Really? You re not much of a pscyhologist my id//io//tino.
Boohoo kolevs feefees are hurt. Guys let’s make Kolev feel better.
The point is that when you re cyber cr//iminal hated by everybody, your days are numbered.
Dr Gueorgui Kolev (Coventry University) dismissed for gross misconduct
-
Much like your ability to harm me, God doesn’t exist.Or more likely I am like God, I strike at random place at random times (from point of view of the sub//hu//mans).
All that I can say is that Middlesex thought like you for 3 years... and then they got smacked down. -
I think we already went through this...
I do not know from what sh//it//ho//le you crawled out,
de//
ge//
ne//rate
But where I am from , teacher is the most respected profession.
But two jobs, no? So what gives?
Mista Misconduct
One of which you've been asked to resign, the other is a teaching fellow post.
-
I have always said, that if an ub//hu//man like you says something online anonymously, it MUST be true...
But I am not so sure other people agree with me.
No, you’re the one suffering from a delusional disorder.
A sub//hu//man like you, "making fun" of a man... YOu must be men//ta//lly ill, no?
Im not psychoanalyzing you, you tool.
I’m making fun of you.
-
I do not think the re//ta//rds around here know what "mocking" means...
Mocking, is like, if I say have two jobs, and you do not have any. And I am mocking you for being a lo//ser...
If you do not have any job, you re REALLY RELLY not in a position to "mock" someone with 2 jobs. This is not mocking, it is more like you re sho//ving a broken bo//tle up your a//s//s.
-
Joro, cutie pie, take a look at yourself in the mirror.
You catch a lot of criticism online. Some of it is valid, but not your fault: you have no ability to control your temper, so you behave like a toddler. You make threats that are obviously empty to anyone with half a brain, and you make them repetitively. Your research is completely uninspired. It's both useless and uninteresting. You don't understand basic ideas, ideas my freshmen understand (and I don't teach at a great school, so the bar here isn't very high), like "time has value" and "the marginal revenue product of a professor isn't equal to all the tuition his students paid this semester." Your English is maybe at B2. You can't help your impulsiveness, or your lack of research aptitude, or your inability to grasp simple concepts, and honestly, English is hard enough to learn as a native that no one should make fun of your lack of communication skill.
Similarly, no one should make fun of you for your strikingly unattractive appearance or the fact that no one cares for you romantically. That isn't a choice you made, although you could probably do something to improve your prospects if you had any propensity at all toward self-reflection.
Some of it is valid, and it is your fault. When someone tries to help you, you should listen to them. When you don't get the answers you want, you shouldn't spend hours writing posts that are barely intelligible because you can't string together a simple sentence without questioning someone's orientation or accusing them of crimes.
Some of it might just be sad. It's not clear whether you earnestly believe that a single person, a moderator being paid by the board owner, is teasing you on these boards, or whether you think that's an clever insult for reasons that aren't clear to anyone here. If you genuinely believe that, you need help this board can't provide.
Some you bring on yourself through your striking arrogance. You think you understand enough to represent yourself at a hearing. Fine, most litigants in person get slapped down and the embarrassing experience of being shown how wrong they are sets them straight. Your lack of legal skill isn't your fault, but your refusal to listen to the feedback you get is, and so is your silly claim that "1 PhD and 4 masters" in an unrelated field somehow qualify you to insult a man who was practicing law before you so much as enrolled in university. Your lack of English skill isn't your fault, and neither is the fact that you don't have the knowledge base to understand expressions you've never learned, but it is your fault that you don't say less and listen more. For heaven's sake, Joro, I've come out and told you who I am - I'm a dual-degreed lawyer/economist, white American citizen, native English speaker with recent Scots-Canadian ancestry - and you think it's clever to pretend you believe I'm a Desi. Worse, you might ACTUALLY believe I'm a recent South Asian immigrant, all because you aren't well-read enough to recognize an expression they didn't teach you in your English "education."
You think that because people like Jim Heckman are able to be unapproachable, you can be too. You think people like you and find you clever and charming.
No one does.
The reason people put up with Jim Heckman is that he is a devastatingly intelligent human being. With Jim Heckman, you get what you pay for.
With you, there are no positives.
And that is why no one can stand you.
-
woah
Joro, cutie pie, take a look at yourself in the mirror.
You catch a lot of criticism online. Some of it is valid, but not your fault: you have no ability to control your temper, so you behave like a toddler. You make threats that are obviously empty to anyone with half a brain, and you make them repetitively. Your research is completely uninspired. It's both useless and uninteresting. You don't understand basic ideas, ideas my freshmen understand (and I don't teach at a great school, so the bar here isn't very high), like "time has value" and "the marginal revenue product of a professor isn't equal to all the tuition his students paid this semester." Your English is maybe at B2. You can't help your impulsiveness, or your lack of research aptitude, or your inability to grasp simple concepts, and honestly, English is hard enough to learn as a native that no one should make fun of your lack of communication skill.
Similarly, no one should make fun of you for your strikingly unattractive appearance or the fact that no one cares for you romantically. That isn't a choice you made, although you could probably do something to improve your prospects if you had any propensity at all toward self-reflection.
Some of it is valid, and it is your fault. When someone tries to help you, you should listen to them. When you don't get the answers you want, you shouldn't spend hours writing posts that are barely intelligible because you can't string together a simple sentence without questioning someone's orientation or accusing them of crimes.
