Close

Complete Captcha

• 9 years - 39617 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 63915 Goods vs 47981 No Goods

1. Economist
   13d1
   

   This!

   Only 10 of the Top-100 under 40yrs in the HB-ranking are female. Some of them I haven't heard about much, which is a pity. We need to change that. They should be celebrated as role models and receive more attention. Journals always interview the same dudes with their old-school research and their entrenched ideological views. Boring!
   23 Benhima Kenza Lausanne Uni 2,2
   40 Schildberg-Hörisch Hannah Düsseldorf Uni 1,6
   61 Hoppe-Fischer Eva I. Bonn Uni 1,3
   64 Hessami Zohal Mannheim Uni 1,3
   68 Hagenbach Jeanne SciencesPo 1,2
   70 Lein Sarah Basel Uni 1,2
   77 Roeder Kerstin Augsburg Uni 1,2
   78 Szech Nora Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) 1,2
   91 Hoerova Marie Frankfurt EZB 1,1
   99 Niepmann Friederike Federal Reserve Board 1,0

   10 months ago # QUOTE 6 Good 0 No Good !

2. Economist
   d45c
   

   What determines who is considered for these lists? Particularly on the under-40 list it seems like some names are missing (maybe not at the top, but still).

   10 months ago # QUOTE 2 Good 2 No Good !

3. Economist
   8d07
   

   WiSo Uni Cologne will cut the faculty by 1/4. This means that a professor who made a deal at appointment to get 4 PhD students will only have 3 in the future. Is something like this know from other places in Germany?

   PhD students or RAs? These can be very different.

   I know a good number of W3s who chose not to supervise any of PhD students. Still emply an army of RAs to do the dirty work.

   10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

4. Economist
   8d07
   

   12 Weber Michael University of Chicago Booth School of Business 2,8
   13 Berg Tobias Frankfurt School of Finance and Management 2,7

   THE Michael Weber is only no 12? and only a marginally better than our local Tobias Berg? Just shows how cr*p this ranking is.....

   10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

5. Economist
   3368
   

   What determines who is considered for these lists? Particularly on the under-40 list it seems like some names are missing (maybe not at the top, but still).

   volunteer, it seems that the system creates a file for each author, you can then decide whether to update your profile or not.

   10 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

6. Economist
   8d07
   

   Only 10 of the Top-100 under 40yrs in the HB-ranking are female. Some of them I haven't heard about much, which is a pity. We need to change that. They should be celebrated as role models and receive more attention. Journals always interview the same dudes with their old-school research and their entrenched ideological views. Boring!
   23 Benhima Kenza Lausanne Uni 2,2
   40 Schildberg-Hörisch Hannah Düsseldorf Uni 1,6
   61 Hoppe-Fischer Eva I. Bonn Uni 1,3
   64 Hessami Zohal Mannheim Uni 1,3
   68 Hagenbach Jeanne SciencesPo 1,2
   70 Lein Sarah Basel Uni 1,2
   77 Roeder Kerstin Augsburg Uni 1,2
   78 Szech Nora Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) 1,2
   91 Hoerova Marie Frankfurt EZB 1,1
   99 Niepmann Friederike Federal Reserve Board 1,0

   Only one name from the list sound familiar... Wonder why is that....

   10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

7. Economist
   1474
   

   Only 10 of the Top-100 under 40yrs in the HB-ranking are female. Some of them I haven't heard about much, which is a pity. We need to change that. They should be celebrated as role models and receive more attention. Journals always interview the same dudes with their old-school research and their entrenched ideological views. Boring!
   23 Benhima Kenza Lausanne Uni 2,2
   40 Schildberg-Hörisch Hannah Düsseldorf Uni 1,6
   61 Hoppe-Fischer Eva I. Bonn Uni 1,3
   64 Hessami Zohal Mannheim Uni 1,3
   68 Hagenbach Jeanne SciencesPo 1,2
   70 Lein Sarah Basel Uni 1,2
   77 Roeder Kerstin Augsburg Uni 1,2
   78 Szech Nora Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) 1,2
   91 Hoerova Marie Frankfurt EZB 1,1
   99 Niepmann Friederike Federal Reserve Board 1,0

   OMG, "entrenched ideological views", where did you get that language from, especially with reference to under-40-year-olds?

   The tragedy evident in this list is that the supply of talented young women is so short. It infuriates me that we are under so much pressure from the top to "hire women", as if this was not a market where supply and demand have to meet. Of these 10 women, some are not moveable, some are not in fields that we're looking for, etc... which at some point leaves the supply at the null set. Yet then we're publicly blamed for "not hiring women".

   10 months ago # QUOTE 3 Good 3 No Good !

