examples where saying it doesn't understand the text seems completely implausible.there's no "it" there, it's a very complicated lookup table. it has no experience of the world, no goals, and no reflection on itself, because there is no sentience behind it. and at no point in scaling the algorithmic complexity, training data, etc do you get something akin to actual intelligence.
do you even scaling hypothesis, bro?
examples where saying it doesn't understand the text seems completely implausible.there's no "it" there, it's a very complicated lookup table. it has no experience of the world, no goals, and no reflection on itself, because there is no sentience behind it. and at no point in scaling the algorithmic complexity, training data, etc do you get something akin to actual intelligence.
Exactly, it's completely ludicrous. How some people can believe that intelligence can exist in meat bodies, it is absurd
Human beings, at least the smart ones, *undrstand* things. chat-gpt doesnt. It just calibrates based on a query. basically assoicates with the query with the most "likely" right response. It has no idea whether it is right or wrong. A human being has been thought to understand things based on symbolic reasoning, deductive reasoning, logic, etc. It is completely different approach.
This is human gibberish
Human beings, at least the smart ones, *undrstand* things. chat-gpt doesnt. It just calibrates based on a query. basically assoicates with the query with the most "likely" right response. It has no idea whether it is right or wrong. A human being has been thought to understand things based on symbolic reasoning, deductive reasoning, logic, etc. It is completely different approach.
Human beings, at least the smart ones, *undrstand* things. chat-gpt doesnt. It just calibrates based on a query. basically assoicates with the query with the most "likely" right response. It has no idea whether it is right or wrong. A human being has been thought to understand things based on symbolic reasoning, deductive reasoning, logic, etc. It is completely different approach.
It doesn't know what humans know about the context of language but simply saying its just a lookup or whatever and doesn't understand things is too simplistic.
https://twitter.com/emollick/status/1626084142239649792
Yes, it doesn't fully understand logic. But it also does a lot of things well that people often have trouble with.
It needs too much data to improve. thats the problem. Imagine you are teaching a student calculus and the student needs to drill 1 million problems just to differentiate simple functions. How is that good?
Human beings, at least the smart ones, *undrstand* things. chat-gpt doesnt. It just calibrates based on a query. basically assoicates with the query with the most "likely" right response. It has no idea whether it is right or wrong. A human being has been thought to understand things based on symbolic reasoning, deductive reasoning, logic, etc. It is completely different approach.It doesn't know what humans know about the context of language but simply saying its just a lookup or whatever and doesn't understand things is too simplistic.
https://twitter.com/emollick/status/1626084142239649792
Yes, it doesn't fully understand logic. But it also does a lot of things well that people often have trouble with.
examples where saying it doesn't understand the text seems completely implausible.there's no "it" there, it's a very complicated lookup table. it has no experience of the world, no goals, and no reflection on itself, because there is no sentience behind it. and at no point in scaling the algorithmic complexity, training data, etc do you get something akin to actual intelligence.
That fact would not prevent humans from adopting it as an authority. Have you never seen Idiocracy?