And wickedness is love?
Their saitanic inversion of categories went about largely unnoticed. It was if Barack Obama drew from this large reservoir of saitanic anti-grace to implement the cultural revolution.
How did the Left make the world think that morality is hatred?
-
(Classical) Liberalism.
They believe that people should be free to do whatever they desire as long as it doesn't harm third parties and that society should remove all constraints to personal choices (which includes culture and morality).In the end, Classical Liberalism was a mistake, since it led to amoralism.
-
And wickedness is love?
Their saitanic inversion of categories went about largely unnoticed. It was if Barack Obama drew from this large reservoir of saitanic anti-grace to implement the cultural revolution.the answer is that they were able to successfully frame any pre-existing social norm as an illegitimate constraint on personal autonomy - the defining feature of liberalism is the autonomy of the self-defining-self - and successfully render “consent” as the only moral imperative that matters
“shaming sexual promiscuity is immoral because all parties involved gave their consent”
the flip side of framing permissiveness as a virtue is framing the instinct to restrict as a sin, so any social tie that binds a person to a time, place, or group is implicitly illegitimate
-
And wickedness is love?
Their saitanic inversion of categories went about largely unnoticed. It was if Barack Obama drew from this large reservoir of saitanic anti-grace to implement the cultural revolution.the answer is that they were able to successfully frame any pre-existing social norm as an illegitimate constraint on personal autonomy - the defining feature of liberalism is the autonomy of the self-defining-self - and successfully render “consent” as the only moral imperative that matters
“shaming sexual promiscuity is immoral because all parties involved gave their consent”
the flip side of framing permissiveness as a virtue is framing the instinct to restrict as a sin, so any social tie that binds a person to a time, place, or group is implicitly illegitimateI wonder if this trend can be reversed.
-
And wickedness is love?
Their saitanic inversion of categories went about largely unnoticed. It was if Barack Obama drew from this large reservoir of saitanic anti-grace to implement the cultural revolution.the answer is that they were able to successfully frame any pre-existing social norm as an illegitimate constraint on personal autonomy - the defining feature of liberalism is the autonomy of the self-defining-self - and successfully render “consent” as the only moral imperative that matters
“shaming sexual promiscuity is immoral because all parties involved gave their consent”
the flip side of framing permissiveness as a virtue is framing the instinct to restrict as a sin, so any social tie that binds a person to a time, place, or group is implicitly illegitimateI wonder if this trend can be reversed.
it cannot, as liberalism has no limiting principle (again, the idea of a “limit” is fundamentally illegitimate if it constrains in any way)
this is why the slippery slope is undefeated, and why the next step will be using gender claims to normalize the agency of minors (“gender affirming care” is the Orwellian slogan), which will pave the way for the normalization of pea-dough-feelya
in ten years only bigots will oppose 32-year old men having sxx with 15-year old boys