Close

Complete Captcha

• 3 years - 166 posts - Latest - RSS
• Thread: 248 Goods vs 188 No Goods

1. Economist
   530e
   

   What is the political view or narrative that's being promoted here? Men should be able to give birth to children, and women should be drafted into the military? Please tell me which political party or "side" has those beliefs.

   the political narrative is that men are more prone to child rearing and household activities (cooking), while women go out and do adventurous stuff (fly, fight,...). and that being a man has nothing to do with biological attributes (menstruation, pregnancy).

   i don’t know what your motivation for pretending not to know which political side promotes these views is, but i’m happy to set it stright: these are typical views of the progressive, modern f3minist left (the trans part is a bit controversial, but has many supporters in that camp as well). politicians with those views tend to be democrats in the US, greens in Europe and so on

   3 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

2. Economist
   a3d6
   

   for people who are curious why there would be so many search queries for "men can menstruate", bear in mind that it is a reasonable question as it would explain the constant wah wah crying fit that modern conservative men maintain on the internet

   3 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

3. Economist
   d046
   

   What is the political view or narrative that's being promoted here? Men should be able to give birth to children, and women should be drafted into the military? Please tell me which political party or "side" has those beliefs.

   the political narrative is that men are more prone to child rearing and household activities (cooking), while women go out and do adventurous stuff (fly, fight,...). and that being a man has nothing to do with biological attributes (menstruation, pregnancy).
   i don’t know what your motivation for pretending not to know which political side promotes these views is, but i’m happy to set it stright: these are typical views of the progressive, modern f3minist left (the trans part is a bit controversial, but has many supporters in that camp as well). politicians with those views tend to be democrats in the US, greens in Europe and so on

   So hold on, you're telling me that Democrats in the US support bringing the draft back and then expanding it to include women? You know the Democrats are having a debate right now on NBC? Please tell me which of the candidates supports reviving the draft and including women as draftees.

   3 years ago # QUOTE 2 Volod 1 Vlad !

4. Economist
   ade7
   

   I never said I was a theorist. The moral hazard and adverse selection question was to show that 7773 isn't an economist. I'm also not sure why you think a theorist in general would be familiar with machine learning.

   LOL. When I offered to reveal myself in exchange for a bet on whether I was an economist, you went scurrying for cover, 9f8d.

   The offer still stands. Tell me how much you want to bet that I am an economist with a PhD and publications and citations.

   If I am not an economist, I pay you big bucks. If I am, you pay me big bucks.

   We both put money into an escrow account. Maybe $100K?

   I will reveal myself to someone we both trust to report as to whether I am telling the truth. The winner gets the escrow account.

   That is the trouble with you lefffteez. You always want to change the subject from the subject.

   Here is where you will go scurrying for cover again, figuring out some reason that we cannot bet, cause you are full of shyte.

   Cheers. : )

   3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

5. Economist
   ade7
   

   So hold on, you're telling me that Democrats in the US support bringing the draft back and then expanding it to include women? You know the Democrats are having a debate right now on NBC? Please tell me which of the candidates supports reviving the draft and including women as draftees.

   You think that a deliberately dishonest misstatement of the other person's position is convincing?

   3 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 1 Vlad !

6. Economist
   530e
   

   So hold on, you're telling me that Democrats in the US support bringing the draft back and then expanding it to include women? You know the Democrats are having a debate right now on NBC? Please tell me which of the candidates supports reviving the draft and including women as draftees.

   i haven’t said any of the things you’re mentioning, and I have explained in my post how these seemingly absurd statements fit into a political narrative. just in case you may be interested in reading the stuff you’re quoting

   3 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

7. Economist
   ade7
   

   i haven’t said any of the things you’re mentioning, and I have explained in my post how these seemingly absurd statements fit into a political narrative. just in case you may be interested in reading the stuff you’re quoting

   Why should 9f8d bother reading anything that someone else has written?

   Information won't affect his/her argument in the slightest.

   3 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 0 Vlad !

8. Economist
   ade7
   

   for people who are curious why there would be so many search queries for "men can menstruate", bear in mind that it is a reasonable question as it would explain the constant wah wah crying fit that modern conservative men maintain on the internet

   Amazingly sexist and insulting to women. Typical of a leffftist.

   3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

9. Economist
   d046
   

   So hold on, you're telling me that Democrats in the US support bringing the draft back and then expanding it to include women? You know the Democrats are having a debate right now on NBC? Please tell me which of the candidates supports reviving the draft and including women as draftees.

   i haven’t said any of the things you’re mentioning, and I have explained in my post how these seemingly absurd statements fit into a political narrative. just in case you may be interested in reading the stuff you’re quoting

   This is what you said: "the political narrative is that men are more prone to child rearing and household activities (cooking), while women go out and do adventurous stuff (fly, fight,...). and that being a man has nothing to do with biological attributes (menstruation, pregnancy)."

   You then associated that narrative with "the progressive, modern f3minist left."

   You finished with "politicians with those views tend to be democrats in the US, greens in Europe and so on."

   Therefore, you believe that Democrats in the US tend to have the view that women should go out and do adventurous stuff, which includes being drafted to fight in the military.

