Close

Complete Captcha

• 5 years - 70 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 148 Goods vs 26 No Goods

1. Economist
   a9dc
   

   Crying, losing hope.
   -Bigio

   5 years ago # QUOTE 5 Jab 2 No Jab !

2. Economist
   3bb0
   

   wow, been a long time I did not see actual interesting comments on a paper on EJMR.

   5 years ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

3. Economist
   35f9
   

   The paper is actually very good, but not polished. I am doubtful the version that is online is the one they submit to a journal.

   5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 1 No Jab !

4. Economist
   151f
   

   Andy Atkeson has a good eye for talent. Maybe the next P-O Weill

   5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 2 No Jab !

5. Economist
   b037
   

   The paper is actually very good, but not polished. I am doubtful the version that is online is the one they submit to a journal.

   Good one Saki.

   5 years ago # QUOTE 4 Jab 0 No Jab !

6. Economist
   e63b
   

   15d3 are you hrm?

   5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

7. Economist
   2db0
   

   15d3 is clearly hrm prob from somewhere he flew out

   5 years ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 0 No Jab !

8. Economist
   e02e
   

   15d3 is either hrm or former referee

   5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

9. Economist
   1ea6
   

   Why not update your webpage?

   5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

10. Economist
    5998
    

    he did update his webpage

    5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

11. Economist
    c870
    

    is he still coming to UCLA?

    5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

12. Economist
    48b6
    

    is he still coming to UCLA?

    Yes

    5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

13. Economist
    48ed
    

    Who gives a shi1.

    5 years ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 0 No Jab !

14. Economist
    1f32
    

    15d3 strong as f**k.

    5 years ago # QUOTE 3 Jab 0 No Jab !

15. Economist
    7b50
    

    I award 15d3 the c7a1 award for excellence in macroeconomics.

    5 years ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !

16. Economist
    4c6c
    

    I think that guy over-placed initially and might still need to go further down after UCLA... I hope I'm wrong tho...

    5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

17. Economist
    9801
    

    What happened to the faulty paper with La'O?

    5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

18. Economist
    0385
    

    I'm a labor guy. Can somebody translate for me what 15d3 is saying?

    5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 1 No Jab !

19. Economist
    3bf3
    

    I have met Bigio and he is such a cool guy an he has very interesting ideas and nice papers, he will be fine. Yes, that WORKING paper version had a mistake, I am pretty sure he has corrected and working on a new version, as if you reg/calibra monkeys never had an error. It is not logNaics, it is not Lacour (never forget).
    I repeat, NO, I am not Bigio, but I can appreciate the work of a nice young economist that is trying to answer interesting questions.

    5 years ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 0 No Jab !

20. Economist
    3d24
    

    Just read this thread. Give me a break. Of course working papers will have the occasional errors in them and garbled proofs. It would only be interesting if it is affecting the substantive conclusion. I've heard nothing of that sort here, or in any case, that is the argument one should make rather than some dull monolog about this or that being "obviously wrong" ..

    5 years ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 2 No Jab !

Reply »