Also see how Bailey et Al cited ED. Not flattering at all.
Wow. Nobody in my field throws that much shade in writing.
Derenoncourt has a QJE r&r
-
Also see how Bailey et Al cited ED. Not flattering at all.
Wow. Nobody in my field throws that much shade in writing.
It's justified. Their paper came out way beforehand. Just the mere fact that ED proceeded to write this paper knowing the existence of the long completed Bailey et al paper claiming to be contemporaneous is close to cheating.
-
The main issue here is continuing to consider a QJE a top5. You need to amend the language to top4 and stop referring to it. It's a journal for harvard editors to place their own papers, and their students papers in.
NB: This is coming from a current harvard student who would die to have a top4.
-
Bailey et al. was completed long ago but then one co-author passed away. Then ED came long and said hey let's write the same paper and call it racial inequality instead! Bailey et al. probably didn't bother taking the paper seriously, as it should rightfully go nowhere. They underestimated the power of AA.
-
I'm glad we're finally taking replication seriously in this profession.
Also Katz
. I believe replication studies are important, but I don’t think it is likely that many pure replication studies will end up getting published in major economics journals unless they generate new lessons (e.g., which policies replicate and which ones don’t or something systematic about what settings do or don’t generate larger treatment effects). Single replication studies just are not that exciting. I hope that the leading field journals will devote more space to convincing replication studies since they are valuable and should get some professional recognition.
-
Since s he is a b lack wimmin in economics working on r ace-related stuff
HOW. DARE. YOU. insinuate that somebody was gifted a QJE due to her gender or race. She EARNED that QJE by having a past affiliation with Harvard.
- person who hasn't read her paper, isn't in her field, and has no QJE (ergo no affiliation with Harvard)honestly this is how i see it. well known every H grad gets one.
-
The main issue here is continuing to consider a QJE a top5. You need to amend the language to top4 and stop referring to it. It's a journal for harvard editors to place their own papers, and their students papers in.
Lol, you guys are so unbelievable. Lol. Amend indeed.
Hahaha