Close

Complete Captcha

• 2 months - 49 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 146 Goods vs 51 No Goods

1. Economist
   1634
   

   The new rules aim to have at least 40 percent of non-executive director posts, or one-third of all director posts on publicly-listed firms filled by women by July 2026.

   And priority to the under-represented gender needs to be given in cases where two candidates are equally qualified, the new rules say.

   Companies with fewer than 250 employees will be exempt from the regulations.

   The rules require EU countries to impose "effective" penalties for companies that do not reach the targets, including fines, or being publicly named and shamed.

   2 months ago # QUOTE 6 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   0991
   

   The people who enacted this should be summarily executed.

   2 months ago # QUOTE 35 Volod 4 Vlad !

3. Economist
   e58b
   

   We, women, are very content to see these positive changes.
   More please!

   The new rules aim to have at least 40 percent of non-executive director posts, or one-third of all director posts on publicly-listed firms filled by women by July 2026.
   And priority to the under-represented gender needs to be given in cases where two candidates are equally qualified, the new rules say.
   Companies with fewer than 250 employees will be exempt from the regulations.
   The rules require EU countries to impose "effective" penalties for companies that do not reach the targets, including fines, or being publicly named and shamed.

   2 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 17 Vlad !

4. Economist
   0991
   

   We, women, are very content to see these positive changes.
   More please!

   The new rules aim to have at least 40 percent of non-executive director posts, or one-third of all director posts on publicly-listed firms filled by women by July 2026.
   And priority to the under-represented gender needs to be given in cases where two candidates are equally qualified, the new rules say.
   Companies with fewer than 250 employees will be exempt from the regulations.
   The rules require EU countries to impose "effective" penalties for companies that do not reach the targets, including fines, or being publicly named and shamed.
   

   You deserve sudden death.

   2 months ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 2 Vlad !

5. Economist
   8699
   

   God, Europe is sooo done. No wonder no innovation has come out of that continent since 1950.

   2 months ago # QUOTE 17 Volod 1 Vlad !

6. Economist
   3a32
   

   The new rules aim to have at least 40 percent of non-executive director posts, or one-third of all director posts on publicly-listed firms filled by women by July 2026.
   And priority to the under-represented gender needs to be given in cases where two candidates are equally qualified, the new rules say.
   Companies with fewer than 250 employees will be exempt from the regulations.
   The rules require EU countries to impose "effective" penalties for companies that do not reach the targets, including fines, or being publicly named and shamed.

   In Indonesia also happened

   Minimum candidates of house or representative must be at least 30 percent women despite not guaranteed to be elected in the election day

   Minimum Directors and Executive Boards at least 30 percent women in the next 5 years

   2 months ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   4a90
   

   Ljl yuropoors

   2 months ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   1646
   

   these woke bureaucracies are going to crush us all

   2 months ago # QUOTE 5 Volod 1 Vlad !

9. Economist
   e58b
   

   Fantastic!

   these woke bureaucracies are going to crush us all

   2 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    2713
    

    calling it now...

    In 5-10 years, rd papers will be written looking at quarterly earnings for companies just above and below the cutoff and find that this policy helps ~1,000 marginal women impacted directly by this policy and hurts millions of workers, consumers, and shareholders

    and if the cultural zeitgeist has not changed course completely by then (it likely will not) then the authors are going to torture the data to show that actually this evidence of discrimination against women earlier in the pipeline

    2 months ago # QUOTE 11 Volod 0 Vlad !

11. Economist
    1646
    

    the femail invasion is a self reinforcing system. only a great depression can stop it now.

    calling it now...
    In 5-10 years, rd papers will be written looking at quarterly earnings for companies just above and below the cutoff and find that this policy helps ~1,000 marginal women impacted directly by this policy and hurts millions of workers, consumers, and shareholders
    and if the cultural zeitgeist has not changed course completely by then (it likely will not) then the authors are going to torture the data to show that actually this evidence of discrimination against women earlier in the pipeline

    2 months ago # QUOTE 3 Volod 0 Vlad !

12. Economist
    b7db
    

    Main boards are just full of rent seekers anyway. Why shouldn't women have a share of the rents?

    2 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 3 Vlad !

13. Economist
    8303
    

    It's a good start.
    Now we need to equalize women in jail, in the streets, in mental asylums, working in steel mills, at the back of fishing ships, etc.

    2 months ago # QUOTE 14 Volod 1 Vlad !

14. Economist
    fc2c
    

    It's a good start.
    Now we need to equalize women in jail, in the streets, in mental asylums, working in steel mills, at the back of fishing ships, etc.

    Let's send them to Ukraine! #girlboss #girlscandoanything

    2 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

15. Economist
    8703
    

    ECF scholars wet

    2 months ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

16. Economist
    7c06
    

    This is the kind of fresh, innovative, forward-looking, pro-active policy that will make Europe race ahead in the global markets. (not)

    2 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 0 Vlad !

17. Economist
    9961
    

    calling it now...
    In 5-10 years, rd papers will be written looking at quarterly earnings for companies just above and below the cutoff and find that this policy helps ~1,000 marginal women impacted directly by this policy and hurts millions of workers, consumers, and shareholders
    and if the cultural zeitgeist has not changed course completely by then (it likely will not) then the authors are going to torture the data to show that actually this evidence of discrimination against women earlier in the pipeline

    the femail invasion is a self reinforcing system. only a great depression can stop it now.

    calling it now...
    In 5-10 years, rd papers will be written looking at quarterly earnings for companies just above and below the cutoff and find that this policy helps ~1,000 marginal women impacted directly by this policy and hurts millions of workers, consumers, and shareholders
    and if the cultural zeitgeist has not changed course completely by then (it likely will not) then the authors are going to torture the data to show that actually this evidence of discrimination against women earlier in the pipeline
    

    Isn't that good? In the past men work and women at home

    Now women work and we, men, just at home

    Easy life . .

    2 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

18. Economist
    b102
    

    There is one obvious solution: all 8 billion people in the world identify as bl/ack tra/nswo/men. 100% diversity achieved.

    2 months ago # QUOTE 4 Volod 0 Vlad !

19. Economist
    20c5
    

    Read a bit further and you should realize this is just window dressing:
    1) as a EU directive it’s up to member states to decide how to implement this
    2) companies just have to publish their quota of woman on the board and tell how they’re going to reach it

    2 months ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 1 Vlad !

20. Economist
    b102
    

    Read a bit further and you should realize this is just window dressing:
    1) as a EU directive it’s up to member states to decide how to implement this
    2) companies just have to publish their quota of woman on the board and tell how they’re going to reach it

    Yeah, because we never went down that slippery slope before, as in academic hiring.

    2 months ago # QUOTE 9 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply »