Not everyone who took SAT goes into econ. How is the statistics of any relevance
Female AP here.
-
OP never answer to this.
She never even said once what her opinion was about what is acceptable as a hiring policy discrimonating on the basis of gender
She never agreed with anybody . At the maximum she “did not disagree”On the other hand she showed us that :
1. She thinks gender must play a role in hiring
2. She is been in hiring panels for a long time gelding this view
3. She does inderstand that even if some policies are not strictly speaking formally quotas , they are the same thing as quota in terms of effects.Once OP was without arguments ,what did she do ?
She opened another thread saying how bad the men where in this one .Nice try OP
I never defined quota as you say I didOP here. I am really sorry if I misunderstood your point. I am trying my best to act in good faith. Please let me know if there is anything I can reasonably do to restore that for you.
Here is what you said:All the policies that have the above effect are equivalent to quotas.
I was trying to say that I was concerned about the use of the word "quota" as misleading. It is being applied to lots of policies that most people wouldn't describe as quotas. And "quotas" is a particularly inflammatory word.
And my impression was that there was a dodge being made around that point, by people saying "any policy that addresses gender is basically a quota".
So that is what I meant by that comment. Again, I am sorry if you took it in a way it wasn't intended.OP do you think I used the work quotas in a misleading sense in what reported above ? Do you agree or not that some other policies have the same effect of quotas ? Please straight and motivated answers would be appreciated