It is 100% the fault of the Econ profession that it devaluated Econ PhD when it allowed a lawyer to be fed chair. You have zero credibility to dispute Dr Lisa’s credentials.
Dr. Lisa is 100x more qualified than lawyer JPow. I say that as a 2x T voter.
-
LOL. Imagine MDs being ok with choosing a lawyer as Surgeon general. Or lawyers being ok with choosing an economist for Supreme Court. It is 100% the fault of Econ phds for devaluing their own degree by allowing lawyer to be chair of fed.
I will support ANY Econ PhD over non -Econ PhD in fed even if the said Econ PhD is a crazed Marxist-Leninist.Powell was a star at in his profession, pre fed appointment. LC was a diversity hire and will only ever be that
-
Econ != science
LOL. Imagine MDs being ok with choosing a lawyer as Surgeon general. Or lawyers being ok with choosing an economist for Supreme Court. It is 100% the fault of Econ phds for devaluing their own degree by allowing lawyer to be chair of fed.
I will support ANY Econ PhD over non -Econ PhD in fed even if the said Econ PhD is a crazed Marxist-Leninist.Powell was a star at in his profession, pre fed appointment. LC was a diversity hire and will only ever be that
-
CB bro here. A PhD in econ is not necessary nor sufficient to head a central bank. Lots of PhDs are clueless over basic things like monetary policy implementation or the inner plumbing of the financial system. There's a reason why many Fed or Treasury officials read Nathan Tankus's writing.
-
CB bro here. A PhD in econ is not necessary nor sufficient to head a central bank. Lots of PhDs are clueless over basic things like monetary policy implementation or the inner plumbing of the financial system. There's a reason why many Fed or Treasury officials read Nathan Tankus's writing.
Is this compliment to Nathan