German Market « Economics Job Market Rumors

10 years - 44624 posts - Latest - RSS
Thread: 69315 Goods vs 51413 No Goods

Economics Job Market Rumors » Job Market » European Job Market

German Market

Economist
f2aa

14 must be a typo, if you have not heard of that guy you are probably not an economist yourself, or have been living under a rock for the past years.

I find it interesting how many names I do not know. In the the under 40 list: place 6, place 14, 18, 21, 29, 32, 38, 43.
This is certainly just my ignorance, but if I google these mystery scientists it appears that they do not publish in journals with "economic" in its title but are more focused on political science or psychology.
Will there be an option to sort for economists on the website?

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
70d6

14 must be a typo, if you have not heard of that guy you are probably not an economist yourself, or have been living under a rock for the past years.

I find it interesting how many names I do not know. In the the under 40 list: place 6, place 14, 18, 21, 29, 32, 38, 43.
This is certainly just my ignorance, but if I google these mystery scientists it appears that they do not publish in journals with "economic" in its title but are more focused on political science or psychology.
Will there be an option to sort for economists on the website?

Ich hingegen freue mich darüber wie viele Namen ich erkenne, bin also offensichtlich ein bißchen informiert was so los ist.

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
9d31

Really interesting that KK (Mainz) is in the ranking with 0.5 points if you select SJR weights A+ only. And then when you look at her CV you only see a co-authored *AER* (hint it's a P&P).

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
31c8

I find it interesting how many names I do not know. In the the under 40 list: place 6, place 14, 18, 21, 29, 32, 38, 43.
This is certainly just my ignorance, but if I google these mystery scientists it appears that they do not publish in journals with "economic" in its title but are more focused on political science or psychology.
Will there be an option to sort for economists on the website?

Place 14 has JPE, AER, Econometrica, JEER… you probably should google better

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
ebd2

So, for an econometrician, you don't consider Journal of Econometrics? This does not make much sense in my point of view.

Of you can, just go to the 2019 ranking and apply that filter. Maybe once they update the website one can do all those things.
That (A/A+) is the ranking that I and many others I talk to use for evaluating people relatively for tenure, promotion, hiring, etc. It matters only at the margin if at all, but if I have to use a ranking that's what I'll be using.

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
25b5

Lausanne is also just a nice place to live.

Thanks. Lausanne is pretty impressive, given what a small department it is.

https://www.handelsblatt.com/downloads/27644894/2/hb_vwl_ranking_2021.pd (if you put .pdf it doesn't work...)

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
f2aa

True, there are several mis-categorizations both ways, JIE, JET, JDE, JoE, and maybe a few others like AEJ-Micro and RED should be A.
While IMF Ec Rev, Management Science, Rev of Corp Fin Studies, review of Environ, econ, Economic Policy, World Bank research Observer, Journal of Financial Intermediation, etc. should be B (they are A!!)

So, for an econometrician, you don't consider Journal of Econometrics? This does not make much sense in my point of view.

Of you can, just go to the 2019 ranking and apply that filter. Maybe once they update the website one can do all those things.
That (A/A+) is the ranking that I and many others I talk to use for evaluating people relatively for tenure, promotion, hiring, etc. It matters only at the margin if at all, but if I have to use a ranking that's what I'll be using.

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
dd10

True, there are several mis-categorizations both ways, JIE, JET, JDE, JoE, and maybe a few others like AEJ-Micro and RED should be A.
While IMF Ec Rev, Management Science, Rev of Corp Fin Studies, review of Environ, econ, Economic Policy, World Bank research Observer, Journal of Financial Intermediation, etc. should be B (they are A!!)

So, for an econometrician, you don't consider Journal of Econometrics? This does not make much sense in my point of view.

Of you can, just go to the 2019 ranking and apply that filter. Maybe once they update the website one can do all those things.
That (A/A+) is the ranking that I and many others I talk to use for evaluating people relatively for tenure, promotion, hiring, etc. It matters only at the margin if at all, but if I have to use a ranking that's what I'll be using.

I think we now know where f2aa publishes.

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 2 No Jab !
Economist
f2aa

Not at all, although I see why you may say that. It is just the categorization we use at my department and seems standard to me.
If anyone wants to argue instead that World Bank Research Observer > JDE or IMF Economic Review > JIE, well be my guest.

