Regarding the Anglin paper the more telling problem is that it appears that it remains unpublished, although written in 2005. Offhand I would say the reason is that it is a very weak attack, largely amounting to saying that although the empirics of the econophysicists look pretty good, they have not completely and totally tied their work to a set of fairly arbitrarily selected theoretical economics models. Duh.
Anglin's comment (or some version of it) was published in the book refered to above (Econophysics of Wealth Distributions). And the criticism that this work relies on unrealistic, or completely ignores, underlying economic mechanisms is very relevant.