Close

Complete Captcha

• 10 months - 29 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 43 Goods vs 23 No Goods

1. Economist
   3cf3
   

   I am in between choosing JCF and EER to submit my paper....it's an international economic study with corporate finance content. I believe, EER=JCF.

   how good the journal is? better than JDE?

   for what kind of paper?
   EER is considered a B pub in most European departments
   

   No. JCF is top field. EER is second tier general interest.

   Yeah if you narrow the field down sufficiently every special interest journal can be made a "top field". The field is called finance and it has one top field, the journal of finance. It also has other good field journals, but JCF is not one of them.

   10 months ago # QUOTE 2 Good 0 No Good !

2. Economist
   f715
   

   No. JCF is top field. EER is second tier general interest.

   haha yeah sure. In the same vein, the journal of banking and finance is a top field for banking and finance, and therefore better than any second tier general interest. Submitting to a journal that specializes in a niche of a particular field doesn't make it a good journal.

   10 months ago # QUOTE 2 Good 1 No Good !

3. Economist
   fc9d
   

   No, JFE, JF are top fields. Using your argument, macro would have 10 top filed journals (monetary, macro finance, growth, dynamic public finance, banking, macro-labor, etc). You get the point.

   I am in between choosing JCF and EER to submit my paper....it's an international
   economic study with corporate finance content. I believe, EER=JCF.

   how good the journal is? better than JDE?

   for what kind of paper?
   EER is considered a B pub in most European departments
   

   No. JCF is top field. EER is second tier general interest.

   10 months ago # QUOTE 2 Good 0 No Good !

4. Economist
   e67e
   

   Around 15 years ago (before JEEA) I would have said EER was clearly above JDE. After that EER fell in deep decline, and until 4/5 years ago, I would have said that JDE was slightly above EER. Since the EER started to pick up, and it improved also in how well it's managed (fast and good refereeing). I would be indifferent between JDE and EER nowadays. I pubbed in JDE a few times, and not yet in EER (got rejected by then recently twice, with good reports)

   10 months ago # QUOTE 6 Good 0 No Good !

5. Economist
   791f
   

   Thanks!

   Around 15 years ago (before JEEA) I would have said EER was clearly above JDE. After that EER fell in deep decline, and until 4/5 years ago, I would have said that JDE was slightly above EER. Since the EER started to pick up, and it improved also in how well it's managed (fast and good refereeing). I would be indifferent between JDE and EER nowadays. I pubbed in JDE a few times, and not yet in EER (got rejected by then recently twice, with good reports)

   10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

6. Economist
   888f
   

   I am suspicions of everything European.

   10 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

7. Economist
   ca07
   

   IER trolls subtle in this thread. Median impact factor terrible, in reality field journal for a couple boring fields

   10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

8. Economist
   fc75
   

   ReStud is second tier

   10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 1 No Good !

9. Economist
   89d8
   

   Lol

   It is a very good journal. Despite people here want to bash this journal, it is coming back and it is close to JEEA. Do not believe all this crap that JEAA>>>>>>EER. EER, IER, EJ, JEEA in the long run counts the same.

   Correct.

   10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

Reply

Post

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.