They are assigned to black or non-black doctors. This includes Asian. But yeah, don’t read. That’s leads to more learning (sarcasm).
As usual, asians are completely invisible. I didn't bother reading the paper, but I assume they didn't randomly assign black patients to asian doctors? Seems like a no brainer to figure out whether black patients really like black doctors or really hate white doctors.
Great. So the more groups a society has, the more doctors groups there must be, even if some groups do a lot worse on MCATs, medical school and board exams than others.
No wonder countries like Japan, China, India, Korea, Singapore etc don’t come near diversity with a 10 foot pole.
actually would be interesting
As usual, asians are completely invisible. I didn't bother reading the paper, but I assume they didn't randomly assign black patients to asian doctors? Seems like a no brainer to figure out whether black patients really like black doctors or really hate white doctors.
I know you're just a dumb hs dropout troll.
https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/policies-shaped-multiracial-nation
But Singapore literally built its identity on racial diversity.
also
Since 1989, the racial quota in each Housing and Development Board (HDB) block and estate has been controlled to broadly reflect Singapore’s racial proportion under the Ethnic Integration Policy (EIP).
Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/policies-shaped-multiracial-nation
Great. So the more groups a society has, the more doctors groups there must be, even if some groups do a lot worse on MCATs, medical school and board exams than others.
No wonder countries like Japan, China, India, Korea, Singapore etc don’t come near diversity with a 10 foot pole.
Okay so I'm kind of puzzled by this one.
The authors randomly assign black male patients to black or white male doctors, and find that the patients are more likely to take up preventative treatment after meeting with a same-race doctor. They argue that this means that "diversity" is important among doctors.
The glaring hole I see in this argument is that the decisions (in this case) belong to the patients. So the (black) patients are only doing it if the doctor is black.
Does that mean that diversity is important? Only in so much as the patients are unwilling to listen to the equally good advice given by the white doctors. And so the story seems to go "black patients are racially biased, so it's important to have black doctors in order to satisfy their racism." How is that not the story they are telling here?
If anything this shows lack of diversity is better. America should have black and white areas and then everyone gets the doctors they trust.
It's actually pretty easy.
Why would black patients not trust white doctors?
Because their black skin causes them to ignore advice from people of a different race?
Or because their experience has been that trusting people of a different race has historically not gone so well.
Once you can think through this, I think you will understand a bit better.
Good luck.Okay so I'm kind of puzzled by this one.
The authors randomly assign black male patients to black or white male doctors, and find that the patients are more likely to take up preventative treatment after meeting with a same-race doctor. They argue that this means that "diversity" is important among doctors.
The glaring hole I see in this argument is that the decisions (in this case) belong to the patients. So the (black) patients are only doing it if the doctor is black.
Does that mean that diversity is important? Only in so much as the patients are unwilling to listen to the equally good advice given by the white doctors. And so the story seems to go "black patients are racially biased, so it's important to have black doctors in order to satisfy their racism." How is that not the story they are telling here?
OK. So they are judging the doctors on the basis of skin color. How is this any different than cab drivers refusing to pick up black males?
No, Singapore literally built its identity on _controlled_ diversity. The kind of diversity where the Chinese population will never fall below 70% of the total. Obviously, they will never allow their native majority to ever become a minority, unlike the USA.I know you're just a dumb hs dropout troll.
https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/policies-shaped-multiracial-nation
But Singapore literally built its identity on racial diversity.
also
Since 1989, the racial quota in each Housing and Development Board (HDB) block and estate has been controlled to broadly reflect Singapore’s racial proportion under the Ethnic Integration Policy (EIP).
Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/policies-shaped-multiracial-nationGreat. So the more groups a society has, the more doctors groups there must be, even if some groups do a lot worse on MCATs, medical school and board exams than others.
No wonder countries like Japan, China, India, Korea, Singapore etc don’t come near diversity with a 10 foot pole.
Singapore and Israel both practice explicitly ethno-nationalistic immigration policies to maintain demographic stability. This is sane and rational planning. The USA could learn much from them.
https://www.quora.com/Why-does-Singapore-only-seem-to-take-Chinese-immigrants
Singapore takes in more Chinese immigrants because the govt has a set racial quota based on the census taken in the 1960s when Singapore first gained independence.
The ratio back then was 70% of Singaporeans were ethnic Chinese. The govt has strive to maintain that ratio ever since the success of its Two is Enough policy which saw the more compliant Chinese people adopting it but not the other races - resulting in that 70% racial percentage going downward.
