*peons
Gender imbalance in flyout
-
If you guys would actually do quality research and quit your complaint. Get back to work, seriously
I am working. At midnight. While my daughter and wife are asleep. And a woman with a third of the performance of me will still get more interviews.
I have every right to be pissed.
*in fairness, i’m more pissed at HRMs who have done less than me.
-
If you guys would actually do quality research and quit your complaint. Get back to work, seriously
I am working. At midnight. While my daughter and wife are asleep. [...]
Actually, it's midnight and you're posting on EJMR, not working. But apart from that, I'm with you.
-
This needs to be cleared up. The whole preference towards women isn’t the whole picture, this aa BS is getting intertwined with the extreme elitist culture in economics.
Only HRM women are benefiting from this. LRM women have it just as bad as the men. Worse is that even though they’re not benefiting from it, people just assume they are and deem them lower quality.
-
I would be partly ok with it if people acknowledged the skewed ratio for what it is: selection based on your gender.
I do think if you have an all-male faculty that's not great, and a deterrent for junior women who might otherwise join.
On the other hand, to pretend it's an equal playing field across genders is infuriating, and close to doublespeak.
Let's be honest that we are moving to two distinct job markets: one for women, one for men.
-
Rookie AP here, first time on the market on the demand side. I was shocked at the open gender discrimination I witnessed. Our process is (1) we make a ranking by merit, (2) we replace men above the cutoff with women until we reach 40%. Even though only about 20% of our applications are from women. We do this for both interviews and flyouts. Men in academia are f***ed.
-
If you guys would actually do quality research and quit your complaint. Get back to work, seriously
I am working. At midnight. While my daughter and wife are asleep. [...]
Actually, it's midnight and you're posting on EJMR, not working. But apart from that, I'm with you.
Still up. Was pooping while running simulations. That ok?
-
List of places with imbalances:
- Duke: 5/5
- Columbia GSB Finance: 5/6
- Columbia GSB Econ: 2/3
- Columbia Econ: 4/6
- Berkeley: 5/7
- Harvard: 2/3
- Michigan: 5/7
- Warwick: 9/12
Others?This is not a convincing argument. Are you listing only the places with majority female flyout ratios?
-
I read tons and tons of papers.
About 90% of the women tenured in the last few years today are not even one third of the men rejected.
My apologies for the deserving 10%. No one will take you seriously.
If you guys would actually do quality research and quit your complaint. Get back to work, seriously
I am working. At midnight. While my daughter and wife are asleep. And a woman with a third of the performance of me will still get more interviews.
I have every right to be pissed.
*in fairness, i’m more pissed at HRMs who have done less than me.