Recommendation appreciated.
Any interesting theory JMP this year?
-
XL from Penn State. People are tired of information design, but his paper is a nice take on the commitment assumption
^This is a joint paper though, is there a reason for that? Nice paper though.
Joint with a junior. Generally okay, if other parts of the profile are good.
-
YC from Cornell
MC from NU and PC from georgetown for decision theory
Is MC's JMP surprising? I guess there should be some similar results in computer science regarding greedy algorithms.
The greedy algorithm part is only a portion of the paper. the most important part imo is that computationally feasibility and consistency are observationally equivalent to choice bracketing.
-
YC from Cornell
MC from NU and PC from georgetown for decision theory
Is MC's JMP surprising? I guess there should be some similar results in computer science regarding greedy algorithms.
The greedy algorithm part is only a portion of the paper. the most important part imo is that computationally feasibility and consistency are observationally equivalent to choice bracketing.
I guess you mean "computationally feasible only if choice bracketing" since the "if" part looks trivial.
-
XL from Penn State. People are tired of information design, but his paper is a nice take on the commitment assumption
There are excellent papers on info design by junior theorists. But this one is just silly.
why?
I am not 24c7. But in another thread, someone is unhappy with the commitment on the marginal distribution.
-
XL from Penn State. People are tired of information design, but his paper is a nice take on the commitment assumption
There are excellent papers on info design by junior theorists. But this one is just silly.
why?
I am not 24c7. But in another thread, someone is unhappy with the commitment on the marginal distribution.
Ah ok, I saw that discussion didn't realize it was about the same paper.