His doc students are so f’ed
Brewing Marketing Scandal
-
There is no evidence for these claims. His profile is still on the website and no one has provided any remotely objective evidence. It's one or two anonymous people saying I heard from so-and-so, I am insider, I know someone who heard . . .
-
His classes have been removed... GSU is doing damage control
There is no evidence for these claims. His profile is still on the website and no one has provided any remotely objective evidence. It's one or two anonymous people saying I heard from so-and-so, I am insider, I know someone who heard . . .
https://robinson.gsu.edu/profile/v-kumar/ -
His classes have been removed... GSU is doing damage control
There is no evidence for these claims. His profile is still on the website and no one has provided any remotely objective evidence. It's one or two anonymous people saying I heard from so-and-so, I am insider, I know someone who heard . . .
https://robinson.gsu.edu/profile/v-kumar/
Where's the proof? Was he even scheduled to teach? There is no discussion of this anywhere except EJMR? Seems weird no one except people on this website are talking about it online.
-
Wait and see if the rumor is founded, or if OP is a troll.
There is no evidence for these claims. His profile is still on the website and no one has provided any remotely objective evidence. It's one or two anonymous people saying I heard from so-and-so, I am insider, I know someone who heard . . .
https://robinson.gsu.edu/profile/v-kumar/ -
And those of us we are busting our balls. Working honestly. I don't know how many projects I killed because my analyses didn't pass robustness tests. And then how many times those same projects were published by some corrupt people with regressions that I know are impossible to produce.
I hate all these people. I hate them. I failed tenure. My wife had to quit her job, we have had to uproot ourselves multiple times.
I want all these fraud papers to come up. Data and code submission have to be mandatory. For survey data / for experiments there has to be clear documentation of how the data was collected, if needed there should be videos of behavioral tests. We should be harder on the authenticity of data and more lenient about "zero" results.
Let's do honest analyses collectively.
-
These rumors have been going around marketing circles for a month or two. Mkt just doesn’t have as many people on here.
His classes have been removed... GSU is doing damage control
There is no evidence for these claims. His profile is still on the website and no one has provided any remotely objective evidence. It's one or two anonymous people saying I heard from so-and-so, I am insider, I know someone who heard . . .
https://robinson.gsu.edu/profile/v-kumar/
Where's the proof? Was he even scheduled to teach? There is no discussion of this anywhere except EJMR? Seems weird no one except people on this website are talking about it online.
-
And those of us we are busting our balls. Working honestly. I don't know how many projects I killed because my analyses didn't pass robustness tests. And then how many times those same projects were published by some corrupt people with regressions that I know are impossible to produce.
I hate all these people. I hate them. I failed tenure. My wife had to quit her job, we have had to uproot ourselves multiple times.
I want all these fraud papers to come up. Data and code submission have to be mandatory. For survey data / for experiments there has to be clear documentation of how the data was collected, if needed there should be videos of behavioral tests. We should be harder on the authenticity of data and more lenient about "zero" results.
Let's do honest analyses collectively.If you want fraud papers to come up, why don't you start. Which papers are published by corrupt people with impossible regressions?
-
^ Some are too big names that I can't do jack s**t on my own. Establish credible whistle blower sites that will protect my identity and I will submit the datasets and codes for all the papers that got published in top finance and accounting journals that I know for a fact to be fraud.
-
^ Some are too big names that I can't do jack s**t on my own. Establish credible whistle blower sites that will protect my identity and I will submit the datasets and codes for all the papers that got published in top finance and accounting journals that I know for a fact to be fraud.
^ There are at least 3 complete papers that my co-author and I can provide documentation for. 3 papers that cost us tenure.
Finance is hopeless, but accounting journals have retracted papers before, the most recent one being Karolyi Junior's. If you really know for a fact that some accounting papers are fraudulent, then post the evidence here and email the journal.
-
Baby Karolyi in the deep blue sea, he swims so wild and swims so free. Daddy Karoli protects he!
^ Some are too big names that I can't do jack s**t on my own. Establish credible whistle blower sites that will protect my identity and I will submit the datasets and codes for all the papers that got published in top finance and accounting journals that I know for a fact to be fraud.
-
And those of us we are busting our balls. Working honestly. I don't know how many projects I killed because my analyses didn't pass robustness tests. And then how many times those same projects were published by some corrupt people with regressions that I know are impossible to produce.
I hate all these people. I hate them. I failed tenure. My wife had to quit her job, we have had to uproot ourselves multiple times.
I want all these fraud papers to come up. Data and code submission have to be mandatory. For survey data / for experiments there has to be clear documentation of how the data was collected, if needed there should be videos of behavioral tests. We should be harder on the authenticity of data and more lenient about "zero" results.
Let's do honest analyses collectively.For proprietary data, it is impossible to impose. It is already hard to make those companies agree to share data to the authors at the first place. If you ask more, you will not even have a project. The new privacy law and regulation make it even less likely for those companies to share interesting data with researchers. It is basically a trade-off of a few questionable papers or no paper at all.