Close

Complete Captcha

• 4 years - 58 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 65 Goods vs 14 No Goods

1. Economist
   7f30
   

   what are those asset pricers going to write then?

   4 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 2 No Good !

2. Economist
   6e6b
   

   They can become part of zombie economicS.

   4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 1 No Good !

3. Economist
   7674
   

   As an aspiring asset pricer, I hope you're wrong, but I'm curious as to why you think so?

   My opinion is that asset pricing and macro-finance are basically blurring together, so when I say asset pricing, I mean those fields combined.

   4 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

4. Economist
   3cbd
   

   It's not dead...just not very open to newcomers

   4 years ago # QUOTE 3 Good 0 No Good !

5. Economist
   7f30
   

   only seniors can publish their stuffs <=> no new ideas <=> not a interesting field <=> dead

   It's not dead...just not very open to newcomers

   4 years ago # QUOTE 7 Good 1 No Good !

6. Economist
   d483
   

   The main problem is the asset pricing theory. The theory has no empirical support. Reasonably successful empirical models are essentially data mining and pattern recognition. Yes, asset pricing is a dead field now.

   4 years ago # QUOTE 6 Good 2 No Good !

7. Economist
   f946
   

   long live corporate finance

   The main problem is the asset pricing theory. The theory has no empirical support. Reasonably successful empirical models are essentially data mining and pattern recognition. Yes, asset pricing is a dead field now.

   4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 2 No Good !

8. Economist
   2f4f
   

   corporate finance theory is more dead than asset pricing. so currently what we have is:
   finance=empirical corporate finance. what a dark future for finance academia, full of boring regression monkeys.

   4 years ago # QUOTE 10 Good 1 No Good !

9. Economist
   36de
   

   This thread is beginning to sound like bitter, underpaid non-fenance bros...

   4 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 1 No Good !

10. Economist
    91c3
    

    don't forget, there's another life for each (field) after death!

    4 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

11. Economist
    7569
    

    Would tenure standard be different for empirical corporate and others like empirical asset pricing?

    4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

12. Economist
    27d1
    

    Would tenure standard be different for empirical corporate and others like empirical asset pricing?

    If youare a junior doing AP, then publish a solo JF and you are gold.

    4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

13. Economist
    dc64
    

    Asset pricing = Just as credible as Astrology for pricing assets.

    4 years ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

14. Economist
    400c
    

    an uninformed and boring thread of vague generalizations

    4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

15. Economist
    2fd5
    

    High IQ macro finance people are gradually going to take finance departments back from the regress cash holdings on corporate governance index trolls.

    4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

16. Economist
    e30d
    

    Shouldn't that be "High Q" instead? Lu Zhang

    High IQ macro finance people are gradually going to take finance departments back from the regress cash holdings on corporate governance index trolls.

    4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

17. Economist
    7674
    

    High IQ macro finance people are gradually going to take finance departments back from the regress cash holdings on corporate governance index trolls.

    These are finance PhDs who are interested in macro, not macro bros interested in finance (for the most part).

    4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

18. Economist
    507f
    

    Well, that's not true

    https://sites.google.com/site/macrofinancesociety/current-members

    These are finance PhDs who are interested in macro, not macro bros interested in finance (for the most part).

    4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

19. Economist
    6484
    

    I think this is true, at least for junior people. Some senior people may be able to publish but it's really hard for juniors to publish AP papers. Naturally, less and less people will do AP and the the field will shrink and become dead.

    what are those asset pricers going to write then?

    4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

20. Economist
    7674
    

    Well, that's not true
    https://sites.google.com/site/macrofinancesociety/current-members

    These are finance PhDs who are interested in macro, not macro bros interested in finance (for the most part).
    

    Hansen, Singleton, Cochrane all work in b-schools.

    So I revise my statement: b-school economists.

    4 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

Reply »