I was one of the militant uncut guys in the Cut or Uncut thread but this is stupid. The decision to circumcise or not should not be mandated by the government. Once again, CA no good.
California's law against circumcision
-
I agree, this is stupid. This is the choice of the mother as to whether or not her child will be circumcised, no one forces this upon her. And, I think that this should remain her choice, not the state's. This is just ludicrous!
Why is this the mother's choice again? The state can force you to do a lot of things. Just as it isn't your choice to beat your kids (its illegal, and the state can take them away for that) why is it your choice if you want to mutilate your kids?
-
I think someone should create a companion site where people can anonymously bet against each other based on claims made here. It would reduce the amount of bullshit posted here by about 90%. This law, if ever proposed, would not be approved. I would start by betting that no such a law would be enacted in California over the next several years.
-
Do you really think that a girl is going to cut things off with you because she sees that you're uncircumcised? At the point at which she notices, wouldn't you imagine that she's already committed, more or less?
That's good. When you're not getting any pussy because of your alien skin, I bet you make yourself feel like a real man everrrrrrrrrry night!
-
I think someone should create a companion site where people can anonymously bet against each other based on claims made here. It would reduce the amount of bullshit posted here by about 90%. This law, if ever proposed, would not be approved. I would start by betting that no such a law would be enacted in California over the next several years.
Don't know about San Francisco but this will be on the ballot (which means it got a non-trivial number of petition signatures) in Santa Monica, CA this fall. You can search NY Times if you're interested. I agree it will never pass.