Yes
German Market
-
Rank in top % First name
Last name
Organization(s)
Country
Points1 1% Florian Scheuer Zürich Uni CH 4.36
2 1% Christoph Rothe Mannheim Uni DE 3.87
3 1% Laurent Fresard Università della Svizzera italiana CH 3.86
4 1% Niklas Potrafke München LMU DE 3.64
5 1% Andreas Fuster Lausanne EPFL CH 3.38
6 5% Maximilian Kasy Oxford University, Wien IHS (Institut für Höhere Studien) AT, GB 3.34
7 5% Tobias Böhmelt University of Essex GB 3.07
8 5% Andreas I. Mueller University of Texas / Austin US 2.99
9 5% Johannes Schmieder Boston University US 2.97
10 5% Nick Netzer Zürich Uni CH 2.91
11 5% Michael Weber University of Chicago Booth School of Business US 2.80
12 5% Tobias Berg Frankfurt School of Finance and Management DE 2.75
13 5% Philipp Strack Yale University US 2.73
14 5% Martin Huber Fribourg Uni CH 2.64
15 5% Davide Cantoni München LMU DE 2.60
16 5% Gabriel Ahlfeldt London School of Economics GB 2.52
17 5% Florian Zimmermann Briq Institute DE 2.50
18 5% Thushyanthan Baskaran Siegen Uni DE 2.46
19 5% Jörg Spenkuch Northwestern University US 2.40
20 5% Christoph Trebesch ifw Institut für Weltwirtschaft Kiel, Universität zu Kiel DE -
I could see behind the paywall. Why are still people like Pierre Boyer and Jeanne Hagenbach in the ranking when they are neither employed in the DACH region nor have a DACH nationality? They were in Mannheim for a while as APs but that was years ago. The people who produce the ranking should fix this. Otherwise we might as well do a global ranking of economists.
-
1 UZH 64
2 LMU 43
3 Bonn 37
4 Lausanne 35
5 Mannheim 34
6 ETH 32
7 Göttingen 31
8 HSG 27
9 Köln 27
10 WU Wien 25
11 Frankfurt 23
12 Lugano 22
13 Bern 20
14 Heidelberg 18
15 Duesseldorf 16
16 Hamburg 16
17 Wien 15
18 Erlangen 15
19 Innsbruck 14
20 Basel 14
21 Linz 12
22 Bielefeld 12
23 Genf 11
24 EPFL 11
25 Graduate Institute Genf 11A few observations:
1. How can Zurich be so far away from everyone else?
2. Swiss Universities generally become more and more competitive, including some I've never heard of (Lugano anyone?). 10 out of the top 25 are in Switzerland (and 4 of the top 10).
3. Some traditionally strong departments are missing completely. Freiburg (Hi Rudi!), HU Berlin, Konstanz, Kiel, etc.
-
1 UZH 64
2 LMU 43
3 Bonn 37
4 Lausanne 35
5 Mannheim 34
6 ETH 32
7 Göttingen 31
8 HSG 27
9 Köln 27
10 WU Wien 25
11 Frankfurt 23
12 Lugano 22
13 Bern 20
14 Heidelberg 18
15 Duesseldorf 16
16 Hamburg 16
17 Wien 15
18 Erlangen 15
19 Innsbruck 14
20 Basel 14
21 Linz 12
22 Bielefeld 12
23 Genf 11
24 EPFL 11
25 Graduate Institute Genf 11
A few observations:
1. How can Zurich be so far away from everyone else?
2. Swiss Universities generally become more and more competitive, including some I've never heard of (Lugano anyone?). 10 out of the top 25 are in Switzerland (and 4 of the top 10).
3. Some traditionally strong departments are missing completely. Freiburg (Hi Rudi!), HU Berlin, Konstanz, Kiel, etc.Simple answer: Switzerland pays a fair wage to Profs and Phd Students and Postdocs. -> Talent
-
Not sure what you have done to get this ranking.