Great. So the more groups a society has, the more doctors groups there must be, even if some groups do a lot worse on MCATs, medical school and board exams than others.
No wonder countries like Japan, China, India, Korea, Singapore etc don’t come near diversity with a 10 foot pole.
I know you're just a dumb hs dropout troll.
https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/policies-shaped-multiracial-nation
But Singapore literally built its identity on racial diversity.
also
Since 1989, the racial quota in each Housing and Development Board (HDB) block and estate has been controlled to broadly reflect Singapore’s racial proportion under the Ethnic Integration Policy (EIP).
Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/policies-shaped-multiracial-nation
The dumb 4chan ethonationalist trolls love to point to Singapore as an example of ethnonationalism. You'd think Singapore were 99.9% Chinese based on how much they extol its "virtues," but Singapore is 74% Chinese, 13% Malay, 9% Indian, and 3% other.
By comparison, the US is 77% white, 13% black, 6% Asian, and 4% other (native or multiracial). Hispanics can be of any race, and the US is 18% Hispanic and 60% non-Hispanic white. So really, the US demographics that these trolls are so afraid of are actually not all that different from Singapore's in terms of how large the majority group is.
Singapore and Israel both practice explicitly ethno-nationalistic immigration policies to maintain demographic stability. This is sane and rational planning. The USA could learn much from them.
Dumb 4chan troll, are you aware that Israel takes in J-ws from ALL OVER THE WORLD? They take in J-ws from Ethiopia, India, France, et cetera et cetera. A previous Commander of the Israeli Navy is 1/4th Chinese for G-d's sake.
If that's what you like, then the USA is already doing it.
Great. So the more groups a society has, the more doctors groups there must be, even if some groups do a lot worse on MCATs, medical school and board exams than others.
No wonder countries like Japan, China, India, Korea, Singapore etc don’t come near diversity with a 10 foot pole.I know you're just a dumb hs dropout troll.
https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/policies-shaped-multiracial-nation
But Singapore literally built its identity on racial diversity.
also
Since 1989, the racial quota in each Housing and Development Board (HDB) block and estate has been controlled to broadly reflect Singapore’s racial proportion under the Ethnic Integration Policy (EIP).
Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/policies-shaped-multiracial-nationThe dumb 4chan ethonationalist trolls love to point to Singapore as an example of ethnonationalism. You'd think Singapore were 99.9% Chinese based on how much they extol its "virtues," but Singapore is 74% Chinese, 13% Malay, 9% Indian, and 3% other.
By comparison, the US is 77% white, 13% black, 6% Asian, and 4% other (native or multiracial). Hispanics can be of any race, and the US is 18% Hispanic and 60% non-Hispanic white. So really, the US demographics that these trolls are so afraid of are actually not all that different from Singapore's in terms of how large the majority group is.
You admitted it right there. US is down to SIXTY percent non-Hispanic white. That is a huge difference from even the 1990s, when the US was still 75% non-Hispanic white. So already, the native core population is headed to minority status in 20 years, something that will never, ever happen in Singapore.
You see, SG Chinese know that the government is actually working in their interests, and would never allow mass immigration of non-Chinese to overwhelm the Chinese 74%.
By contrast, US whites know that their elites and government want nothing more than to open the floodgates with DACA, caravans from Honduras, amnesties, refugees, etc.
I only wish we could have a Lee Kuan Yew type of leader appear in America.
Singapore and Israel both practice explicitly ethno-nationalistic immigration policies to maintain demographic stability. This is sane and rational planning. The USA could learn much from them.Dumb 4chan troll, are you aware that Israel takes in J-ws from ALL OVER THE WORLD? They take in J-ws from Ethiopia, India, France, et cetera et cetera. A previous Commander of the Israeli Navy is 1/4th Chinese for G-d's sake.
If that's what you like, then the USA is already doing it.
LOL, yeah they take in European Jws from all over the world. They tried an experiment where they took.in a few tens of thousands of Ethiopians... and it was a total disaster. After injecting the Ethiopians with contraceptives, they are now running hard from the idea of ever letting in any Africans ever again.
You admitted it right there. US is down to SIXTY percent non-Hispanic white. That is a huge difference from even the 1990s, when the US was still 75% non-Hispanic white. So already, the native core population is headed to minority status in 20 years, something that will never, ever happen in Singapore.
