Close

Complete Captcha

• 1 year - 93 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 61 Goods vs 7 No Goods

1. Economist
   5e88
   

   They have been publishing papers in top journals in recent years.

   Please explain in great detail

   All of them are productive people. Not deadwood. Not retirees.

   Who are the seniors leaving? Do you mean the retirees?

   Two seniors and one junior

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 1 No Good !

2. Economist
   ed17
   

   Are you including LY? He essentially left two years ago so not new.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Good 2 No Good !

3. Economist
   d041
   

   All this year.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Good 1 No Good !

4. Economist
   81dc
   

   What a crappy place

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Good 1 No Good !

5. Economist
   0590
   

   Why so many persons hate NUS?

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

6. Economist
   2d49
   

   NUS is like a well polished rotten apple. Shinny on the outside but rotten to the core.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 2 Good 0 No Good !

7. Economist
   5e37
   

   Foreigners get bullied into leaving so that Singaporean friends can be brought in.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

8. Economist
   e846
   

   Currently unfolding at NUS.
   Someone made and circulated a video to mock the new provost and NUS blocked the site on campus.

   https://www.captiongenerator.com/1532452/NUS-in-2019?fbclid=IwAR3VXyazulFm-BCXcNzny1hKely6djyLOV-Wo8f2iWHkdWDtjQEbXLGVmdc

   11 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

9. Economist
   38b5
   

   Eh

   11 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

10. Economist
    555d
    

    What kind of ridiculous title is "senior deputy president"?

    11 months ago # QUOTE 2 Good 0 No Good !

11. Economist
    58b0
    

    What kind of ridiculous title is "senior deputy president"?

    The kind you get when you spend your life sucking president's d**k.

    11 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

12. Economist
    01a7
    

    Also 2-3 from LKY, 9 from business?

    are these tenure denials or resignations?

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

13. Economist
    8968
    

    Tenure denial...

    Also 2-3 from LKY, 9 from business?

    are these tenure denials or resignations?

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

14. Economist
    adb1
    

    Tenure denial...

    Also 2-3 from LKY, 9 from business?

    are these tenure denials or resignations?
    

    isn't this like harvard then?

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

15. Economist
    2d49
    

    Out of 7 applications in LKY, only one passed

    Also 2-3 from LKY, 9 from business?

    are these tenure denials or resignations?

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

16. Economist
    da22
    

    Tenure denial...

    Also 2-3 from LKY, 9 from business?

    are these tenure denials or resignations?
    

    isn't this like harvard then?

    Except that it's garbage in, garbage out

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

17. Economist
    fc4d
    

    Who did not pass

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

18. Economist
    04b4
    

    Out of 7 applications in LKY, only one passed

    Also 2-3 from LKY, 9 from business?

    are these tenure denials or resignations?
    

    The Indians gang has a firm foothole. If you look at PhD students, usually more than 50% are Indians. There is an Indian prof who can't publish and the Indian AP they tenured can't publish alone (need to ride on coauthor).

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

19. Economist
    baaa
    

    SG horrible place. Would not even go there as a tourist.

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

20. Economist
    04b4
    

    What a crappy place

    Sg unis are run top down through authoritarian policies. The older ones are still very entrenched in Chinese culture, and free thinking and questioning authority is not welcome, they will get rid of you quickly.

    But free thinking and challenging authority (in a civil way) are probably cornerstones of great ideas and research.

    10 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

Reply »