The baseline Handelsblatt ranking of 2019 is as follows1 Zürich Uni CH 63.3 21 56 631 Florian Scheuer 6.7%
2 München LMU DE 37.4 29 83 1320 Uwe Sunde 9.6%
3 Mannheim Uni DE 35.6 25 41 453 Christoph Rothe 9.8%
4 Zürich ETH CH 34.3 11 63 757 Peter Egger 17.8%
5 Bonn Uni DE 33.4 22 42 405 Stephan Lauermann 10.2%
6 Göttingen Uni DE 30.5 18 55 831 Holger Strulik 19.8%
7 Köln Uni DE 27.7 24 45 497 Patrick W. Schmitz 11.3%
8 Frankfurt / Main Uni DE 26.7 21 32 375 Roman Inderst 20.7%
9 Lausanne Uni CH 26.7 12 22 223 Norman Schürhoff 10.3%
10 St.Gallen Uni CH 22.2 18 46 370 Michael Lechner 8.9%
11 Università della Svizzera italiana CH 20.5 10 21 188 Laurent Fresard 18.8%
12 Wien WU AT 19.2 17 67 610 Clive Spash 8.0%
13 Heidelberg Uni DE 18.9 14 28 389 Axel Dreher 16.8%
14 Bern Uni CH 18.2 17 29 372 Eric A. Strobl 13.5%
15 Genf Uni CH 18.0 10 31 233 Harald Hau 18.7%
16 Berlin HU DE 17.6 15 34 478 Roland Strausz 20.4%
17 Universität Hamburg DE 17.3 22 39 465 Andreas Lange 12.1%
18 Wien Uni AT 15.4 13 31 295 Maarten Janssen 15.2%
19 Düsseldorf Uni DE 15.3 12 35 374 Paul Heidhues 16.1%
20 Erlangen-Nürnberg Uni DE 15.2 18 46 492 Matthias Wrede 10.2%
21 Basel Uni CH 13.6 19 30 313 Aleksander Berentsen 13.6%
22 Linz Uni AT 13.0 9 34 385 Friedrich G. Schneider 24.4%
23 Duisburg-Essen Uni DE 12.2 17 28 542 Ansgar H. Belke 25.6%
24 Hannover Leibniz Uni DE 12.1 11 24 302 Marcel Prokopczuk 14.3%
25 Bielefeld Uni DE 11.8 11 22 230 Frank Riedel 17.1% -
Funny how Handelsblatt looks at this ranking and then titles “ München hat die forschungsstärkste VWL ” and then all the LMU guys congratulate themselves on econtwitter for being number one. At least UZH seems to take it with humour. I guess they don’t even compare themselves with German departments.
-
1 UZH 64
2 LMU 43
3 Bonn 37
4 Lausanne 35
5 Mannheim 34
6 ETH 32
7 Göttingen 31
8 HSG 27
9 Köln 27
10 WU Wien 25
11 Frankfurt 23
12 Lugano 22
13 Bern 20
14 Heidelberg 18
15 Duesseldorf 16
16 Hamburg 16
17 Wien 15
18 Erlangen 15
19 Innsbruck 14
20 Basel 14
21 Linz 12
22 Bielefeld 12
23 Genf 11
24 EPFL 11
25 Graduate Institute Genf 11
A few observations:
1. How can Zurich be so far away from everyone else?
2. Swiss Universities generally become more and more competitive, including some I've never heard of (Lugano anyone?). 10 out of the top 25 are in Switzerland (and 4 of the top 10).
3. Some traditionally strong departments are missing completely. Freiburg (Hi Rudi!), HU Berlin, Konstanz, Kiel, etc.To be honest the Handelsblatt department ranking does not make any sense. Everybody in the field knows that Göttingen is definitely not above Cologne or even Frankfurt. The ranks of Hamburg, Bielefeld and Erlangen are also a big joke. The weighting of journals must be completely broken by now in order to generate such results.
Otherwise how could you explain such big differences to the Tilburg ranking, that measured the same metric around a similar time period.
The missing of Konstant, Kiel and Berlin is quite puzzling, even if you one argues that the Tilburg weights, or the impact factor weights are misleading the differences can never be so large.Tilburg - impact weights 2016-2020
1. Germany - EuropeUNIVERSITY OF BONN 328
2. Germany - EuropeUNIVERSITY OF MUNICH 319
3. Germany - EuropeUNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM 282
4. Germany - EuropeUNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE 242
5. Germany - EuropeGOETHE UNIVERSITY FRANKFURT 187
6. Germany - EuropeHEIDELBERG UNIVERSITY 154
7. Germany - EuropeHUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY OF BERLIN 122
8. Germany - EuropeUNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG 92
9. Germany - EuropeUNIVERSITY OF DUSSELDORF 87
10. Germany - EuropeUNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ 81
11. Germany - EuropeUNIVERSITY OF TUBINGEN 72
12. Germany - EuropeUNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN-NURNBERG 66
13. Germany - EuropeFREE UNIVERSITY BERLIN 65
14. Germany - EuropeUNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG-ESSEN 65
15. Germany - EuropeTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH 61
16. Germany - EuropeUNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM 54
17. Germany - EuropeUNIVERSITY OF HANNOVER 54
18. Germany - EuropeUNIVERSITY OF GOTTINGEN 53
19. Germany - EuropeTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE 47
20. Germany - EuropeDORTMUND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY 45 -
The weighting of journals must be completely broken by now in order to generate such results.
imho it's not the weighting itself (not that it doesn't have its shortcomings), but insisting on dividing by the number of coauthors. an aej: applied with 2 co-authors, for example, nets you 0.14 points and is thus worth as much as, say, a single-authored world development. and if you have a JME with 2 co-authors, you get fewer points than for a single-authored pub in small business economics. i think this explains most of the distortions with respect to the tillburg ranking.