4chan troll, why do you exclude white Hispanics from your group? Isn't Nicolás Fuentes now a leader in your asinine movement?
And of course, "native core population" is laughable. The native population in Singapore are the Malays, and the native population in the US are the American Indians. The oldest Chinese families in Singapore are descendants of immigrants from around the same time as the oldest white families in America.
Yet, I just wonder whether this paper's results apply to Singapore or Isreal.
I know you're just a dumb hs dropout troll.
https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/policies-shaped-multiracial-nation
But Singapore literally built its identity on racial diversity.
also
Since 1989, the racial quota in each Housing and Development Board (HDB) block and estate has been controlled to broadly reflect Singapore’s racial proportion under the Ethnic Integration Policy (EIP).
Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/policies-shaped-multiracial-nationGreat. So the more groups a society has, the more doctors groups there must be, even if some groups do a lot worse on MCATs, medical school and board exams than others.
No wonder countries like Japan, China, India, Korea, Singapore etc don’t come near diversity with a 10 foot pole.No, Singapore literally built its identity on _controlled_ diversity. The kind of diversity where the Chinese population will never fall below 70% of the total. Obviously, they will never allow their native majority to ever become a minority, unlike the USA.
https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/singapore-and-israel-both-have-ethno-nationalistic-immigration-policies
Singapore and Israel both practice explicitly ethno-nationalistic immigration policies to maintain demographic stability. This is sane and rational planning. The USA could learn much from them.
https://www.quora.com/Why-does-Singapore-only-seem-to-take-Chinese-immigrants
Singapore takes in more Chinese immigrants because the govt has a set racial quota based on the census taken in the 1960s when Singapore first gained independence.
The ratio back then was 70% of Singaporeans were ethnic Chinese. The govt has strive to maintain that ratio ever since the success of its Two is Enough policy which saw the more compliant Chinese people adopting it but not the other races - resulting in that 70% racial percentage going downward.
LOL, yeah they take in European Jws from all over the world. They tried an experiment where they took.in a few tens of thousands of Ethiopians... and it was a total disaster. After injecting the Ethiopians with contraceptives, they are now running hard from the idea of ever letting in any Africans ever again.
You might want to double check your sources, 4chan troll. There are over 100,000 Ethiopian J-ws in Israel today, nearly 2% of the population. "Ethnonationalism," amirite?
Also, if you think Israel is majority Ashkenazi, you are wrong. It is actually majority Mizrahi (immigrants from the Arab countries), and there is extensive intermarriage between Mizrahi and Ashkenazi J-ws. But "ethnonationalism" amirite?
You admitted it right there. US is down to SIXTY percent non-Hispanic white. That is a huge difference from even the 1990s, when the US was still 75% non-Hispanic white. So already, the native core population is headed to minority status in 20 years, something that will never, ever happen in Singapore.4chan troll, why do you exclude white Hispanics from your group? Isn't Nicolás Fuentes now a leader in your asinine movement?
And of course, "native core population" is laughable. The native population in Singapore are the Malays, and the native population in the US are the American Indians. The oldest Chinese families in Singapore are descendants of immigrants from around the same time as the oldest white families in America.
Why should I include them when they are clearly different from non-Hispanic whites on average IQ, education levels and all the rest? Who cares what some tard says, not me.
You have admitted that there is indeed a fundamental difference between SG and USA. In SG, the Chinese will never be replaced. In the US, the non-Hispanic Whites will be replaced in 20 years. Singapore, the sane and rational country, would never ever allow DACAs to simply walk across the border.
That is why Singapore, together with Japan, China, Korea, Israel, etc are enjoying the benefits of non-diversity, while the US hurtles towards civil war.
LOL, yeah they take in European Jws from all over the world. They tried an experiment where they took.in a few tens of thousands of Ethiopians... and it was a total disaster. After injecting the Ethiopians with contraceptives, they are now running hard from the idea of ever letting in any Africans ever again.You might want to double check your sources, 4chan troll. There are over 100,000 Ethiopian J-ws in Israel today, nearly 2% of the population. "Ethnonationalism," amirite?
Also, if you think Israel is majority Ashkenazi, you are wrong. It is actually majority Mizrahi (immigrants from the Arab countries), and there is extensive intermarriage between Mizrahi and Ashkenazi J-ws. But "ethnonationalism" amirite?
