大家在合作共事前千万要三思。
- 只有嘴上功夫，忽悠共事者，很少有实际付出；
- 在学校无心教课，常常在seminar上不知所云；
- 利用学校牌子出推荐信“帮助国内大佬们的子女申请美国学习；
- 剥削学生，无情占用学生劳动成果，“暗示”学生送礼，收受”馈赠“；
- 私生活淫乱，胡搞女学生.讽刺的是，常以”基督徒“的纯洁形象示人，活脱脱的男绿茶婊。
Cong@Cornell/Booth
-
Everyone should think twice before you want to work together with him.
-B.S his co-authors into working tgt, pays little effort;
-B.S in seminars, can't even answer the easiest questions;
-Use schools brand name to issue recommendation letters "to help" the children of those VIPs in China in apply ing for US schools;
- Take advantage of his students, ruthless take students' work for his own, and always hints of buying gifts for him and receive "gifts" happily from his students;
-Very scrud up in his personal life, scruing around with students/coworks...Ironically, he always put on the pure "christian" face, what a man-hore -
I kind of understand why. I'm not a Cong hater. He started as being working solely in theories, yet he's moving into lots of empirical papers as you can see from all his working papers. It's not easy and it's a dramatic change, and the quickest way is to free ride coauthors and take advantage of his students. Indeed, think twice.
-
I have totally no problem with his personality. In fact, I have met him a couple of times and found him to be a nice guy.
However, I don't like his type of theory work at all. He is basically applying the information design stuff to all types of financial studies. There isn't much insight other than what theory people already know. It's good to see that he's turning into empirical works. I definitely don't want his type of theory work to be the future of finance theories.
There is no evidence because all of this is made up by a disgruntled former Booth PhD student. Cong is one of the best finance theorists in the past five years, definitely top 3.
-
I have totally no problem with his personality. In fact, I have met him a couple of times and found him to be a nice guy.
However, I don't like his type of theory work at all. He is basically applying the information design stuff to all types of financial studies. There isn't much insight other than what theory people already know. It's good to see that he's turning into empirical works. I definitely don't want his type of theory work to be the future of finance theories.There is no evidence because all of this is made up by a disgruntled former Booth PhD student. Cong is one of the best finance theorists in the past five years, definitely top 3.
he is the regmonkey in theory
-
Is there any evidence behind each accusation, or is this just badmouthing
Nah. This is posted by the Cong Nutter. They are obsessed with him and badmouth him. Endlessly. The nutter disappeared for a while but they are back. So expect many more of these posts. Many. Many. Many.
-
I kind of understand why. I'm not a Cong hater. He started as being working solely in theories, yet he's moving into lots of empirical papers as you can see from all his working papers. It's not easy and it's a dramatic change, and the quickest way is to free ride coauthors and take advantage of his students. Indeed, think twice.
He is a little bit slow.