Close

Complete Captcha

• 6 months - 50 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 171 Goods vs 145 No Goods

1. Economist
   4f98
   

   If Harald Uhlig is connected to Karl, Tucker Carlson and the rest of the American far-right extremist subversive movement, he must be exposed and fired.

   Far-right extremist? Seriously? You just call everything you don't like far-right extremist.

   If Uhlig is actually fostering a conspiracy to have a hit piece on JMCs. It's bad form and should be reprimanded. I didn't sign it, but why else would a thread like this be created. Should we just casually forget bru net was Uhligs RA?

   Uhlig isn't responsible for everything Bru-net says or does. If there was such a strong connection between them, Uhlig would have interfered to push for Bru-net's admission into some US PhD program, if not Chicago, then by pulling strings into a lower ranked MRM. Bru-net likes to curry favor with Uhlig but Uhlig just ignores him all the time

   6 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   001f
   

   If Harald Uhlig is connected to Karl, Tucker Carlson and the rest of the American far-right extremist subversive movement, he must be exposed and fired.

   Far-right extremist? Seriously? You just call everything you don't like far-right extremist.

   If Uhlig is actually fostering a conspiracy to have a hit piece on JMCs. It's bad form and should be reprimanded. I didn't sign it, but why else would a thread like this be created. Should we just casually forget bru net was Uhligs RA?

   Uhlig isn't responsible for everything Bru-net says or does. If there was such a strong connection between them, Uhlig would have interfered to push for Bru-net's admission into some US PhD program, if not Chicago, then by pulling strings into a lower ranked MRM. Bru-net likes to curry favor with Uhlig but Uhlig just ignores him all the time

   It's quite obvious Uhlig has way more to lose than bru net, suppose Uhlig has had no involvement with the creation of this thread. I'd suggest Uhlig cru sh this issue immediately, because this currying favor does NOTHING but cause problems. WHY? Uhlig isn't the JPE editor now anyway, the letter was SUCCESSFUL.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

3. Economist
   45b9
   

   If Harald Uhlig is connected to Karl, Tucker Carlson and the rest of the American far-right extremist subversive movement, he must be exposed and fired.

   Far-right extremist? Seriously? You just call everything you don't like far-right extremist.

   If Uhlig is actually fostering a conspiracy to have a hit piece on JMCs. It's bad form and should be reprimanded. I didn't sign it, but why else would a thread like this be created. Should we just casually forget bru net was Uhligs RA?

   Why else? Some of us think that what the petitioners did was wrong. It was a coordinated attempt to erase someone's career with bad faith allegations of thoughtcrime. We're ratifying their behavior if we don't stand up to it.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

4. Economist
   001f
   

   If Harald Uhlig is connected to Karl, Tucker Carlson and the rest of the American far-right extremist subversive movement, he must be exposed and fired.

   Far-right extremist? Seriously? You just call everything you don't like far-right extremist.

   If Uhlig is actually fostering a conspiracy to have a hit piece on JMCs. It's bad form and should be reprimanded. I didn't sign it, but why else would a thread like this be created. Should we just casually forget bru net was Uhligs RA?

   Why else? Some of us think that what the petitioners did was wrong. It was a coordinated attempt to erase someone's career with bad faith allegations of thoughtcrime. We're ratifying their behavior if we don't stand up to it.

   ljl standing up for morality when this is a pure machiavellian play. It did not matter what the reason is, they wanted a new editor. You want di 3 on this hill go ahead, but your fighting with sociopaths.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 1 Vlad !

5. Economist
   45b9
   

   ljl standing up for morality when this is a pure machiavellian play. It did not matter what the reason is, they wanted a new editor. You want di 3 on this hill go ahead, but your fighting with sociopaths.

   You've got to fight those types sooner or later, bro. Letting them grow stronger first is a rookie move.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

6. Economist
   001f
   

   ljl standing up for morality when this is a pure machiavellian play. It did not matter what the reason is, they wanted a new editor. You want di 3 on this hill go ahead, but your fighting with sociopaths.

   You've got to fight those types sooner or later, bro. Letting them grow stronger first is a rookie move.

   Again, let it be the hill you di 3 on. There are so many easier paths to actually eliminate them, but you all you guys herd on the dvmbest path.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 1 Vlad !

7. Economist
   45b9
   

   ljl standing up for morality when this is a pure machiavellian play. It did not matter what the reason is, they wanted a new editor. You want di 3 on this hill go ahead, but your fighting with sociopaths.

   You've got to fight those types sooner or later, bro. Letting them grow stronger first is a rookie move.

   Again, let it be the hill you di 3 on. There are so many easier paths to actually eliminate them, but you all you guys herd on the dvmbest path.

   Hey I'm just a bodybuilder observing from the outside. But it looks to me like you folks got yourselves into this mess because no hill was suitable enough to di 3 on. Keep it up and there will be no hills left to defend.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   001f
   

   ljl standing up for morality when this is a pure machiavellian play. It did not matter what the reason is, they wanted a new editor. You want di 3 on this hill go ahead, but your fighting with sociopaths.

   You've got to fight those types sooner or later, bro. Letting them grow stronger first is a rookie move.

   Again, let it be the hill you di 3 on. There are so many easier paths to actually eliminate them, but you all you guys herd on the dvmbest path.

   Hey I'm just a bodybuilder observing from the outside. But it looks to me like you folks got yourselves into this mess because no hill was suitable enough to di 3 on. Keep it up and there will be no hills left to defend.

   Hey bodybuilder, keep out of this business.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   ef33
   

   ljl standing up for morality when this is a pure machiavellian play. It did not matter what the reason is, they wanted a new editor. You want di 3 on this hill go ahead, but your fighting with sociopaths.

   You've got to fight those types sooner or later, bro. Letting them grow stronger first is a rookie move.

   Again, let it be the hill you di 3 on. There are so many easier paths to actually eliminate them, but you all you guys herd on the dvmbest path.

   Easier paths such as what? Do enlighten us

   6 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    ec21
    

    And give them the job!

    Please explainZ

    4 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply

Post <blockquote>And give them the job!</blockquote>

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.