True, there are several mis-categorizations both ways, JIE, JET, JDE, JoE, and maybe a few others like AEJ-Micro and RED should be A.
While IMF Ec Rev, Management Science, Rev of Corp Fin Studies, review of Environ, econ, Economic Policy, World Bank research Observer, Journal of Financial Intermediation, etc. should be B (they are A!!)

So, for an econometrician, you don't consider Journal of Econometrics? This does not make much sense in my point of view.

Of you can, just go to the 2019 ranking and apply that filter. Maybe once they update the website one can do all those things.
That (A/A+) is the ranking that I and many others I talk to use for evaluating people relatively for tenure, promotion, hiring, etc. It matters only at the margin if at all, but if I have to use a ranking that's what I'll be using.

I think we now know where f2aa publishes.

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 5 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
8b3e

You cannot seriously argue that 3 publications in an A+ are comparable to two publicaions in an A plus one publication in B-. GH has only one publication in B++ but those three publications in A+ and even one in A++, so that ZW with his two publications in A and just one publication in B- is hardly comparable. LQ is a different story. Also, the distance between A and A+ is much smaller than between A+ and A++.

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
4523

You cannot seriously argue that 3 publications in an A+ are comparable to two publicaions in an A plus one publication in B-. GH has only one publication in B++ but those three publications in A+ and even one in A++, so that ZW with his two publications in A and just one publication in B- is hardly comparable. LQ is a different story. Also, the distance between A and A+ is much smaller than between A+ and A++.

What do you want say?

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 3 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
59e9

You cannot seriously argue that 3 publications in an A+ are comparable to two publicaions in an A plus one publication in B-. GH has only one publication in B++ but those three publications in A+ and even one in A++, so that ZW with his two publications in A and just one publication in B- is hardly comparable. LQ is a different story. Also, the distance between A and A+ is much smaller than between A+ and A++.

I wish I could follow you on either your liberal use of initials, or your adamant certainty and knowledge about what exactly constitutes A++, A-, B++...

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 4 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
bc19

You cannot seriously argue that 3 publications in an A+ are comparable to two publicaions in an A plus one publication in B-. GH has only one publication in B++ but those three publications in A+ and even one in A++, so that ZW with his two publications in A and just one publication in B- is hardly comparable. LQ is a different story. Also, the distance between A and A+ is much smaller than between A+ and A++.

I wish I could follow you on either your liberal use of initials, or your adamant certainty and knowledge about what exactly constitutes A++, A-, B++...

GTFO sociologist - you should at least have visited an ECON 101 at a German university, where these things are discussed in all detail.

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 1 No Jab !
Economist
a1e3

When will Forschungsmonitoring publish the detailed rankings?

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 4 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
e176

Did I miscount or is there a grand total of 2 females among the 50 under 40?

https://www.handelsblatt.com/downloads/27644894/2/hb_vwl_ranking_2021.pd (if you put .pdf it doesn't work...)

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
e176

Also HU exposing his reactionary instincts again on Twitter. Sad!

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 1 Jab 2 No Jab !
Economist
233c

Also HU exposing his reactionary instincts again on Twitter. Sad!

HU is one of the last noble knights in times of political correctness and moral corruption. A true legend.

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 3 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
5b72

Did I miscount or is there a grand total of 2 females among the 50 under 40?

https://www.handelsblatt.com/downloads/27644894/2/hb_vwl_ranking_2021.pd (if you put .pdf it doesn't work...)

Possibly that would change if there were age adjustments for parental leave. This is currently not the case.

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
dd26

For sure parental leaves explain all the differences.

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 2 Jab 0 No Jab !
Economist
6bd0

Did I miscount or is there a grand total of 2 females among the 50 under 40?

https://www.handelsblatt.com/downloads/27644894/2/hb_vwl_ranking_2021.pd (if you put .pdf it doesn't work...)

Neither of which is in DACH, currently (Carolin Pfl. is in Chicago, and #50, Jeanne H., is French and at sciences Po).

Still, I wonder where other people are. Shouldn't PP (Cologne) be in that list at least? PhD 2013. Is she older than 40?

3 weeks ago # QUOTE 0 Jab 0 No Jab !

« Previous 1…2,2172,2182,219…2,232 Next »

Recently Announced

Upcoming

Economics

Job Market

Off Topic

Job Market Wiki

Job Market Candidates

Updates

German Market

Reply »