Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 234 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 216 Goods vs 106 No Goods

1. Economist
   9629
   

   "And it does not cost me anything. I can only win. And Middlesex can only lose."
   How is your research going? And teaching at your new job? Do you have time for that?

   In another thread he posted this gem:

   Sim//ple//ton, Sim//ple//ton, Sim//ple//tooooooon.
   If I lose at the current Appeal, and
   IF I lose at the actual hearing, and
   If I lose at the Appeal of the actual hearing
   I would still be at 0.
   And the Middlesex cri//mi//nal by this time will be at -300 to -500k in expenses for their "big win."

   > “economist”
   > baffled by opportunity cost
   

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   fc04
   

   ^ and what is your point Legalino Expertino? You feel the statement you re citing falls short and your "great legal standard"? Or is untrue in some sense?

   You might want to elaborate here, because normal people might not understand what you re being sarcastic about ? (gem... I do not think it is a gem, but I am shutting your mou//th one and for good with this gem)

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

3. Economist
   9629
   

   Oh, I think normal people understood it just fine.

   ^ and what is your point Legalino Expertino? You feel the statement you re citing falls short and your "great legal standard"? Or is untrue in some sense?
   You might want to elaborate here, because normal people might not understand what you re being sarcastic about ? (gem... I do not think it is a gem, but I am shutting your mou//th one and for good with this gem)

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

4. Economist
   fc04
   

   You think wrong repeatedly.

   And you fail to say anything constructively.

   Btw, how many Masters and PhDs you have?

   You seem to have very high opinion of yourself, but all I see is a pretty du//mb guy who never says anything constructive...

   And whatever constructive you say is all wrong.

   Oh, I think normal people understood it just fine.

   ^ and what is your point Legalino Expertino? You feel the statement you re citing falls short and your "great legal standard"? Or is untrue in some sense?
   You might want to elaborate here, because normal people might not understand what you re being sarcastic about ? (gem... I do not think it is a gem, but I am shutting your mou//th one and for good with this gem)
   

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

5. Economist
   9629
   

   When I've attempted to help you, you've acted like a pigeon on a chessboard. You don't have any understanding of the significance of the things you point out, and have lied repeatedly about how I've characterized myself while claiming you're more skilled than I am at my profession because I don't jurisdiction-specific knowledge that has no fundamental bearing on the outcome of your case.

   Why would I continue trying to help you? You just knock over the pieces, relieve yourself on the chessboard, and strut around as if you've won.

   It's clear to most who read this what's going on, and when your case is decided you'll just blame it on some outside force because you're so breathtakingly ig//norant that you don't understand why the claims you're making are so poorly supported.

   You think wrong repeatedly.
   And you fail to say anything constructively.
   Btw, how many Masters and PhDs you have?
   You seem to have very high opinion of yourself, but all I see is a pretty du//mb guy who never says anything constructive...
   And whatever constructive you say is all wrong.

   Oh, I think normal people understood it just fine.

   ^ and what is your point Legalino Expertino? You feel the statement you re citing falls short and your "great legal standard"? Or is untrue in some sense?
   You might want to elaborate here, because normal people might not understand what you re being sarcastic about ? (gem... I do not think it is a gem, but I am shutting your mou//th one and for good with this gem)
   

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

6. Economist
   fc04
   

   First thing first, the expression "pigeon on a chessboard", and some derivatives that you use do not mean sh//it in English. It is probably some expression you have in India or Pakistan, but it does not translate to English.

   So nobody understands you when you re using your cool Indian/Pakistani expression.

   Next, nobody needs the help of some clueless du//mb a//s//s anonymous troll.

   What you have been doing is called unfunny trolling. And frankly wha you re doing is just tiring.

   When I've attempted to help you, you've acted like a pigeon on a chessboard. You don't have any understanding of the significance of the things you point out, and have lied repeatedly about how I've characterized myself while claiming you're more skilled than I am at my profession because I don't jurisdiction-specific knowledge that has no fundamental bearing on the outcome of your case.
   Why would I continue trying to help you? You just knock over the pieces, relieve yourself on the chessboard, and strut around as if you've won.
   It's clear to most who read this what's going on, and when your case is decided you'll just blame it on some outside force because you're so breathtakingly ig//norant that you don't understand why the claims you're making are so poorly supported.

   You think wrong repeatedly.
   And you fail to say anything constructively.
   Btw, how many Masters and PhDs you have?
   You seem to have very high opinion of yourself, but all I see is a pretty du//mb guy who never says anything constructive...
   And whatever constructive you say is all wrong.

   Oh, I think normal people understood it just fine.

   ^ and what is your point Legalino Expertino? You feel the statement you re citing falls short and your "great legal standard"? Or is untrue in some sense?
   You might want to elaborate here, because normal people might not understand what you re being sarcastic about ? (gem... I do not think it is a gem, but I am shutting your mou//th one and for good with this gem)

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 2 Vlad !

7. Economist
   9629
   

   I'm not sure if you know less about English or about the law, because you're exposing yourself as clueless on both topics.