Some of it might just be sad. It's not clear whether you earnestly believe that a single person, a moderator being paid by the board owner, is teasing you on these boards, or whether you think that's an clever insult for reasons that aren't clear to anyone here. If you genuinely believe that, you need help this board can't provide.
Some you bring on yourself through your striking arrogance. You think you understand enough to represent yourself at a hearing. Fine, most litigants in person get slapped down and the embarrassing experience of being shown how wrong they are sets them straight. Your lack of legal skill isn't your fault, but your refusal to listen to the feedback you get is, and so is your silly claim that "1 PhD and 4 masters" in an unrelated field somehow qualify you to insult a man who was practicing law before you so much as enrolled in university. Your lack of English skill isn't your fault, and neither is the fact that you don't have the knowledge base to understand expressions you've never learned, but it is your fault that you don't say less and listen more. For heaven's sake, Joro, I've come out and told you who I am - I'm a dual-degreed lawyer/economist, white American citizen, native English speaker with recent Scots-Canadian ancestry - and you think it's clever to pretend you believe I'm a Desi. Worse, you might ACTUALLY believe I'm a recent South Asian immigrant, all because you aren't well-read enough to recognize an expression they didn't teach you in your English "education."
You think that because people like Jim Heckman are able to be unapproachable, you can be too. You think people like you and find you clever and charming.
No one does.
The reason people put up with Jim Heckman is that he is a devastatingly intelligent human being. With Jim Heckman, you get what you pay for.
With you, there are no positives.
And that is why no one can stand you. -
Joro, cutie pie, take a look at yourself in the mirror.
You catch a lot of criticism online. Some of it is valid, but not your fault: you have no ability to control your temper, so you behave like a toddler. You make threats that are obviously empty to anyone with half a brain, and you make them repetitively. Your research is completely uninspired. It's both useless and uninteresting. You don't understand basic ideas, ideas my freshmen understand (and I don't teach at a great school, so the bar here isn't very high), like "time has value" and "the marginal revenue product of a professor isn't equal to all the tuition his students paid this semester." Your English is maybe at B2. You can't help your impulsiveness, or your lack of research aptitude, or your inability to grasp simple concepts, and honestly, English is hard enough to learn as a native that no one should make fun of your lack of communication skill.
Similarly, no one should make fun of you for your strikingly unattractive appearance or the fact that no one cares for you romantically. That isn't a choice you made, although you could probably do something to improve your prospects if you had any propensity at all toward self-reflection.
Some of it is valid, and it is your fault. When someone tries to help you, you should listen to them. When you don't get the answers you want, you shouldn't spend hours writing posts that are barely intelligible because you can't string together a simple sentence without questioning someone's orientation or accusing them of crimes.
Some of it might just be sad. It's not clear whether you earnestly believe that a single person, a moderator being paid by the board owner, is teasing you on these boards, or whether you think that's an clever insult for reasons that aren't clear to anyone here. If you genuinely believe that, you need help this board can't provide.
Some you bring on yourself through your striking arrogance. You think you understand enough to represent yourself at a hearing. Fine, most litigants in person get slapped down and the embarrassing experience of being shown how wrong they are sets them straight. Your lack of legal skill isn't your fault, but your refusal to listen to the feedback you get is, and so is your silly claim that "1 PhD and 4 masters" in an unrelated field somehow qualify you to insult a man who was practicing law before you so much as enrolled in university. Your lack of English skill isn't your fault, and neither is the fact that you don't have the knowledge base to understand expressions you've never learned, but it is your fault that you don't say less and listen more. For heaven's sake, Joro, I've come out and told you who I am - I'm a dual-degreed lawyer/economist, white American citizen, native English speaker with recent Scots-Canadian ancestry - and you think it's clever to pretend you believe I'm a Desi. Worse, you might ACTUALLY believe I'm a recent South Asian immigrant, all because you aren't well-read enough to recognize an expression they didn't teach you in your English "education."
You think that because people like Jim Heckman are able to be unapproachable, you can be too. You think people like you and find you clever and charming.
No one does.
The reason people put up with Jim Heckman is that he is a devastatingly intelligent human being. With Jim Heckman, you get what you pay for.
With you, there are no positives.
And that is why no one can stand you.You re//ta//rd are pathologically verbose. I got through your first sentence, and my research is amazing.
Also you re in no position of an anonymous troll to "evaluate" my research. Reveal yourself, and then we can have a look what your research contributes, and what mine contributes.
And to//olet mo//uth anonymous troll like you toilet mo//uthing is definitely NOT "criticisim".
-
Sorry man, I'm an Aussie so I've no idea who wrote about the Premier League story ... it's just funny.
This was a ZING,
said old Non-jobs to himself from a different IP.Funniest line on EJMR for months!
Old two jobs beaten again. You're like that 9-0 Premier League game from the 90s on repeat and you're not scoring 9..
-
I do not know whether you re ausia or shmousie, but an extremely st//up//id person wrote something extremely st//up//id... Finding such a st//up//idity funny the chances that you are the same person are 99.99%.
Sorry man, I'm an Aussie so I've no idea who wrote about the Premier League story ... it's just funny.
This was a ZING,
said old Non-jobs to himself from a different IP.Funniest line on EJMR for months!
Old two jobs beaten again. You're like that 9-0 Premier League game from the 90s on repeat and you're not scoring 9..
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.