Close

Complete Captcha

• 5 years - 66 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 251 Goods vs 34 No Goods

1. Economist
   24ee
   

   I'll go with Andres Rodriguez-Clare
   1993: Stanford PhD. Restud Tour.
   1994: AP at Chicago Booth
   1999: *Left academia* to work for the Council of Presidential Advisors in Costa Rica
   2002: Inter-American Development Bank
   2005: Tenured at Penn State
   2012: Full Prof at Berkeley

   I'll go with Mark Aguiar:
   1999: MIT PhD
   2004: Booted from Chicago GSB with no pubs. (Received BA in 1988 so likely in late 30s at this point.)
   2006: Tenured associate prof at Rochester.
   2009: Full prof at Rochester.
   2011: Full prof at Princeton.
   That's a wild ride.

   insane!

   1 year ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   f601
   

   I'll go with Andres Rodriguez-Clare
   1993: Stanford PhD. Restud Tour.
   1994: AP at Chicago Booth
   1999: *Left academia* to work for the Council of Presidential Advisors in Costa Rica
   2002: Inter-American Development Bank
   2005: Tenured at Penn State
   2012: Full Prof at Berkeley

   I'll go with Mark Aguiar:
   1999: MIT PhD
   2004: Booted from Chicago GSB with no pubs. (Received BA in 1988 so likely in late 30s at this point.)
   2006: Tenured associate prof at Rochester.
   2009: Full prof at Rochester.
   2011: Full prof at Princeton.
   That's a wild ride.

   insane!

   Dani Rodrik?

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

3. Economist
   859f
   

   confused by op. how is this a 'comeback' without any low points? Even if someone becomes an AP at that school then never did anything again they are objectively a success. Job market candidates from HRM who drop off are tutoring highschoolers and the like inbetween long bouts of depression.

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

4. Economist
   c803
   

   Hrm will go to hrm ultimately, what's the point of saying great comeback? NoN-Sense thread

   1 year ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

5. Economist
   ccc8
   

   I'll go with Andres Rodriguez-Clare
   1993: Stanford PhD. Restud Tour.
   1994: AP at Chicago Booth
   1999: *Left academia* to work for the Council of Presidential Advisors in Costa Rica
   2002: Inter-American Development Bank
   2005: Tenured at Penn State
   2012: Full Prof at Berkeley

   I'll go with Mark Aguiar:
   1999: MIT PhD
   2004: Booted from Chicago GSB with no pubs. (Received BA in 1988 so likely in late 30s at this point.)
   2006: Tenured associate prof at Rochester.
   2009: Full prof at Rochester.
   2011: Full prof at Princeton.
   That's a wild ride.

   insane!

   Dani Rodrik?

   So Dani Rodrik tenure denial from Harvard and then come back?

   7 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

6. Economist
   98b8
   

   confused by op. how is this a 'comeback' without any low points? Even if someone becomes an AP at that school then never did anything again they are objectively a success. Job market candidates from HRM who drop off are tutoring highschoolers and the like inbetween long bouts of depression.

   Compared with the vast majority of people this isn't a "low point", but expectations are everything. I'm guessing an AP at HRM with no pubs after five years feels a lot of pressure and could face a real crisis of confidence.

   6 months ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply

Post <blockquote><blockquote>Another example of how broken the system is. </blockquote> Seemed to work pretty well</blockquote>

Send Post »

Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li.