   But please, tell me more about how you're expert enough on vernacular English to be completely wrong about my ethnicity and linguistic background. Please. You speak so clearly and elegantly yourself.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   fc04
   

   You re not sure of anything, because you are a clueless kid in your early 20ties, of immigrant background, who attended the corresponding of a polytechnic (LAC, or whatever you call it where you are), and sit through one course on law, but did not study for the exam after that, and probably never graduated from his undergread.

   I'm not sure if you know less about English or about the law, because you're exposing yourself as clueless on both topics.
   But please, tell me more about how you're expert enough on vernacular English to be completely wrong about my ethnicity and linguistic background. Please. You speak so clearly and elegantly yourself.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

9. Economist
   9629
   

   ... says the guy whose only method of argument is "I don't understand something, so it must be wrong."

   Have you looked up "Dunning-Kruger Effect" yet?

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    fc04
    

    I did a google search, so apparently there is some meme about the pigeon on the chessboard.

    In any case, the reference does not mean anything in English.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

11. Economist
    fc04
    

    Annoying little t//u//r//d, go troll somewhere else.

    YOU have not shown to know what is "Dunning-Kruger Effect", what you re doing is called "name dropping".

    So further, that you re young, badly educated, half literate kid of immigrant background, like I have told you before, you read the failing NYT, WoPO and CNN, and you in your re//ta//rdation think that you re an "intellectual".

    But what you are in fact is just a college drop out.

    ... says the guy whose only method of argument is "I don't understand something, so it must be wrong."
    Have you looked up "Dunning-Kruger Effect" yet?

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

12. Economist
    9629
    

    No, I'm sure if you're not very bright it wouldn't mean anything to you.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

13. Economist
    fc04
    

    Further, by you using the word "kid" when you refer to a professor, I firstly thought that you a
    ho//
    mo
    ra//pist.

    But this is not the case.

    You re a failure in life, college dropout, and your family treats you with contempt, so probably your father and uncles and mom and aunts call you "kid", like in "you re good for nothing, kid", and "you need to leave the house and fend for yourself, kid"... so you go around projecting online anonymous calling a Professor Doctor "kid".

    Men//tal illness is not so hard to identify, kid.

    No, I'm sure if you're not very bright it wouldn't mean anything to you.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

14. Economist
    9629
    

    I guess we'll see how your case turns out. You're nearly 100% certain you'll win, so maybe when your claim is dismissed (as you were from Middlesex), you'll update your priors about how intelligent you are and realize that your inferences about me are 100% wrong.

    Then maybe you'll read the wikipedia articles on "opportunity cost" and "Dunning-Kruger Effect."

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

15. Economist
    9629
    

    I've just checked, and they're both available on the Simple English version of Wikipedia! How lucky for you.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

16. Economist
    fc04
    

    Name dropping legal expertino, I am

    99.5% sure that I will get 3 salaries. I have not thought about the probability distribution over the outcomes between 3 salaries and 400k, except that winning 400k has chances of 0.5% or less.

    And I am having problems explaining to you that name dropping does not take you anywhere.

    If you have collected some moral from Dunning Kruger or from Opportunity Cost, do share them, and cite the source if you want. Name dropping takes you anywhere.

    In your mind you re some sort of authority which is right by default and "needs to be convinced". In the mind of everybody else you are a du//nce and a failure in life who is unfunny trolling online 24/7.

    I guess we'll see how your case turns out. You're nearly 100% certain you'll win, so maybe when your claim is dismissed (as you were from Middlesex), you'll update your priors about how intelligent you are and realize that your inferences about me are 100% wrong.
    Then maybe you'll read the wikipedia articles on "opportunity cost" and "Dunning-Kruger Effect."

    1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

17. Economist
    9629
    

    I’d say it’s astonishing how totally you’ve missed the point, but you’re just living up to your usual standards.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

18. Economist
    7031
    

    Do you seriously not know what the dunning-kruger effect is (and would rather reveal your ignorance than spend 2 seconds on google)? It refers to the tendency of incompetent people to overestimate their competence. He's saying that your declaring yourself a legal expert is an example of this.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

19. Economist
    9629
    

    It was a great gag while it lasted. I’d drawn it out for weeks at this point.

    Do you seriously not know what the dunning-kruger effect is (and would rather reveal your ignorance than spend 2 seconds on google)? It refers to the tendency of incompetent people to overestimate their competence. He's saying that your declaring yourself a legal expert is an example of this.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

20. Economist
    9629
    

    As usual, you’ve misinterpreted. It doesn’t matter what my opinion is.

    I questioned you about your case in the hopes you’d have the humility to realize you don’t know what you’re doing. (An “expert” in the law, especially one as knowledgeable as you, would recognize the technique, obviously.) Of course, you don’t have that humility, because you’re so arrogant.

    Since you’ve been acting like a goat this whole time, I’ve continued questioning you because your incompetence combined with your total lack of awareness and reflection is pretty funny.

    In your mind you re some sort of authority which is right by default and "needs to be convinced". In the mind of everybody else you are a du//nce and a failure in life who is unfunny trolling online 24/7.

    1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

Topic Closed

This topic has been closed to new replies.