8. Economist
   370c
   

   Are u sore cos u are not included in the list? Which names are missing? Probably they coauthor everything, maybe even with big shots. Do the math, kid.

   What determines who is considered for these lists? Particularly on the under-40 list it seems like some names are missing (maybe not at the top, but still).

   10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

9. Economist
   370c
   

   I take it that you don’t talk to women much;-)

   Only 10 of the Top-100 under 40yrs in the HB-ranking are female. Some of them I haven't heard about much, which is a pity. We need to change that. They should be celebrated as role models and receive more attention. Journals always interview the same dudes with their old-school research and their entrenched ideological views. Boring!
   23 Benhima Kenza Lausanne Uni 2,2
   40 Schildberg-Hörisch Hannah Düsseldorf Uni 1,6
   61 Hoppe-Fischer Eva I. Bonn Uni 1,3
   64 Hessami Zohal Mannheim Uni 1,3
   68 Hagenbach Jeanne SciencesPo 1,2
   70 Lein Sarah Basel Uni 1,2
   77 Roeder Kerstin Augsburg Uni 1,2
   78 Szech Nora Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) 1,2
   91 Hoerova Marie Frankfurt EZB 1,1
   99 Niepmann Friederike Federal Reserve Board 1,0

   Only one name from the list sound familiar... Wonder why is that....

   10 months ago # QUOTE 4 Good 0 No Good !

10. Economist
    c38f
    

    I have the same impression. And I am not sure whether this ranking is finalized as the Homepage still says they are calculating. 2 years ago it was similar. Some names were added to the list after first publication. So I think we should wait with discussions.

    Are u sore cos u are not included in the list? Which names are missing? Probably they coauthor everything, maybe even with big shots. Do the math, kid.

    What determines who is considered for these lists? Particularly on the under-40 list it seems like some names are missing (maybe not at the top, but still).
    

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

11. Economist
    9244
    

    Are u sore cos u are not included in the list? Which names are missing? Probably they coauthor everything, maybe even with big shots. Do the math, kid.

    What determines who is considered for these lists? Particularly on the under-40 list it seems like some names are missing (maybe not at the top, but still).
    

    So people on the list are also way older than 40.

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

12. Economist
    2366
    

    Like who?

    Are u sore cos u are not included in the list? Which names are missing? Probably they coauthor everything, maybe even with big shots. Do the math, kid.

    What determines who is considered for these lists? Particularly on the under-40 list it seems like some names are missing (maybe not at the top, but still).
    

    So people on the list are also way older than 40.

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

13. Economist
    9244
    

    ^ Stefan Hoderlein?

    10 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

14. Economist
    e1b4
    

    Is this the academic age? I cannot believe that they use the discriminatory biological age for the ranking. This may explain the small number of women.

    10 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

15. Economist
    6bd0
    

    Is this the academic age? I cannot believe that they use the discriminatory biological age for the ranking. This may explain the small number of women.

    No of course they use biological age.

    Hoderlein is like 47.

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

16. Economist
    370c
    

    They should lift the threshold to 45yrs.

    Is this the academic age? I cannot believe that they use the discriminatory biological age for the ranking. This may explain the small number of women.

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

17. Economist
    370c
    

    Who else is over 40?

    ^ Stefan Hoderlein?

    10 months ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Good !

18. Economist
    6bd0
    

    They should lift the threshold to 45yrs.

    45 is also the threshold for the Gossen-Prize, so that would be consistent

    10 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 0 No Good !

19. Economist
    f8cb
    

    Is this the academic age? I cannot believe that they use the discriminatory biological age for the ranking. This may explain the small number of women.

    Why should biological age be discriminatory against women?

    10 months ago # QUOTE 2 Good 0 No Good !

20. Economist
    f119
    

    Only 10 of the Top-100 under 40yrs in the HB-ranking are female. Some of them I haven't heard about much, which is a pity. We need to change that. They should be celebrated as role models and receive more attention. Journals always interview the same dudes with their old-school research and their entrenched ideological views. Boring!
    23 Benhima Kenza Lausanne Uni 2,2
    40 Schildberg-Hörisch Hannah Düsseldorf Uni 1,6
    61 Hoppe-Fischer Eva I. Bonn Uni 1,3
    64 Hessami Zohal Mannheim Uni 1,3
    68 Hagenbach Jeanne SciencesPo 1,2
    70 Lein Sarah Basel Uni 1,2
    77 Roeder Kerstin Augsburg Uni 1,2
    78 Szech Nora Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) 1,2
    91 Hoerova Marie Frankfurt EZB 1,1
    99 Niepmann Friederike Federal Reserve Board 1,0

    Only one name from the list sound familiar... Wonder why is that....

    I know exactly zero people on this list!

    10 months ago # QUOTE 1 Good 2 No Good !

Reply »