and leave us the f/u/k alone on ejmr? You guys are deran/ged loo/ns and you're not even good at math.
i think this guy posts a lot here. hes the math phd larper who keeps recommending the actuarial career. hes a complete loon. he pretends to have a phd in fourier analysis and claims to be a data scientist making 300k a year. ljl.Actually, the author mentioned in the BC/AMM thread that he is slef-taught and works under very difficult socioeconomic conditions. It's clear that you're merely hating on the author despite being clueless in number theory. Just shut the hell up, your comments are full of hate & racism, and are not adding any value to this thread.
This is such a silly post. It shows that he's not careful when posting stuff and doesnt know how to check his own work because he's simply not good enough at math.
It doesn't matter how many wrong versions the author produced before. A problem like the RH can only be understood after numerous failed attempts. The question is, does the author LEARN from the past mistakes to make their approach better ? And why would the author's nationality matter ?
Your comments are completely void of any sense nor substance. You said you're not a number theorist, so you should probably just be a spectator in this thread.
You have no idea what research mathematics is like.
Why dont you take your cra/zy wok/e a/s/s back to chad topaz land at mjmr and leave us the f/u/k alone on ejmr? You guys are deran/ged loo/ns and you're not even good at math.
i think this guy posts a lot here. hes the math phd larper who keeps recommending the actuarial career. hes a complete loon. he pretends to have a phd in fourier analysis and claims to be a data scientist making 300k a year. ljl.Actually, the author mentioned in the BC/AMM thread that he is slef-taught and works under very difficult socioeconomic conditions. It's clear that you're merely hating on the author despite being clueless in number theory. Just shut the hell up, your comments are full of hate & racism, and are not adding any value to this thread.
Shut the fuck up, racist & dumb idiot.
Why dont you take your cra/zy wok/e a/s/s back to chad topaz land at mjmr and leave us the f/u/k alone on ejmr? You guys are deran/ged loo/ns and you're not even good at math.i think this guy posts a lot here. hes the math phd larper who keeps recommending the actuarial career. hes a complete loon. he pretends to have a phd in fourier analysis and claims to be a data scientist making 300k a year. ljl.Actually, the author mentioned in the BC/AMM thread that he is slef-taught and works under very difficult socioeconomic conditions. It's clear that you're merely hating on the author despite being clueless in number theory. Just shut the hell up, your comments are full of hate & racism, and are not adding any value to this thread.
Shut the fuck up, racist & dumb idiot.
what a valuable contribution by an analytic number theorist...
The guy thinks we need to give him special attention because he's african. It's pretty sad. The guy has no track record in mathematical research and has already posted a flawed proof despite revising it several times over the course of two years. And we're the bad guys for thinking he's a crank and we need to st/f/u unless we can find the flaw in his work (which of course is ridiculous since he's appealing to highly specialized results that only number theorists know about). There's probably nobody on this forum that wants to check this and yet he continues to tell us that it *deserves* special attention. No buddy, it doesnt deserve special attention. The best thing you can hope for is that a third tier mathematician will glance at it and find it interesting, probably correct, and then get a real big shot to try to find the flaw. This is a forum for economists. Imagine every crank starts self promoting their cr/ap on ejmr like deran/ged loons... jf/c no.
what a valuable contribution by an analytic number theorist...
The guy thinks we need to give him special attention because he's african. It's pretty sad. The guy has no track record in mathematical research and has already posted a flawed proof despite revising it several times over the course of two years. And we're the bad guys for thinking he's a crank and we need to st/f/u unless we can find the flaw in his work (which of course is ridiculous since he's appealing to highly specialized results that only number theorists know about). There's probably nobody on this forum that wants to check this and yet he continues to tell us that it *deserves* special attention. No buddy, it doesnt deserve special attention. The best thing you can hope for is that a third tier mathematician will glance at it and find it interesting, probably correct, and then get a real big shot to try to find the flaw. This is a forum for economists. Imagine every crank starts self promoting their cr/ap on ejmr like deran/ged loons... jf/c no.
what a valuable contribution by an analytic number theorist...
Just shut the hell up, dude. All your comments are just tantrums void of any mathematical substanve whatsoever. There are several people who have already expressed genuine interest in this paper (myself included), because the paper clearly merits such.
The guy thinks we need to give him special attention because he's african. It's pretty sad. The guy has no track record in mathematical research and has already posted a flawed proof despite revising it several times over the course of two years. And we're the bad guys for thinking he's a crank and we need to st/f/u unless we can find the flaw in his work (which of course is ridiculous since he's appealing to highly specialized results that only number theorists know about). There's probably nobody on this forum that wants to check this and yet he continues to tell us that it *deserves* special attention. No buddy, it doesnt deserve special attention. The best thing you can hope for is that a third tier mathematician will glance at it and find it interesting, probably correct, and then get a real big shot to try to find the flaw. This is a forum for economists. Imagine every crank starts self promoting their cr/ap on ejmr like deran/ged loons... jf/c no.
what a valuable contribution by an analytic number theorist...
Where did he ever mention that he is African, and that we should give him attention because of that ?
I'm in econ too, but dude your reasoning capacity is pathetic & you're speaking lotta bullshit.