It should be an earthquake every time this happens
The guy can cite whatever he wants. Thats why it is called a WORKING PAPER. Its not like he made up any results, which would be a real problem...people over all of science cite only whatever fits to their story, now you find a single case and act like its an earthquake? Seriously
That’s because most posters here base their ethics and morals on some LRM undergrad micro course
This seems to be a common view in here.
So the fact that many people would do the same means that we should not care?
I am not a fan of MT. But seriously, how many APs wouldn't do the same in such a situation? It seems strange to single him out like this.
Or rather on their interpretation of the content of that course.
That’s because most posters here base their ethics and morals on some LRM undergrad micro course
This seems to be a common view in here.
So the fact that many people would do the same means that we should not care?
I am not a fan of MT. But seriously, how many APs wouldn't do the same in such a situation? It seems strange to single him out like this.