The movie reportedly cost the studio $135 million, and if this pace remains the same, earning around $20 million or so over the five day weekend, then the studio is going to lose A LOT of money.
Families simply aren’t interested in exposing their small children to this content.
That’s not what it’s about. There is a ghey boy in the movie, but that doesn’t make it a lgbtq+ (or whatever) movie.
What is the movie about?
And why did it cost so much?A s3xual relationship between two teen boys.
See every review of this movie (e.g., https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/strange-world-lgbtq-character-disney-banned-173857878.html)
The movie reportedly cost the studio $135 million, and if this pace remains the same, earning around $20 million or so over the five day weekend, then the studio is going to lose A LOT of money.
Families simply aren’t interested in exposing their small children to this content.
Two counterpoints:
1) Hollywood accounting is not that simple. There's an obvious incentive to put every little unrelated expense of the giant company as part of the movie cost. It's both for tax purposes and for advertising (they spent so much money in this movie, it just be great!).
2) The movie has an advertising aspect whose benefits are real, but not easy to quantify. Disney gets the laurels of being progressive with not only consumers, but their staff and, perhaps even more important, democrat politicians. You could think that comes at the cost of families with kids, their core business. But half of those families are progressive, and there other half cares about taking care of their kids and getting two hours of vacation from parenting. They might avoid this movie but will keep seeing others by Disney.
The movie reportedly cost the studio $135 million, and if this pace remains the same, earning around $20 million or so over the five day weekend, then the studio is going to lose A LOT of money.
Families simply aren’t interested in exposing their small children to this content.Two counterpoints:
1) Hollywood accounting is not that simple. There's an obvious incentive to put every little unrelated expense of the giant company as part of the movie cost. It's both for tax purposes and for advertising (they spent so much money in this movie, it just be great!).
2) The movie has an advertising aspect whose benefits are real, but not easy to quantify. Disney gets the laurels of being progressive with not only consumers, but their staff and, perhaps even more important, democrat politicians. You could think that comes at the cost of families with kids, their core business. But half of those families are progressive, and there other half cares about taking care of their kids and getting two hours of vacation from parenting. They might avoid this movie but will keep seeing others by Disney.
2/10 cope
The movie reportedly cost the studio $135 million, and if this pace remains the same, earning around $20 million or so over the five day weekend, then the studio is going to lose A LOT of money.
Families simply aren’t interested in exposing their small children to this content.Two counterpoints:
1) Hollywood accounting is not that simple. There's an obvious incentive to put every little unrelated expense of the giant company as part of the movie cost. It's both for tax purposes and for advertising (they spent so much money in this movie, it just be great!).
2) The movie has an advertising aspect whose benefits are real, but not easy to quantify. Disney gets the laurels of being progressive with not only consumers, but their staff and, perhaps even more important, democrat politicians. You could think that comes at the cost of families with kids, their core business. But half of those families are progressive, and there other half cares about taking care of their kids and getting two hours of vacation from parenting. They might avoid this movie but will keep seeing others by Disney.
My family and many others have stopped consuming Disney products (which is reflected in the poor performance of their stock price).
The media won’t report on this (out of fear that other companies will stop being woke).
Lol yeah the media conspiracy. Nonetheless media reviews are in agreement that it’s a pretty bland cartoon.
The issue is more the typical Hollywood big budget problem that scripts gets endlessly rewritten until it fits all the commercial boxes. By then all the originality is gone of course.
The movie reportedly cost the studio $135 million, and if this pace remains the same, earning around $20 million or so over the five day weekend, then the studio is going to lose A LOT of money.
Families simply aren’t interested in exposing their small children to this content.Two counterpoints:
1) Hollywood accounting is not that simple. There's an obvious incentive to put every little unrelated expense of the giant company as part of the movie cost. It's both for tax purposes and for advertising (they spent so much money in this movie, it just be great!).
2) The movie has an advertising aspect whose benefits are real, but not easy to quantify. Disney gets the laurels of being progressive with not only consumers, but their staff and, perhaps even more important, democrat politicians. You could think that comes at the cost of families with kids, their core business. But half of those families are progressive, and there other half cares about taking care of their kids and getting two hours of vacation from parenting. They might avoid this movie but will keep seeing others by Disney.My family and many others have stopped consuming Disney products (which is reflected in the poor performance of their stock price).
The media won’t report on this (out of fear that other companies will stop being woke).