Why doesn’t Israel want to let in any more Ethiopian Jws? because they saw how they performed.
http://www.haaretz.com/amp/opinion/.premium-why-isn-t-netanyahu-willing-to-bring-all-the-ethiopian-j*ws-to-israel-1.6589911
Why Isn't Netanyahu Willing to Bring All the Ethiopian Jws to Israel?
Last month’s cabinet resolution to bring 1,000 of the Ethiopian Jws still waiting in Addis Ababa and Gondar undermines a 2015 cabinet resolution calling for bringing to Israel all the remaining Ethiopian Jws — 8,000 people. Why has Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu neglected his promises and is bringing only 1,000? Why leave 7,000 behind? The new resolution shows demonstrates just how difficult it is for Israel to absorb black Jws.
Why should I include them when they are clearly different from non-Hispanic whites on average IQ, education levels and all the rest? Who cares what some tard says, not me.
I would love to read your "evidence" showing the "clear differences" between Hispanic and non-Hispanic huwhites, 4chan troll.
You have admitted that there is indeed a fundamental difference between SG and USA.
No, I haven't. I've said that there is a fundamental similarity between SG and USA: the so-called "native core population" is descended from 18th and 19th Century immigrants.
Your claim of a fundamental difference is based on your refusal to lump all huwhites together, insisting that there are "clear differences" between Hispanic (Spanish descended) and non-Hispanic (non-Spanish descended). Yet you lump all ethnic Chinese together in Singapore when in reality, their ancestors didn't all come from the same parts of China (cf. Europe) either.
Your entire ideology is retarded, as shown by how you think countries like Singapore and Israel are ethnonationalist when they are in reality multiethnic.
LOL, yeah they take in European Jws from all over the world. They tried an experiment where they took.in a few tens of thousands of Ethiopians... and it was a total disaster. After injecting the Ethiopians with contraceptives, they are now running hard from the idea of ever letting in any Africans ever again.You might want to double check your sources, 4chan troll. There are over 100,000 Ethiopian J-ws in Israel today, nearly 2% of the population. "Ethnonationalism," amirite?
Also, if you think Israel is majority Ashkenazi, you are wrong. It is actually majority Mizrahi (immigrants from the Arab countries), and there is extensive intermarriage between Mizrahi and Ashkenazi J-ws. But "ethnonationalism" amirite?
As for “ethnonationalism”, _of course Israel is ethnonatonalist. Why did they build a southern border wall that cut illegal immigration from Africans to zero? Why doesn’t Israel welcome mass immigration from Africa, Philippines, Bangladesh, etc which the United States is perfectly happy to take? Where is the Israeli DACA program? Why don’t migrant caravans walk across the borders with Israeli politicians guiding them?
Because Israel is an ethnonationalist state, while the USA is not. Duh.
Why should I include them when they are clearly different from non-Hispanic whites on average IQ, education levels and all the rest? Who cares what some tard says, not me.I would love to read your "evidence" showing the "clear differences" between Hispanic and non-Hispanic huwhites, 4chan troll.
You have admitted that there is indeed a fundamental difference between SG and USA.
No, I haven't. I've said that there is a fundamental similarity between SG and USA: the so-called "native core population" is descended from 18th and 19th Century immigrants.
Your claim of a fundamental difference is based on your refusal to lump all huwhites together, insisting that there are "clear differences" between Hispanic (Spanish descended) and non-Hispanic (non-Spanish descended). Yet you lump all ethnic Chinese together in Singapore when in reality, their ancestors didn't all come from the same parts of China (cf. Europe) either.
Your entire ideology is retarded, as shown by how you think countries like Singapore and Israel are ethnonationalist when they are in reality multiethnic.
I can’t make it any clearer to you. Singapore controls its migration policy to ensure the Chinese remain a majority forever. Israel controls its migration policy to ensure Jws remain a majority forever (and also keep out problematic groups even if they claim to be Jwish.
The US, on the other hand, doesn’t try to control jack sh*t. They let anyone and everyone overstay their visa, walk across the border, have birthright citizenship, etc which Singapore and Israel would never do in a million years. Who cares where the Chinese came from? What matters is what the government is doing to protect the status of the Chinese population now and into the future.
One path is sane, rational, and yes, “ethnonationalist”. The other leads to what we see around us every day: civil strife, the loss of free speech (because some groups will be offended), decay and dissolution.
This topic has been closed to new replies.