Americans watch football and listen to rap. It's all about IQ at the end of the day.Which is why india doesnt have indoor plumbing and usa does
India super power by 2030.
How can anyone say the economy is good when mass layoffs are going on
-
Great thing for workers. Boomers retiring finally makes room for advancement. We'll probably just blow it all by bringing in H1Bs for the high paying jobs though.
H1bs are the top talent in tech.
The U.S. has to improve its high schools and universities to be able to compete.H1Bs have a compensating differential of gaining immigration access that citizens don't. How many times does this need to be repeated for you east asians to get it? You are not better, you are being compensated in excess of what citizens would make, and they fall out of the market due to that subsidy.
Brilliant insights from our resident clown.
Amazing ad hominem from a P@jeet or Zh@ng that can't grasp simple concepts
-
I think what AF10 is trying to say is Americans are too d/u/m/b to code.
Have you ever interviewed at FAANG? These h1bs have no lives outside of FAANG bubble / leetcoding. Their only goal in life is to make it to the US , get into FAANG, and work 24/7. They also completely gut companies and are incredibly nepotistic.
-
I think what AF10 is trying to say is Americans are too d/u/m/b to code.
Have you ever interviewed at FAANG? These h1bs have no lives outside of FAANG bubble / leetcoding. Their only goal in life is to make it to the US , get into FAANG, and work 24/7. They also completely gut companies and are incredibly nepotistic.
You guys make fun of the leebs who want to get rid of the SAT.
Seems you are against having an objective measure of excellence (Leetcode).
-
I think what AF10 is trying to say is Americans are too d/u/m/b to code.
Have you ever interviewed at FAANG? These h1bs have no lives outside of FAANG bubble / leetcoding. Their only goal in life is to make it to the US , get into FAANG, and work 24/7. They also completely gut companies and are incredibly nepotistic.
You guys make fun of the leebs who want to get rid of the SAT.
Seems you are against having an objective measure of excellence (Leetcode).Look what leetcoders/h1bs have done to Goog/FB/MSFT. They cannot compete with elite (OpenAI) and have to buy them (MSFT) or just lose (Google).
-
I think what AF10 is trying to say is Americans are too d/u/m/b to code.
Have you ever interviewed at FAANG? These h1bs have no lives outside of FAANG bubble / leetcoding. Their only goal in life is to make it to the US , get into FAANG, and work 24/7. They also completely gut companies and are incredibly nepotistic.
You guys make fun of the leebs who want to get rid of the SAT.
Seems you are against having an objective measure of excellence (Leetcode).Look what leetcoders/h1bs have done to Goog/FB/MSFT. They cannot compete with elite (OpenAI) and have to buy them (MSFT) or just lose (Google).
OpenAI guys are Indian, Chinese and Russian Juish alums of Google and Meta.
-
The problem is that many journalists and bad economists are only looking at top-level data like the overall unemployment rate. Yes, the overall unemployment rate is low, but it doesn't include those not in the labor f0rce. It more importantly fai1s to account for job quality. Sometimes, like during the current period and during the Dotcom Crash this omission really matters. If one person gains a part-time job at McDonald's and another person loses a $500K Google job, then the overall unemployment rate is unchanged, leading to the pyrrhic mirage that the economy is "healthy".
Real wage growth tells the real story. Real wage growth is negative, indicating that workers either face l0usy bargaining positions or are being c0mpelled by circumstance to take subpar jobs. There is also a regional concentration effect, where job loss leads to sev3re recession-like conditions in the Bay Area, Seattle, and NYC while the rest of the country is less affected.
-
in particular, look at wage growth adjusted for cost of housing. that has been highly negative for 20 years.
This is absolutely untrue. The "cost of housing" is heavily dependent on interest rates, until 2020 (when things did change), the actual cost of housing as a fraction of income was remarkably stable.