Close

Complete Captcha

• 2 months - 111 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 587 Goods vs 144 No Goods

1. Economist
   db7d
   

   Or do babies appear out of the aether when two people of any sex love each other very much? The economists on Twitter seem to have the latter opinion

   https://www.twitter.com/emily_beam/status/1167144099524354049

   2 months ago # QUOTE 19 Good 1 No Good !

2. Economist
   986a
   

   I don't know, I'm a man and I have sex with a woman all the time- daily even! But a baby never comes.

   This might have something to do with it being an'al only, but still. This is what we do. No babies! Best thing ever.

   2 months ago # QUOTE 13 Good 6 No Good !

3. Economist
   4be1
   

   Yes it takes a genetic man and a genetic woman to make a baby.

   2 months ago # QUOTE 19 Good 0 No Good !

4. Economist
   3851
   

   Yes it takes a genetic man and a genetic woman to make a baby.

   OMG! whoever you are, you are a contemptible bigot and should lose your job for saying this.

   2 months ago # QUOTE 35 Good 0 No Good !

5. Economist
   9100
   

   Ban this person from the profession, AEA President Card!

   Yes it takes a genetic man and a genetic woman to make a baby.

   2 months ago # QUOTE 31 Good 0 No Good !

6. Economist
   9156
   

   oh god those replies

   kill it with fire!!!

   2 months ago # QUOTE 7 Good 1 No Good !

7. Economist
   8b26
   

   I'm pretty certain that one of the clone experiments was done by chemically triggering the egg fertilization after they injected in the dna they wanted. So they only needed the egg from whatever female they used and the necessary dna.

   2 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 6 No Good !

8. Economist
   8b26
   

   But, depending on what definition you want, all you need to have a baby is a women with an egg, some man juice and a turkey baster.

   2 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 4 No Good !

9. Economist
   4872
   

   so much cringe. look at all these twitter freaks.

   2 months ago # QUOTE 15 Good 0 No Good !

10. Economist
    3115
    

    I think we should apply potential outcomes approach to address whether man and woman cause baby to exist. Appears not to be causal though.

    2 months ago # QUOTE 6 Good 0 No Good !

11. Economist
    b3b9
    

    It’s amazing, so many people tweeting in favor of this kind of bulls**t. I feel sorry for Doepke!

    2 months ago # QUOTE 8 Good 0 No Good !

12. Economist
    b87a
    

    Yes. Unless Michelle Obama is involved, in that case it takes two men.

    2 months ago # QUOTE 6 Good 8 No Good !

13. Economist
    84d9
    

    It's amazing how many bitter losers there are on Twitter. What a cesspool.

    2 months ago # QUOTE 18 Good 0 No Good !

14. Economist
    60f2
    

    And I'm consistently asked why I'm not on twitter. So I don't have to engage with people like these who have infected the profession.

    2 months ago # QUOTE 20 Good 0 No Good !

15. Economist
    c291
    

    how is babby formed?

    2 months ago # QUOTE 17 Good 0 No Good !

16. Economist
    3e66
    

    Libs at war with basic biology... again...
    Party of science...

    2 months ago # QUOTE 16 Good 0 No Good !

17. Economist
    5f22
    

    My summary:

    Though the work looks serious, the authors surely could have predicted that a slightly different first sentence would go over better and convey the same meaning.

    The mob is a little ridiculous. So much gratuitous self-righteousness.

    The original tweet was pretty funny, and not subject to the same criticisms as the mob.

    2 months ago # QUOTE 5 Good 5 No Good !

18. Economist
    73fd
    

    AER to toilet confirmed

    2 months ago # QUOTE 4 Good 0 No Good !

19. Economist
    0423
    

    Not clicking on that Twitter link.

    That said, there is a boatload of literature in sociology on that topic. I wonder if the authors looked at it.

    2 months ago # QUOTE 3 Good 6 No Good !

20. Economist
    7af1
    

    Only Jesus can make babbys

    2 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

Reply »