explained elsewhere
Yeah, totally. Best excuse in the world
Dr Gueorgui Kolev (Coventry University) dismissed for gross misconduct
-
No no, the sitting judge WENT under investigation for misconduct.
The sitting judge admitted all alleged misbehaviours.
The regional judge concluded that everything is kosher.
Now they both will undergo investigation by the Ombudsman.
^
Kolev, can you provide evidence to support your claim that the sitting judge is under investigation for misconduct?
It's a strong claim to make. I'm sure that you, as someone steeped in the English legal system, are fully aware of that. -
No no, the sitting judge WENT under investigation for misconduct.
The sitting judge admitted all alleged misbehaviours.
The regional judge concluded that everything is kosher.
Now they both will undergo investigation by the Ombudsman.^
Kolev, can you provide evidence to support your claim that the sitting judge is under investigation for misconduct?
It's a strong claim to make. I'm sure that you, as someone steeped in the English legal system, are fully aware of that.
Truly this is the mother of all conspiracies! Who do you think is behind it all? Are Middlesex so powerful?
-
The Sh//it//ho//le of Middlesex has all the cash they embezzled from the tax payer and from the students parents.
Cash is king.
What do I know?
I just go through the legal motions when I see something dodgy.
And I let the system work itself out.
Asymptotically if you re a criminal, as I claims the Sh//it//ho//le of Middlesex are, you go bankrupt before you can pay yourself out of your crimes.
No no, the sitting judge WENT under investigation for misconduct.
The sitting judge admitted all alleged misbehaviours.
The regional judge concluded that everything is kosher.
Now they both will undergo investigation by the Ombudsman.^
Kolev, can you provide evidence to support your claim that the sitting judge is under investigation for misconduct?
It's a strong claim to make. I'm sure that you, as someone steeped in the English legal system, are fully aware of that.
Truly this is the mother of all conspiracies! Who do you think is behind it all? Are Middlesex so powerful?
-
The re//ta//rded criminals do not mention that despite all the crimes that the good judge threw out before 1 Oct 2019, there are LOTS of MORE crimes to go about that the criminals committed AFTER 1 Oct 2019.
And those later crimes will be considered in FULL extent of the JUSTICE system, this time in front of a jury of 3.
And you understand, a jury of 3 is 3 times more expensive to bribe than one judge.
-
The re//ta//rded criminals do not mention that despite all the crimes that the good judge threw out before 1 Oct 2019, there are LOTS of MORE crimes to go about that the criminals committed AFTER 1 Oct 2019.
And those later crimes will be considered in FULL extent of the JUSTICE system, this time in front of a jury of 3.
And you understand, a jury of 3 is 3 times more expensive to bribe than one judge.Bribe?
-
"The claimant’s claims of sex discrimination/harassment/victimisation arising out of alleged treatment prior to 7 October 2019 are out of time and it is not just and equitable to extend time. Accordingly, those claims are struck out."
Two claims related to unfair dismissal are in time, so they will presumably be heard. I suppose these claims are also the most important ones.
-
I know nothing about any bribe.
But I do know that bribing 3 people is at least 3 times more expensive than one person.
And most of the time a LOT more, because at any time one can rat on the other two.
The re//ta//rded criminals do not mention that despite all the crimes that the good judge threw out before 1 Oct 2019, there are LOTS of MORE crimes to go about that the criminals committed AFTER 1 Oct 2019.
And those later crimes will be considered in FULL extent of the JUSTICE system, this time in front of a jury of 3.
And you understand, a jury of 3 is 3 times more expensive to bribe than one judge.Bribe?
-
Also gender discrimination, bullying and harassment.
But apparently all the gender discrimination, bullying and harassment that took place before 1 Oct 2019 will not be taken into account.. Because good judge.
"The claimant’s claims of sex discrimination/harassment/victimisation arising out of alleged treatment prior to 7 October 2019 are out of time and it is not just and equitable to extend time. Accordingly, those claims are struck out."
Two claims related to unfair dismissal are in time, so they will presumably be heard. I suppose these claims are also the most important ones.
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.