   Well, as I told you, there is a Democratic debate hosted by NBC going on RIGHT NOW. Please tell me which of the Democratic candidates has the view that women should go out and do adventurous stuff like being drafted to fight in the military.

   3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

10. Economist
    530e
    

    i haven’t said any of the things you’re mentioning, and I have explained in my post how these seemingly absurd statements fit into a political narrative. just in case you may be interested in reading the stuff you’re quoting

    Why should 9f8d bother reading anything that someone else has written?
    Information won't affect his/her argument in the slightest.

    i’d be curious to know the motivation. it seems more like trolling at this point in order to deliberately derail the discussion

    3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 1 Vlad !

11. Economist
    d046
    

    i haven’t said any of the things you’re mentioning, and I have explained in my post how these seemingly absurd statements fit into a political narrative. just in case you may be interested in reading the stuff you’re quoting

    Why should 9f8d bother reading anything that someone else has written?
    Information won't affect his/her argument in the slightest.

    i’d be curious to know the motivation. it seems more like trolling at this point in order to deliberately derail the discussion

    LJL, OP deletes my post because he doesn't want to admit his dumb comment implied a belief that Democrats support drafting women.

    3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

12. Economist
    ade7
    

    i haven’t said any of the things you’re mentioning, and I have explained in my post how these seemingly absurd statements fit into a political narrative. just in case you may be interested in reading the stuff you’re quoting

    Why should 9f8d bother reading anything that someone else has written?
    Information won't affect his/her argument in the slightest.

    i’d be curious to know the motivation. it seems more like trolling at this point in order to deliberately derail the discussion

    That is what they've been doing since the start, trying to change the subject.
    1) Everyone knows google is biased so it doesn't matter. (Ok, so they don't.)
    2) O'Keefe manipulates videos. (Well, no, there is no evidence for that.)
    3) O'Keefe got embarrassed by the WaPo. (So what?)
    4) Where are the videos from the WaPo case? (Videos from a case where Veritas alleged no malfeasance and the target came out looking fine?)
    5) Why don't we just switch to bing or duckduckgo? (We could but that wouldn't correct the fact that google is apparently lying to people.)
    6) Google has no power. (LOL. Hilarious claim.)

    The whole game for the trolls is to change the subject from google deliberately and dishonestly skewing the results of their searches, defrauding their customers of the honest search that they promise.

    3 years ago # QUOTE 1 Volod 1 Vlad !

13. Economist
    ade7
    

    LJL, OP deletes my post because he doesn't want to admit his dumb comment implied a belief that Democrats support drafting women.

    How much do you want to bet?

    3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

14. Economist
    ade7
    

    LJL, OP deletes my post because he doesn't want to admit his dumb comment implied a belief that Democrats support drafting women.

    How much do you want to bet?

    C'mon big-mouth. How much?

    3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

15. Economist
    530e
    

    for the record: i didn’t delete any of 9f8d’s posts, and i won’t, as long as the debate stays on topic (i tolerate attacks in principle, as long as they’re on topic). to answer his/her question which democratic candidate supports the narrative that women should be free to ‘do anything’, as suggested by Google: all of them. and that includes the option (not the requirement) to enroll in the army.

    3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

16. Economist
    ade7
    

    LJL, OP deletes my post because he doesn't want to admit his dumb comment implied a belief that Democrats support drafting women.

    How much do you want to bet?

    C'mon big-mouth. How much?

    Didn't you say your "life savings?" Surely you can come up with $100K?

    I'd be willing to go much, much higher. (But then, it isn't really a bet for me.)

    3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

17. Economist
    530e
    

    ^ any of his posts *here*. i have deleted some posts on a previous page, which i’m sure he’ll point out, which were an obvious attempt to lead the discussion in this thread away from the topic, which seems to be bothering him so much that he doesn’t even want people to discuss it on an obscure online forum

    3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

18. Economist
    d046
    

    LJL, OP deletes my post because he doesn't want to admit his dumb comment implied a belief that Democrats support drafting women.

    How much do you want to bet?

    Since you're still in high school, why stop at $100,000? Let's bet ONE...HUNDRED...BILLION DOLLARS.

    Or, you could just answer my moral hazard and adverse selection analogy. I'm sure that if you had actually looked it up (on Bing), if you were half as smart as you think you are, you could've come up with the right answer by now. Especially since zero math was required.

    3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

19. Economist
    ade7
    

    And (again) 9f8d goes scurrying for cover when asked to actually back up his/her blowhard claims.

    I was right again.

    3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

20. Economist
    ade7
    

    LJL, OP deletes my post because he doesn't want to admit his dumb comment implied a belief that Democrats support drafting women.

    How much do you want to bet?

    Since you're still in high school, why stop at $100,000? Let's bet ONE...HUNDRED...BILLION DOLLARS.
    Or, you could just answer my moral hazard and adverse selection analogy. I'm sure that if you had actually looked it up (on Bing), if you were half as smart as you think you are, you could've come up with the right answer by now. Especially since zero math was required.

    I don't want to answer your analogy. I don't jump through hoops for juniors.

    I want you to put up money. How much?

    3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Volod 0 Vlad !

Reply »