The top universities were creating their own club and reject all others, so the jifmim, frl, irfa and emerging market review are the alternative network of all rejected papers. Consequently they have higher factor than all others
That’s great to see that these journals fight against the corruption of the sacred postcode.
US MRM bro
The top universities were creating their own club and reject all others, so the jifmim, frl, irfa and emerging market review are the alternative network of all rejected papers. Consequently they have higher factor than all othersThat’s great to see that these journals fight against the corruption of the sacred postcode.
US MRM bro
They don’t fight they make their own fortune
The top universities were creating their own club and reject all others, so the jifmim, frl, irfa and emerging market review are the alternative network of all rejected papers. Consequently they have higher factor than all othersThat’s great to see that these journals fight against the corruption of the sacred postcode.
US MRM bro
We should not think of it as resistance. Batten is the leader of a highly corrupt gang.
The top universities were creating their own club and reject all others, so the jifmim, frl, irfa and emerging market review are the alternative network of all rejected papers. Consequently they have higher factor than all othersThat’s great to see that these journals fight against the corruption of the sacred postcode.
US MRM broWe should not think of it as resistance. Batten is the leader of a highly corrupt gang.
Australian Caudillo
Batten is blamed for cross- citations, but does the RFS have two "babies RFS"?, are papers reject from the AER with recommendation to submit to others "babies journals?", Nature officially recommend to shift papers between journals,
are you sure that he is the one that invent this method?
was he the first to manage several journals under one umbrella?
Maybe you have bad feeling now just that this cycle works against your system?
It makes sense that FRL has a pretty high impact factor. Every once in a while, a short note turns out to make a small but important point.
Lol, no. Something else is going on. FRL is ranked 4th, and Emerging Markets Review is ranked 5th. Notice that both journals are edited by Ba++en.
It makes sense that FRL has a pretty high impact factor. Every once in a while, a short note turns out to make a small but important point.Lol, no. Something else is going on. FRL is ranked 4th, and Emerging Markets Review is ranked 5th. Notice that both journals are edited by Ba++en.
Sounds like your jealous
When is the next round of impact factors out? Will FRL continue its relentless rise? Will the americans continue to sneer at anything thats not QJE as they cower from tornadoes in their mom's basement sipping on mountain dew and hoping to get a visiting assistant professorship in North Eastern Square State Normal College?
When is the next round of impact factors out? Will FRL continue its relentless rise? Will the americans continue to sneer at anything thats not QJE as they cower from tornadoes in their mom's basement sipping on mountain dew and hoping to get a visiting assistant professorship in North Eastern Square State Normal College?
Came out in June. FRL's rise continues
Never heard of the Spanish editor before. How do appointments work?
Mostly
good reviewers ask to or are asked to be AE's. AE's are the pool from whom E's are drawn in that or closely related journals. Usually the outgoing Ed will suggest a pool of candidates to the publisher from whom they pick. EJMR would have you believe its down to corruption, black masses, who knows what. In reality it's more like a committee head being replaced.