Complete Captcha
Loading..
Economist 6c60
Ok
Economist bcf6
"For keeping Asians out of Harvard"
Economist 7aed
All white men haha
Econtwitter going to seethe
Economist 3383
Disappointing. Not diverse at all.
-JW
Economist 1737
Will they cite his Harvard work on personality scores?
Economist b1cc
Good s scientists
Economist 0a60
Econ is a joke. Sad I wasted my life on this.
Economist a6fa
There were so many other worthy candidates. Why the forefathers of cutenomics who paved the way for Levitt?
Economist 34f8
Sad that Alan Krueger did not live to win alongside Card.
Economist 2ccb
can we all stop clustering std errors now?
Economist cd7e
Why not Donald Rubin, if you really want someone who made the foundational work?
Economist 1f03
I’m fine with angriest and imbens tbh
Economist aa66
Well deserved prize. Though sad for Blundell (and even sadder for AK)
Economist c0b1
Agree with the other thread, Rubin, Angrist, Imbens, not that it matters
Economist 35e2
Imbens actually is a great choice
Joshua Angrist looks like John Oliver, so it's fine by me too.
Economist 305c
Angrist is neither clear nor simple. Dig deeply into his papers and you will see what I mean.
Economist 79ab
Rubin is a statistician. Why not Ashenfelter?
Economist 7aec
How long Manski will have to wait?
Didn’t realize that a three-way prize is not equal shares. Card is half, the others are a quarter each.